Irish students are 'collateral damage' in Trump's higher education battle, immigration lawyer says
Boston-based John Foley told RTÉ radio's Today with Claire Byrne show that there had been a fall off in Irish students going to the US to study, and he was advising parents to send their children to Canada.
Advertisement
'The US administration is going to change the rules down the road, because while they've given the consular officers more responsibility, they haven't added more consular officers, so they've put more pressure on the consulate officers.
"And it's going to mean the whole system is slowed, because it's gonna take longer for the interviews to take place, so the line's gonna get longer, and it's gonna mean fewer students coming into the United States, and that's part of Mr. Trump's battle with higher education.
"The fact that Irish students are collateral damage, that doesn't matter to Mr. Trump.
'Why would you want to come to the United States now when just getting into the country is as difficult as they're making it? I get calls from Irish parents, and I say to them, you know, they have great colleges in Canada as well, but Mr. Trump doesn't care about that.
Advertisement
"He really, you know, he's setting his own agenda, and the United State is in a psychological civil war with itself. This is Trump versus higher education, and Irish students are going to be collateral damage.'
When asked what his advice to Irish students seeking entry to the US, Mr Foley said to 'be prepared for what you know is going to happen".
"You have to give them your social media information. They're going to check it out. Before you get there, clean it up. Delete things that you know they're going to have a problem with.
Ireland
90 arrests made during Donegal International Rally...
Read More
'If they ask you if you changed or you deleted stuff, tell them the truth. Tell them you prepared for the interview and you deleted silly stuff and stupid stuff that was on your phone, and just tell the truth, you know, America is still great but we are a country that is in trouble. We are at war with ourselves.
Advertisement
'You've got to tell them the truth. If they catch you in a lie, you know, you'll be barred. So you've gotta tell them the truth, but you've also gotta be prepared when you go in there. And there's a lot of ways you can prepare.'
Mr Foley warned that the entire process of getting into the US was now taking longer. In the past the interview at Dublin or Shannon airport would take 'a couple of minutes'. Paperwork would be reviewed, a few questions would be asked 'and it would be over.'
'Now they're going to take a little bit more time and they're gonna look at some of your social media. But the Consular Officers don't really have time to go back over five years' worth of text messages from a 14 year old boy, to a 14-year-old girl, five years ago.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
US appeals court blocks New Mexico's 7-day waiting period on gun purchases
A panel of federal appellate judges ruled Tuesday that New Mexico's seven-day waiting period on gun purchases likely infringes on citizens' Second Amendment rights, putting the law on hold pending a legal challenge. The ruling by the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sends the case back to a lower court. New Mexico's waiting period went into effect in May 2024, and does hold an exception for concealed permit holders. 'Cooling-off periods do not fit into any historically grounded exceptions to the right to keep and bear arms, and burden conduct within the Second Amendment's scope,' wrote Judge Timothy Tymkovich in the split 2-1 ruling. 'We conclude that New Mexico's Waiting Period Act is likely an unconstitutional burden on the Second Amendment rights of its citizens. In a dissenting opinion, Judge Scott Matheson said New Mexico's waiting period 'establishes a condition or qualification on the commercial sale of arms that does not serve abusive ends.' The National Rifle Association and Mountain States Legal Foundation, an advocacy group for gun rights, filed the lawsuit on behalf of two New Mexico residents, citing concerns about delayed access to weapons for victims of domestic violence and others. Democratic state lawmakers had enacted the restrictions in hopes of ensuring more time for the completion of federal background checks on gun buyers. In a statement, Democratic Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham expressed 'deep disappointment' and said Tuesday's ruling was likely to cost lives. 'New Mexico's waiting period law was carefully crafted to minimize gun violence while respecting Second Amendment rights,' said Lujan Grisham, highlighting additional exceptions for gun purchases by law enforcement officers and transactions between immediate family members. 'Waiting periods prevent impulsive acts of violence and suicide, giving people time to step back and reassess their emotions during moments of crisis.' It was unclear whether the governor and legislators would request a broader review by a majority of judges on the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. Only California, Hawaii and Washington, along with the District of Columbia — have longer waiting periods than New Mexico that range up to 14 days, according to the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. Rhode Island also has a seven-day wait. Michael McCoy, director of the Mountain States Legal Foundation's Center to Keep and Bear Arms, applauded the ruling. The group is also challenging Colorado's minimum three-day waiting period for gun purchases, enacted in 2023. 'The court found that there was no analogous law from that era that would support the modern day law that's at issue,' McCoy said. 'For now, it means New Mexicans can go buy their firearms without an arbitrary delay imposed.' —-
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Oregon city at heart of Supreme Court homelessness ruling to ensure camping spaces under settlement
The Oregon city at the heart of a major U.S. Supreme Court homelessness ruling has agreed to ensure camping spaces for at least 150 people as part of a settlement reached with a disability rights group that sued the city over its camping rules. Disability Rights Oregon, which sued Grants Pass in January, said Friday that it had reached a settlement agreement. The advocacy group accused the city of discriminating against people with disabilities and violating a state law requiring cities' camping regulations to be 'objectively reasonable.' 'This settlement represents a significant step forward in ensuring people with disabilities experiencing homelessness have places to rest, basic necessities like drinking water, and real opportunity to stabilize their lives,' Jake Cornett, executive director and CEO of Disability Rights Oregon, said in a statement. Grants Pass Mayor Clint Scherf said in an email Tuesday that the city appreciates having reached an agreement and will "continue to work toward effective measures to benefit all members of our community.' A copy of the settlement agreement showed the city signed off on it earlier this month. Josephine County Circuit Court Judge Sarah McGlaughlin issued a preliminary injunction in March blocking the city from enforcing its camping rules unless it increased capacity at city-approved sites for camping and ensured they are physically accessible to people with disabilities. City ordinances prohibit sleeping or leaving personal property in a park overnight in most cases. Those found in violation can be fined up to $50. The city said Friday on Facebook that law enforcement 'will begin noticing the parks, and occupants will have 72 hours to remove their belongings.' The city's website shows three 'designated resting locations' in the downtown area, near City Hall and the police station, where people can stay for four days before having to relocate. The time limit can be enforced unless disability accommodations are necessary, the city said on Facebook. At resting sites, individuals are limited to spaces that are 8 feet by 8 feet (2.4 meters by 2.4 meters), with buffers of 3 feet (0.9 meters) between spaces, as outlined in city code. Under the settlement, Grants Pass must ensure that at least 150 camping spaces are available in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act for the next 12 months. Drinking water and hand washing stations must be available on-site. The city must also provide $60,000 in grant funding to a nonprofit for homeless services. Grants Pass, a small city of about 40,000 along the Rogue River in the mountains of southern Oregon, has struggled for years to address the homelessness crisis and become emblematic of the national debate over how to deal with it. Its parks in particular became a flashpoint, with many of them becoming the site of encampments blighted by drug use and litter. Last June, in a case brought by the city, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that communities can ban sleeping outside and fine people for doing so, even when there are not enough shelter beds. After the high court ruling, Grants Pass banned camping on all city property except locations designated by the City Council, which established sites for the town's hundreds of homeless people in a bid to move them from the parks. Upon taking office in January, the new mayor and new council members moved to close the larger of the two sites, which housed roughly 120 tents, according to Disability Rights Oregon's complaint, which said the sites were frequently crowded with poor conditions and inaccessible to people with disabilities because of loose gravel. After the lawsuit was filed, the city reopened a second, smaller site. McGlaughin's order in March said the city had to increase capacity to what it had been before the larger site was closed. Homelessness increased 18% last year nationwide, driven mostly by a lack of affordable housing as well as devastating natural disasters and an increase in migrants in some areas.
Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
'OUT OF CONTROL' Trump threatens to go after 'WOKE' Smithsonian museum for focusing too much on slavery
President Donald Trump has set his sights on another D.C. institution he plans on remaking in his image – the Smithsonian. On Tuesday afternoon, Trump fired off a message to his supporters on Truth Social, raging at the historical institution for focusing their museums on 'how horrible our country is' because of slavery. The president, who recently took over the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts after firing the entire board, said museums are 'the last remaining segment of ' WOKE '' in the country. 'The Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL, where everything discussed is how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been — Nothing about Success, nothing about Brightness, nothing about the Future.' Trump added, 'We are not going to allow this to happen, and I have instructed my attorneys to go through the Museums, and start the exact same process that has been done with Colleges and Universities where tremendous progress has been made.' He then claimed 'country cannot be WOKE' before declaring museums should promote the US as the ''HOTTEST' Country in the World.' The Daily Mail has reached out to the Smithsonian for comment. Trump's latest attack against the historical society appears related to a White House initiative seeking to ensure Smithsonian museum exhibitions, materials, and operations align with the president's view of American history. Earlier this month, three top White House officials sent a letter to Lonnie Bunch, the secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, stating they plan on conducting a far-reaching review of the institution's museums. 'This initiative aims to ensure alignment with the president's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions,' the White House letter states. Trump wants the museums to showcase 'unity, progress, and enduring values that define the American story.' The White House has begun reviewing a wide-variety of areas at the Smithsonian, including their use of artist grants, exhibition planning, and exhibition text. The Smithsonian responded to the letter stating their 'work is grounded in a deep commitment to scholarly excellence, rigorous research, and the accurate, factual presentation of history.' 'We are reviewing the letter with this commitment in mind and will continue to collaborate constructively with the White House, Congress, and our governing Board of Regents.' The Smithsonian currently has a federal appropriation budget that exceeds $1 billion, while 62 percent of the institution is bankrolled by government funds. Twenty-one museums are managed by the Smithsonian that include exhibits detailing the nation's history with slavery. Since the start of his second-term, the White House has targeted publicly funded cultural and educational centers, such as universities and colleges, that Trump has deemed as 'woke.'
