logo
Karnataka high court quashes appointment ofMaharani varsity's acting vice-chancellor

Karnataka high court quashes appointment ofMaharani varsity's acting vice-chancellor

Time of India24-05-2025
Bengaluru: The high court has quashed Dr BK Meera's appointment as the acting vice-chancellor of Maharani Cluster University in the city. Justice R Nataraj delivered the ruling while partly allowing a petition filed by TM Manjunath, director of the School of Humanities and Liberal Arts at the university, a contender for the post.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The judge, however, declined Manjunath's request for directing his appointment, stating that the chancellor of universities (governor) maintains the authority to appoint an acting vice-chancellor as per the Karnataka State Universities (KSU) Act, 2000.
The chancellor may consider Manjunath's appointment if he meets the eligibility criteria, the judge added.
Manjunath had contested the March 28 order appointing Meera as acting vice-chancellor, succeeding Dr Ushadevi C.
He highlighted that the previous vice-chancellor's reply dated Oct 23, 2024, included a list of senior-most directors, where his name appeared first, having been appointed as director on Oct 16, 2023.
The chancellor's office defended its decision, citing that Meera, the senior-most zoology professor, was selected to better understand female students' academic and psychological needs, applying section 14(4) of the KSU Act, 2000, which requires women vice-chancellors for women's universities.
Justice Nataraj emphasised that the senior-most dean must become the acting vice-chancellor. The chancellor's discretionary powers do not extend to appointing someone other than a dean/director to this position.
The court noted that the request of the governor's office for senior-most deans/directors did not specify women candidates only. Additionally, no evidence showed the university is exclusively for women, unlike Akkamahadevi University. The notification neither explained why Manjunath was overlooked nor mentioned any irregularities in his directorship appointment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Govt. to table private school fee Bill in Monsoon Session: CM
Govt. to table private school fee Bill in Monsoon Session: CM

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

Govt. to table private school fee Bill in Monsoon Session: CM

Chief Minister Rekha Gupta on Saturday said the Delhi government will table a Bill to regulate fee hikes by private schools during the upcoming Monsoon Session of the Assembly, beginning August 4. Amid ongoing protests by parents, the Delhi government had earlier approved a draft of the Bill and proposed bringing an Ordinance, since the Assembly was not in session. Now, it has decided to table the Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees) Bill, 2025. 'The Delhi government will table the Bill to regulate fee hikes by private schools in the Monsoon Session of Assembly beginning from August 4,' Ms. Gupta said while addressing the media. The parents' groups, while pointing out issues in the Bill, said that they will send their detailed suggestions to the government on Sunday. Three-level checks A three-level verification will be implemented to regulate fee hikes, according to the Bill seen by The Hindu. First, schools will form an 11-member committee comprising the school management – a management representative and principal – three teachers, five parents from the parent-teacher association, selected by a draw of lots, and a nominee of the Directorate of Education (DoE). A District Fee Appellate Committee will hear appeals against the decisions taken by school-level committees. A similar procedure will be followed with a State-level revision committee, which will be the highest appellate authority. An aggrieved parents' group, which the Bill describes as 15% of the total strength of parents in an affected school, may appeal to the District Fee Appellate Committee within 30 days from the time the fees are approved, against the decisions of school-level committees. The Bill also specifies that if a school is found levying a fee that is not determined in the provisions of the Act, the DoE will direct the school to roll back the fee and refund the excess amount to the parents. The penalty for violators can range between ₹1 lakh and ₹10 lakh. Meanwhile, a fine of ₹50,000 will be levied on schools for harassing students over delayed payment of fees. The Bill also mentions the 10 factors that will determine the fee structure, including the location of the school, infrastructure made available, the education standardof schools, and a reasonable revenue surplus as may be prescribed. Divya Mattey, a parent of a student who studies in Delhi Public School, Dwarka, said, 'It will be difficult to get a minimum of 15% of the parent body to raise a question.' Mr. Mattey said that parents have noted that the penalties might not affect bigger schools, for whom '₹50,000 might be a small amount'. AAP, BJP at odds Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) Delhi State president Saurabh Bharadwaj criticised the Bill, saying, 'Until now, even under the 1973 law, if a single parent felt that fees had been unfairly hiked, they could file a complaint with the DoE. Now, that has been scrapped. Under the new law, you'll need a minimum of 15% of parents to raise a complaint. In a school with 3,000 students, that means identifying 450 parents – a near-impossible task.' Delhi BJP chief Virendra Sachdeva said, 'It would have been better if Saurabh Bharadwaj had waited until the Bill was tabled in the upcoming session before commenting on it.'

Create uniform policy for mobile towers: HC
Create uniform policy for mobile towers: HC

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Create uniform policy for mobile towers: HC

Jaipur: Rajasthan High Court Friday called upon the state govt to formulate a uniform policy on the installation of mobile towers on residential and commercial buildings across the state. The court's observation came while hearing a petition filed by a private company involved in the installation of mobile towers and one Chhitar Mal, who challenged a notice issued by Khandela municipality in Sikar district directing the removal of mobile towers from a building allegedly erected without permissions. The petitioners contended that the towers were installed after due intimation to the municipality and claimed that, as per prevailing rules, no separate permission under the Municipal Act was required. They further argued that the local body permitted the erection of the tower and only later raised objections. Justice Avneesh Jhingan, who heard the matter, observed that the issue of installing mobile towers in already constructed buildings in residential and commercial zones had serious implications for public safety. He emphasised that it was critical to assess the structural strength and load-bearing capacity of such buildings. The court pointed out that the municipality failed to consider the petitioners' representation before issuing notice for removal, even though the tower was erected with their knowledge. The court directed the municipality to decide the issue of removal within 15 days of receiving the order. It also asked the petitioners or their representative to appear before the local body on Aug 1. A copy of the order was directed to be sent to the secretary (Local Self Govt). Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !

Camp court disposes of 139 appeals under ODA Act
Camp court disposes of 139 appeals under ODA Act

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

Camp court disposes of 139 appeals under ODA Act

Bhubaneswar: In a significant move towards expediting urban development-related appeals, a special camp court held at Unnati Bhawan here on Saturday disposed of 139 cases under the Orissa Development Authorities (ODA) Act, 1982. The session, presided over by principal secretary of housing and urban development, Usha Padhee, addressed appeals related to the Bhubaneswar Development Authority (BDA) and Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation (BMC). This initiative comes following directives from chief minister Mohan Charan Majhi. "The camp court represents our commitment to transparent and accountable administration," said Padhee. The hearing tackled cases from a backlog of over 700 pending appeals filed by citizens against various administrative orders in the real estate and related sectors. In a recent administrative reform, the govt has designated additional senior officers, including the director of municipal administration and special secretaries, as appellate authorities in the govt. The decentralised approach aims to streamline the appeal process and reduce pending cases. The housing and urban development department plans to continue the camp courts in phases to address remaining cases. The initiative has received positive response from the public, marking a significant step towards efficient urban governance. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store