Jennifer Saunders and Adrian Edmondson locked in YEAR-long battle over £250k extension to £2m country mansion
Celebrity couple Ade Edmondson and Jennifer Saunders are facing a fresh planning battle over the £250,000 extension of their historic Dartmoor home.
3
3
The Absolutely Fabulous and Bottom stars bought the country retreat to enjoy rural life and said they plan to move there full time.
The pair - who currently split time between a London townhouse and their Devon home - want to carry out a raft of landscaping and construction works to the property.
They had previously been granted planning permission last year to create a new entrance and parking area, extend a workshop, create a terrace and move a existing greenhouse.
They also want to replace a window, build a new garden pavilion and install air source heat pumps and a solar array.
Permission was granted with conditions attached, but the couple have now applied for several of these to be "discharged".
This includes the requirement to remove a external staircase and first floor door in their entirety within a year of the original permission and installing the first floor window shown in plans within the same timescale.
The couple also want to remove the stipulation that details of the "new replacement painted timber door" should be submitted and approved in writing by planners.
The planning application, that is currently under consideration by Dartmoor National Park Authority, also seeks to remove a third condition that details of how and where Air Source Heat Pumps will be installed is approved in advance.
In documents to support the original application, their representatives wrote: "Jennifer and Adrian have lived at Teigncombe Manor for over 30 years.
"Their work has meant that the couple splits their time between London and Devon.
"However, Jennifer and Adrian anticipate in the coming years reducing the amount of time spent away from home in and living full time at Teigncombe Manor.
"They wish to make some sensitive alterations to the existing outbuildings in order to better suit their current needs and lifestyles."
But building conservation officer Clare Vint for the Dartmoor National Park Authority, had raised concerns and wrote in her report: "As the application currently stands the impact of the proposals on the significance of the listed buildings and their setting has not been minimised.
"There is also insufficient justification for the works and minimal public benefit."
The council report states the settlement on the site predates the Doomsday Book of 1086 formerly known as Taincoma and the 16th century Manor House is grade II listed.
Ms Vint added: "The interior and exterior of the building are of high significance architecturally, historically and archaeologically."
She said the air source heat pump and relocated oil tank would need to be screened to minimise the visual impact while an "associated concrete slab" needed to be minimised to avoid a physical impact on the foundations of the listed building.
She said the entrance walling, location and size of vehicle access "should not be altered" while warning building a paved area would "interrupt the relationship between the stables (cottage) building and the house."
She added: " The change in topography to create the car pergola, with its stark raised eastern wall, glazed balustrade, with vehicles visible at high level when viewed from the south east will cause harm to the setting of the cottage, the setting of the house and the overall relationship between them.
"When coupled with the open car port frame (pergola) the negative impact is increased (irrespective of whether this is covered in vegetation in time)."
Plans for the degree of negative impact of the solar panels can only be fully assessed with details of the amount of vegetation that would need to be removed, she added.
Ms Vent also recommended a number of amendments to minimise the impact on the building.
These included painting external stairs black to reduce their visibility and screening the air source heat pump or potentially relocating it to a less visible location.
She also recommended minimising the 'negative impact' on the garden pavilion through a 'reduction in overall height, depth and width, and a more lightweight structure."
Teigncombe Manor, the site of a mediaeval settlement and the Domesday manor of Taincoma, has a rich history.
The manor, referred to as South Teign in historical documents, was likely a rest house on Mariner's Path during the Middle Ages.
The current structure of Teigncombe Manor is a former Dartmoor longhouse refurbished in the mid-20th century. The cottage range of buildings dates to between the 1880s and 1905, with refurbishments carried out by the current client following a successful planning application in 1995.
The application on behalf of the celebrity couple stated "Some works within the listed curtilage of the cottage were previously undertaken without consent.
"This application seeks to regularise those works, with no structural alterations proposed within the cottage."
A decision on the application to remove the conditions will be made at a later date.
3
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
How Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's 'addiction to drama' led to some 'self-inflicted' wounds, royal author claims
It's no secret that marrying into the Royal Family can be a difficult adjustment for many brides and grooms alike. The current Queen consort - Camilla - herself was reviled by the public for many years due to the role she played in the breakdown of King Charles and Princess Diana 's marriage. However, with the help of Charles she was able to navigate these difficulties. According to royal author Tina Brown, it was Prince Harry who could have helped Meghan Markle stay the course within the Royal Family and adapt to palace life but yet did not do this because 'he didn't want to'. In her best selling biography Palace Papers, Brown said: 'So why didn't Harry help navigate Palace culture for his future wife? He didn't want to. 'Their new complicity required Meghan to fight all the norms he had kicked against for so long. She was now his comrade in arms.' Brown goes as far to claim that one aide called their confrontational stance as a mutual 'addiction to drama'. But this would lead to what Brown described as 'partially self-inflicted' wounds for the Sussexes. This damage started even before Harry and Meghan had walked down the aisles and said 'I do' at St George's Chapel in May 2018. Brown wrote: 'The speed with which Meghan seemed to dispense with people was becoming a meme. Bad karma rained down from her spurned half-siblings. 'Living in Florida and Oregon, respectively, Samantha, 53, and Tom, 51, had always been cash-strapped loose cannons.' Indeed the half siblings did not help themselves when they started criticising the soon-to-be Duchess of Sussex publicly. Brown said: 'Samantha had called Meghan "narcissistic and selfish" as early as November 2016, before Meghan and Harry were engaged, but she was stirred again by Harry's insensitive remark on BBC Radio 4's Today show about the royals being "the family, I suppose, that [Meghan's] never had". 'This seems rich, given what Harry has since told the world about his miseries as a misfit in the royal cage... But in a contest of dysfunctional families the Markles versus the Windsors is probably a toss-up.' The Royals believed that despite the obvious bad blood, it was best to invite all of Meghan's family members. As Lady Anne Glennconner told Brown: 'We all have black sheep in our families, don't we? But you know you have to somehow round them up and get them onside and bring them all in and stick them somewhere.' 'Though Americans are more inclined than the British to exclude difficult or embarrassing relatives, wiser heads would have recommended that Meghan grit her teeth and invite Samantha and Tom, with PR clamps firmly in place,' Brown said. But Meghan was 'a brand now as much as a bride' and filled the pews of St George's Chapel with the 'famous, the beautiful and the influential '. This guest list only led the half siblings to double down on the 'trash talk' with Tom Jr claiming in an interview that Meghan's refusal to invite him has 'torn my family apart' and Samantha tweeted: 'It's time to "man up"... "shout outs" about humanitarianism don't work when you are allowing Meg to ignore the Markles.' Then Tom Jr wrote an open letter to Harry in which he said the marriage was 'the biggest mistake in Royal wedding history' and described Meghan as a 'jaded, shallow, conceited woman that will make a joke of you and the royal family heritage. Not to mention, to top it all off, she doesn't invite her own family and instead invites complete strangers to the wedding.' Harry and Meghan's 'addiction to drama' followed by 'self-inflicted' wounds continued while they were working royals and even after 'Megxit'. During their royal tour of Australia in the autumn of 2018, the couple were praised for what was by all accounts a successful trip. However, behind the scenes the Sussexes' relationship with their royal aides was not so rosy and the couple's obsession with how they were being perceived by the public allegedly led them to clash with their team. Writing in his royal bestseller, titled Revenge, Tom Bower claimed that in contrast to 'glowing photos' of Harry and Meghan being recorded daily, the mood in Sussex headquarters was 'miserable'. In one particularly dramatic outburst, Bower claimed that Meghan 'allegedly threw a cup of tea into the air'. The tension within Sussex HQ was apparently partly caused by the Duke and Duchess' obsession with their media coverage during the games. Bower wrote Meghan's anger may have been 'partly fuelled by Harry. Every night, he trawled social media, searching for snide comments on the internet. Every morning he and Meghan turned on their phones to surf the internet. Thin-skinned, they were inflamed by the slightest criticism'. 'Then, both bombarded their staff with demands for retribution and removal of the criticism.' It was at this time that fresh stories about Meghan's father were reported in the America media including claims that Thomas Markle had first heard Meghan was pregnant on the radio, that he snorted cocaine and visited a Playboy club in Manila. Despite the stories having emerged in the American press, Harry allegedly 'blamed British newspapers for those reports'. Bower said: 'But the only jibe he could attach to the accompanying British journalists was a report that one of Meghan's outfits cost £19,660. As a sign of Meghan's intentions, she also wore a Serena Williams brand jacket. Soon afterwards, it was promoted on Instagram.' This coverage still angered Meghan, causing her to become 'irate' and blaming the senior royal aide Jason Knauf and his staff for not suppressing the stories 'Hollywood-style'. 'Her mistake, she would lament, was "believing them when they said I would be protected",' Bower wrote. He added: 'Unsurprisingly, Meghan's fury influenced Harry's attitude towards the small British media contingent accompanying the couple. "Thank you for coming, although you weren't actually invited", he sniped. He also brusquely snapped unprovoked abuse at a TV reporter.' 'The altercation bewildered the media. Beyond the Sussexes' entourage, no one was aware of the turbulent background in Kensington Palace and at the Sussexes' headquarters in Sydney.' And rumours of Harry and Meghan's troubled relationship with Jason and the other royal aides were growing. This included allegations that Meghan sent emails to staff at 5am and that her assistant Melissa Toubati quit after she was driven to tears by the duchess. But no falling out was as dramatic as the one which occurred between the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and Jason. In fact, Meghan's falling out with Jason was so bad that the Duchess did not even let him know when she was making a surprise appearance at an award ceremony, much to the anger of the royal press pack. He would step down as a royal aide in March 2019. After Harry and Meghan stepped down as working royals in 2020 a major flashpoint of drama occurred in March 2021 during Prince Harry and Meghan Markle 's bombshell interview with Oprah in which serious allegations were wedged against the Royal Family. One claim was the Sussexes' suggestion that the Royal Family was collectively racist, pointing the finger at one – unnamed – member who, they alleged, had speculated about the colour of their son Archie's skin when Meghan was pregnant in a racist way. While the allegations were shocking it was the Queen's calm and measure response that was widely praised. Writing in his tell-all book Courtiers, royal author Valentine Low reveals how the Queen's carefully crafted response became 'the stuff of royal legends'. After the interview was broadcast the Queen's first response was to stay quiet. 'The palace stayed completely silent, because the Queen decided she wanted to sleep on it,' Low said. 'She was not going to be rushed into saying anything precipitate.' Eventually a statement was released the next evening which read: 'The whole family is saddened to learn the full extent of how challenging the last few years have been for Harry and Meghan. The issues raised, particularly that of race, are concerning. While some recollections may vary, they are taken very seriously and will be addressed by the family privately. 'Harry, Meghan and Archie will always be much- loved family members.' According to Low, the statement 'some recollections may vary' not only instantly became the stuff of legend but it also proved that the Queen was still firmly in charge of the family. 'The statement was notable for two other things: for the informality - and affection - for which it referred to Harry and Meghan, rather than the Duke and Duchess of Sussex , and for the fact that it dared confront the issue of race,' Low wrote. The Queen's response was widely praised at the time. Speaking to MailOnline in 2021, Royal author Phil Dampier said: 'The phrase "recollections vary" is telling. 'The Queen is really saying that Harry and Meghan might be giving their version of events or their interpretation of a conversation a couple of years ago, without going so for as to say they are lying, which they might not be. 'Clearly she has spoken to the person who allegedly made the remark about Archie and they have given her their version of events.' Likewise it was warmly received by the British public, with polls finding an increase in support for the Royal Family after an interview and a decrease in support for the Sussexes. Ofcom also received over 6,000 complaints about the interview which became the most complained about show of April 2021. And while the rift between the family does now appear to be healing, the interview did lasting damage to the Sussexes' relationship with the rest of the family.
The Guardian
12 minutes ago
- The Guardian
A moment that changed me: I slipped in the shower, realised I was exhausted – and transformed my life
For as long as I can remember, I have been ambitious and desperate to prove myself. It started with a competitive spirit at school sports days, then a determination to land parts in local theatre productions, then a place at drama school. I was between acting jobs when a friend suggested I try standup. One gig and I was hooked. I quickly decided comedy was my future and I would do whatever it took to make it work. The rest of my life went out of the window. I gigged constantly – often six nights a week – determined to hone my craft and establish myself as a comedian. I was always knackered, but I revelled in it, telling myself I loved the hustle. I trod the boards at comedy clubs, art centres, theatres … anywhere that would have me. I performed for six years at the Edinburgh festival fringe – the first two to very little fanfare (and audience numbers), but after that, things started to rev up. I was booked for bigger shows, sometimes abroad, sometimes on TV. I felt as if I was really hitting my stride. Then the pandemic happened. I had spent so long being obsessed with my job that, when it stopped, I didn't quite know who I was or what to do with myself. In the scheme of things, I was enormously lucky: I got to spend loads more time with my partner, Alice, and our wonderful daughter. All of a sudden, I was someone I never knew I had wanted to be: a homebody. I had my girls, my sofa and more banana bread than I care to remember – even my old pal anxiety seemed to have taken a holiday. It was glorious. Then, the world opened back up, my career kicked off again and my tour resumed after a two-year hiatus. The hustle was back! I could gig five times a week, alongside recording two podcasts and occasional TV and radio spots. I was working nonstop – just how I liked it. I got booked for the Just for Laughs comedy festival in Montreal in 2022, a feather in the cap of any standup comedian. I had visions of smashing my gig and coming home with an American agent (I am aware Montreal is in Canada, but it's where US agents go to look for international talent). I boarded the plane with a hope, a dream – and a ruptured disc in my spine (L4, if you're interested). But I stocked up on strong painkillers and decided that the opportunity was too good to miss. The shows went well but, when I got back to my hotel, I hopped in the shower, slipped and had a back spasm which, paired with the ruptured disc, rendered me pretty much immobile. I crawled back to the room, realising it was too late in the day to call my wife, my mum, or my agent, who were all in the UK. Instead, I cried – and I mean really sobbed – into the carpet, while watching videos of Alice and our daughter on my phone. That was the moment I realised I was exhausted. Over the following weeks I saw an osteopath, a GP and a therapist who all pretty much said the same thing: I was burning the candle at both ends and my body couldn't take it. If I kept going, I was told I could expect more injuries, more anxiety and potential burnout. Faced with the choice between a blinkered, unrelenting focus on my career, or spending time with my family, I knew that my family would win every time. Now, I make sure I am never away for more than three nights in a row. I never miss swimming on a Sunday or family dinner on Monday evening. I don't crave the hit I used to get from performing – instead, I am more than happy reciting bedtime stories for an enthusiastic audience of one. At 39, I am no longer obsessed with gaining other people's approval. I am relieved I have time to breathe; I enjoy my job, but I also make sure I have time to enjoy life outside work, too. I still have ambition, I still gig and tour – but currently my five-year-old thinks I am the coolest person on the planet, and I'm not deluded enough to believe that's going to last for ever. I've learned to slow down, savour the moment and, most importantly, let go of the hustle. Am I Having Fun Now? by Suzi Ruffell is published by Pan Macmillan (£18.99). To support the Guardian, order your copy at Delivery charges may apply. Her tour, The Juggle, runs from 10 September to 23 November.
Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Royal Mint issues last coins featuring Elizabeth II
The final batch of coins featuring the late Queen Elizabeth II are entering circulation across the UK, the Royal Mint has announced. More than 23 million Queen £1 coins are being released alongside 7.5 million new King Charles III £1 coins. The Royal Mint said the last of the Elizabeth II coins, dated 2022, are the rarest £1 coins in active circulation. The historic transition – with the dual release of almost 31 million coins – represents a significant moment for UK coinage, as the nation witnesses the changeover from Britain's longest-reigning monarch to her son and heir on the £1 denomination, the Royal Mint said. The Queen's £1 coins will be the final ones bearing Elizabeth II's portrait to enter circulation. Rebecca Morgan, the director of commemorative coins at the Royal Mint, said: 'This release represents a pivotal moment in British coinage history. 'As we release more of the King Charles III £1 coins into circulation alongside the final coins of Queen Elizabeth II, we're witnessing the physical representation of our monarchy's transition. This dual release creates an exceptional opportunity for both seasoned numismatists and those new to coin collecting.' The Royal Mint is encouraging the public to check its change over the coming weeks, as the new coins begin to appear in pockets and tills. Ms Morgan added: 'Finding these new coins in your change could spark a rewarding hobby that connects you with the heritage, history and craftsmanship behind British currency.' Since the introduction of the King's effigy on UK coinage in 2023, the 50p and £1 are the only denominations with his portrait to have entered circulation so far. Inspired by flora and fauna The King's £1 coins feature an intricate bee design on the reverse and are part of the Definitive collection, inspired by the flora and fauna of the British Isles. Some 2.975 million £1s with the King's effigy were released last August. In total, there are around 24.7 billion coins in circulation across the UK, with the King's coins representing only around 0.004 per cent of those, making his new coins highly desirable to collectors. All UK coins bearing the Queen's portrait will remain legal tender and in active circulation to allow a smooth transition and minimise the environmental impact and cost.
