logo
Bank's rate decision leaves frustrated Reeves praying for an August cut

Bank's rate decision leaves frustrated Reeves praying for an August cut

Yahoo4 hours ago

Last week's spending review revealed Rachel Reeves's plan for reviving the UK's struggling economy – but one of the most powerful levers for unleashing growth lies out of her reach, at the Bank of England.
Thursday's no-change decision on interest rates from the Bank's nine-member monetary policy committee (MPC) was widely expected; but the chancellor and her colleagues will be fervently hoping for a cut in August, perhaps sooner – and more before the year is up.
The Bank's governor, Andrew Bailey, had already warned the pace of rate cuts looked uncertain, as a result of Donald Trump's trade wars. The alarming prospect of a fresh conflict in the Middle East is likely to have made MPC members even more cautious.
The minutes from Thursday's meeting suggested the MPC would 'remain sensitive to heightened unpredictability in the economic and geopolitical environment,' and would 'continue to update its assessment of risks to the economy'.
Evidence of rising food prices in the latest inflation data is also likely to have preyed on their minds – driven in part by climactic challenges, including the poor harvests that triggered the largest annual increase in chocolate costs on record. Inflation is expected to remain around its current level of 3.4% for the rest of the year – well above the Bank's 2% target.
Yet the minutes did also suggest the balance of opinion is shifting towards loosening policy, as the jobs market continues to slow down, helping to alleviate concerns about bumper wage deals driving up inflation.
The MPC now expects the impact of Trump's tariffs to be less dramatic than at its last forecast in May, given various concessions and deals – though they stress that 'trade policy uncertainty would nevertheless continue to have an impact on the UK economy'.
Dave Ramsden, deputy governor, voted for a quarter-point cut, to 4% – joining the external members Alan Taylor and Swati Dhingra, both of whom wanted a bigger-than-consensus half-point reduction in May.
The paragraph of the minutes that set out their argument pointed to the fact that 'the cumulative evidence from a range of labour market data pointed to a material further loosening in labour market conditions'.
Ramsden has previously been slightly ahead of the consensus in moving to cut – he was ready for rates to come down in May last year, three months before the eventual reduction in August; and wanted to see a cut in December, that didn't happen until February.
The other two doves voted for a bumper half-point cut in May, so it is no surprise that they would have liked to have seen another reduction on Thursday.
Dhingra told MPs on the Treasury select committee recently that she was becoming increasingly concerned about the risk that holding policy 'too tight' for an extended period – ie keeping rates high – risked undermining the economy's potential to grow.
Bailey confirmed alongside Thursday's no-change decision that rates remained on a 'gradual downward path'. That appears to point to another quarter-point cut in August. Reeves will be hoping the MPC picks up the pace.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BOE's Lombardelli on Rate Cut, Labor Market, Inflation
BOE's Lombardelli on Rate Cut, Labor Market, Inflation

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

BOE's Lombardelli on Rate Cut, Labor Market, Inflation

Bank of England Deputy Governor for Monetary Policy Clare Lombardelli discusses the central bank's decision to hold interest rates at 4.25% on Thursday. She also talks about the importance of monitoring geopolitical developments in the Middle East and the impact they could have on oil prices and UK inflation, as well as the UK labor market situation. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Oakley Capital Buys a Majority Stake in Fornasetti's Holding Company
Oakley Capital Buys a Majority Stake in Fornasetti's Holding Company

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Oakley Capital Buys a Majority Stake in Fornasetti's Holding Company

MILAN — In a strategic move, Fornasetti heir Barnaba Fornasetti agreed to sell 60 percent of Immaginazione Srl, the holding company that owns and manages Fornasetti, to Oakley Capital. The private equity firm operates mostly in Europe and specializes in premium brands. Its portfolio includes luxury luggage firm Globe-Trotter and Italian design firm Alessi. More from WWD 10 Rustic Cottage Aesthetic Home Finds to Channel This Summer's TikTok 'Garden Girl' Vibe EXCLUSIVE: As Royal Copenhagen Turns 250, Its Creative Director, a Fashion Veteran, Has Fresh Ideas Alpargatas Inks Deal With The Eastman Group For Havaianas In North America 'This agreement marks a significant moment of transformation for Fornasetti. Our identity and our creative vision will always remain at the core of our project, strengthened by new energies and skills that will guide us through a phase of thoughtful, ambitious and value-oriented expansion,' Barnaba Fornasetti said in a statement. The son of the late Piero Fornasetti, the Milan-based artist runs the design and decorative arts house his father started in the 1940s and is credited with propelling it into modern times, expanding the product offering and geographic reach and through a variety of collaborations. Oakley Capital's operating partner Vicente Castellano said that Oakley plans to accelerate the company on a global level. 'We have a strong track record and have already enjoyed several successful partnerships with iconic brands, such as Globe-Trotter and Alessi. We are delighted to invest in another prestigious Italian brand… to fully realize its untapped potential and transform the brand into a global lifestyle company.' Best of WWD In the Hills of Kyoto, a Glassmaker's Magical Forest The Story Behind the Mysterious Face That Adorns Most of Fornasetti's Décor Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

PS21/3: Are UK firms really ready?
PS21/3: Are UK firms really ready?

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

PS21/3: Are UK firms really ready?

The Financial Conduct Authority's (FCA) operational resilience rules were introduced three years ago with a clear message: financial firms must be able to withstand disruptions and keep essential services running no matter what happens. On paper, the industry has had plenty of time to prepare. In reality, some firms are still racing against the clock, realising too late that compliance is about more than just paperwork. With only days left, the question remains: who's truly ready, and who's cutting it fine? Operational resilience isn't a new concept, but it has taken on greater urgency in recent years. From cyberattacks and IT failures to third-party outages, financial institutions face increasing risks that can bring services to a halt. Customers expect 24/7 access to their money; businesses need smooth payment flows; and regulators are watching closely. PS21/3 was introduced to make sure firms aren't just reacting to disruptions, they're prepared in advance. Yet, as the deadline looms, gaps in resilience planning are becoming more apparent. Some firms have treated compliance as a tick-box exercise, failing to integrate resilience into their broader strategy. Others have struggled with the sheer complexity of mapping critical business services and setting realistic impact tolerances. The FCA has been clear: firms need to justify their decisions with evidence, not assumptions. Simply hoping a competitor can pick up the slack during a disruption isn't enough. Every firm must know exactly how long it can sustain an outage before harm is caused and prove that they can recover within that timeframe. One of the biggest challenges for firms has been managing third-party dependencies. Today's financial ecosystem is deeply interconnected, with banks, payment providers and fintech firms all relying on external vendors for core services. What happens when those vendors fail? The CrowdStrike outage in 2024 was a stark reminder of how dependent financial firms are on third-party providers. Some businesses had contingency plans in place; others found themselves blindsided, unable to function until their suppliers restored service. The FCA has made it clear that firms cannot outsource responsibility for resilience. Even if a third party is delivering a key service, the regulated firm is still accountable for ensuring its stability. For payment providers and e-commerce businesses, this challenge is even greater. Many operate across multiple jurisdictions, juggling various payment rails, processors and alternative payment methods. Ensuring that these providers meet resilience standards and can keep transactions flowing even in times of disruption, is essential. Beyond financial institutions themselves, merchants also have a stake in operational resilience. If a payment provider or acquiring bank fails to meet FCA standards, businesses relying on them could face service outages, lost revenue and customer frustration. Merchants must be proactive in selecting financial partners that take resilience seriously. This means working with payment providers that have robust contingency plans, failover mechanisms and diverse payment routing capabilities. A provider with a single point of failure is a business risk; one that many merchants cannot afford to take. As resilience becomes a key factor in financial partnerships, businesses need to demand transparency from their providers. How do they handle service disruptions? How quickly can they switch to backup systems? What safeguards are in place to keep payments running? These are the questions that should be asked before an outage occurs, not after. With the deadline fast approaching, firms that are still scrambling must prioritise key actions in the coming days. While long-term resilience requires a continuous effort, there are still urgent steps that can be taken to ensure compliance by 31 March: Verify that all important business services have been identified, and impact tolerances are clear. Every service should have a defined maximum tolerable outage time, backed by data. Run final scenario tests. Stress-testing resilience plans under 'severe but plausible' conditions can expose vulnerabilities that need last-minute fixes. Strengthen third-party oversight. Ensure that suppliers have their own resilience frameworks in place, and that they align with FCA expectations. Review and update recovery strategies. Response teams should know exactly what to do when disruptions occur, minimising downtime and customer impact. For firms that planned ahead, this period is about fine-tuning and reinforcing resilience strategies. For those that delayed preparations, it's a race to prove that they can meet regulatory standards, before the FCA starts asking tough questions. While 31 March marks the official compliance deadline, operational resilience isn't a one-time task, it's an ongoing expectation. The FCA has made it clear that financial firms must continue refining their resilience strategies, conducting regular reviews, and adapting to new risks. Beyond regulatory pressure, firms that invest in resilience stand to gain a competitive advantage. Customers trust institutions that can deliver seamless services, even during crises. Payment providers that can guarantee uptime will attract more business. Merchants will prioritise financial partners that won't leave them stranded when disruptions strike. Those who see resilience as more than just a compliance burden, but rather as a core pillar of their operations, will be the ones that emerge stronger in the long run. For financial services, resilience isn't just about surviving disruptions, it's about thriving despite them. Azimkhon Askarov is Co-CEO & Partner at "PS21/3: Are UK firms really ready?" was originally created and published by Electronic Payments International, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store