
Farage returns to Scotland for by-election campaign
Tomorrow, Nigel Farage enters the fray with a rare trip north of the Border.
READ MORE:
The last time he took part in a Scottish by-election campaign — Aberdeen Donside in 2013 — he was forced to cancel a large lunch and press conference after an anti-fascist group threatened to demonstrate outside.
That was little more than a month after he had suffered a torrid half-hour of abuse and heckling from campaigners on the Royal Mile, who forced him to find refuge in a city centre pub.
He will be back in the Granite City tomorrow morning, hosting a press conference where he will no doubt meet some of the four Aberdeenshire councillors who have defected to his party in recent weeks.
The Reform leader will be joined by his deputy, MP Richard Tice, on the visit, with both men then heading to South Lanarkshire to join the campaign for their candidate Ross Lambie.
Another ex-Scottish Tory, his defection might have made headlines — if not for the chaotic press conference outside a Glasgow chip shop where Mr Tice could not remember his name.
If he manages a win on Thursday, Mr Lambie's name will not be slipping the mind of the party hierarchy again.
Three weeks ago, Reform thought they could get a good third place at the by-election. Now, Glasgow councillor Thomas Kerr says they might be able to pull it off.
'I always thought that seats like Hamilton would be in contention for Reform next year,' he told The Herald. 'I thought it would take longer to get to the stage that we are at at the moment.
'I just do not know how this is going to play out anymore.
'If we get a good second place next week, then there will be serious questions for all the other parties — especially for Labour and the Tories — about this idea that you tactically vote for them to stop the SNP. Actually, that flips its head at that point.'
Based on current polling, a proportional swing suggests Reform UK should win around 15% to 20% of the vote in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse — well behind the SNP on 33.6% and Labour on 28.5%.
However, turnout is expected to be significantly lower than at a general election.
It could fall by as much as 44% — similar to the drop seen in 2023's Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election.
That would remove around 16,000 votes from the total, the researcher and Herald columnist Mark McGeoghegan posted on his Bluesky account this week.
If just a quarter of those missing votes are Labour supporters, Reform could find itself neck-and-neck with Mr Sarwar's party.
Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner with Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar and Labour party candidate Davy Russell during a walk about in Quarter, South Lanarkshire (Image: Andrew Milligan) If 35% to 40% come from SNP voters, then Reform could pull level with Mr Swinney's party too.
'There is a narrow path to a Reform victory,' Mr McGeoghegan posted, 'and either way their performance in this by-election is going to be a shock for a lot of Scots.'
Given the demographics in the constituency, you might expect Reform to perform better here than national polling suggests.
That is despite the race row that has dominated the last week.
The party has faced widespread criticism for a Facebook and Instagram advert using heavily edited footage from a 2022 speech by Mr Sarwar in which he called for greater South Asian representation in politics.
Door knocking currently suggests a very thin SNP win, with Reform second, Labour well back, and the Tories at risk of losing their deposit.
Labour sources have been briefing for weeks now that they are about to lose. One yesterday told The Times the party should expect to get 'quite considerably humped'.
If Labour is pushed back into third, the implications could be significant. Some Scottish Labour MPs have told Sir Keir Starmer a poor result could stop them supporting planned disability benefit reforms.
Tensions reportedly flared during a meeting with Pat McFadden last week, with some fearing the higher-ups in the UK party have failed to grasp how close next year's election is.
There could also be implications closer to home.
For a by-election, the Holyrood hopeful picked by the party has had a very low profile. Davy Russell, a former high heidyin at Glasgow City Council, has declined to take part in radio interviews, TV debates and even local hustings.
When the BBC asked Mr Sarwar why his man had turned down their invitation to appear on Good Morning Scotland, he replied: 'That is a matter for the campaign team and the campaign.'
If the party does get humped, then there will be questions over the selection process and the party's fitness for next year's Holyrood election.
John Swinney, Katy Loudon and SNP supporters in Hamilton (Image: Jeff J Mitchell/Getty) Last week, John Swinney penned an open letter to Labour supporters calling on them to vote for Katy Loudon to beat Nigel Farage.
He described the Brexiteer as a 'clear and present danger to our country' and said he must be stopped.
'The problem is that Labour cannot do that. Their campaign is in collapse and Keir Starmer is busy pandering to Farage.
'And so, I am today asking Labour supporters to act.
'It is time to unite behind our shared principles, defeat Nigel Farage, and refuse to be divided by a man determined to destroy the values we hold dear.'
The letter was splashed by the Daily Record, an effective endorsement from a paper traditionally associated with Labour.
Two days later, the paper splashed a letter from Mr Sarwar.
'Do not believe the spin and the nonsense of John Swinney,' he wrote. 'This by-election is a two-horse race between Scottish Labour and the SNP.
'Reform's poison will not win here,' he insisted.
The SNP say he might. 'It is tight,' one source said. 'Losing to Reform is not impossible.'
'Nigel Farage has made the political weather, frankly, north and south of the Border,' Professor Sir John Curtice told The Herald on Sunday.
But he warned that the strategy of talking up Reform could backfire.
'It is the old story — if you do not like something, it is not always a good idea to draw people's attention to it, which is precisely what Sarwar and Swinney have done and we will have to wait and see whether or not this makes any difference at all and whether or not they were wise to do so.
'It is a bit of a two-edged sword. If we take what Swinney is now saying — 'it is a battle between us and Reform, so if you hate Nigel Farage you have to vote for us' — well, you might be able to persuade some people who would otherwise vote Labour to vote for you.
'But on the other hand, you might also be able to persuade the not inconsiderable number of Conservatives in this constituency that maybe voting for Reform might be the best way of giving the SNP a bloody nose. You might encourage anti-SNP tactical voting as much as you might persuade pro-SNP tactics.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
2 minutes ago
- Spectator
Top five lowlights from Sturgeon's memoir
They say good things come to those who wait, but Steerpike will let readers be the judge of that when it comes to Nicola Sturgeon's memoir Frankly. The 450-page account by Scotland's former first minister was supposed to be hitting bookshelves on Thursday, but some shops decided to release it ahead of time and Mr S has got his hands on an early copy, reading it so you don't have to. Here are the top lowlights from Sturgeon's new tome… Trans U-turn One of the controversies that, some suggest, prompted her resignation in 2023 was the gender reform bill – and the scandal of double rapist Isla Bryson being housed in a women's prison. The question of whether Bryson is a man or a woman proved rather difficult for the then-first minister to answer at the time – and Sturgeon still hasn't managed to square this circle, pointedly calling the rapist 'they' in an ITV interview last night. At the time, Sturgeon first voted down Tory MSP Russell Findlay's amendment to ban sex offenders from obtaining a gender recognition certificate and later voted against SNP MSP Michelle Thomson's amendment to pause applications by those charged with rape or sexual assault. While she dismissed concerns from the bill's critics then, now Sturgeon admits in her book: 'The question I ask myself most when I reflect on this period is whether I should have hit the pause button when I realised, sometime in 2022, just how polarised the issue was becoming. With hindsight I wish I had.' Too little, too late… Salmond fallout Sturgeon's infamous fallout with her political mentor and boss Alex Salmond has had books written about it – and so of course the ex-FM had to include at least a nod to it in her own. But she hasn't held back. She broke down in tears when her colleague Ian Blackford told her Salmond had passed away in October 2024 and confessed she wondered whether she should cut the chapter on him from her book. 'Would I just be stirring up pain for his wife and family (which I truly don't want to do)?' she pondered. Regardless, she went and published it anyway. Charming! Sturgeon claimed that the former SNP leader hadn't read the independence white paper, accused him of undermining John Swinney during the latter's first attempt at leading the SNP and alleged he had planted questions via opposition MSPs on the committee assessing the Scottish government's handling of harassment complaints. In short, despite her claims of grief on hearing of her former boss's passing, the SNP's Dear Leader decided to pull no punches. 'I have tried not to rewrite history,' she begins the chapter, later adding: '[Alex] was trying to rewrite history.' Talk about tit for tat! Cross-party politics Scotland's former FM has long been accused of creating a divisive political culture over both independence and the trans debate. Yet in her memoir she claims that her motivation for a deal with the Scottish Greens after falling short of a majority in the 2021 Holyrood election was down to her desire to 'champion a more constructive style of politics'. Er, right. She goes on: At the tail end of the last parliament, embroiled in the Salmond saga and worn down by Covid, I had become weary of the opportunism and perpetual game-playing of opposition parties. It was partly a result of electoral frustration, but they had become impervious to any attempts to build cross-party consensus. And this is the woman lauded for her high emotional intelligence?! Brexit The Queen of the Nats wouldn't ever exploit a democratic result for her own political gain, would she? Not according to her memoir, anyway, in which she writes that, after Britain voted to leave the EU: The established narrative now, though, is that I went hell for leather for a second referendum immediately after the Brexit vote. It isn't true. On the contrary, I spent the next nine months doing the precise opposite. I tried hard to persuade the UK government to pursue a compromise option… It was in good faith, therefore, that we published 'Scotland's Place in Europe' in December 2016, mapping out what a different outcome for Scotland might look like and how it could be achieved. I was explicit that this was a solution for Scotland within the UK; in other words, an alternative to independence. It seems rather odd, then, that in the aftermath of the Brexit vote, Sturgeon told a journalist that the chance of another independence referendum was 'highly likely'. And since then, the SNP has consistently stood on a platform that advocates for closer ties with the EU – if not rejoining the European Union altogether. How very interesting… London The SNP's Dear Leader has spent most of her life calling for Scotland's independence from the United Kingdom – but in a rather amusing revelation, it doesn't seem like she wants to practice what she preaches. In her book, she writes: 'I am determined to see more of the world. I might live outside of Scotland for a period.' In fact, she has since admitted to both the Sunday Times and the BBC that: 'I love London.' Just one of those nationalists who'll do anything for their country but live in it, eh?


STV News
2 minutes ago
- STV News
Council awaiting guidance on whether to reassign mixed-sex facilities in schools
Perth and Kinross Council is still awaiting Scottish Government guidance as to whether it needs to reassign mixed-sex facilities in schools. The new £80m Perth High School – due to open next week – is one of nine PKC schools built with mixed-sex spaces and one of three which does not have separate male and female toilets. In April 2025, a Court of Session judge ruled Scottish state schools must provide single-sex toilets for pupils but the Scottish Government is still considering whether its guidance needs to be updated. The Court of Session judgement in April was made in a case brought against Scottish Borders Council by parents concerned about a new primary school built with only gender-neutral toilets. The Court of Session judge ruled mixed-sex schools must provide single-sex toilets for pupils, but could have gender neutral toilets as well. The Scottish ruling came after the UK Supreme Court unanimously ruled a woman is defined by biological sex under equalities law. And – with Perth and Kinross pupils due to return to school next week for the new session – the Scottish Government is still deciding whether or not its guidance needs to be updated to reflect recent legal decisions. A PKC spokesperson said: 'As previously advised, the council has nine schools with mixed-sex facilities. Six of these also have separate male and female toilets while the remaining three have been designed with floor to ceiling cubicles in semi-open plan areas that allows schools to reassign their toilets. This arrangement is also in place at the new Perth High School. 'We await further guidance from the Scottish Government following the Supreme Court judgement and will respond to this guidance once provided.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Local authorities have statutory responsibility for the school estate, including provision of toilets. 'As with any significant legal or policy developments, we consider whether guidance requires to be updated to reflect recent legal decisions and this consideration is under way.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country


Telegraph
2 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Liz Truss criticises ‘multicultural' Olympic ceremony 12 years after praising it
Liz Truss has criticised the London 2012 Olympics opening ceremony as not representing 'the views of the average Briton'. The former prime minister suggested that 'the views expressed' at the event were not those shared by people outside of London but of 'an elite that hates Britain', even though she praised the ceremony in 2013. Speaking to Ben Shapiro, a Right-wing US commentator, Ms Truss claimed that the 'elite are trying to suppress' the voices of those in small towns and rural communities. Shapiro, who hosts the Ben Shapiro Show, asked the former Tory leader about the 2012 Olympics opening ceremony, which took place in the capital. Former UK PM Liz Truss on what Britain must learn from Trump — The Ben Shapiro Show (@BenShapiroShow) August 11, 2025 He asked: 'Can there be a restoration of a true pride in what Great Britain was and should be in the middle of this bizarre sort of melange of multiculturalism that has taken over London?' Ms Truss replied: 'The views expressed in the Olympic ceremony are not the views of the average Briton. 'The problem is we have an elite that hates Britain, and they have done for some time, that is the history of people like Jeremy Corbyn [and] Keir Starmer. 'They want to help the human rights of anybody who doesn't live in Britain, but they're very reticent about actually defending our own interests. 'We need to galvanise the people who are patriots in our country, but they have been neglected. They generally don't live in London. They live in small towns, they live in rural areas. They don't have much of a voice. And what is happening is the elite are trying to suppress those voices.' But Ms Truss had previously praised the 2012 opening ceremony, which took place shortly before she became an education minister under Lord Cameron. In a speech in 2013, she said: 'Last summer's Olympics opening ceremony seamlessly combined Isambard Kingdom Brunel and William Shakespeare, Tim Berners-Lee and Mary Poppins.' In 2019, she told The Sunday Telegraph: 'I think we need to revive what I call the Olympics 2012 spirit [with] a modern, patriotic, enterprising vision of Britain and we need to use Brexit to achieve that.' The opening ceremony of London 2012 was directed by Danny Boyle and attracted some 900 million viewers. It featured a cameo appearance of Queen Elizabeth II alongside Daniel Craig in his role as James Bond. The pair apparently jumped out of a helicopter together into the Olympic stadium, where the late monarch was wearing the same outfit as she had been when she met Bond in Buckingham Palace. The show also featured references to the novel Peter Pan, the Chariots of Fire film, and several hymns and folk songs such as Jerusalem and Danny Boy. In a segment designed to celebrate the NHS, performers danced in traditional nurse uniforms and white doctors' coats.