logo
Judge finds Thomas Hamp not criminally responsible in 2022 stabbing death of Emily Sanche

Judge finds Thomas Hamp not criminally responsible in 2022 stabbing death of Emily Sanche

Yahoo04-07-2025
A Saskatoon judge ruled Thursday that Thomas Hamp was in the throes of a psychotic break when he fatally stabbed his partner Emily Sanche in 2022 and is not criminally responsible for his actions.
Justice Grant Currie said he accepted forensic psychiatrist Shabehram Lohrasbe's opinion on Hamp's mental state at the time of the stabbing.
"This leads me to the conclusion that, when he stabbed and killed Emily, Thomas likely was operating under a mental disorder that rendered him incapable of knowing that doing so was wrong," Currie wrote in his 22-page decision at Court of King's Bench.
Hamp's judge-alone trial on the charge of second-degree murder began in September 2024. From the start, the defence never disputed that Hamp stabbed Sanche.
"This isn't going to be a whodunit," lawyer Brian Pfefferle said on the first day of the trial. "There is a mental element that will be an issue."
Prosecutor Cory Bliss did not disagree that there was a mental element at play. But instead of accepting that the then-25-year-old was suffering from "schizophrenic spectrum disorder," he suggested that Hamp's heavy use of cannabis to self-medicate his symptoms for obsessive compulsive disorder led to him killing Sanche. This would mean Hamp was criminally responsible for what happened.
Bliss read an agreed statement of facts into the record at the start of the trial.
"In the early morning hours of Feb. 20, 2022, Thomas retrieved a kitchen knife from the set of knives found within the suite," Bliss said.
"He stabbed Emily in the upper left chest with that knife. In doing so the blade broke and remained lodged in Emily's body."
She died later in hospital. Hamp had originally been charged with aggravated assault.
According to the statement, Hamp originally told a neighbour and police that a man had broken into the third-floor apartment and attacked the couple. He recanted that later, saying that he stabbed Sanche and then himself.
The paper trail
Sanche was aware of Hamp's deteriorating mental condition and kept careful notes about her efforts to get help. These notes proved critical to the psychiatric assessment by Shabehram Lohrasbe, the forensic psychiatrist retained by defence.
Lohrasbe testified that he met with Hamp twice in person and then again by video, for a total of five hours. He also interviewed Hamp's parents and reviewed reports from his clinical treatment for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD).
Lohrasbe also reviewed detailed notes and text messages written by Sanche, who was studying for a master's degree in counselling and expressed concerns about her partner's deteriorating mental health in the year before he killed her. Lohrasbe also reviewed notes take by Sanche's cousin.
The notes included observations Sanche made hours before her death, after the couple contacted the Saskatoon Crisis Intervention Service. Hamp was supposed to go to the hospital that day.
Lohrasbe said he's done thousands of assessments over his four-decade career and that the written records from the two young women "are incredibly important documents." He said Sanche's text message chain "is poignant, and so close to the offence."
"I've never seen anything like it."
In his analysis, Lohrasbe said Hamp's worsening OCD symptoms and heavy cannabis use almost surely played a role in the psychotic episode, but "their precise potential roles cannot be delineated."
Next step: the Saskatchewan Review Board
The decision by Justice Currie ends Hamp's journey through the criminal justice system. Pfefferle said the next step is for his case to go before the Saskatchewan Review Board. It decides what happens to individuals the court finds not criminally responsible.
"It isn't about punishment at all," he said.
"It's singularly focused on trying to determine whether a person is safe to be released into the community. And once they're determined to be safe, and conditions are formulated, then the person can be released."
In a written statement, Hamp's parents Bryan and Sandi thanked the judge for the finding.
"We, like everyone who knew and loved Emily Sanche will forever grieve her death," they wrote.
"Emily was a beautiful, honest, smart and caring person. We are grateful for Emily's love for our son and the dedication she showed him."
Bliss said he would be consulting with his colleagues at Public Prosecutions on whether the decision would be appealed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

People seeking to clear their record of a criminal conviction can now do so online in Pa.
People seeking to clear their record of a criminal conviction can now do so online in Pa.

CBS News

time30 minutes ago

  • CBS News

People seeking to clear their record of a criminal conviction can now do so online in Pa.

Pennsylvania recently launched an online application for pardons, becoming one of the first states in the country to digitize the process for people seeking to clear their record of criminal convictions. Thousands of people apply annually, seeking approval from the five-member Board of Pardons and the governor to wipe their records of criminal history that can block access to jobs, housing, and certain rights, such as serving on a jury or holding public office. Previously, people had to fill out the application on paper and mail it to the board alongside relevant documents. The process was onerous for applicants and Board of Pardons staff, officials said, especially in recent years as advocacy under former Lt. Gov. John Fetterman caused hundreds more people to apply annually. Even before the influx, a pardon candidate could wait years for their application to reach a decision. A digitization effort began under Fetterman, but stalled out by the time he and former Gov. Tom Wolf left office. Gov. Josh Shapiro's administration, in collaboration with the Commonwealth Office of Digital Experience, renewed efforts to move the application online. The office is an in-house team of technology experts created in 2023 and tasked with making state government more easily accessible online. The online application is intended to give more people the opportunity to earn a pardon, said Lt. Gov. Austin Davis, as well as make processing those applications easier and more efficient for Board of Pardons staff. "We took the time to update and improve the process from soup to nuts, from adding a Spanish language form, which is something that we had been hearing, to using AI to help us process handwritten applications which were previously being retyped by staff members," Davis told Spotlight PA in an interview. More than 240 people have applied for a pardon online since the application launched. Here's what you need to know about the pardons process and the new online application: A pardon is forgiveness for a crime and is provided by the governor. If you earn a pardon for a criminal conviction, the state will automatically expunge it. After receiving a pardon, you can apply for a job, housing, or any other services and deny that you were ever convicted of the crime. A pardon also restores rights that may have been lost because of a criminal conviction. Anyone with a criminal conviction can apply for a pardon. People still serving a prison or parole sentence might have better luck applying for a commutation, which does not wipe their record of the crime, but instead shortens their sentence for it. Commutation applications still must be completed using the paper form. You can apply for a pardon at the Board of Pardons website. The Board of Pardons recommends gathering the documents you need before starting the application, as you cannot save the application after beginning it. Those documents include all court records associated with the cases, including the: 1. Criminal complaint 2. Affidavit of probable cause 3. Criminal information/indictment 4. Final plea or verdict 5. Sentencing order 6. Documentation of your financial obligation status The board adds: "If the court does not have these documents, they must provide a letter confirming they are unavailable. If you were sentenced by a Magisterial District Judge and your case is older than seven years, you are not required to get a letter." Applicants also must include a personal statement that explains why they want a pardon. The board encourages applicants to explain how their life has changed for the better since the crime and include any additional documents that can serve as evidence of positive change. The board also recommends paying outstanding fines and fees associated with your case. A paper application is still available for download here. If you cannot print the paper application at home, you can ask the Board of Pardons to mail you an application. To request an application, mail a document including your name, address and contact information to: Pennsylvania Board of Pardons555 Walnut StreetSuite 704Harrisburg, PA 17101 The Board of Pardons is working with the Commonwealth Office of Digital Experience to design a way for pardon applicants to receive automatic updates. An exact timeline is not clear as of August, board spokesperson Kirstin Alvanitakis said. In the meantime, you or a designated representative can request updates from the Board of Pardons by emailing bopclemency@ or calling (717) 787-2596. Board staff will confirm the name and birthdate or social security number of the applicant, and aim to respond in 24 hours. The online application is available in 18 languages, including English and Spanish. The printable application is available in just two languages: English and Spanish. The printable PDF application includes more information about the pardons process and what type of clemency might be appropriate. You can access that at The Pennsylvania Pardon Project, a nonprofit based in Philadelphia, created a tip sheet and video guide to using the digital application. You can access those resources on their website, ___ This story was originally published by Spotlight PA and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.

How AT&T Customers Can File Claim in Data Breach Settlement
How AT&T Customers Can File Claim in Data Breach Settlement

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

How AT&T Customers Can File Claim in Data Breach Settlement

An AT&T logo is seen on Aug. 17, 2025. Credit - Jonathan Raa—Getty Images. AT&T customers in the United States could be entitled to up to $7,500 after the telecommunications company reached a $177 million settlement over two major data breaches. The settlement is still awaiting a final green light, following the initial ruling from a federal judge in June, with an approval hearing set for Dec. 3. But eligible customers need to submit any claims ahead of that date. Here is everything you need to know about the breaches and the settlement, plus how you can file a claim. When did the AT&T data breaches occur? One breach occurred in March 2024, during which the personal information—including Social Security numbers—of around 7.6 million current account holders and 65.4 million former customers was leaked onto the dark web. Another breach was confirmed in July 2024, when AT&T said that it had become aware that hackers illegally downloaded customer data from a third-party cloud platform. The telecommunications firm said that calls and text message records that took place between May 1 and Oct. 31, 2022 were compromised for 'nearly all' cellular customers. Additionally, records from Jan. 2 2023 were compromised for a 'very small number of customers.' Regarding the breach dating back to 2022 and 2023, 'the data does not contain the content of calls or texts, personal information such as Social Security numbers, dates of birth, or other personally identifiable information,' according to AT&T. However, it's thought phone numbers could be linked to customers based on public information. In a statement to TIME, AT&T said: 'While we deny the allegations in these lawsuits that we were responsible for these criminal acts, we have agreed to this settlement to avoid the expense and uncertainty of protracted litigation. We remain committed to protecting our customers' data and ensuring their continued trust in us.' Who is eligible to make a claim for a portion of the AT&T settlement? Those eligible to make a claim for one or both of the data breaches should receive an email from the address 'attsettlement@ with details on claimants' rights and options, according to Kroll Settlement Administration, the handlers of the settlement. AT&T has said that customers can claim compensation in relation to the March 2024 breach if they are a United States citizen and their personal information, including 'names, addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses, dates of birth, account passcodes, billing account numbers, and Social Security numbers,' was leaked. Claimants should receive notice that they could be entitled to a settlement payment, however, if people have not been contacted but think they may still be eligible, they can call Kroll—(833) 890-4930—for further assistance. Regarding the 2022 and 2023 breach, claimants are eligible if they were an 'AT&T account owner or line/end user.' Compensation could also be available to those with 'telephone numbers with which those customers interacted.' Some claimants may also be eligible to claim against both data breaches, this is known as 'overlap settlement class members.' Read More: AT&T Recognized as One of the 2021 TIME100 Most Influential Companies How you can make a claim for a portion of the AT&T settlement Claimants must submit a form via the settlement website or by mail to AT&T, whose address is available on the aforementioned website. Submissions must be made by Nov. 18, 2025. Those eligible for compensation that want to be exempt from the settlement must send a letter to Kroll requesting exclusion by Oct. 17, 2025. Details for the postal address can be found on the website's FAQ page under the section 'How do I exclude myself from the settlement?' Claimants can also file an objection if they object to the settlement and or 'the application/s for attorneys' fees, costs, and service awards' relating to the settlement. This must also be done by Oct. 17. Contact details are available on the FAQ page under the title 'How do I object to the Settlement?' When can claimants expect to receive compensation from AT&T and how much could they receive? The final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for Dec. 3, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. Central Time. If approved, there could still be appeals from AT&T or other parties, which would likely delay the payment process. The roll-out of settlement payments will begin once the amounts have been approved and all appeal deadlines have expired. Claimants for the March 2024 data breach are entitled to up to $5,000. Meanwhile, up to $2,500 is available for those impacted by the data breach that took place in 2022 and 2023. Some claimants are entitled to both, and could receive up to $7,500 if their data was compromised in both breaches. Contact us at letters@ Solve the daily Crossword

Former Attorney General William Barr Says He Didn't See Trump Implicated In Epstein Files
Former Attorney General William Barr Says He Didn't See Trump Implicated In Epstein Files

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Former Attorney General William Barr Says He Didn't See Trump Implicated In Epstein Files

WASHINGTON — Former Attorney General William Barr told lawmakers on Monday that President Donald Trump isn't implicated in the government's investigation into sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Barr sat for an hourslong deposition after receiving a subpoena from the House Oversight Committee last month amid a furor over the Trump administration's refusal to release its files from its investigation of Epstein's crimes. 'What Attorney General Barr testified in there was that he never had conversations with President Trump pertaining to a client list. He didn't know anything about a client list,' House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) told reporters outside the deposition room. High-profile Trump supporters, including top officials in his administration, have previously speculated that the government has a list of Epstein's clients that hasn't seen the light of day because powerful people whose names appear on the list have conspired to keep the material hidden. Trump's current attorney general, Pam Bondi, said earlier this year that she had the client list literally sitting on her desk. In July, however, the Justice Department said there was no client list, no conspiracy to hide incriminating material and no reason to release any further information about the Epstein case. Related: Trump was friends with Epstein for years, and his name is reportedly mentioned repeatedly in the government's Epstein files, but Barr said that if there was anything truly damaging, it would have come out already. 'He said that he had never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this, and that he believed if there had been anything pertaining to President Trump, with respect to the Epstein list, that he felt like the Biden administration would have probably leaked it out,' Comer said Monday. Related: Barr was attorney general when Epstein died in prison in 2019 after being arrested and charged with sex trafficking of minors. Epstein had previously been arrested in 2006, but struck a sweetheart deal with federal prosecutors to avoid federal charges. The Justice Department then indicted him in 2019 after the scale of his crimes came to wider attention. The following year, the department issued a memo criticizing its prior refusal to prosecute Epstein. Related: Comer's committee issued subpoenas for Barr and other former attorneys general as part of a batch also targeting former first couple Bill and Hillary Clinton. The subpoenas were approved on a bipartisan basis last month during a surprising subcommittee vote. House Democrats said Barr's testimony on Monday left them with more questions about the Trump administration's refusal this year to release its files from the case. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) said it appeared Republicans conducted the deposition in a half-hearted manner. 'The question is if they are truly invested in doing what's right and making sure that there's real transparency for the American people,' Crockett told reporters. 'Right now, it doesn't seem like that. It seems like they are going through the motions, and they want people to believe that they are digging in. But at the end of the day, I don't think that we've learned anything through the Republican questioning.' Related: Comer said his committee's Epstein investigation was bipartisan and that he wished Democrats wouldn't 'politicize' things. He also said he believed his subpoena for the actual Epstein files would be successful. 'I'm under the impression that they're gathering all these documents, and that's what the subpoena called for,' Comer said. 'And I think the administration knows this is what Congress wants, Republicans and Democrats. And I think President Trump has said clearly [that] he wants to release all the documents. So we're going to get the documents.' Related... Trump Administration Ignores Chuck Schumer's Deadline For Epstein Files Epstein Accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell's Grand Jury Records To Remain Sealed Trump's Sleight-Of-Hand On The Jeffrey Epstein Scandal

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store