
France and Poland's reconciliation is a sign of Europe's alarm over US disengagement
I n the city where a dethroned Polish king once governed a French province and built enduring landmarks, the leaders of France and Poland will sign a treaty on Friday that could be the first formal step towards extending French nuclear deterrence over central Europe in this new era of US unreliability.
The treaty of Nancy will be signed on Europe Day, in the town hall on the 18th-century Place Stanislas, by the French president, Emmanuel Macron, and the Polish prime minister, Donald Tusk. It will cement a reconciliation between two countries that have been estranged within the EU for most of the last three decades.
France's lack of enthusiasm for EU enlargement and its pursuit of cooperation with Russia were the main reasons for the strained relationship. Poles still bitterly remember Jacques Chirac telling central European countries that endorsed the 2003 invasion of Iraq that they had behaved badly and 'missed a good opportunity to shut up'.
Warsaw has long relied exclusively on the US and Nato for its security and has resisted any EU role in defence. But with Donald Trump pursuing rapprochement with Russia, Poland's arch-foe, and his willingness to let Moscow prevail in Ukraine and reduce US military exposure to Europe, Tusk is rushing to build closer ties with Paris, Berlin and London in a quest for extra security insurance.
The Franco-Polish friendship treaty, closely resembling the Franco-German treaty signed in 2019, will be inked on the very day that Vladimir Putin stages a giant military parade in Moscow's Red Square, with the Chinese president, Xi Jinping, at his side, to mark the 80th anniversary of the defeat of Nazi Germany.
'Poland realises the depth of the security challenge and after years of benign neglect for Europe's defence integration, finally wants to discuss slipping under France's nuclear umbrella,' Shahin Vallée and Joseph de Weck wrote in an analysis for the Groupe d'Etudes Géopolitiques thinktank.
Tusk was quick to respond positively when Macron, after Trump's first shock disengagement signals, offered European partners a dialogue on nuclear deterrence. Without specifying how France might use its small atomic arsenal to shield Poland and other eastern EU members, the treaty of Nancy will pledge closer cooperation in a range of areas related to the ultra-sensitive nuclear field including air forces, air-to-air refuelling, air and missile defence and artillery. Negotiations are under way for Poland to buy military tanker aircraft and civilian planes from Airbus, as well as possibly submarines, though deals may not be signed until later in the year.
A Polish diplomat familiar with the document said the wording on mutual defence echoes the EU's Lisbon treaty, in which each country has 'an obligation of aid and assistance by all the means in their power' if the other were attacked. Poland would have liked an explicit mention of nuclear capability, but the diplomat said the 'security guarantees are most important for Poland in the current geostrategic context and because of transatlantic turbulence'. Tusk was keen to seal the deal before Poland's 18 May presidential election rather than wait to secure more.
This does not mean that Warsaw is giving up on US nuclear protection. It is simultaneously pushing to join Nato's nuclear sharing programme, under which a handful of European allies with no nukes of their own store US weapons on their soil and fly aircraft adapted to deliver them if the alliance so decides. Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Italy and Turkey each hold at least 20 US nuclear bombs for this purpose. Poland has wanted to join that club for more than a decade but has made no progress. US and western European diplomats have long worried that such a move would be escalatory towards Russia and could put nuclear storage sites too close to the eastern European border, potentially raising pressure for early use in the event of an invasion.
France has historically maintained a policy of total independence for its force de frappe (strike force). It does not participate in Nato's nuclear planning group, in which the US, the UK and other allies consult on policy, training and deployment of these ultimate weapons. Yet Trump's erratic course and ambiguity about whether he would be prepared to defend Nato allies against Russian aggression has forced European governments to rethink their security assumptions and reach for backup plans should the US and Nato be no longer available.
Germany's new chancellor, Friedrich Merz, who took office this week, is also keen to talk to Macron about extended nuclear protection as well as conventional arms cooperation. The stars are aligning for the Franco-German-Polish grouping known as the Weimar Triangle to take the lead on these issues, reaching out to the UK as a vital defence partner despite its withdrawal from the EU.
An EU-UK security and defence agreement is likely to be concluded at a summit on 19 May. France and Britain are negotiating an update of their Lancaster House defence treaty, and Berlin is working on bilateral defence pacts with Warsaw and London.
France will never share control of its 290 nuclear warheads, most of which are based on submarines on permanent patrol beneath the oceans. Only Monsieur le Président can have his finger on the button, not some European committee. However, Paris keeps dropping hints that it is open to extending its umbrella to European allies. To do so credibly, it would need more costly warheads and launchers than it owns now. That might require European co-financing or some trade-off to help France raise defence spending.
Its small force of nuclear bombers has never been deployed abroad. Without mid-air refuelling and air-to-air interceptors, it could not reach far into Russia and return home. In French doctrine, the planes would deliver a final warning shot if France's vital interests were in danger, prior to the ultimate Armageddon strike. In the kind of small gestures that count in the language of nuclear deterrence, an Italian refuelling plane recently joined a French nuclear air patrol for the first time. And France did not deny a British newspaper report in February that it was considering deploying air-launched nuclear weapons to Germany.
The last Polish government, led by Jarosław Kaczyński's conservative nationalist Law and Justice (PiS) party, did its best to obstruct French efforts for closer EU integration. But Poland has now repositioned itself at the heart of the EU under Tusk's centre-right coalition, and France has lost its illusions about Russia since Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The treaty of Nancy is a consequence of Putin's aggression and Trump's global wrecking ball.
Paul Taylor is a senior visiting fellow at the European Policy Centre
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
So much for smashing the gangs! Starmer claims the secret to solving the small-boat crisis is a crackdown on people smugglers, but soft-touch French judges let them walk free from court with merely a slap on the wrist
French judges were last night accused of 'going soft' on criminals orchestrating a wave of small-boat crossings to Britain after a string of convicted people smugglers were allowed to dodge prison. An investigation by The Mail on Sunday can today expose how criminals convicted of involvement in people trafficking have been allowed to walk free with a slap on the wrist by French courts – even when they were caught red-handed. In one of the most shocking cases, a married couple were last week handed suspended sentences and allowed to return home to Germany despite being caught with an inflatable dinghy, 50 life jackets and phones full of the numbers of migrants willing to pay thousands of pounds to make the perilous Channel crossing to England. And in another astonishing verdict, a suspected Iraqi people smuggler allegedly involved in last weekend's record number of small-boat crossings was 'given the benefit of the doubt' and acquitted by a French court, even though police found a 20-seat inflatable boat in the boot of the car he was in. A delighted Ibrahim Hussein, 36, blew kisses at the three judges who cleared him. Details of the extraordinary leniency by judges in northern France come as Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch last night demanded the freedom to deny migrants benefits – a move currently restrained by European human rights laws. Writing in today's MoS, Mrs Badenoch said it was 'fundamentally unfair' that after five years migrants can claim the same benefits as UK citizens regardless of whether they have paid taxes. French police officers were last weekend photographed on a beach idly watching as dozens of migrants waded into the Channel and climbed on to a dinghy. Writing in today's MoS, Mrs Badenoch said it was 'fundamentally unfair' that after five years migrants can claim the same benefits as UK citizens regardless of whether they have paid taxes France is reportedly poised to demand millions of pounds in extra cash to help intercept Channel migrants. Ministers are close to agreeing a deal to lift a ban on French police stopping boats in shallow water. But president Emmanuel Macron is expected to demand that the UK stump up even more money to pay for the law enforcement. The UK is already paying Paris £480million over three years to stop the Channel crossings. Now our exclusive investigation of the French courts can reveal: A man from Azerbaijan was convicted of people smuggling after being caught delivering an 18ft inflatable boat and its engine – but walked free from court in Dunkirk with a suspended sentence. A Bosnian who admitted transporting four boats to smugglers escaped with an eight-month suspended sentence. The woman, 19, who lived in Germany, said she had just passed her driving test and 'wanted to get away to France'. A 19-year old from Chad also got a suspended sentence in Boulogne on Wednesday after collecting hundreds of thousands of pounds from UK-bound migrants. Critics last night warned the paltry sentences risked torpedoing Keir Starmer's repeated pledge to 'smash the gangs' in a bid to secure the UK's borders. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'So much for Starmer's vow to smash the gangs. Despite being paid hundreds of millions of pounds, the French are clearly barely lifting a finger to stop this evil trade in illegal immigrants which has led to dozens of deaths. 'The French are taking Starmer and the UK taxpayer for a ride.' And Alp Mehmet, of Migration Watch UK, said French judges had 'gone soft', adding: 'It's a disgrace. These pathetic and weak judgments make it open season for these ruthless criminals.' There were extraordinary scenes in a court in Dunkirk last Monday when Afghans Idris Osman, 37, and his wife Tahmina, 36, walked free after being convicted of involvement in a people smuggling operation. Family members, who had travelled from their home in Germany, cheered after the couple were handed eight-month suspended sentences and banned from France for ten years. Three days earlier, they were arrested after their German-registered Mazda was seen close to a beach at Leffrinckoucke, near Dunkirk. A search revealed an inflatable boat, outboard motor, cans of fuel and 50 life jackets. Brazen Idris Osman attempted to blame his wife, saying: 'She's the one who has the contacts with the man who organised the trip – a Kurd named Djmal. I thought we were going to Belgium for a wedding and that we were transporting a recreational boat.' The couple were paid around £3,600 for the trip, the court heard. On the same day, Syrian Taher Al Arrag, 45, and Iraqi Ibrahim Hussein, 36, appeared in a French court accused of offences related to people smuggling last weekend. Some 1,200 migrants arrived in the UK last Saturday – a record for a single day this year. Pictured: a group of people believed to be migrants carry a boat which may be used to cross the Channel. The social media footage comes as Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch last night demanded the freedom to deny migrants benefits – a move currently restrained by European human rights laws French gendarmes stopped the pair in an Opel Vectra in Neufmoulin, near Abbeville. In the boot, police found five 20-litre cans of fuel, a 20-seat inflatable boat, an outboard engine and 35 life jackets. Both said they were going to use the boat to get to Britain themselves, despite leaving their families in Germany. Hussein, who had been in the passenger seat, was acquitted after judges gave him the 'benefit of the doubt'. Al Arrg was convicted of 'aiding the illegal movement of foreigners' and jailed for a year, with the possibility of parole after two months. In another case, a man from Azerbaijan, referred to only by the initials RR, was arrested on May 25 after his car spun out of control during a police chase. Officers found a boat, fuel and 42 life jackets in the car. He was also arrested on May 18 while delivering a boat and its engine to a beach. But at a court in Dunkirk on May 30, judges gave him a one-year suspended sentence. Germany is a key part of the supply chain for boats used by the gangs. Boats from Turkey with Chinese-sourced engines are transported to German warehouses before being covertly moved to the French coast.


Times
5 hours ago
- Times
If I were Rachel Reeves: Hunt, Zahawi and Mel Stride give their advice
Sir Lots of people think being chancellor is like being Santa Claus with lots of goodies to dole out. The reality is rather different as both Rachel Reeves and I have found out. As I explain in my new book Can We Be Great Again? the biggest difference between good and bad governments is the extent to which you manage to carve out space for long-term decisions as opposed to daily firefighting. Here are the three crucial things I will be looking out for when it comes to the long term. First, given the austerity cuts about to be imposed on the police and criminal justice system, are we going to invest in modernising them so they really can deliver better outcomes with less money? Police officers spend up to eight hours a week on unnecessary admin tasks. They are crying out for modern IT systems which are normally the first casualty of any spending negotiations. If we want services to improve, things that unlock greater efficiency should be top and not bottom of a government's list. Second, when Europe is at war, you cannot commit to a programme that costs 3 per cent of GDP and only provide 2.5 per cent in funding — as the government appears to have done. That is a scandalous and dangerous black hole if ever there was one — not least a fortnight before the Nato summit. I was at the table when Trump nearly pulled the US out of Nato in 2018 so we are taking a big risk. But if we plug the gap, France and Germany are likely to as well. If we don't, and the US pulls out of Nato, it will not be 3 per cent we are arguing over but double that. Keir Starmer has shown he can be an international statesman — now really is the moment we need him to do the right thing. Finally, we have to avoid the doom loop of ever higher taxes creating ever lower growth. That means longer term supply-side policies to boost our growth rate. But in the short-term the only game in town is welfare reform as I explain in my new book. Getting the working age benefit bill to 2019 levels saves £49 billion — more than enough for 3 per cent of GDP on defence and to avoid tax rises. It would also be far better for people on benefits to be in work. Welfare reform isn't easy for Labour but with a large majority and four years in the mandate, if not now when? Nadhim Zahawi Rachel Reeves is in a difficult position. As the only cabinet member with real private sector experience, she should by now understand the difficulties businesses are facing because of the government's actions, not to mention families. Crucial to fixing this is to be able to reduce the tax burden, and that requires getting serious about growth. That will come from getting out of the way, deregulating and allowing supply-side reforms, but it also means attracting investment rather than driving it away. The closure of the non-doms regime has been a catastrophe for this, signalling that Britain isn't interested in prosperity. A flat-rate charge for wealthy individuals and entrepreneurs, as they do in Italy, would be a smart move, and worth eating humble pie over. Rome has had 2,200 multimillionaires settle there — raising hundreds of millions in tax and investment for the Italian people. If the chancellor can tempt them to the UK through a mix of a more welcoming tax regime, and a pledge to tackle law and order concerns, we could be back in business. Even before counting their ingenuity and investment, if we attracted just 3,000 new wealthy residents to Britain, charging them £400,000 per year to have an equivalent of non-dom tax status, she would be able to reverse the winter fuel allowance cut. Taking this further, and aiming for the sort of numbers America is hoping to attract with their Golden Visa programme, and she could do anything from abolishing the hated inheritance tax, which does so much to destroy family businesses and long-term investment in Britain, to an immediate increase in defence to 3 per cent of GDP or more. These are popular, easy fiscal policies which would unlock so much investment and revenue for the government. All Reeves needs to do is convince Labour not to hate wealth creators, which I grant may be a steep political challenge. Nadim Zahawi was Conservative chancellor between July and September 2022 Sir Mel Stride If I were in Rachel Reeves's shoes next week, I would do things very differently. First, I'd level with the public. Our country faces serious economic constraints and Labour's reckless policies are only deepening those problems — high debt, sluggish growth, rising cost of living. LEON NEAL/GETTY IMAGES The chancellor will no doubt tell us she is exercising judicious fiscal discipline, without mentioning that most of the new projects and programmes she is announcing are paid for with hundreds of billions in extra borrowing. I'd focus on what actually moves the dial. Productivity, public service reform and fiscal responsibility. That means rooting out waste, and being clear-eyed about what government can and cannot afford. And I wouldn't be afraid to say 'no'. Sometimes leadership means doing the difficult thing, not the easy or popular one. The scale of the spending being set out next week was confirmed in March, before the chancellor began being forced into embarrassing U-turns on welfare. We've seen what happens when fiscal credibility is lost — I would never let that happen again. So if I were the chancellor, I'd offer a serious plan. Rebuild stability, drive growth and restore trust. No gimmicks. Just hard truths and a credible path forward for our country.


Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Starmer's trade deals FIASCO: 'Win-wins' are just sugar-coated concessions
Keir Starmer has sought to portray his hastily stitched together trade deals with the United States, the European Union and India as unalloyed triumphs. The way he tells it, you'd think he is so persuasive at the negotiating table that he could sell ice to Eskimos and sand to Arabs. But the truth is that a Prime Minister in need of an economic success story to sell to an increasingly disillusioned electorate has sugar-coated the outcomes of these talks and misleadingly presented them as 'win-wins' for UK plc. In fact, he has been bamboozled and outmanoeuvred at every turn by representatives of foreign powers who really do know how to play hardball. Take the French president Emmanuel Macron's outrageous piece of brinkmanship over fishing rights. Aware of how desperate the embattled Starmer was to announce a new trade deal with Brussels, he ambushed him at the 11th hour with a demand that EU fishermen be given further rights to our waters for 12 years. No wonder one member of an influential French fisheries committee later gloated: 'We couldn't have hoped for better.' And what did we get in return? A vague promise to allow British travellers to use e-gates at European airports at some unspecified point in the future. Starmer's willingness to sign agreements that have concessions to the other party baked in – but only airy promises about reciprocal benefits – is a feature of all the deals he has signed to date. The American deal, for example, has more holes than a sieve. Under the terms of the 'US-UK Economic Prosperity Deal', we were told that Britain would be freed from a 25 per cent tariff on steel and aluminium, for example. (A tariff, incidentally, that was later doubled to 50 per cent but is currently on hold until July 9.) The dash for a carbon-free economy means that there is only one UK blast furnace producing vital virgin steel currently operating at full capacity. As a result, the White House is concerned about the prospect of Britain sending cheaper imported steel to the US that has been pressed or rolled in this country. So the US negotiators are insisting that only steel that is 'melted and poured' in the UK (in other words, smelted in a furnace) is covered by the trade deal. All very well, but one of Britain's biggest steel exporters is Tata Steel. It shut down its blast furnaces at Port Talbot in South Wales last year, so must currently import raw steel from the Netherlands and India – both subject to American tariffs. This is a knotty problem – and the clock is ticking. Unless an agreement can be reached by July 9 when the new tariff rates kick in, Britain's steel exports will be hit by that punitive 50 per cent rate. So much for the US deal. The EU one is even worse. While Starmer surrendered to Macron's ultimatum over fishing, Brussels remained characteristically obdurate when it came to its €150 billion (£125 billion) defence fund. Despite the growing threat from Russia, the US's coolness towards Nato and Britain's leadership in high-tech warfare – not to mention our control of the Eurofighter Typhoon platform – Starmer extracted only the woolliest of commitments from the EU. The bloc merely said the new deal 'will pave the way' for Britain's defence industry to participate in the EU's fund. There were similarly weasel words when it came to the use of e-gates by British travellers to the Continent. Under the terms of the deal, access would be given as 'soon as possible', yet we could be queuing for years to come. Even the recently agreed trade deal with India has its critics. It included an extension from one to three years to a scheme that offered Indian workers employed here on a temporary basis an exemption from National Insurance Contributions – a totally toxic clause given Chancellor Rachel Reeves' now notorious October Budget, which raised Employer National Insurance Contributions. What is particularly shameful is the dishonest way in which the Government has presented the deals to the British people as if they are a big win for everyone. Tell that to the working men and women and fishing crews whose livelihoods are threatened by the weakness and incompetence of the man at No 10.