Trolleybuses are back as demand grows for cleaner public transport
Berlin (dpa)- The trolleybus is considered by many to be clunky technology from the past. But thanks to technical innovation, these so-called silent servants are staging a comeback as some countries seek to decarbonize their public transport.
The trolleybus, which draws power from dual overhead wires mounted over roads using spring-loaded trolley poles, has been around for 130 years and used to be considered inflexible since it could seldom deviate from a set route.
The advent of powerful batteries for off-grid driving has changed all that. It has also done away with the need to erect unsightly overhead wires in historic city centres, an aspect which used to deter many European cities from operating the vehicles.
Modern trolleys can also manage off-wire journeys and have on-board batteries that are recharged by the overhead wires with what's called In-Motion Charging (IMC) technology. They also come with contemporary tech such as wi-fi and air-conditioning. Chief producers include Polish firm Solaris, Hess of Switzerland and Yutong in China.
Non-profit lobby group Trolleymotion says some 300 trolleybus systems are still in operation globally, reflecting sustained interest in this clean and efficient form of electric public transport.
"European cities are steadily converting back to trolleybus public transport," says Gunter Mackinger, who used to be in charge of a large trolleybus system in Salzburg, Austria and remains a passionate advocate of the technology.
He claims trolleybuses are even better than battery-electric buses, since they have none of the charging delays or the heavy weight which puts a strain on electric buses and shortens their service life.
Many European networks were discontinued in the 1960s and 1970s but urban planners now believe this was a mistake.
Prominent recent converts to the trolleybus include Prague which has re-introduced trolleybuses on an airport corridor, while the Estonian capital Tallinn scrapped plans to replace the trolleybuses with battery-electric buses and is buying 40 new ones instead.
The city said retaining the existing trolleybus infrastructure saves money and avoids the expenses and downtime associated with large-scale battery bus charging
Italy has long been a stronghold of the trolleybus, but until recently many of its systems have been neglected. Naples has now just ordered 40 state-of-the-art, 12.5-meter-long hybrid/electric trolleybuses to replace 59 existing vehicles.
Trolleybuses returned to the capital Rome in 2021 after an absence of 33 years and they ply mainly on the outskirts. The southern city of Lecce brought back trolleybuses in 2012 and Pescare is poised to do the same this year.
Germany still has three systems in Solingen, Eberswalde near Berlin and in Esslingen close to Stuttgart. The latter plans to buy 52 new trolleybuses soon. Berlin has mulled bringing back the trolleybus but a decision has been deferred.
Switzerland also has 12 systems which run alongside trams and regular buses, mainly using hydro-electric power which is plentiful in the alpine republic.
Mexico is set to soon inaugurate the new 18.5 km long Chalco-Santa Martha trolleybus line with 13 stations and two terminals, and an initial fleet of 108 trolleybuses. This will be expanded to 184 in the future.
In the highland city of Quito, Ecuador, elderly Mercedes trolleybuses have just been been replaced by new Chinese-made Yutong vehicles.
Fleet renewal was hailed at the gala opening last month by transport director Xavier Vásquez as a milestone in reducing carbon emissions.
"The new trolleybuses are environmentally-friendly and the benefit is real, it's as if we had planted a thousand new trees this week," Vásquez told local media.
Meanwhile, Sao Paulo in Brazil has introduced introduced huge four-axle articulated trolleybuses to speed up rapid transit services. These can carry up to 146 passengers although only 60 get a seat.
Both Vancouver in Canada and the Greek capital Athens are poised to renew their systems while in the French city of Nancy, new trolleybuses from Hess have just started plying as replacements for troublesome rubber-wheeled trams which were prone to breaking down.
Some 85 Russian cities still rely heavily on trolleybuses and the country seemingly has no intention of phasing them out.
Systems include one in Novosibersk where a total of 258 home-manufactured trolleybuses went into operation last year. The world's northernmost system also operates in the Arctic city of Murmansk.
Surprisingly Moscow is a casualty. In autumn 2020, what was then the world's largest trolleybus system with 83 routes and 600 km of overhead wires, stopped operating.
A campaign to keep the silent servants failed and officials said the system had become too inefficient and unwieldy for a modern city.
Some critics questioned whether the real purpose behind the closure was to free up lucrative real estate sites taken up by the trolleybus facilities, including a huge garage near the centre.
There have been other setbacks too. Morocco's new system has been dormant since 2022 owing to technical gremlins and it is unclear when it will restart. Tehran has also recently decided to abandon trolleybuses in favour of battery-electric buses.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘They are in shock': Indian students fear Trump has ended their American dream
For weeks, Subash Devatwal's phone has not stopped ringing. Some of the calls have been from distressed students, at other times it is their panicked parents, but all have the same question – is their dream of studying in the US still possible? Devatwal runs an education consultancy in Ahmedabad, the main city in the Indian state of Gujarat. It is one of thousands of such organisations that exist across the country, helping Indian students achieve what many consider to be the ultimate symbol of success: getting into an American university. It has long been a booming business for Devatwal. Families in India will often invest their entire life savings to send their children to study in the US and last year there were more than 330,000 Indians enrolled at American universities, more than any other foreign nationality, overtaking Chinese students in numbers for the first time in years. But this year the situation looks drastically different. As Donald Trump's administration has taken aim at international students – first implementing draconian screening measures over political views and then last week ordering all US embassies globally to indefinitely pause all student visa interviews – many Indian students and their families have been left in limbo. Trump's unilateral decision to block Harvard University from admitting international students, which was later blocked by the courts, also caused widespread panic and stoked fears that foreign students at other universities could get caught in the president's crosshairs. 'The students are in shock. Most of them spend several years preparing to study in the US,' said Devatwal. He said many of his clients were now hesitant to pursue a US degree, given the high levels of turmoil and uncertainty following the Trump administration's new policies. Indian students can expect to pay between $40,000 to $80,000 (£29,500 to £59,000) a year on tuition alone to study in the US. In previous years, Devatwal's organisation sent more than 100 students to American universities but this year he said the number had dropped to about 10. Instead, families were shifting their focus to the UK and other European countries. A recent analysis by the Hindu newspaper estimated a 28% drop in Indian students going to the US in 2025. 'Families contribute their savings, take out loans from banks and borrow from relatives, all in the hope that the student will secure a good job abroad, repay the debt, and build a promising future,' said Devatwal. 'In such uncertain circumstances, parents are understandably reluctant to let their children take such a risky path.' Brijesh Patel, 50, a textile trader in Surat, Gujarat, said he had been saving money for over a decade to make sure his son could go to a US university, including selling his wife's jewellery and borrowing money from relatives. 'Everyone in the family wanted our son to go to the US for his studies and make something good of his life,' said Patel. His 21-year-old son, who he asked not to be named for fear of retribution by the US authorities, had secured a place at two American universities for his master's degree and Patel had already paid 700,000 rupees (£6,000) to consultancies who helped with the applications. But amid the turmoil under Trump, Patel said his son was being advised not to even apply for his student visa, due to the uncertainty and high probability of rejection. 'We simply can't take that risk. If our son goes now and something goes wrong, we won't be able to save that kind of money again,' he said. However, Patel said he was not willing to give up on the family dream just yet. 'I am an optimist, and my son is willing to wait a year,' he said. 'We're hoping that things improve by then. It's not just my son who will be living the American dream, it's all of us: my wife, our relatives and our neighbours. I've struggled my whole life – I don't want my son to face the same struggles here in India.' The fear among prospective and current students was palpable. Several Indian students studying in the US declined to speak to the Guardian, fearing it could jeopardise their visas. In India, a student selected in December to be one of this year's Fulbright-Nehru doctoral fellows – a highly competitive scholarship that pays for the brightest students to study abroad at US universities as part of their PhD thesis – said the applications of their entire cohort had recently been demoted back to 'semi-finalists'. The student, who asked to remain anonymous over fears it would affect their application, said they had invitation letters from top Ivy League universities for the fellowship, which is considered one of the most prestigious scholarships in the US, but now everything was up in the air. 'We are supposed to start in October and our orientation was scheduled for May, all the flights and hotels were even booked, but then it all got cancelled. Now we've been informed all our applications are under review by the Trump administration,' said the student. They said it had caused 'huge panic and anxiety' among those accepted. 'I know a lot of people are going back through their social media, deleting things and doing a lot of self-censoring.' Piyush Bhartiya, a co-founder of the educational technology company AdmitKard, said many parents who had been set on sending their children to the US were rethinking their plans. He cited one example of a student who had been admitted to New York University for the coming year but was instead planning to go to the London School of Economics after the US visa interviews were paused. Bhartiya said Indian students primarily went to the US to study Stem subjects – science, technology, engineering and maths – and so the focus had shifted to other countries strong in these areas. 'Germany is the main country where students are shifting to for Stem subjects,' he said. 'Other countries like Ireland, France, the Netherlands, which are also gaining substantial interest in the students. At the undergraduate level, the Middle East has also seen a lot of gain in interest given parents feel that it is close by and safer and given the current political environment they may want their kids closer to the home.' Among the Indian students forced to abandon their plans is Nihar Gokhale, 36. He had a fully funded offer for a PhD at a private university in Massachusetts, but recently received a letter saying the funding was being withdrawn, as the university faced issues under the Trump administration. 'It was quite shocking. I spoke to people at the university, and they admitted it was an exceptional situation for them too,' said Gokhale. Without the funding, the US was financially 'out of the question' and he said he had an offer from the UK he now intended to take up. 'For at least the next three or four years, I'm not considering the US at all,' he said. • This article was amended on 4 June 2025 to correct a conversion error. An earlier version said that 700,000 rupees was £68,000 instead of saying £6,000.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hegseth says Nato allies ‘very close' to raising defence spending target to 5%
The US defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, said Nato allies were 'very close, almost near consensus' to an agreement to significantly raise targets for defence spending to 5% of GDP in the next decade. The Trump administration official indicated he expected the increased target to be agreed at a summit in The Hague later this month – and confirmed that the headline figure was to be split into two parts. 'This alliance, in a matter of weeks, will be committing to 5%: 3.5% in hard military and 1.5% in infrastructure and defence-related activities. That combination constitutes a real commitment,' he said. Hegseth was speaking at a press conference at Nato headquarters in Brussels after the morning session of an all-day meeting of defence ministers from the 32-country transatlantic military alliance. 'I'm very encouraged by what we heard in there,' Hegseth told reporters. 'Countries in there are well exceeding 2% and we think very close, almost near consensus, on a 5% commitment to Nato.' Nato's current target level for military spending, agreed at a summit in Cardiff in 2014, is 2% of GDP, but Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that European allies and Canada do not spend enough compared with the US. In an attempt to avoid Trump wrecking the first Nato summit of his second term, the alliance's new secretary general, Mark Rutte, proposed a 3.5% plus 1.5% target, though there is some ambiguity about the target date. Initial reports suggested that Rutte wanted allies to hit the target from 2032, though earlier this week British sources suggested the date could be 2035. Sweden's defence minister said he would like to see the target hit by 2030. Only Poland currently exceeds the 3.5% target for hard military spending at 4.32%, according to Nato figures, while the US defence budget, the largest in the alliance, amounts to 3.4% of GDP, at $967bn (£711bn). The UK spends 2.33% of GDP on its military, but has pledged to increase that to 2.5% by 2027 and to 3% some time in the next parliament. Earlier this week the prime minister, Keir Starmer, declined to set a firm date for the UK achieving 3% as he unveiled a strategic defence review. Related: Why is defence such a hard sell? The same reason Starmer is struggling in the polls | Martin Kettle Rutte will visit London on Monday to meet Starmer before the summit. Downing Street said the prime minister and the secretary general would 'talk about how we ensure all allies step up their defence spending now in order to respond to the threats that we face now'. Germany's defence minister, Boris Pistorius, said Berlin would need up to 60,000 additional troops to meet new Nato targets for weapons and personnel. 'We are stepping up to our responsibility as Europe's largest economy,' the minister said on Thursday. Germany, which currently spends 2.12% of GDP on defence, had been singled out by Trump as a laggard in spending, though until Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Berlin had been reluctant to be a leader in European military spending, partly due to the memories of the militarism of the second world war.

Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Goldman Sachs lowers Tesla vehicle delivery estimates
-- Goldman Sachs has lowered its Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) vehicle delivery and EPS estimates, citing "weaker monthly datapoints in key regions" such as China, the US, and Europe, along with concerning consumer survey data. The investment bank now anticipates a more challenging environment for the electric vehicle manufacturer. According to Goldman Sachs, U.S. deliveries through May are "tracking down mid teens yoy," based on data from Wards and Motor Intelligence. European registration data for April is said to show a "50% yoy decline," with May data indicating a "mid 20% range yoy decline." In China, the bank said that while April and May data suggest a low single digit sequential increase, it represents a "20% yoy decrease" compared to the same period last year. Consequently, Goldman Sachs now projects Q2 2025 deliveries to be 365,000 units, a notable reduction from their previous estimate of 410,000 and "below Visible Alpha Consensus Data at 417K." They believe Q2 deliveries could range between 335,000 and 395,000 depending on June's performance and "the degree of incentives Tesla utilizes." Consumer survey data from Morning Consult and HundredX, analyzed by Goldman Sachs with their Data Works team, indicates "weak" sentiment for Tesla in North America and Europe, while being "stronger in China." This suggests "demand/brand issues may be contributing to weakness in the US and European markets," said Goldman Sachs. The believe the decline in China could stem from "competition and product cycle timing." Reflecting these trends, Goldman Sachs has revised its delivery assumptions for 2025, 2026, and 2027 to 1.575 million, 1.865 million, and 2.15 million units, respectively, down from prior estimates. Despite the downward revisions, Goldman Sachs maintains a Neutral rating on Tesla shares, lowering their 12-month price target for the stock to $285 from $295. Related articles Goldman Sachs lowers Tesla vehicle delivery estimates Shopify, Citi named signature picks at Wells Fargo Goldman Sachs lowers MYR Group, raises MasTec Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data