
Perth International College of English closes after 20 years, blaming government policy changes
Perth International College of English director John Paxton sent out a letter to international students this week to notify them of the closure, after more than 20 years in business.
'It is with deepest regret that I have to inform you all that PICE was forced into liquidation today,' he wrote. 'It will come as little surprise to many in the industry as we follow the path of other colleges in Australia.
'It is a sad reflection that we have survived so many tough times over the last 23 years, including major recent catastrophes like COVID border closures, but we are unable to survive the political behaviour of our own government.'
The college, in Murray Street, is one of several education providers — particularly English language and vocational colleges — that have scaled back operations or gone out of business as a result of negative impacts from the Federal Government's migration reforms.
Mr Paxton said the visa settings and visa refusal regime the Australian Government initiated in December, 2023, had started the decline of colleges offering English Language Intensive Courses for Overseas Students (ELICOS).
But raising the visa fee in July last year by 125 per cent to make it the most expensive globally was the 'finishing touch', with applications halving from that date.
'The ELICOS sector has been called collateral damage from their political agenda, and that unfortunately has been PICE's fate,' he said.
'I made a calculated decision to keep the business afloat and ride out the storm with my personal money. And that has come to an end. I have none left.'
Mr Paxton, the WA State delegate and former board member of peak ELICOS body English Australia, said he had been unable to find a buyer or investor, despite his efforts to find a solution that would allow the college to remain open.
Students would be protected by the government's Tuition Protection Scheme, giving them the option to transfer to another college of their choice, or they could request a refund of unused fees.
'We will do everything possible to ensure all students — current and future — will be taken care of,' he said.
English Australia chief executive Ian Aird said the board was 'deeply saddened' by the news.
He said despite PICE's 'exemplary reputation for quality', the increase in student visa fees, record high visa refusal rates and processing delays meant the college was 'unable to attract enough enrolments to be financially sustainable'.
StudyPerth chief executive Derryn Belford said many English colleges were finding it harder to attract students because of the visa fee increases.
'My understanding is the Federal Government is aware that they've caused a problem with this in the English language space, but it's how fast can they fix it,' she said.
'Often, you'll see that it is the good institutions that fall over when big policy changes happen because they keep to the rules.'
Educators have previously raised concerns the changes would have a flow-on effect at universities, dramatically impacting the viability of the international education sector which contributes around $3.6 billion a year to WA's economy.
Premier Roger Cook last month wrote to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to highlight his concerns about the plight of the international education sector.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Australian
10 hours ago
- The Australian
New road user tax: How much Aussie EV owners could soon pay per kilometre
The Federal Government is advancing plans for electric vehicle owners to pay a new 'road-user charge', but it may not stop at EV drivers. In Australia, drivers currently pay a fuel excise of 51.6 cents per litre every time they fill up. According to the Government, that money goes towards building and maintaining the nation's roads. But EV drivers currently pay nothing. The Productivity Commission has warned that Australia's $12 billion a year fuel excise is in 'terminal decline' as more drivers switch to low-and zero-emission cars. The proposed solution, currently being discussed and advanced by Treasurer Jim Chalmers, is a distance-based charge for EV drivers, but industry experts say it could be rolled out more broadly to cover all light vehicles, like in New Zealand. If that happens, it could mean all motorists pay a set fee for every kilometre they travel, regardless of whether they drive a diesel ute, petrol SUV, hybrid small hatchback or electric sedan. MORE: New road charge coming for EV drivers The Productivity Commission says all road users should contribute to the cost of infrastructure. (AAP Image / Julian Andrews). What is the road-user charge? Currently, Australian drivers of petrol and diesel pay a fuel excise – a tax of 51.6c per litre – every time they fill up. This tax money is used to build and maintain roads. Electric vehicle (EV) owners currently pay nothing, meaning as more Australians switch to EVs, the government's road funding pool is shrinking. A road-user charge (RUC) would change that by making EV drivers pay for each kilometre they travel. The aim is to ensure all road users contribute to the upkeep of the network, regardless of what powertrain they drive. In New Zealand, the approach is going even further. From 2027, all light vehicles – petrol, diesel, hybrids, and electric will be charged based on distance travelled and vehicle weight. This national approach means everyone pays for the exact road use they generate, but it also means some are paying more than others. If the same road-user charge is applied to all light vehicles in Australia, it's understood that would be instead of paying fuel excise, not on top of it. However, this is a big shift and has not been discussed or committed to yet. MORE: EV tax 'makes no sense' Petrol and diesel drivers currently pay a 51.6c per litre excise to fund road maintenance. Picture: NCA NewsWire / Andrew Henshaw How would it work? Victoria implemented a road user charge for electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles that later failed a court challenge, leading to millions of dollars in refunds. It worked like this: – Flat rate for EVS of approximately 2.8c/km – Flat rate for Plug-in hybrids of approximately 2.3c/km – Distance measured by odometer photos or an app – Funds directed to road maintenance and construction There have been discussions about exemptions or rebates for regional motorists, who often drive far greater distances, and others argue the charge should eventually apply to all vehicles, not just EVs. New Zealand's Road User Charge (RUC) framework does not offer specific exemptions or rebates for regional motorists based on travel distance. However, there are exemptions for certain vehicle types, such as: – Electric vehicles over 3.5 tonnes (heavy EVs), remain exempt until 1 July 2027. – Light electric vehicles under 1,000kg remain exempt. – Vehicles unsuitable for public roads or used almost exclusively off-road can apply for exemptions. MORE: China unveils plan to take on Tesla in Australia From 2027 the New Zealand model will charge all light vehicles based on distance travelled and weight, not just electric cars. Picture: Jonathan Ng When could it happen? Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has ruled out new taxes this term, so not before 2027. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has signalled it as a 'second term' reform, after further consultation with states and industry. If the RUC is applied to EVs only Using Victoria's scrapped 2.8c/km rate: City driver – 12,000km/year – EV: $336 a year (currently $0) – Petrol/diesel: No change – still pay fuel excise Regional driver (or high-mileage drivers) – 30,000km/year – EV: $840 a year (currently $0) – Petrol/diesel: No change – still pay fuel excise If the RUC is applied to EVs only, then EV owners, especially high-mileage or regional drivers, will be impacted. Outer-suburban and regional drivers typically driver far more than inner city drivers, not because they want to, but because they have to. According to data buyers searching for home up to an hour from the CBD have dramatically more choice, with as much as eight times the number of houses available compared to a 30-minute radius. Electric vehicle owners could soon face a per-kilometre tax under new federal plans. Picture: Mark Bean What if it expands to all vehicles like New Zealand? If Australia adopts a national RUC for light commercial vehicles, like New Zealand, the impact on your wallet would depend heavily on the type of vehicle you drive and how far you travel each year. For example, a large ute or SUV such as a Toyota HiLux, Ford Ranger or Toyota LandCruiser Prado uses approximately 10L/100km, which means drivers would pay roughly $336 a year under a 2.8c/km charge if they drive the national average of 12,000km. That's about $283.20 less than the $619.20 you'd currently pay in fuel excise, and the savings would be even bigger for high-mileage regional drivers. High-mileage vehicles like utes could face high costs under distance-based road tax. Picture: Supplied If the RUC is applied to everyone, similar to what New Zealand is implementing in 2027, then heavy/less efficient vehicles like petrol or diesel utes and SUVs will come out ahead. While EVs and very efficient hybrids will pay more than under fuel excise. However, owning an EV and paying per-km RUC will still be cheaper than what ICE drivers pay via fuel excise. Danielle Collis Journalist and Reporter Danielle's background spans print, radio and television, she has contributed to outlets such as The Age, ABC, Channel Nine and many more. For more than four years, Danielle has worked as Liz Hayes' producer and investigative journalist on her show 'Under Investigation', covering everything from corporate scandals to Australia's most baffling crime cases. Danielle's covered a range of topics from breaking news, politics, lifestyle and now motoring. Danielle Collis

Daily Telegraph
18 hours ago
- Daily Telegraph
New road user tax: How much Aussie EV owners could soon pay per kilometre
Don't miss out on the headlines from Motoring. Followed categories will be added to My News. The Federal Government is advancing plans for electric vehicle owners to pay a new 'road-user charge', but it may not stop at EV drivers. In Australia, drivers currently pay a fuel excise of 51.6 cents per litre every time they fill up. According to the Government, that money goes towards building and maintaining the nation's roads. But EV drivers currently pay nothing. The Productivity Commission has warned that Australia's $12 billion a year fuel excise is in 'terminal decline' as more drivers switch to low-and zero-emission cars. The proposed solution, currently being discussed and advanced by Treasurer Jim Chalmers, is a distance-based charge for EV drivers, but industry experts say it could be rolled out more broadly to cover all light vehicles, like in New Zealand. If that happens, it could mean all motorists pay a set fee for every kilometre they travel, regardless of whether they drive a diesel ute, petrol SUV, hybrid small hatchback or electric sedan. MORE: New road charge coming for EV drivers The Productivity Commission says all road users should contribute to the cost of infrastructure. (AAP Image / Julian Andrews). What is the road-user charge? Currently, Australian drivers of petrol and diesel pay a fuel excise – a tax of 51.6c per litre – every time they fill up. This tax money is used to build and maintain roads. Electric vehicle (EV) owners currently pay nothing, meaning as more Australians switch to EVs, the government's road funding pool is shrinking. A road-user charge (RUC) would change that by making EV drivers pay for each kilometre they travel. The aim is to ensure all road users contribute to the upkeep of the network, regardless of what powertrain they drive. In New Zealand, the approach is going even further. From 2027, all light vehicles – petrol, diesel, hybrids, and electric will be charged based on distance travelled and vehicle weight. This national approach means everyone pays for the exact road use they generate, but it also means some are paying more than others. If the same road-user charge is applied to all light vehicles in Australia, it's understood that would be instead of paying fuel excise, not on top of it. However, this is a big shift and has not been discussed or committed to yet. MORE: EV tax 'makes no sense' Petrol and diesel drivers currently pay a 51.6c per litre excise to fund road maintenance. Picture: NCA NewsWire / Andrew Henshaw How would it work? Victoria implemented a road user charge for electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles that later failed a court challenge, leading to millions of dollars in refunds. It worked like this: – Flat rate for EVS of approximately 2.8c/km – Flat rate for Plug-in hybrids of approximately 2.3c/km – Distance measured by odometer photos or an app – Funds directed to road maintenance and construction There have been discussions about exemptions or rebates for regional motorists, who often drive far greater distances, and others argue the charge should eventually apply to all vehicles, not just EVs. New Zealand's Road User Charge (RUC) framework does not offer specific exemptions or rebates for regional motorists based on travel distance. However, there are exemptions for certain vehicle types, such as: – Electric vehicles over 3.5 tonnes (heavy EVs), remain exempt until 1 July 2027. – Light electric vehicles under 1,000kg remain exempt. – Vehicles unsuitable for public roads or used almost exclusively off-road can apply for exemptions. MORE: China unveils plan to take on Tesla in Australia From 2027 the New Zealand model will charge all light vehicles based on distance travelled and weight, not just electric cars. Picture: Jonathan Ng When could it happen? Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has ruled out new taxes this term, so not before 2027. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has signalled it as a 'second term' reform, after further consultation with states and industry. If the RUC is applied to EVs only Using Victoria's scrapped 2.8c/km rate: City driver – 12,000km/year – EV: $336 a year (currently $0) – Petrol/diesel: No change – still pay fuel excise Regional driver (or high-mileage drivers) – 30,000km/year – EV: $840 a year (currently $0) – Petrol/diesel: No change – still pay fuel excise If the RUC is applied to EVs only, then EV owners, especially high-mileage or regional drivers, will be impacted. Outer-suburban and regional drivers typically driver far more than inner city drivers, not because they want to, but because they have to. According to data buyers searching for home up to an hour from the CBD have dramatically more choice, with as much as eight times the number of houses available compared to a 30-minute radius. Electric vehicle owners could soon face a per-kilometre tax under new federal plans. Picture: Mark Bean What if it expands to all vehicles like New Zealand? If Australia adopts a national RUC for light commercial vehicles, like New Zealand, the impact on your wallet would depend heavily on the type of vehicle you drive and how far you travel each year. For example, a large ute or SUV such as a Toyota HiLux, Ford Ranger or Toyota LandCruiser Prado uses approximately 10L/100km, which means drivers would pay roughly $336 a year under a 2.8c/km charge if they drive the national average of 12,000km. That's about $283.20 less than the $619.20 you'd currently pay in fuel excise, and the savings would be even bigger for high-mileage regional drivers. High-mileage vehicles like utes could face high costs under distance-based road tax. Picture: Supplied If the RUC is applied to everyone, similar to what New Zealand is implementing in 2027, then heavy/less efficient vehicles like petrol or diesel utes and SUVs will come out ahead. While EVs and very efficient hybrids will pay more than under fuel excise. However, owning an EV and paying per-km RUC will still be cheaper than what ICE drivers pay via fuel excise. Originally published as Petrol, diesel, hybrid or EV: What new road user charge could mean for you

News.com.au
a day ago
- News.com.au
Petrol, diesel, hybrid or EV: What new road user charge could mean for you
The Federal Government is advancing plans for electric vehicle owners to pay a new 'road-user charge', but it may not stop at EV drivers. In Australia, drivers currently pay a fuel excise of 51.6 cents per litre every time they fill up. According to the Government, that money goes towards building and maintaining the nation's roads. But EV drivers currently pay nothing. The Productivity Commission has warned that Australia's $12 billion a year fuel excise is in 'terminal decline' as more drivers switch to low-and zero-emission cars. The proposed solution, currently being discussed and advanced by Treasurer Jim Chalmers, is a distance-based charge for EV drivers, but industry experts say it could be rolled out more broadly to cover all light vehicles, like in New Zealand. If that happens, it could mean all motorists pay a set fee for every kilometre they travel, regardless of whether they drive a diesel ute, petrol SUV, hybrid small hatchback or electric sedan. What is the road-user charge? Currently, Australian drivers of petrol and diesel pay a fuel excise – a tax of 51.6c per litre – every time they fill up. This tax money is used to build and maintain roads. Electric vehicle (EV) owners currently pay nothing, meaning as more Australians switch to EVs, the government's road funding pool is shrinking. A road-user charge (RUC) would change that by making EV drivers pay for each kilometre they travel. The aim is to ensure all road users contribute to the upkeep of the network, regardless of what powertrain they drive. In New Zealand, the approach is going even further. From 2027, all light vehicles – petrol, diesel, hybrids, and electric will be charged based on distance travelled and vehicle weight. This national approach means everyone pays for the exact road use they generate, but it also means some are paying more than others. If the same road-user charge is applied to all light vehicles in Australia, it's understood that would be instead of paying fuel excise, not on top of it. However, this is a big shift and has not been discussed or committed to yet. How would it work? Victoria implemented a road user charge for electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles that later failed a court challenge, leading to millions of dollars in refunds. It worked like this: – Flat rate for EVS of approximately 2.8c/km – Flat rate for Plug-in hybrids of approximately 2.3c/km – Distance measured by odometer photos or an app – Funds directed to road maintenance and construction There have been discussions about exemptions or rebates for regional motorists, who often drive far greater distances, and others argue the charge should eventually apply to all vehicles, not just EVs. New Zealand's Road User Charge (RUC) framework does not offer specific exemptions or rebates for regional motorists based on travel distance. However, there are exemptions for certain vehicle types, such as: – Electric vehicles over 3.5 tonnes (heavy EVs), remain exempt until 1 July 2027. – Light electric vehicles under 1,000kg remain exempt. – Vehicles unsuitable for public roads or used almost exclusively off-road can apply for exemptions. When could it happen? Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has ruled out new taxes this term, so not before 2027. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has signalled it as a 'second term' reform, after further consultation with states and industry. If the RUC is applied to EVs only Using Victoria's scrapped 2.8c/km rate: City driver – 12,000km/year – EV: $336 a year (currently $0) – Petrol/diesel: No change – still pay fuel excise Regional driver (or high-mileage drivers) – 30,000km/year – EV: $840 a year (currently $0) – Petrol/diesel: No change – still pay fuel excise If the RUC is applied to EVs only, then EV owners, especially high-mileage or regional drivers, will be impacted. Outer-suburban and regional drivers typically driver far more than inner city drivers, not because they want to, but because they have to. According to data buyers searching for home up to an hour from the CBD have dramatically more choice, with as much as eight times the number of houses available compared to a 30-minute radius. What if it expands to all vehicles like New Zealand? If Australia adopts a national RUC for light commercial vehicles, like New Zealand, the impact on your wallet would depend heavily on the type of vehicle you drive and how far you travel each year. For example, a large ute or SUV such as a Toyota HiLux, Ford Ranger or Toyota LandCruiser Prado uses approximately 10L/100km, which means drivers would pay roughly $336 a year under a 2.8c/km charge if they drive the national average of 12,000km. That's about $283.20 less than the $619.20 you'd currently pay in fuel excise, and the savings would be even bigger for high-mileage regional drivers. If the RUC is applied to everyone, similar to what New Zealand is implementing in 2027, then heavy/less efficient vehicles like petrol or diesel utes and SUVs will come out ahead. While EVs and very efficient hybrids will pay more than under fuel excise.