Finland's president discusses Ukraine ceasefire, icebreaker deal with Trump
Trump has threatened to impose new sanctions on Russia and buyers of its oil, including India and China, unless President Vladimir Putin agrees by Friday to end the 3-1/2-year war in Ukraine.
"President Trump's deadline for a ceasefire is approaching. Finland supports all efforts towards an immediate ceasefire. Longterm negotiations must lead to a lasting and just peace," Stubb said in a post on X.
Stubb added that his call with Trump also covered ongoing discussions about icebreakers.
In June, Trump mentioned the U.S. is negotiating the purchase of 15 icebreakers from Finland.
"Finland has built 60 percent of the world's icebreakers. We have the capacity to build them reliably and fast," Stubb said on Monday.
Trump has consistently advocated for the U.S. to acquire as many as 40 new icebreakers to enhance national security in the Arctic. Those icebreakers could help companies with logistics and keep open supply lines for potential oil and gas and mineral development in the rugged and frigid region.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
a minute ago
- Fox News
Jack Smith was 'racing against the clock' to get cases against Trump to a jury: Sen Tom Cotton
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., explains why he requested a special investigation into Jack Smith's actions to bring charges against President Donald Trump prior to the 2024 election on 'Hannity.'
CNN
a minute ago
- CNN
‘How much does it cost for fascism?': Tensions erupt at Nebraska GOP congressman's town hall
Rep. Mike Flood faced a barrage of criticism at a packed town hall in Lincoln, Nebraska, Monday evening as constituents repeatedly confronted him over his support for President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' immigration policy and what they described as threats to democracy. It didn't take long for the audience gathered for the meeting at the University of Nebraska to erupt in chants of 'tax the rich,' while the Republican congressman attempted to defend his decision to vote for the the president's massive agenda. 'I truly believe that this bill will allow America to experience growth, that it will allow our communities to thrive, that it will spark our economy, that it will help farmers and ranchers, that it will take care of the vulnerable. And more than anything, I truly believe this bill protects Medicaid for the future,' Flood said, speaking over outbursts from the crowd. Flood, one of few members of his party to hold in-person events during spring's congressional recess as the GOP looked to avoid blowback from the president's DOGE initiative, heeded the National Republican Congressional Committee's updated guidance to focus this August district work period on selling Trump's agenda. 'With the One Big Beautiful Bill signed into law just a few weeks ago, this is a critical opportunity to continue to define how this legislation will help every voter and push back on Democrat fearmongering,' the memo from the NRCC, the House GOP's campaign arm, stated. But as he did earlier this year, Flood met a largely hostile crowd. The congressman was pressed on everything from the president's sweeping tax and spending cuts legislation to veterans' issues, Medicaid funding and the war in Gaza during a wide-ranging question-and-answer period – all against a backdrop of near-constant heckling, chants and booing from the audience. Still, the he maintained his position on the president's domestic agenda package. 'Is every bill perfect? No, but I supported this bill,' he told the crowd. In one tense back-and-forth in Nebraska, an audience member confronted Flood about government spending and authoritarianism. 'My question is fiscal,' the attendee began, referencing reports that the makeshift immigration detention facility in Florida dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz' is expected to cost $450 million to operate for a single year. 'How much does it cost for fascism? How much do the taxpayers have to pay for a fascist country?' the attendee asked, as the crowd erupted in applause. Flood responded, 'Americans went to the polls in November, and they had a choice between a Democratic candidate that had an open border, no enforcement, fentanyl, drugs, human trafficking, and they had a choice between that and a candidate that said close the border, get illegal immigrants out of our country, stop the fentanyl, stop the human trafficking, stop the drugs, stop the crime, stop the violence. That's what Americans voted for.' 'Americans voted for a border that is secure, and I support the president enforcing our immigration laws, which, by the way, were written by Congress.' The audience appeared to grow increasingly agitated, with continued shouts hurled at the congressman. Another member from the audience accused Flood of staying silent in the face of what they called a 'fascist machine,' referring to the conservative blueprint Project 2025. 'You said in Seward that you were not a fascist,' the person said. 'But your complicity says otherwise.' 'Fascists don't hold town halls with open question-and-answer series,' he responded. The audience again booed. Despite his efforts to present the recently passed budget bill – which one constituent called 'the big, ugly bill' – as a solution for Medicaid funding and rural hospitals, audience members attacked Flood over cuts to SNAP benefits, veterans' programs and health care access. Veterans in the audience criticized him for backing a law they said threatens benefits for those who served. 'How can you stand a bill that erodes the very services that people like me, my family, and younger vets rely on?' one Marine Corps veteran asked. Flood said he had personally met with the VA secretary and promised improvements to the system but offered no specifics. The Nebraska lawmaker also fielded a question on the Jeffrey Epstein files – a topic that has consumed Capitol Hill in recent weeks but yielded limited exchanges so far in the early public town halls during lawmakers' break from Washington. Read aloud by an aide at the event, the written question posed: 'Why are you covering up the Epstein files?' It was met with raucous applause from the audience. Flood responded: 'Let's be very clear – at the next pro forma session of the Congress, you will find my name as a sponsor on a resolution from the House Rules Committee to release the Epstein files to protect the victims and not re-victimize them again.' He added that he supports Congress' subpoena of Epstein's former associate Ghislaine Maxwell for a deposition, and declard: 'I am for the release of those records.' The topic also arose at a Democrat's town hall Monday night in Benton Harbor, Michigan, where Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin made a case against presidential pardon power. Asked by an audience member if she thinks the presidential pardon power should be limited, Slotkin called it 'a quirk of history that does not make sense in America for either party, for any reason.' 'To me, it is just a strange thing that the president of the United States has a few extra chits in their pocket to give away,' she continued, adding that she doesn't think people who are wrongly imprisoned should be in jail. As pressure grows on the Trump administration to release more information related to the Epstein case, the president hasn't ruled out a pardon for Maxwell, who met recently with a top Justice Department official and also was transferred to a lower security prison camp from where she was previously being held. Asked last week if clemency was on the table in exchange for Maxwell's testimony, Trump said, 'I'm allowed to do it, but nobody's asked me to do it. I know nothing about it. I don't know anything about the case, but I know I have the right to do it.' Slotkin expressed wariness that Trump is talking about pardon for Maxwell 'in year one of his presidency, not the end of his presidency, which is what you typically see.' 'Look, I thought it was controversial with President Biden, too. It was controversial with everyone that Obama or Clinton or Bush did. So to me, it's just this weird kind of literally get out of jail free card that I just think muddies the waters,' she said. 'When you have a president who has a deep, deep problem with corruption, it just can be taken to such a dangerous degree that he's letting out pedophiles and criminals, violent people because he's paying back favors to others. I just can't support that,' she continued. The Michigan senator, who delivered what she called her 'economic war plan for America' and argued against the massive domestic policy bill that Trump signed into law July 4, addressed another issue that looms large for lawmakers when they return to DC in a matter of weeks: government funding. As Democrats weigh how to approach negotiations with Republicans to keep the government funded past the September 30 deadline, Slotkin, who did not vote for the GOP-led bill to avert a shutdown earlier this year, said she would not be open to any proposal without a commitment by Republicans to restore some of the health care-related funding they have voted to slash. 'For me, for my vote, for my willingness to join in that negotiation, you're going to have to restore something of Americans' health care in order to get me back on that team,' she said.
Washington Post
18 minutes ago
- Washington Post
How is Bureau of Labor Statistics data collected, and why is Trump targeting it?
A government agency best known for its number-crunching prowess became the target of the president's criticism last week when a federal jobs report was revised to show a less-than-rosy economic picture. President Donald Trump ordered the firing of Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer after a bleak jobs report showed signs of a slowing economy, and revised figures revealed things were worse for the labor market than initially reported in May and June. The high-profile firing and fallout has cast a spotlight on the agency's data, which has long been used to measure key markers of the economy. The BLS, an agency of the Labor Department, collects and analyzes data on the labor market and consumer prices, and its reports are used widely throughout government and industry to inform economic decisions. Here's what you need to know about the agency's data and what happens next. Trump ordered the firing of McEntarfer last week after a federal jobs report showed a much weaker labor market than many expected and announced that hiring in May and June was downgraded by a quarter of a million jobs fewer than previously reported. That bleak report caused the president to criticize McEntarfer, a Biden appointee, for overseeing what he called 'faked' jobs numbers. Without evidence, he alleged the jobs numbers had been manipulated for political purposes both last year and this year. McEntarfer was appointed to the role in 2024 by President Joe Biden and confirmed on a bipartisan Senate vote. Commissioners serve four-year terms and often overlap with multiple presidential administrations. In an email to staff after her ousting, McEntarfer defended the BLS's work. 'BLS produces some of the most closely watched economic data in the nation,' she wrote. 'Our data moves markets because it is some of the most timely and accurate information on economic conditions that businesses and policymakers have.' BLS collects and analyzes data on a wide range of economic topics, including wages, productivity, labor force participation, import and export prices and consumer prices. Much of the data comes from surveys that the agency conducts with businesses and households or conducts jointly with the Census Bureau. The data on monthly payroll is collected from a survey of businesses and government agencies, and unemployment numbers are collected from a population survey conducted with the Census. Economists and statisticians check the data for mistakes, combine the data to find trends and then analyze results. The data collected by BLS is used by government agencies and businesses to understand economic behavior, make investment decisions and plan for expansion or contraction. The data collected by BLS is considered the best information of what's going on in the labor economy, said Katharine Abraham, an economics professor at the University of Maryland who was the commissioner of the BLS from 1993 to 2001, during the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations. 'That's not to say that there isn't noise, but it's considered to be the best information we have,' she said. Other analyses of the labor market and economy are released by private businesses or industry groups, but one of the reasons BLS data is considered so powerful is because of the breadth of information the agency can collect, pulling on its credibility and connections with the Census Bureau and others. Some economists worry that the shake-up within the BLS could lead to fewer respondents taking surveys. Even before last week, there was concern among some policymakers and staff that government economic data was getting harder to collect and analyze reliably, because of budget strains and falling response rates to government surveys. The revisions to May and June's jobs numbers showed a much bleaker labor market picture than previously thought — but revisions to job reports are common. Early versions of the jobs report rely on larger business that respond quickly to surveys, while responses from smaller businesses — often more affected by economic headwinds — filter in later. 'As more information comes in, the numbers get revised. That's just a part of the process,' Abraham said. 'There's a trade off between getting numbers out quickly and having them be as accurate as possible.' Trump previously criticized another downward revision last year during the Biden administration, falsely saying the figures weren't so much a 'revision' as they were a 'lie.' He was referring to last August, when the BLS reported that the U.S. economy had created 818,000 fewer jobs from April 2023 through March 2024, marking the largest annual 'benchmark' revision to federal jobs data in 15 years. This initial annual adjustment was part of a standard process in which the Labor Department updates its monthly payroll survey estimates with more comprehensive — but less timely — state unemployment tax records. Former BLS leaders have criticized the firings as unfounded. The commissioner does not produce the job numbers, nor view them until they are finalized in a report written by career staff, several former commissioners told The Washington Post. William Beach, who served as commissioner during the Trump administration and into Biden's term, said the commissioner has no ability to alter the reported data under the current system. 'He's making a claim that is just not possible,' Beach said, referring to Trump. 'It's like saying the moon is five miles away. It may look close to you, but it's much farther away.' Manipulation of the BLS data for political purposes is possible but unlikely to go undetected, experts say. Leadership could infuse political bias into language used to describe the data to the public. Or they could delay or speed up data releases for political advantage. They could also alter the statistical methods used to turn raw survey data into national estimates. 'Somebody could come in and say, 'We're going to change the way we do these calculations with the goal of producing some different result,'' Abraham said. 'But I think it would be hard to even figure out what change might lead to the result you wanted.' But Abraham said she's less worried about Trump appointing someone who 'rigs the numbers' than she is that the firing will erode public trust in BLS data. Fewer businesses and households respond to the voluntary surveys that are used to gather BLS data if the agency's legitimacy is in doubt. That generally leads to less accurate data being used to set policy and larger monthly revisions, because of delayed responses. 'If people come to believe that data are all rigged anyway, someone might think, why should I bother responding anyway?' Abraham said.
