New parking app launched by Montreal mobility agency
The old version will no longer be functional as of July 31.
The agency recently introduced the Mobicité app, which replaces the current P$ Mobile Service app and allows users to easily and securely pay for street parking and spots in many agency-managed lots using their mobile devices.
'With Mobicité, we are acquiring a real asset that supports our mission: making space-sharing more equitable and improving accessibility across the city for everyone,' the agency said in a statement.
'The Agency's mobile app, which already has more than 800,000 users, has been recognized as a valuable tool to better inform the public—especially drivers—by helping them make better decisions and encouraging them to adopt new behaviours for more sustainable mobility.'
The new app includes similar features to the old one but adds a map that shows all paid parking managed by the agency, along with accessible parking spots and electric vehicle charging stations. It does not, however, display real-time availability of parking spaces.
The agency said it will continue to enhance the app over time with new features based on users' needs. Users have until Dec. 15 to download their transaction history from the P$ Mobile Service app by accessing their account on the Montreal Sustainable Mobility Agency's website.
The Mobicité app is available for free on the App Store and Google Play.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
28 minutes ago
- CBC
Ontario Land Tribunal approves controversial Davis Tannery development in Kingston
The Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) has approved a controversial development in Kingston, Ont., that would see more than 1,500 homes built at what's currently a site contaminated by decades of industry. In 2022, city council voted against the Davis Tannery project — named after a business that once operated there — in a move that was celebrated by environmental groups, but promptly appealed by the developer, identified in multiple media reports as Jay Patry. In a statement released Monday, the city said the OLT had weighed in with a decision that "approves the development in its entirety, through amendments to both the Official Plan and the Zoning By-Law." Those amendments will be shared in a draft of the new official plan, which the city said will be released to the public in mid-August. "This development marks a major step forward for Kingston, bringing much needed housing to the urban core, and remediating the largest brownfield property in the city," read a statement attributed to Mayor Bryan Paterson. "I'm excited to see how this project will contribute to the renewal and revitalization of Kingston's Inner Harbour." Concerns about contamination The project proposes four phases which would see mid-rise, mixed-use commercial and residential buildings with 1,500-1,670 homes at the site sandwiched between River Street and Belle Park, according to the city. A minimum of 3,600 square metres of commercial space and a new park along the Cataraqui River are also outlined in the proposal. The project was opposed by organizations including No Clearcuts in Kingston (NCK), which was a party in the tribunal and argued against removing trees — including a 200-year-old oak — and releasing toxins trapped in the soil. A media release shared by the group Monday said it was "deeply disappointed" by the decision, adding it allows the "clearcutting of 2000 trees." "We are extremely upset and disheartened to learn that the desire of so many Kingstonians to preserve the Tannery urban forest has been thwarted by the Tribunal's decision," read a quote from NCK member Kathleen O'Hara. The group said it has concerns about "dangerous chemicals," including chromium in the ground and asked how the developer and various levels of government plan to coordinate a safe cleanup. "Will there be credible, independent monitoring of environmental impacts on a daily basis while the pre-construction clearcutting is underway?" asked Kerry Hill, who was identified in the release as a retired biologist. NCK also said its members will continue to monitor the project in order to minimize the environmental damage it could cause. In a 78-page document dated July 25, OLT vice-chair Steven Cooke wrote he "accepts and adopts the majority of the contested evidence" and expert opinions provided by the developer. "The Tribunal is persuaded by the evidence that the proposal promotes efficient development of land, accommodates a range of appropriate mixed uses, intensifies uses within the settlement area, and contributes to the range of housing options, and in particular, remediation of a brownfield as desired by the City," it reads. Cooke added that the OLT considered the points raised by those against the project, but "was not persuaded that the concerns they have raised are either sustainable given the evidence offered in support of the planned development, or otherwise bears relevance to the land use planning merits of the proposal." However, the tribunal did deny the developer's proposal to cap part of a wetland, with Cooke writing the provincial policy "clearly states that 'development and site alterations shall not be permitted.'"
CBC
28 minutes ago
- CBC
Digital identity copyrights + Protecting affordable rentals
The National breaks down Denmark's move to stop unauthorized deepfakes by allowing people to copyright their digital identities. Plus, how B.C. is trying to protect affordable rent.
CBC
28 minutes ago
- CBC
Why Trump's deals with the EU, Japan may not be templates for Canada in trade talks
Social Sharing U.S. President Donald Trump's successive announcements of deals setting baseline tariffs on the European Union and Japan are prompting questions about whether they're a road map for Canada to follow in trade talks. Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen described the bones of an agreement on Sunday. It sets across-the-board tariffs of 15 per cent on most European Union exports to the United States, along with a commitment by Europe to invest $600 billion US in the American economy and spend $750 billion on U.S. energy products — although there's plenty of fine print still to come. That makes it broadly comparable to the deal Trump announced last week with Japan: a 15 per cent across-the-board tariff and a Japanese commitment to invest $550 billion in the U.S. Trump was threatening to hit Europe with 30 per cent baseline tariffs and Japan with 25 per cent on Aug. 1, so both trading blocs are selling the deals as wins. Because Canada is facing the threat of 35 per cent tariffs on some goods on the same date, does that mean Canada should be aiming for a similar agreement? Prime Minister Mark Carney certainly isn't saying so. Asked whether any forthcoming deal will be "in the ballpark" of those 15 per cent baseline tariffs, he emphasized the differences between Europe's and Canada's trading relationship with the U.S. "We are in a different position, and that is why these negotiations ... are different," Carney said on Monday, citing Canada's geographical closeness and energy exports to the U.S. "Europe, in that agreement yesterday, made commitments to buy American energy," he said at a news conference in Prince Edward Island. "America needs Canadian energy." WATCH | Canada's trade talks with the U.S. are different from Europe's, Carney says: Carney says Canada is 'in a different position' than EU on trade deal with U.S. 15 hours ago Across-the-board tariffs 'difficult for Canada to accept' There are plenty of reasons why a 15 per cent baseline tariff rate is not something for Canada to aspire to, given that its economy is proportionally far more dependent on the U.S. market than Europe's and Japan's are. Jonathan O'Hara, an international trade lawyer in the Ottawa law office of McMillan LLP, said Canada should set its sights on a better deal than the EU or Japan negotiated since it's already so tightly integrated with the American economy. "On a broad level, having some kind of across-the-board tariffs, I think, would be very difficult for Canada to accept," O'Hara said in a weekend interview with CBC News. WATCH | Here's what's in Trump's tariff deal with the EU: Trump, EU reach trade deal framework 1 day ago Yet it appears that Canada doesn't actually face the prospect of tariffs that are truly across-the-board. That's because it has something that neither the European Union nor Japan have: an actual free-trade deal. Trump's "fentanyl emergency" tariffs, currently set at 25 per cent — which he's threatening to raise to 35 per cent on Friday — hit only those goods that don't comply with the rules of origin in the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). That means the vast bulk of Canada's exports to the U.S. are currently crossing the border tariff-free. Steel and aluminum tariffs a big question That may be why Carney's Liberal government does not feel the same sort of pressure as Europe and Japan to get a deal on Trump's timeline, said Drew Fagan, a professor at the University of Toronto's Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy. "Overall, the average tariff on Canadian goods going into the United States is about as low as any place in the world," he told CBC News. "What's important for us is that the [CUSMA] free-trade agreement continues to hold. Whether it will in the future, of course, is a fundamental question." The biggest exceptions to Canada's mostly tariff-free access to the U.S. are steel and aluminum, hit by Trump's 50 per cent global rate as he tries to prop up that sector at home. In their deals reached with the U.S., neither the EU nor Japan are let off the hook from that tariff. While Canada is surely angling for something better on steel and aluminum — such as the U.K.'s 25 per cent tariff, potentially headed to zero — the European and Japanese agreements suggest that will be tough to achieve. Carlo Dade, director of international policy at the University of Calgary's School of Public Policy, said Canada will likely face a tariff rate comparable to Europe's. "The Americans have decided to readjust the terms of trade," Dade said. "The price of access to the U.S. market is going up globally. It appears everyone is going to have to pay an increased cost." There are plenty of signs to suggest that the prospects are slim for Canada to reach a deal by Trump's deadline of Friday: Carney said the talks are complex, his top trade negotiators are downplaying the importance of the deadline and Trump himself is saying there may not be a deal at all.
