G7 takes aim at China: World's richest nations unite to crush unfair trade tactics
BANFF, Alberta: Financial policymakers from the seven well-heeled economies of the world clinched a two-day high-level meeting in the Canadian Rockies with a skillfully crafted treaty to deal with the world's 'economic imbalances'—an initiative broadly understood as an understated condemnation of China's trade policies.
According to the latest Yahoo Finance report, while U.S. tariffs and other prickly issues emerged over the Group of Seven (G7) conference, bureaucrats opted to highlight accord and compromise over conflict, putting aside their conventional free trade grandstanding to agree on larger economic objectives.
The concluding announcement avoided directly naming China but indicated a united concern over 'nonmarket policies and practices,' usually a contraction of China's export restrictions and currency controls. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was influential in creating the language to integrate and conform with the Trump government's hard-hitting posture on trade. Sidestepping the tariff tensions
Principally, U.S. tariffs went untouched in the statement, a silence that mirrors both detachment and tact. President Trump's all-encompassing tariffs on partners, including aluminum, cars, and steel were a breaking point in the background. Yet, in a move carped by several onlookers as powerless, the statement dodged the subject matter.
European Union Trade Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis accepted that tariffs persisted to be a 'difficult topic,' with consultations avoided in agreement with bilateral discussions between the U.S. and specific G7 members. Detractors such as former Treasury official Mark Sobel thumped the statement for the absence of truthfulness, identifying it as 'feeble' and blind to the apparent cracks within the group. Ukraine support is steady but softened
On geopolitical questions, the G7 reiterated its backing for Ukraine but employed subdued language compared to the previous years. The group denounced Russia's continuing hostility but sidestepped past word forms such as 'unjustifiable' or 'full-scale invasion,' echoing the Trump regime's careful slant toward Russia.
A prominent passage in the communiqué stated that no nation backing up Russia's war struggle would be allowed to gain from Ukraine's imminent rebuilding—a strong signal intended for China. The group likewise reiterated its promise to keep Russian resources frozen and implied additional reprisal measures if the armistice remains elusive. See also Nike pulls US sneaker featuring slavery-era flag Climate, taxes, and the forgotten priorities
Unity as the prime objective came at a cost. Vital issues like climate change and worldwide tax collaboration—once pillars of G7 pronouncements, were noticeably non-existent from this year's statement. This oversight mirrors a tactical move to focus on primary economic questions, particularly campaigned by the U.S., instead of longstanding worldwide initiatives.
Canadian Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne recognised the compromises and the cost-benefit decisions. 'There will always be tension around tariffs,' he said. 'But this year our focus was to return to the G7 core mission—restoring global growth and stability.'
With the G7 leaders' high-level meeting slated for mid-June in Kananaskis, the foundation is laid, but the route ahead is undefined. As political scientist John Kirton said, the sheer presence of a communiqué is a political triumph in itself, but the indicators' lasting unity or provisional concession remains to be seen.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
The Schengen Agreement at 40: Will free movement in Europe endure amid rising migrant antipathy?
BRUSSELS – Few people – even in Europe – know where the real Schengen is; it's a tiny community in southeastern Luxembourg, one of the continent's smallest states. But everyone in Europe and almost everyone coming to the continent from elsewhere around the world has personally experienced what the village's name has been synonymous with: the free movement of people and goods between the member states of the area of the same name. Or, simply put, a border-free Europe, where people travel without having to produce any document or explain the purpose of their journey. In many countries, even the physical location of national borders is no longer very obvious; markers for borders that once people fought and died for are now just historic curiosities. On June 14, Europe will mark with pride the 40th anniversary since the signature of the Schengen Treaty. All opinion surveys indicate that the border-free benefits of the agreement brought to the continent are still considered the most significant and popular achievement of European integration. Still, the celebrations will be muted. For although Schengen remains highly popular – there was joy in Romania and Bulgaria when these two nations joined the Schengen area last year – European officials are debating whether the arrangement, as originally conceived and currently applied by its 29 member-states, can survive in an age of heightened international security threats and massive migratory pressures. The story of the Schengen Agreement is a classic example of both the excellent and infuriating aspects of Europe. One of the original principles of the European Union (EU) since its foundation in the late 1950s was the idea of the free movement of people and goods. But for many decades after the EU came into being, border controls were still enforced. These were not very onerous, and increasingly, EU citizens could travel by just showing an identity card rather than a passport. Still, people had to queue at border points, and travellers from outside Europe who required visas had to apply for travel permits to each individual EU state they wished to visit. Pressure to do away with the internal EU border controls has been building up since the 1970s, but no consensus could be achieved inside the Union. On June 14, 1985, a small group comprising only five EU countries – Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands – gathered and signed a separate treaty abolishing their immigration controls. That agreement was outside the EU structures but – as its signatories hoped – it eventually caught on as other nations joined the arrangement. This gradual approach offered maximum flexibility. As everyone knew from the start, Britain was never likely to join Schengen. But Ireland also did not join because it was impractical to do so without the British, and Cyprus did not join because the island is part-occupied by Turkey. However, Iceland, Norway and Switzerland which are not in the EU did become Schengen members, as did the continent's smallest states of Andorra, Liechtenstein, Monaco, San Marino and the Vatican City. Schengen is now the world's largest association of independent states operating a complete freedom of travel. Still, Schengen was conceived for a continent that no longer exists. When the original five countries put their signatures to the deal, Europe was still divided by the Cold War and the eastern half of the continent was hermetically sealed with electrified barbed wire, machine guns and minefields. And while immigration pressures on Europe were already evident, most were confined to Britain and France and their former colonies. Yet only five years after the treaty was concluded, communist regimes collapsed in eastern Europe, enabling tens of millions of relatively poor east Europeans to travel. Subsequently, all European countries were hit by waves of migrants from the Middle East and Africa. And if this was not enough, terrorist attacks swept across the continent, with both criminals and weapons moving freely across borders. The ghastly terrorist November 2015 attack on the Bataclan nightclub in Paris, in which 130 people perished, was perpetrated by terrorists who lived in Belgium, and bought their weapons and explosives from traffickers across the continent. Most were known to police forces; all arguably escaped detection because of Europe's open borders. According to the Schengen Borders Code, it is within the competence of member states to reintroduce border controls for a limited period of time, but only as 'a last resort in an exceptional situation'. In 2006, France was the first country to temporarily reintroduce border controls, supposedly in response to demonstrations by Basques, an ethnic group straddling the borders of France and Spain. This pattern continued for years in France for major sporting events, political summits, or sensitive political rallies. The major turning point came in 2015 – the year in which around two million migrants flocked to Europe. Schengen states introduced border controls in droves. And then came the coronavirus pandemic. Countries got more innovative in the way they justify their 'exceptional' circumstances. Norway, for instance, once cited 'threats to critical infrastructure' to reimpose border controls. And Slovenia, a south-eastern EU nation, simply cited the 'increased global terrorist threat' to do the same. According to the available statistics, between 2006, when France pioneered the move, and 2015, there were 36 recorded cases when countries reimposed border controls. But between 2015 and 2024 – a comparable period – the number of such 'exceptional' border controls jumped to 405. It's an exception which threatens to become a rule. Yet most of these measures are ineffective because European countries no longer have the border forces or the required logistics to close their borders completely, so the moves were symbolic and of short duration. That was certainly the case with Germany in September 2024, when the country reintroduced border controls at just certain points, announced well in advance. This gave plenty of time for those trying to cross the frontiers illegally to find other routes. Still, it is remarkable that despite all these tensions and the broad political backlash against migrants throughout Europe, the Schengen arrangement has survived essentially unchanged. That's largely because it remains a powerful symbol of European integration. The reimposition of border controls would also snarl up transport and trade throughout Europe. All this discussion is largely irrelevant for the community of Schengen, now decked up with flowers and flags for the grand anniversary on Saturday, June 14. A 'Europe Museum' is operating in Schengen, telling the continent's history of border-free travel. And Princess Marie-Astrid, the boat on which the original treaty was signed, will also be on call for this weekend's celebrations. Even though the necessary land docking facilities planned to accommodate the boat were completed far too late. Some things never change in Europe. Jonathan Eyal is based in London and Brussels and writes on global political and security matters. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNA
4 hours ago
- CNA
EU plans energy saving measures for data centres
BRUSSELS :The European Union is preparing a package of measures to improve data centres' energy savings, the bloc's energy commissioner said on Thursday. "I will propose a data centre energy efficiency package," EU energy commissioner Dan Jorgensen told a conference in Brussels, without providing further details. Data centres account for 3 per cent of EU electricity demand, but their consumption is expected to increase rapidly this decade due to the expansion of artificial intelligence.
CNA
7 hours ago
- CNA
Trump willing to extend trade talks deadline, but says that won't be necessary
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday (Jun 11) he would be willing to extend a Jul 8 deadline for completing trade talks with countries before higher US tariffs take effect, but did not believe that would be necessary. Trump told reporters before a performance at the Kennedy Center that trade negotiations were continuing with some 15 countries, including South Korea, Japan and the European Union. "We're rocking in terms of deals," he said. "We're dealing with quite a few countries and they all want to make a deal with us." He said he did not believe a deadline extension would be "a necessity." Trump said the US would send out letters in coming weeks specifying the terms of trade deals to dozens of other countries, which they could then embrace or reject. "At a certain point, we're just going to send letters out ... saying, 'This is the deal. You can take it, or you can leave it,'" Trump said. "So at a certain point we'll do that. We're not quite ready." US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told lawmakers earlier that the Trump administration could extend the July trade deal deadline - or "roll the date forward" for countries negotiating in good faith, in certain cases. A 90-day pause in Trump's broadest, "reciprocal" tariffs will end on Jul 8, with only one trade deal agreed with Britain and some 17 others at various stages of negotiation. "It is highly likely that those countries - or trading blocs as is the case with the EU - who are negotiating in good faith, we will roll the date forward to continue the good-faith negotiations," Bessent told the House Ways and Means Committee. "If someone is not negotiating, then we will not." Bessent's remarks marked the first time a Trump administration official has indicated some flexibility around the expiration date for the pause. Bessent reiterated the possibility of more negotiating time at a second hearing before the Senate Appropriations Committee on Wednesday, saying it was "my belief that countries that are negotiating in good faith could be rolled forward." He said the European Union had previously been slower to come forward with robust proposals, but was now showing "better faith", without providing specifics. Trump echoed that more upbeat view on Wednesday, saying, "They do want to negotiate." A deal struck on Tuesday in London with China to de-escalate that bilateral trade war is proceeding on a separate track and timeline, with an Aug 10 deadline set last month. The president has been the final decision-maker on his administration's tariff and trade policies, but Bessent's influence has increased in recent months and the Treasury chief has been viewed by many trading partners as a moderating voice. Trump announced the pause on Apr 9, a week after unveiling "Liberation Day" tariffs against nearly all US trading partners that proved to be so unexpectedly large and sweeping that it sent global financial markets into near panic. The S&P 500 Index plunged more than 12 per cent in four days for its heftiest run of losses since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020. Investors were so rattled they bailed out of safe-haven US Treasury securities, sending bond yields rocketing higher. The dollar sank. Markets started their recovery on Apr 9 when Trump unexpectedly announced the pause. The recovery continued in early May when the Trump team agreed to dial back the triple-digit tariff rates it had imposed on goods from China. Those events have given rise to what some on Wall Street have parodied as the "TACO" trade - an acronym for Trump Always Chickens Out. "The only time the market has reacted positively is when the administration is in retreat from key policy areas," Democratic Representative Don Beyer of Virginia told Bessent before pressing him on what to expect when the July deadline expires.
