Seatrium to pay over S$240 million to Brazilian, Singapore authorities over corruption offences
On Wednesday (Jul 30), the company announced that it signed a leniency agreement with Brazilian prosecutors in relation to Operation Car Wash – the name given to a major corruption probe in Brazil that had initially focused on companies bribing politicians for contracts .
Seatrium's subsidiary, Estaleiro Jurong Aracruz, a shipyard in Brazil, came under investigation in 2023 for its past conduct linked to the probe. The unit's former president was charged by the Brazilian authorities for money laundering and corruption, linked to contracts that subsidiaries of Sembcorp Marine – Seatrium's former incarnation – entered into in 2012.
Seatrium will make a final settlement payment of around S$168.4 million under the leniency agreement with Brazil.
Additionally, it is required to pay a financial penalty of US$110 million under a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) it signed on Wednesday with the Singapore authorities.
However, because the Singapore Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) has agreed that a maximum of US$53 million of Seatrium's payments to the Brazilian authorities may be credited against this penalty, the company will pay the Singapore authorities a sum of US$57 million – around S$73.3 million – under the DPA, which is subject to approval of the Singapore High Court.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
'The DPA will come into force only when the High Court approves it, after determining that it is in the interests of justice and that its terms are fair, reasonable and proportionate,' a Wednesday statement by the AGC said.
Under the DPA, Seatrium must also review and improve its ethics and compliance programme 'to reduce the risk of a recurrence of any similar conduct', the AGC statement said.
It added: 'If the company subsequently fails to comply with the terms of the DPA as approved by the High Court, the public prosecutor may apply to the High Court to terminate the DPA. In the event the DPA is terminated, the public prosecutor may initiate criminal proceedings against the company in respect of the alleged offences.'
This news came a day ahead of Seatrium's announcement of its first-half earnings on Jul 31.
The company said that there will be no material impact to its net earnings and net tangible asset per share for the financial year ending Dec 31, 2025. This is because it had previously made provisions in its financial statements for the in-principle settlement payment and financial penalty.
The group called for a trading halt on Wednesday morning, before the announcement. The counter fell to S$2.29 after the announcement, 3.8 per cent or S$0.09 below Tuesday's closing price, with some 9.2 million shares having changed hands as at 11.41 am. The counter recovered to S$2.38 by 3 pm, unchanged from the day before.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and the Commercial Affairs Department (CAD) have informed Seatrium that their joint investigation into its potential offences has concluded, the company said.
The authorities said no action will be taken against Seatrium or its employees.
On Wednesday, Citi assigned Seatrium a 'buy' call and a target price of S$2.65.
The bank said: 'Although the share price had recovered from the lows during the initial MAS and CAD investigation announcement, we believe the conclusion of the investigation will lift the remaining overhang on Seatrium. The next milestone (or hurdle) to future value creation may come with improving margins and financials in its results.
'We apply a target multiple of 1.2 times on FY2026 (estimates), as we believe the market will look into its long-term prospects as new higher-margin contracts should raise returns further and push return on equity higher.'
Seatrium said it is 'keen to move forward' and to ride on energy-market tailwinds. It added that it has zero tolerance for fraud, bribery and corruption.
In February, Seatrium posted its first full-year profit since its 2023 reconstitution. It swung into the black with a S$156.8 million net profit in FY2024, a turnaround from the S$2 billion loss in FY2023.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
24 minutes ago
- Straits Times
US envoy Steve Witkoff meets Israeli hostage families in Tel Aviv
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox US envoy Steve Witkoff (left) arriving on Aug 2 for a closed meeting with the families of Israeli hostages still being held by Hamas militants in the Gaza Strip. TEL AVIV - US envoy Steve Witkoff met anguished relatives of Israeli hostages still held in Gaza on Aug 2, as fears for the captives' survival mounted almost 22 months into the war sparked by Hamas' October 2023 attack. Mr Witkoff was greeted with some applause and pleas for assistance from hundreds of protesters gathered in Tel Aviv, before going into a closed meeting with the families. The Hostages and Missing Families Forum confirmed the meeting was under way and videos shared online showed Mr Witkoff arriving as families chanted 'Bring them home!' and 'We need your help.' The visit came one day after Mr Witkoff visited a US-backed aid station in Gaza, to inspect efforts to get food into the devastated Palestinian territory. Mr Yotam Cohen, brother of 21-year-old hostage Nimrod Cohen, told AFP: 'The war needs to end. The Israeli government will not end it willingly. It has refused to do so. 'The Israeli government must be stopped. For our sakes, for our soldiers' sakes, for our hostages' sakes, for our sons and for the future generations of everybody in the Middle East.' Of the 251 hostages taken during the Hamas attack, 49 are still being held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore $3b money laundering case: MinLaw names 6 law firms taken to task over involvement in property deals Singapore Police reopen access to all areas in Marina Bay after crowd congestion eases at NDP Preview area Singapore Opening of Woodlands Health has eased load on KTPH, sets standard for future hospitals: Ong Ye Kung Asia KTM plans new passenger rail service in Johor Bahru to manage higher footfall expected from RTS Singapore HSA investigating teen allegedly vaping on MRT train Asia 4 workers dead after falling into manhole in Japan Singapore New vehicular bridge connecting Punggol Central and Seletar Link to open on Aug 3 Singapore New S'pore jobs portal launched for North West District residents looking for work near home After the meeting, the Forum released a statement saying that Mr Witkoff had given them a personal commitment that he and US President Donald Trump would work to return the remaining hostages. 'Horrifying acts' Hamas attempted to maintain pressure on the families, releasing a video of one of the hostages – 24-year-old Mr Evyatar David – for the second time in two days, showing him looking emaciated in a tunnel. The video called for a ceasefire and warned that time was running out for the hostages. Mr David's family said their son was the victim of a 'vile' propaganda campaign and accused Hamas of deliberately starving their son. 'The deliberate starvation of our son as part of a propaganda campaign is one of the most horrifying acts the world has seen. He is being starved purely to serve Hamas' propaganda,' the family said. The United States, along with Egypt and Qatar, had been mediating ceasefire talks between Hamas and Israel that would allow the hostages to be released and humanitarian aid to flow more freely. But talks broke down in July and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government is under increasing domestic pressure to come up with another way to secure the missing hostages, alive and dead. He is also facing international calls to open Gaza's borders to more food aid, after UN and humanitarian agencies warned that more than two million Palestinian civilians are facing starvation. 'Without rest' But Israel's top general warned that there would be no respite in fighting if the hostages were not released. 'I estimate that in the coming days we will know whether we can reach an agreement for the release of our hostages,' armed forces chief of staff Eyal Zamir said in a statement. 'If not, the combat will continue without rest.' Lieutenant-General Zamir denied that there was widespread starvation in Gaza. 'The current campaign of false accusations of intentional starvation is a deliberate, timed, and deceitful attempt to accuse the IDF (Israeli military), a moral army, of war crimes,' he said. Alongside reports from UN-mandated experts warning a 'famine is unfolding' in Gaza, more and more evidence is emerging of serious malnutrition and deaths among the most vulnerable Palestinian civilians. Ms Modallala Dawwas, 33, living in a displacement camp in Gaza City told AFP her daughter Mariam had no known illnesses before the war but had now dropped from 25kg to 10kg and was seriously malnourished. Hamas' 2023 attack resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to a tally based on official figures. Israel's campaign in Gaza has killed at least 60,332 people, mostly civilians, according to figures from the Hamas-run territory's health ministry, deemed reliable by the UN. Gaza's civil defence agency said Israeli fire killed 34 people in the territory on Aug 2. Civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal said five people were killed in an Israeli strike on an area of central Gaza where Palestinians were awaiting a food distribution by the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. He added that the Aug 2 strikes mostly targeted areas near Gaza City in the north and Khan Younis in the south. AFP
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Malaysia businesses respond to latest Trump tariff announcement
Businesses in Malaysia remain cautious despite the decision by the US to reduce tariffs on Malaysian imports. But the reduction at least helps the overall cost competitiveness of Malaysian-manufactured goods in the US market. Businesses and manufacturers are also bracing for higher operating costs and potential price hikes. Afifah Ariffin reports.
Straits Times
10 hours ago
- Straits Times
Singapore High Court rules that property ‘decoupling' is illegal if done solely to avoid taxes
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox While buyers are free to hold their stakes in a 99-to-1 arrangement, the transaction could be illegal if the decoupling was undertaken to avoid paying more tax. SINGAPORE – Couples who transfer full ownership of their first home to one spouse – a gambit known as 'decoupling' – so that the other can buy another property without the additional buyer's stamp duty (ABSD), are breaking the law if the sole purpose of the move is to avoid tax, the High Court has found. The finding stemmed from a recent dispute involving an unmarried couple who held their first property in the ratio of 99 to 1 in favour of the woman. But when they broke up, the former boyfriend claimed he owned at least half of the home, and not just 1 per cent. A reason for holding the property 99-to-1 was that they had planned a decoupling to avoid the ABSD for their second property. This would be achieved when the boyfriend transferred away his minute share so that he can buy a second property as a non-owner. Although the decoupling did not materialise, the court scrutinised such transactions and found that owners who decouple in this manner could be committing tax evasion as well as the underpayment of stamp duty if the 99-to-1 holding was found to be a sham. High Court Judge Lee Seiu Kin noted that while buyers were free to hold their stakes in a 99-to-1 arrangement, the transaction could be illegal if the decoupling was undertaken to avoid paying more tax. For instance, if the 1 per cent owner gave up the share but had an arrangement to still co-own the same property, the individual would be deemed to have evaded tax by wrongful declaration of ownership interests. If that same owner – while still a 'beneficial' owner of the first property – then bought another residence without paying ABSD, he could be accused of using the decoupling scheme to dupe the taxman. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore New vehicular bridge connecting Punggol Central and Seletar Link to open on Aug 3 Singapore Tengah facility with over 40 animal shelters, businesses hit by ticks Singapore HSA investigating teen who was observed to be allegedly vaping in MRT train Singapore 60 years of building Singapore Asia 'Every day, we think about how to upgrade': China's factories see rise in robot adoption Singapore Sheng Siong to open first store in Orchard by end-August Sport Spurs captain Son Heung-min says he is leaving the English Premier League club Life Tastemakers: Burnt-out serial entrepreneur cooks up $16m success with Lau Wang Claypot Delights Finally, the move to use the 1 per cent as a ploy to save on buyer's stamp duty could attract the penalty of underpayment of tax because a joint owner typically pays duty on 50 per cent of the property. Tax evasion and avoidance The Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Iras) did not comment on Justice Lee's finding specifically but noted that any breaches of tax law depend on the specific circumstances of each case. For tax avoidance, Iras will check whether the arrangement 'is artificial, contrived or has little or no commercial substance and is designed to obtain a tax advantage that is not intended by Parliament'. As for tax evasion, this happens when individuals deliberately provide Iras with inaccurate or incomplete information with the aim of reducing their tax liability. Iras says it takes a serious view against those who evade or avoid tax, as well as professionals who promote or facilitate tax avoidance arrangements. The couple in the recent case did not breach any tax law because they neither decoupled nor bought a second property. Buyers should act in good faith Singapore's leading tax expert Stephen Phua said the case should serve as a cautionary tale for property buyers to act in good faith and avoid having secret arrangements to hide their true ownership interests. Decoupling is not wrong if a joint owner makes an outright transfer of his share in that property because this owner, who no longer has any property, can then buy another without being liable for ABSD. 'The problem comes if the owner continues to retain a beneficial interest in the property after the transfer via a secret arrangement. If this scheme is exposed, such as in a dispute, the consequences could be severe,' said Associate Professor Phua, who teaches tax laws at NUS. Take a couple who hold their first property 99-to-1 as part of a decoupling plan to buy a second property. They could be in trouble if it is found that they intended to share both properties jointly. In this example, Prof Phua says the couple could face two tax penalties – one for underpayment of stamp duty in the decoupling, and another for not paying ABSD on the second property. Justice Lee's finding comes about two years after Iras clamped down on an unrelated 99-to-1 ABSD avoidance scheme that involved first-time buyers using artificial transfer agreements to rope in relatives for mortgage purposes. An insurance broker told The Straits Times that he has come across at least five lawyers being sued by clients due to Iras enforcement. He added: 'I think it is prudent for lawyers to study the latest court case carefully when advising clients on transfers of properties between co-owners, especially if it is being done with the view of buying another residential property.'
