Irish students are 'collateral damage' in Trump's higher education battle, immigration lawyer says
Irish students are collateral damage in US President Donald Trump's 'battle with higher education', an American immigration lawyer has said.
Boston-based John Foley told RTÉ radio's Today with Claire Byrne show that there had been a fall off in Irish students going to the US to study, and he was advising parents to send their children to Canada.
Advertisement
'The US administration is going to change the rules down the road, because while they've given the consular officers more responsibility, they haven't added more consular officers, so they've put more pressure on the consulate officers.
"And it's going to mean the whole system is slowed, because it's gonna take longer for the interviews to take place, so the line's gonna get longer, and it's gonna mean fewer students coming into the United States, and that's part of Mr. Trump's battle with higher education.
"The fact that Irish students are collateral damage, that doesn't matter to Mr. Trump.
'Why would you want to come to the United States now when just getting into the country is as difficult as they're making it? I get calls from Irish parents, and I say to them, you know, they have great colleges in Canada as well, but Mr. Trump doesn't care about that.
Advertisement
"He really, you know, he's setting his own agenda, and the United State is in a psychological civil war with itself. This is Trump versus higher education, and Irish students are going to be collateral damage.'
When asked what his advice to Irish students seeking entry to the US, Mr Foley said to 'be prepared for what you know is going to happen".
"You have to give them your social media information. They're going to check it out. Before you get there, clean it up. Delete things that you know they're going to have a problem with.
Ireland
90 arrests made during Donegal International Rally...
Read More
'If they ask you if you changed or you deleted stuff, tell them the truth. Tell them you prepared for the interview and you deleted silly stuff and stupid stuff that was on your phone, and just tell the truth, you know, America is still great but we are a country that is in trouble. We are at war with ourselves.
Advertisement
'You've got to tell them the truth. If they catch you in a lie, you know, you'll be barred. So you've gotta tell them the truth, but you've also gotta be prepared when you go in there. And there's a lot of ways you can prepare.'
Mr Foley warned that the entire process of getting into the US was now taking longer. In the past the interview at Dublin or Shannon airport would take 'a couple of minutes'. Paperwork would be reviewed, a few questions would be asked 'and it would be over.'
'Now they're going to take a little bit more time and they're gonna look at some of your social media. But the Consular Officers don't really have time to go back over five years' worth of text messages from a 14 year old boy, to a 14-year-old girl, five years ago.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Murdochs urged Tucker Carlson to run against Trump — after they fired him, ex-Fox host claims
After a week of casting himself as the MAGAverse's main character, Tucker Carlson seemed determined to keep his name in headlines this week when he shockingly asserted that Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch asked him to run for president against Donald Trump after firing him from Fox News. Carlson, who was abruptly fired without explanation by Fox News in April 2023, has largely held his fire over the years against his former employer despite the obvious bad blood over his sudden termination. While the ex-primetime star has floated various theories about what led to his demise at the right-wing network, bouncing between the Dominion lawsuit and his outspoken views on the Ukraine war, it's been speculated that it was just because he 'got too big for his boots' and alienated 'large swaths' of the company. Still, Carlson has generally stayed fairly complimentary (if a bit trollish) towards the Murdochs since his exit from Fox – until now. Since leading the MAGA isolationist charge against Trump over his Iran saber-rattling, Carlson has not only torn into his former colleagues for being 'warmongers' but also the Fox ownership for firehosing 'propaganda' to their elderly viewing base. During his latest podcast broadcast, Carlson – who started his own media outlet after departing Fox – brought on former Fox News host Clayton Morris, who has had his own checkered history since leaving the conservative cable giant. 'This is really the first time I've attacked them,' Carlson asserted, noting that 'they canned me over two years ago.' He said it was important to take the Murdochs to task now, though, because he feels that Fox News' purpose is 'to scare old people into obedience.' While he continued to blast ultra-hawkish hosts Sean Hannity and Mark Levin for pushing the administration to join Israel's war against Iran, Carlson also shared that his former bosses offered to support him if he threw his name into the 2024 GOP presidential race. 'The Murdochs really hate Trump. Like, there's no one who hates Trump more than the Murdochs,' Carlson declared, referencing the on-again/off-again friendship between Rupert Murdoch and the president. 'I got fired in April of 2023. In May of 2023, they asked me to run for president against Trump and said they would back me,' he continued. Prior to Trump running away with the Republican nomination, the Murdochs had attempted to boost the campaigns of Ron DeSantis, Nikki Haley and Vivek Ramaswamy. 'Obviously I'm not gonna be running for any office. You know, I would never get elected anyway, plus I like Trump!' Carlson exclaimed. After Morris interjected, wanting to know if Carlson was actually claiming they asked him to run for president against Trump, the former primetime Fox star confirmed that was indeed the case. 'Yeah, yeah, yeah! Lachlan Murdoch said, 'You should run, we'll back you, the whole thing,'' Carlson insisted, adding that the Murdochs offered to put not only the 'whole Fox News apparatus' behind him but also the rest of their media empire. 'And not just Fox but, you know, the Wall Street Journal,' he said. 'We'll back you.' 'And that came right from Lachlan?' Morris wondered, prompting Carlson to assert that the offer was made. 'I was already gone; they'd already canceled my show. I was still under contract, but they canceled my show. 'You should run, we support you, you should run,'' Carlson concluded.. Conservatives, meanwhile, have been floating Carlson's name for president going back as far as 2020. There was even a short-lived effort to convince him to run following his termination from Fox News, though Carlson ended up fully backing Trump and finding his way into the president's inner circle during the heat of the presidential race. Before sparking Trump's anger in recent days with his criticism of the president's handling of Iran, Carlson was seen as a close adviser. In fact, he is largely credited with convincing Trump to choose JD Vance as running mate, and he had a prime speaking slot at last year's Republican National Convention.
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
DOGE cuts to the IRS will cost $500 billion in lost revenue, watchdog finds
The so-called Department of Government Efficiency's efforts to bulldoze federal agencies and slash the federal workforce will ultimately cost American taxpayers billions of dollars, according to a watchdog group. At the Internal Revenue Service, more than 11,000 people were either fired or took buyouts. Just this year, it's estimated that roughly $500 billion in revenue will be lost because of the cuts, according to the report from Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. President Donald Trump established the U.S. DOGE Service by executive order signed on his first day back in office. Elon Musk, the world's wealthiest man, was tapped to steer the group's work, which the White House says is now embedded across every government office. CREW's analysis found that 50,000 people have lost their jobs due to DOGE cuts to government agencies, which could result in the loss of more than $10 billion in U.S.-based economic activity and the closure of programs that have returned more than $26 billion to taxpayers. Some of the programs targeted by DOGE aim to protect consumers from fraud, eliminate waste, and prevent the abuse of taxpayer funds — efforts that Musk and administration officials have claimed are at the center of DOGE's work. Trump has also restricted the work of the offices of inspectors general, which execute audits, investigations, and take action to protect taxpayer funds. They also ensure that agencies work efficiently. The Independent has requested comment from the White House. The CFPB, which was founded after the 2008 financial crisis to protect Americans from abusive financial practices, has returned more than $26 billion to Americans since 2011 while operating at a fraction of that amount. Nearly 1,500 staff members have been cut, including those who have been placed on administrative leave or laid off. The Trump administration also announced $4 billion in cuts to medical research under the NIH. DOGE cut as many as 20,000 jobs at the Department of Health and Human Services. CREW calculated that the cuts conducted by DOGE could result in roughly $10 billion in lost economic activity and a loss of roughly 44,000 jobs annually. The watchdog group also found that DOGE 'disrupted' the federal government's response to the bird flu outbreak, which had already cost more than $1.4 billion. At the Department of Agriculture, about 5,700 members of staff have been cut, including some who have been put on administrative leave. Similarly, almost all 10,000 USAID staff were fired, put on indefinite leave, or removed in other ways. Organizations based in the United States are set to lose $28.9 billion from domestic contracts and assistance from the agency. DOGE closed down the tax division at the Department of Justice, which in one year collected $247 million in revenue lost to fraud and corruption as it enforced U.S. tax laws. Like the CPFB, it costs a fraction of that to run. 'There are well-documented historical, or expected, returns on investment that have been destroyed, diminished or jeopardized by DOGE's work,' the CREW report's authors stated. 'This administration's chaotic and ill-conceived actions resulting in the loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs and billions of dollars will have untold consequences to the American economy and the everyday lives of American families,' the group added.
Western Telegraph
32 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Starmer: No tax rises on working people to reach 5% defence spending pledge
The Prime Minister is meeting leaders of other Nato member countries in The Hague, where they are expected to formally agree the target, made up of 3.5% on 'core defence' and another 1.5% on 'resilience and security'. He rejected that tax rises would be needed to pay for higher defence spending. 'Every time we've set out our defence spending commitments, so when we went to 2.5% in 2027/28, we set out precisely how we would pay for it, that didn't involve tax rises. 'Clearly we've got commitments in our manifesto about not making tax rises on working people and we will stick to our manifesto commitments,' the Prime Minister told reporters in the Netherlands. Sir Keir Starmer said tax rises would not be needed to pay for higher defence spending (Kin Cheung/PA) He said the current commitment to get defence spending up to 2.5% of GDP by 2027/8 was not coming at the expense of welfare, but rather from cuts to overseas development aid. 'So, it's a misdescription to suggest that the defence spending commitment we've made is at the expense of money on welfare.' Donald Trump is among the world leaders at the summit, and told reporters on the way to the Netherlands that it would depend 'on your definition' when asked if he would commit to Nato's Article 5, which requires members to defend each other from attack. At a Cabinet meeting on Tuesday morning, Sir Keir underscored that national security is the 'first duty' of Government. His trip comes as the Government publishes its national security strategy, setting out plans to make the UK 'more resilient to future threats'. Downing Street has described the 5% goal as 'a projected target' that allies will review in 2029 when Nato carries out its next capability assessment. It is a significant jump from the current 2% Nato target, and from the UK Government's aim of spending 2.5% of gross domestic product (GDP) on defence from 2027 and 3% at some point after the next election. But the figure is in line with the demands of US President Donald Trump, who has called for Nato allies to shoulder more of the burden of European defence. The Government expects to spend 1.5% of GDP on resilience and security by 2027. The Prime Minister is meeting leaders of other Nato member countries in The Hague (Ben Stansall/PA) The details of what counts towards that target are due to be set out during this week's summit, but it is likely to include spending on energy and border security as well as intelligence agencies. But increasing core defence spending to 3.5% will not happen until 2035, with at least two elections likely to take place before then. The Institute for Fiscal Studies estimates that an increase in core defence spending from 2.6% to 3.5% would cost around £30 billion more a year. It noted however that the plans concern spending far in the future – due in 10 years' time – and therefore may not affect the Government's spending review or autumn budget decisions, but prompt the chancellor to revise plans at the 2027 spending review. Spending 3.5% of national income on defence is 'certainly not unprecedented' but much more is now spent on health than in the past, IFS researcher Bee Boileau noted. Shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel said the Government had not been clear enough about how it would reach the core defence spending goal, claiming ministers had only offered 'smoke and mirrors'. She added: 'So, when will he actually deliver a plan to get to 2%, and why won't he heed our calls to hit 3% by the end of this Parliament, which would be vital, and a vital stepping stone on the way to that higher defence spending that he is seeking.' The Nato gathering comes amid the backdrop of escalating Middle East tensions and the ongoing war in Ukraine. Sir Keir has urged Israel and Iran to get back to the fragile ceasefire brokered by Donald Trump. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at 10 Downing Street (Jeff Moore/PA) Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is expected to attend the summit, but not take part in the main discussions of the North Atlantic Council. Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte described the move to spend more on defence as a 'quantum leap' that would make the organisation 'a stronger, a fairer and a more lethal alliance'. But it was reported on Sunday that Spain had reached a deal that would see it exempted from the 5% target. Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said that Spain would be able to keep its commitments to the 32-nation military alliance by spending 2.1% of GDP on defence needs.
