Russia denies asking Iran to agree to ‘zero enrichment' nuclear deal with US — Novaya Gazeta Europe
On Saturday, Axios reported, citing three European officials and one Israeli official with direct knowledge of the matter, that Moscow had urged Tehran to effectively halt its nuclear enrichment efforts, with Vladimir Putin expressing that position last week in calls to US President Donald Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron.
'Putin would support zero enrichment. He encouraged the Iranians to work towards that in order to make negotiations with the Americans more favourable. The Iranians said they won't consider it,' one European official told Axios.
According to the press release published by the Foreign Ministry, which also highlighted recent comments by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stressing Moscow's interests in mediating between Washington and Tehran, Axios' reporting is part of a 'dirty politicised campaign' being launched 'aiming to escalate tensions around the Iranian nuclear program'.
On Saturday, Iran's state-owned news agency Tasnim also denied Axios' reporting, citing a top source who claimed that Tehran had not received any request from Vladimir Putin to agree to 'zero enrichment'.
'At the last meeting between Mr. Putin and [Iranian Foreign Minister] Abbas Araghchi, such an issue was not raised," the source told Tasnim. 'After that, no messages about zero enrichment were exchanged.'
Russia has been a long-standing diplomatic ally to Iran on the nuclear issue for many years. However, as the Wall Street Journal reported on 23 June, Iran was dissatisfied that Moscow did not provide any military aid during its recent 12-day war with Israel.
Iran, meanwhile, has closely supported Russia throughout its war with Ukraine, supplying Moscow with Shahed suicide drones and other military equipment that have played a key role in Russia's ongoing strikes on Ukrainian infrastructure.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Novaya Gazeta Europe
7 hours ago
- Novaya Gazeta Europe
Ukraine wing of Russia-linked neo-Nazi group claims involvement in killing of security service colonel — Novaya Gazeta Europe
The Ukrainian wing of far-right terrorist organisation The Base, which is suspected of having ties to Russia, has claimed involvement in the recent killing of a top-ranking intelligence colonel in Kyiv, Ukraine's capital, The Guardian reported on Wednesday. Last Thursday, Colonel Ivan Voronych was fatally shot five times in Kyiv by an unidentified gunman who fled the scene of the killing in an SUV. On Sunday, Ukraine's Security Service (SBU) chief Vasyl Malyuk announced that two Russian FSB agents suspected of assassinating Voronych had been killed in a police raid on their place of residence in Kyiv. The Base, founded in 2018 by Rinaldo Nazzaro, a former Pentagon contractor suspected of engaging in espionage at the behest of the Kremlin, is a neo-Nazi terrorist group previously implicated in 'an assassination plot, mass shootings, and other actions in Europe', according to The Guardian. For months, the newspaper reports, The Base has been offering to pay members or voluntary collaborators to conduct 'targeted assassinations' or attacks on Ukraine's 'critical infrastructure', in a similar fashion to the sabotage operations carried out in Europe by Russia's intelligence services. In two Telegram posts published last week, White Phoenix, the alleged Ukraine-based arm of The Base, claimed that its 'activists' had carried out a 'carefully planned' attack on Voronych as a 'warning to the regime' of Volodymyr Zelensky. 'The execution of the SBU colonel is not the end, but only the beginning,' one post by the White Phoenix read, adding that it was 'proud of [its] comrades' and calling on 'all honest Ukrainians' to join them. Independent media outlet Agentstvo wrote that the Base's founder Nazzaro lives in St. Petersburg and has been married to a Russian woman since 2012. In April, The Guardian reported that former members of The Base suspected Nazzaro of having ties to Russian special services, although he has repeatedly denied the allegation, including at one occasion on Russian state TV. According to The New York Times, Voronych was a senior officer in the Fifth Directorate, an elite SBU unit responsible for killing a top Russian separatist commander named Arsen Pavlov, also known as Motorola, in Ukraine's eastern Donetsk region in 2016.
Novaya Gazeta Europe
7 hours ago
- Novaya Gazeta Europe
With a pinch of salt. What Trump's decision to send more weapons to Ukraine will mean for the war — Novaya Gazeta Europe
At face value, Donald Trump's announcement about his plans on Russia and Ukraine look like a major policy change. Speaking from the Oval Office on 14 July, where he had been meeting with NATO secretary general Mark Rutte, the US president said he would send 'top-of-the-line-weapons' to help Kyiv and — unless a ceasefire deal is agreed inside a 50-day time limit — the US would impose secondary sanctions on any countries dealing with Russia. David Hastings Dunn Professor of International Politics, University of Birmingham But while this represents a significant departure from Trump's previous approach, it's more of a step back towards the policy approach of his predecessor Joe Biden than the U-turn that some commentators are claiming. For months Russia has stepped up its bombardment of Ukraine, buoyed by the fact that neither the US Congress nor the White House has authorised any new military aid to Kyiv. Moscow would have been aware of this lack of US action and its missile and drone attacks against Ukraine have aimed to run down the stocks of air defence missiles supplied by Biden while paying lip service to the idea of peace negotiations. For Trump the penny appears finally to have dropped as to what was happening. His frustration and disappointment in Putin is what has finally led to him calling this out. According to Trump, Putin 'fooled a lot of people — Clinton, Bush, Obama, Biden — he didn't fool me. At a certain point talk doesn't talk, it's got to be action.' The decision to send new supplies of defensive — and potentially even longer-range offensive missiles — to Ukraine, even if the Europeans pay for them, is an important signal to Russia. But so too is the threat of tariffs of 100% on countries such as India and China that sustain the Russian economy by buying its oil and gas at knockdown prices. What has not changed, however, is the goal of Trump's policy towards the war in Ukraine. The US senate, led by Lindsay Graham, the influential Republican senator for South Carolina, has been itching to pass these secondary sanctions for months. Now that the Trump administration appears to have adopted this plan it is a significant policy instrument to pile the pressure on Russia. The change in Trump's approach may also mean that the €6.9 billion of frozen Russian assets in the US, and €192 billion in Europe, could be released to aid Ukraine, which would provide a ready means to pay for the US arms transfers. What has not changed, however, is the goal of Trump's policy towards the war in Ukraine. While the Biden administration called out the illegality of Putin's unprovoked aggression and called for the restoration of Ukrainian sovereignty, Trump is merely calling for a ceasefire. Trump may say he is 'disappointed' with Putin, but he has not labelled him as the aggressor. In fact at one point he was blaming Ukraine for the invasion. And, significantly, he has not demanded that Russia give up the 20% of Ukraine that it currently illegally occupies. The US president is also silent on what the US would commit to in terms of security and stability for Ukraine after the fighting stops. This is a much bigger question than Ukraine's NATO membership. America's European allies in NATO regard some sort of stability force on Ukrainian territory as necessary to deter any future Russian aggression. Whether or not US troops would be involved, and all the signs are that they would not, some sort of US security back-stop or guarantee is still seen in Europe as key to its success, as would be US logistical and intelligence support for its operation. Another aspect of the change in Trump's policy is the long lead time that Russia has been given to come to the table. A lot of Ukrainian civilians are likely to die during this period if the intense bombardment continues. On the battlefield, 50 days would give the Russians an extended window during a renewed summer offensive to make further territorial gains inside the occupied provinces. So Trump's proposals have to be viewed through the prism of his propensity to set deadlines that are then pushed back multiple times, as with the on-again, off-again tariffs, which have given Trump the nickname Taco — 'Trump always chickens out' — on Wall Street. Trump is seen by many as both inconsistent in his threats and unpredictable as to where policy will eventually settle. Russian senator, Konstantin Kosachev, was certainly taking this view when he told the BBC after Trump's announcement that, 'if this is all Trump had to say about Ukraine today, then so far it's been much ado about nothing'. This sentiment was shared by the Russian stock market which rose 2.7% in the aftermath of Trump's announcement. Analysts had expected much worse, so the long delay in the prospect of anything actually happening was clearly seen as a long way off and potentially subject to change or cancellation. Trump is seen by many as both inconsistent in his threats and unpredictable as to where policy will eventually settle. The fact that Trump told BBC Washington correspondent Gary O'Donoghue that while he was 'disappointed' with Putin, he was 'not done with him', and his clear reluctance to act quickly and decisively in sanctioning Russia, should be seen as an important counterpart to the apparent policy shift. Like so many things with the 47th US president, it's important not to react to the media appearances or the headlines they provoke, without also paying attention to the policy actions of his administration. This article was first published by The Conversation. Views expressed in opinion pieces do not necessarily reflect the position of Novaya Gazeta Europe.
Novaya Gazeta Europe
12 hours ago
- Novaya Gazeta Europe
White House plays down reports Trump asked Zelensky about striking Moscow — Novaya Gazeta Europe
US President Donald Trump walks on the South Lawn of the White House on 15 July 2025. Photo: EPA/Al Drago / POOL The White House has played down reports that US President Donald Trump asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky about launching aerial attacks on Moscow in a phone call earlier this month, with Trump himself stressing on Tuesday that Ukraine 'shouldn't target' the Russian capital. 'President Trump was merely asking a question, not encouraging further killing. He's working tirelessly to stop the killing and end this war,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement after The Financial Times (FT) reported on Tuesday that Trump had 'privately encouraged Ukraine to step up deep strikes on Russian territory' in a call with Zelensky on 4 July. According to the FT, Trump asked Zelensky whether Kyiv could 'hit Moscow [and] St. Petersburg too', to which the Ukrainian president replied, 'Absolutely. We can if you give us the weapons'. Two unnamed sources briefed on the call told the FT that Trump then indicated his support for the idea of Ukraine striking major Russian cities to 'make them [Russia] feel the pain' and force the Kremlin to negotiate an end to the war. The conversation was prompted by Trump's call with Putin the day before he spoke with Zelensky, the FT said, after which the US president said he was 'very disappointed' and 'didn't make any progress' with the Russian leader. On Tuesday evening, Trump told reporters outside the White House that Zelensky 'shouldn't target' Moscow in strikes and that the US was 'not looking' to supply Kyiv with long-range missiles capable of hitting targets deeper inside Russian territory. A day earlier, Trump announced that Washington would supply Ukraine with 'top-of-the-line' weapons, including Patriot air defence systems, to defend itself from Russian attacks and threatened to impose 'very severe' tariffs on Moscow's trading partners should Putin not agree to a deal to end the war within 50 days. The move marks a major shift in the Trump administration's policy on the war in Ukraine, with the US president growing increasingly frustrated with Putin for declaring Russia's readiness for peace while continuing to launch missile and drone strikes on Ukrainian cities.
