‘Lights off protest' by Muslims against Waqf amendment
Mumbai: Responding to a call by
All India Muslim Personal Law Board
, Muslims in the city observed a 15-minute 'Batti Gul' (lights off) on Wednesday (9-9.15 pm) to protest the newly enacted Waqf (Amendment) 2025 Act.
"Supporting the Personal Law Board's call to keep lights off for 15 minutes Wednesday evening, we appealed to the people to keep their sectarian differences aside and join the campaign. The response was overwhelming as it was a peaceful demonstration of a united voice against an unconstitutional law," said Samajwadi Party leader and Islam Gymkhana president Yusuf Abrahni.
At 9 pm, most Muslim homes, shops, mosques, and other institutions saw the lights off. Many recorded images where a few homes and streets in Muslim-dominated areas were visible. The Personal Law Board appealed to Muslims and others who opposed the Waqf law to share videos of this protest on social media platforms.
Social activist Dr Azeemuddin, sharing several videos on WhatsApp groups, said that many places in Nalasopara observed this lights-off protest to reject the Waqf law, which Muslims see as an attempt to "usurp their religious properties".
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Never Put Eggs In The Refrigerator. Here's Why...
Car Novels
Undo
Supreme Court asked the govt not to implement provisions of the law until it hears petitions challenging the controversial law on May 5. Of around 70 petitions, the court is scheculed to hear five, one of them by city social worker Jameel Merchant.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
SC refuses to stay ongoing teachers recruitment exam in Andhra Pradesh
The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to hear a plea for halting the ongoing teacher recruitment examinations in Andhra Pradesh and said it couldn't be stopped "midway". "We don't devise a mechanism for holding examinations. It is not our expertise," a bench of Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan told the petitioner's counsel. The bench questioned the petitioner's counsel for not moving the Andhra Pradesh High Court first. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like You Won't Believe What These Celebrities Studied in College Learn More Undo After the counsel said the high court was on summer break, the bench said, "The High Court of Andhra Pradesh is reopening after summer vacation on June 16. In view of the above, we are not inclined to entertain this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner would be at liberty to approach the high court." The petitioner's counsel referred to the government notification and said even for a district-level recruitment, multi-shift examinations were to be conducted. Live Events "They are going for a computer-based testing and then they go for normalisation," the counsel said. The bench, however, said, "The exams have commenced. We can't stop them midway." Additional Solicitor General S V Raju informed the bench that over a lakh aspirants had already appeared in the examinations. The plea said the state government initiated the process for teachers' recruitment for filling over 16,000 posts and examinations would be conducted from June 6 to July 6.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
43 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Decoded: How Iran and Israel's decades-old conflict could explode into war
The Islamic Republic of Iran on Thursday (June 12) posted a chilling two-word message on social media platform X: 'We are ready,' amid reports that Israel is preparing to launch a strike on Iran's nuclear facilities. The United States has responded by warning that Iran may retaliate against American targets in neighbouring Iraq and has advised some US citizens to leave the region as a precaution. Tensions have surged since the breakdown of nuclear talks between Washington and Tehran. US President Donald Trump has reaffirmed his hardline stance, declaring that Iran would not be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon. 'Very simple. They can't have a nuclear weapon. We're not going to allow that,' he said, adding that US troops are being repositioned away from parts of the Middle East 'because it could be a dangerous place.' Iran's enriched uranium stockpile nears weapons-grade threshold The trigger behind this rising tension lies in Iran's growing nuclear stockpile. According to a recent estimate by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Iran now holds over 408 kilograms of uranium enriched up to 60 per cent purity, dangerously close to the 90 per cent threshold required for a nuclear weapon. That's a nearly 50 per cent increase from earlier this year. The time it would take Iran to 'break out' and build a bomb is shrinking rapidly. Tracing the historical roots of Iran-Israel hostility Iran and Israel weren't always enemies. In fact, prior to 1979, the two countries maintained close ties. Iran was one of the first Muslim-majority nations to recognise Israel after its founding in 1948. Under Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, Iran and Israel enjoyed diplomatic, economic, and military ties. Both nations viewed Arab nationalism as a mutual threat, and Israel considered Iran a key strategic ally on the periphery of the Arab world. But this cooperation snapped after the 1979 Islamic Revolution. The new regime in Tehran cut all ties with Israel, transferred the Israeli embassy to the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO), and declared Israel an enemy of Islam. Ayatollah Khomeini's regime began openly supporting anti-Israel militant groups, shifting the nature of the conflict from political rivalry to ideological confrontation. Iran's proxy network intensifies regional warfare against Israel Since then, Iran has supported and armed groups such as Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, and the Islamic Jihad Movement in the Palestinian territories. This network of proxies has conducted many wars against Israel, including those in Lebanon and several Gaza conflicts from 2008 to 2024. Iran has also provided support to groups in Syria and Yemen over the years, designed to counter Israel and attack its interests. How close is Iran to developing a nuclear weapon? Iran's nuclear programme has always been at the heart of Israeli fears. Israel has long considered Iran's nuclear ambition an existential threat. Over the years, it has launched covert operations to sabotage Iran's programme, including the infamous Stuxnet cyberattack and the assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists. These efforts have slowed but not stopped Iran's progress. Once Iran crosses the 90 per cent enrichment mark, experts warn it could produce a nuclear weapon within weeks—a scenario Israel says it will not allow. Where are the modern flashpoints in the Iran-Israel conflict? The conflict has played out across multiple theatres in West Asia. Lebanon remains a critical front. Iran's most powerful proxy, Hezbollah, is based there and has fought major wars with Israel, including the 2006 conflict. Hezbollah is believed to possess over 100,000 rockets aimed at Israeli cities. In Gaza, Iran funds and supports both Hamas and the Islamic Jihad Movement. Despite the Shia-Sunni divide, their shared hostility towards Israel unites them. Syria is another major flashpoint. Iran maintains a strong military presence there and uses the territory to transfer weapons to Hezbollah. Israel frequently launches airstrikes on Iranian assets and supply routes in Syria. Recently, Iraq has emerged as a new front. Iranian-backed militias there have carried out drone attacks on Israeli targets. In 2024, after Israel bombed an Iranian consulate in Damascus, Iran and its proxies launched a large-scale drone and missile barrage. Though most were intercepted with US and European assistance, Israel responded with strikes inside Iran and Syria. Both sides then pulled back to avoid a wider regional war. Who supports Iran and Israel in this regional power struggle? Iran's 'Axis of Resistance' includes state and non-state actors such as the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), its elite Quds Force, Hezbollah, Hamas, the Islamic Jihad Movement, Houthi rebels in Yemen, and various Shiite militias in Iraq and Syria. Iran also supports smaller militant groups in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Israel, meanwhile, is firmly backed by the United States. Washington provides billions in military aid, advanced defence systems like Iron Dome, and intelligence support. US forces also target Iranian-backed militias in Syria and Iraq. Western allies, including the UK, Germany, and Italy, assist diplomatically and through missile defence cooperation. While not formal military allies, several Sunni Arab states share Israel's concerns. Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain, and Egypt have deepened ties with Israel since the 2020 Abraham Accords. The Palestinian Authority in the West Bank remains ideologically opposed to Israel but occasionally coordinates security efforts against Hamas. Why is Iraq becoming a critical theatre in this confrontation? Iraq now serves as a launchpad for Iranian-aligned militias and a proxy battleground. Groups like Kata'ib Hezbollah under the 'Islamic Resistance in Iraq' banner have claimed attacks on Israeli military assets. These militias allow Iran to strike Israel indirectly while avoiding direct confrontation. Geographically, Iraq's proximity to Israel makes it strategically significant for weapons transfers and strikes. However, the Iraqi government under Prime Minister Mohammed Shia' Al-Sudani is under pressure to control these groups, fearing that Israeli retaliation could further destabilise the country. The US military presence in Iraq—currently around 2,500 troops—acts as a deterrent. But Washington's plan to withdraw by 2026 could reduce Iraq's resistance to Iranian pressure and shift the balance of power further. Are the conditions now set for full-scale regional war? With nuclear breakout potential, active proxy networks, and direct military exchanges, the Iran-Israel conflict is dangerously close to escalation. Iraq's emergence as a proxy front, growing Hezbollah stockpiles, increased Western involvement, and failed diplomacy are all converging. Whether this leads to an all-out war or a prolonged cycle of strikes and retaliation depends on the decisions made in the coming weeks—both in Jerusalem and Tehran, and in capitals far beyond.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
"There has to be a BETTER way," says Kim Kardashian against ICE Raids; Donald Trump's administration responds
Kim Kardashian, the American socialite, voiced out her concerns regarding the ongoing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in Los Angeles, USA. The raids against immigrant communities have caused widespread protests in response to President Donald Trump's deployment of the National Guard and Marine Troops. What did Kim Kardashian say? In an Instagram story posted by the 44-year-old reality star, she called the raids 'inhumane,' stating that the immigrant communities have contributed to the fabric of the city. Requesting justice for the communities, Kardashian, who has been an ally of Trump, urged to find a better way. 'When we're told that ICE exists to keep our country safe and remove violent criminals — great. But when we witness innocent, hardworking people being ripped from their families in inhumane ways, we have to speak up. We have to do what's right,' Kim expressed her disappointment. 'Growing up in LA, I've seen how deeply immigrants are woven into the fabric of this city. They are our neighbours, friends, classmates, co-workers, and family. No matter where you fall politically, it's clear that our communities thrive because of the contributions of immigrants. We can't turn a blind eye when fear and injustice keep people from living their lives freely and safely. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo There HAS to be a BETTER way,' she added. The response from Donald Trump's Administration As a response from the Trump administration, the assistant secretary for Homeland Security, Tricia McLaughlin, shared the pictures of the convicts and asked the reality star which one of them she would like to defend. She shared, '@KimKardashian, which one of these convicted child molesters, murderers, drug traffickers and rapists would you like to stay in the country?' 'These are just a few of the convicted illegal criminals who have been picked up in the last 72 hours,' she added.
