
You're brushing your teeth wrong — a common myth you grew up hearing can leave you ‘long in the tooth'
For decades, Americans have been scrubbing their smiles with the wrong tools and techniques thanks to a deeply ingrained myth.
This rough-around-the-edges technique is doing more harm than good, according to Chicago-based dentist Dr. Joy Poskozim.
3 Your rough-around-the-edges technique is doing more harm than good, according to Chicago-based dentist Dr. Joy Poskozim.
S Fanti/peopleimages.com – stock.adobe.com
The idea that harder bristles work better to clean your teeth has persisted for ages — but it's not actually true.
Hard-bristled brushes can actually wear down enamel over time — a condition called toothbrush abrasion — causing teeth to appear browner, thinner and more brittle, especially around the gumline.
Even worse, overly aggressive brushing can irritate the gums to the point that they begin to pull back from the teeth — which is where the phrase 'long in the tooth' comes from, according to Poskozim.
'Starting in the 1950s, softer nylon toothbrush bristles were being created by toothbrush makers like Colgate,' she told The Post.
'[But] there are some people to this day that prefer a medium-hardness toothbrush to the soft-bristled brushes.'
If you really want bristles that feel a bit firmer, Poskozim recommends an electric toothbrush like the one by Sonicare.
3 'Starting in the 1950s, softer nylon toothbrush bristles were being created by toothbrush makers like Colgate,' Poskozim told The Post.
Syda Productions – stock.adobe.com
'The bristles are soft and the toothbrush is timed for two minutes — so they are brushing longer and, even though the bristles are soft, it feels like a 'harder' brush,' she said.
Poskozim notes that the average American only brushes for 37 seconds, which is well below the professional recommendation of a full two minutes.
The dentist, who works extensively with older adults, says many patients grew up with dangerous dental beliefs and habits that still linger.
Those include:
Thinking harder toothbrushes are better
Not knowing anything about flossing
Never seeing the dentist on a regular basis unless in pain
Not having to see a dentist when having baby teeth
Having all teeth removed preventatively to prevent toothaches
Getting full dentures when you're only 16, 'sometimes still done in the deep South'
3 Overly aggressive brushing can irritate the gums to the point that they begin to pull back from the teeth — which is where the phrase 'long in the tooth' comes from, according to Poskozim.
Rasulov – stock.adobe.com
Bristle firmness isn't the only thing that's changed since the '50s — in fact, there have been shifts in dental care since even the late '90s.
'When I graduated from NYU College of Dentistry in 1999, the only thing we knew about the fluoride ion was that it bonded with the surface calcium, helping to prevent bacteria from penetrating into the teeth,' she said.
That's because tooth enamel is porous — which is why we feel sensitivity and get stains. But modern science shows fluoride is doing more than just shielding the surface.
'Now we know that fluoride also prevents micronutrients from leaving out teeth, so fluoride keeps teeth 'mineralized,'' she said.
Some other old-school myths, according to Poskozim, is that brushing once a day is enough and it's best to brush before breakfast.
'The whole purpose of brushing teeth is to disrupt the oral bacteria from creating cavities from the foods we eat and plaque depositing,' she said.
'Therefore, it is better to brush after meals, not allowing excess food particles to fester in and around our teeth.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
33 minutes ago
- USA Today
Lawmakers want independent re-do of Air Force missile community cancer study
The Air Force started studying cancer rates in the nuclear missile community in 2023 due to pressure from ailing missile officers. Lawmakers may soon order an independent re-do of an ongoing Air Force study on possible cancer risk in personnel manning its nuclear missiles. A provision in the House's draft defense policy bill would, if passed, require the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to commission a study examining "occupational health and safety conditions" in Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile facilities. The sites include the underground alert facilities where Air Force missile officers spend long shifts prepared to launch in the case of nuclear war. The move comes after an independent researcher concluded there is an increase in cases of a rare cancer at an Air Force missile base in Montana, adding another wrinkle to a years-long push for answers. The new, congressionally directed research would also scrutinize the methodology and design of an ongoing Air Force study of the issue. The Air Force Medical Service and Air Force Global Strike Command, which oversees the service's nuclear-armed missile and bomber forces, began studying the missile community's cancer risks in 2023 after a Space Force officer compiled a list of cancer diagnoses at Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana. The Air Force study's preliminary findings indicated troops in the nuclear missile community don't have higher cancer diagnosis or death rates than other active duty servicemembers or the general U.S. population. The official study's environmental surveys, however, confirmed the presence of polychorinated biphenyls − a likely cancer-causing chemical − in alert facilities at Malmstrom and at Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota. And an independent assessment of self-reported Non-Hodgkin lymphoma cases at Malmstrom released in April found an increase in diagnoses among missileers. Rep. Don Bacon, R-Nebraska, submitted the independent study amendment, which cleared a key hurdle when it passed the House Armed Services Committee on July 16. Bacon told USA TODAY that a meeting with one of his constituents − an ailing retired missile officer − moved him to author the provision. "Let's make sure that we have some outside experts working with the Air Force," said Bacon, who is a retired Air Force brigadier general. "We want to make sure there's credibility and, whatever results come out, that we've done total due diligence." The Omaha-based representative added that the Air Force needs to learn what's wrong in the aging Minuteman III launch facilities before it builds new ones for the planned Sentinel ICBM. Air Force officials defended the rigor and transparency of their ongoing study in a statement to USA TODAY. "We welcome the opportunity of scientific and medical professionals to review Air Force studies and to provide comments," said Alana Miller, a spokeswoman for the Office of the Air Force Surgeon General. Miller emphasized the internal independence of Air Force epidemiologists conducting the study and their partnerships with external researchers who review their findings. The Torchlight Initiative, an advocacy group for missile community members, praised the independent study amendment in a press release. Torchlight has documented more than 800 self-reported cases of cancer and other exposure-related diseases among ICBM airmen and veterans. "There is an urgent need for ... thorough independent research, formal acknowledgement of likely exposures, and a sustained commitment to safeguard future personnel through enhanced environmental monitoring," the group argued. For the independent study to occur, the provision must make it into the final defense policy bill later this year. The House and Senate typically pass competing versions of the legislation before negotiating a compromise bill for the president's signature. Davis Winkie's role covering nuclear threats and national security at USA TODAY is supported by a partnership with Outrider Foundation and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.


Boston Globe
33 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
UN body says Israeli forces have killed over 1,000 aid-seekers in Gaza since May, as hunger worsens
Israel accuses Hamas of siphoning off aid — without providing evidence of widespread diversion — and blames U.N. agencies for failing to deliver food it has allowed in. The military says it has only fired warning shots near aid sites. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an Israeli-backed American contractor, rejected what it said were 'false and exaggerated statistics' from the United Nations. The Gaza Health Ministry, which is part of the Hamas-run government and staffed by medical professionals, said Tuesday that 101 people, including 80 children, have died in recent days from starvation. During hunger crises, people often die from a combination of malnutrition, illness and deprivation. Advertisement Israel eased a 2½-month blockade in May, allowing a trickle of aid in through the longstanding U.N.-run system and the newly created GHF. Aid groups say it's not nearly enough. Palestinians carried sacks of flour unloaded from a humanitarian aid convoy that reached Gaza City from the northern Gaza Strip, on Tuesday. Jehad Alshrafi/Associated Press 'I do it for my children' Dozens of Palestinians lined up Tuesday outside a charity kitchen in Gaza City, hoping for a bowl of watery tomato soup. The lucky ones got small chunks of eggplant. As supplies ran out, people holding pots pushed and shoved to get to the front. Advertisement Nadia Mdoukh, a pregnant woman who was displaced from her home and lives in a tent with her husband and three children, said she worries about being shoved or trampled on, and about heat stroke as daytime temperatures hover above 90 F (32 C). 'I do it for my children,' she said. 'This is famine — there is no bread or flour.' The U.N. World Food Program says Gaza's hunger crisis has reached 'new and astonishing levels of desperation.' Ross Smith, the agency's director for emergencies, told reporters Monday that nearly 100,000 women and children are suffering from severe acute malnutrition, and a third of Gaza's population is going without food for multiple days in a row. MedGlobal, a charity working in Gaza, said five children as young as 3 months had died from starvation in the past three days. 'This is a deliberate and human-made disaster,' said Joseph Belliveau, its executive director. 'Those children died because there is not enough food in Gaza and not enough medicines, including IV fluids and therapeutic formula, to revive them.' The charity said food is in such short supply that its own staff members suffer dizziness and headaches. Palestinians held onto an aid truck returning to Gaza City from the northern Gaza Strip on Tuesday. Jehad Alshrafi/Associated Press Aid delivery model criticized Of the 1,054 people killed while trying to get food since late May, 766 were killed while heading to sites run by the Israeli- and U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, according to the U.N. human rights office. The others were killed when gunfire erupted around U.N. convoys or aid sites. Thameen al-Kheetan, a spokesperson for the U.N. rights office, says its figures come from 'multiple reliable sources on the ground,' including medics, humanitarian and human rights organizations. He said the numbers were still being verified according to the office's strict methodology. Advertisement Palestinian witnesses and health officials say Israeli forces regularly fire toward crowds of thousands of people heading to the GHF sites. The military says it has only fired warning shots, and GHF says its armed contractors have only fired into the air on a few occasions to try to prevent stampedes. A joint statement 'The Israeli government's aid delivery model is dangerous, fuels instability and deprives Gazans of human dignity,' read the statement, which was signed by the United Kingdom, France and other countries friendly to Israel. 'The Israeli government's denial of essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable.' Israel and the United States rejected the statement, blaming Hamas for prolonging the war by not accepting Israeli terms for a ceasefire and the release of hostages abducted in the militant-led attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, which triggered the fighting. Hamas has said it will release the remaining hostages only in return for a lasting ceasefire and an Israeli withdrawal. Israel says it will keep fighting until Hamas has been defeated or disarmed. Displaced Palestinians waited for donated food at a community kitchen in Gaza City, northern Gaza Strip, on Tuesday. Jehad Alshrafi/Associated Press Strikes on tents sheltering the displaced Israeli strikes killed at least 25 people Tuesday across Gaza, according to local health officials. One strike hit tents sheltering displaced people in the built-up seaside Shati refugee camp in Gaza City, killing at least 12 people, according to Shifa Hospital, which received the casualties. The Israeli military said that it wasn't aware of such a strike by its forces. Advertisement The dead included three women and three children, the hospital director, Dr. Mohamed Abu Selmiya, told The Associated Press. Thirty-eight other Palestinians were wounded, he said. An overnight strike that hit crowds of Palestinians waiting for aid trucks in Gaza City killed eight, hospitals said. At least 118 were wounded, according to the Palestinian Red Crescent. 'A bag of flour covered in blood and death,' said Mohammed Issam, who was in the crowd and said some people were run over by trucks in the chaos. 'How long will this humiliation continue?' The Israeli military had no immediate comment on that strike. Israel blames the deaths of Palestinian civilians on Hamas, because the militants operate in densely populated areas. Israel renewed its offensive in March with a surprise bombardment after ending an earlier ceasefire. Talks on another truce have dragged on for weeks despite pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump. Hamas-led militants abducted 251 people in the Oct. 7 attack, and killed around 1,200 people. Fewer than half of the 50 hostages still in Gaza are believed to be alive. More than 59,000 Palestinians have been killed during the war, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Its count doesn't distinguish between militants and civilians, but the ministry says that more than half of the dead are women and children. The U.N. and other international organizations see it as the most reliable source of data on casualties. Magdy reported from Cairo, and Goldenberg from Jerusalem. Associated Press Writer Jamey Keaten in Geneva contributed to this report.


Time Business News
34 minutes ago
- Time Business News
Wound Care Biologics Gain Ground in Healing Complex Surgical and Trauma Wounds
The bioengineered products used for non-healing wounds of lower extremity are Wound care biologics. Usage involves of active biological agents such as plant and animal-derived biomolecules which exhibits antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. They used in the post surgeries and trauma cases as they provide moist healing environment aiding heat loss, protein, and prevent bacterial contamination. Demand for various products are also been manufactured to replace or augment various substrates in the wound healing cascade. Wound care biologic dressings are increasingly being used in post surgeries and severe trauma cases as they provide moist healing environment aiding heat loss, protein and electrolyte loss for faster healing, and prevent bacterial contamination. Key Growth Drivers and Opportunities Increasing incidence of traumatic: Growing incidences of traumatic, surgical, ulcers and burn wounds are the major driver factor of wound care biologics. In 2017, according to global diabetes community it was estimated that 422 million adults are living with diabetes globally, and this is expected to increase to 642 million by 2040. Challenges The higher cost tag associated with biologics and the tough regulatory hurdles for bringing new tissue-engineered products to market are holding back the growth of the wound care biologics sector. Smaller healthcare centers frequently find it tough to pay for or keep these cutting-edge treatments on hand, which limits patients' ability to get them. Innovation and Expansion Convatec Enters Biologics Market with Triad Life Sciences Acquisition In March 2022, Convatec Group Plc made a move by acquiring Triad Life Sciences Inc., a medical device company from the United States. Triad focused on creating products from biological sources to help heal surgical wounds, chronic wounds, and burns. For Convatec, purchasing Triad was a truly significant step. It allowed them to enter the market for biological wound care solutions, providing them with more tools to address medical needs that had previously gone unmet. MIMEDX Gains Japan Approval, Expands Global Footprint with Epifix In June 2021, MIMEDX (US) received approval from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare for the commercialization of Epifix in Japan. MIMEDX, a US-based company, has received the green light from Japan's Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare to bring Epifix to market in Japan. This news is a big deal and marks a major step forward for the company's plans to expand its reach around the world. Inventive Sparks, Expanding Markets Key players operating in the wound care biologics market includes Smith & Nephew Plc., Organogenesis, Inc., Integra Lifesciences Holdings Corporation, among others. Companies in the wound care biologics sector are focused on providing cutting-edge healing options that speed up recovery and enhance the quality of life for patients. About Author: Prophecy is a specialized market research, analytics, marketing and business strategy, and solutions company that offer strategic and tactical support to clients for making well-informed business decisions and to identify and achieve high value opportunities in the target business area. Also, we help our client to address business challenges and provide best possible solutions to overcome them and transform their business. TIME BUSINESS NEWS