logo
Brexit reset: Who won – Starmer or the EU?

Brexit reset: Who won – Starmer or the EU?

Yahoo19-05-2025

The UK and EU talks went down to the wire, but in the early hours of Monday negotiators managed to strike a deal.
Sir Keir Starmer will be keen to promote the wins of the agreement, including trade and easier travel rules for British holidaymakers to the European Union.
But Britain has also had to make significant concessions, particularly on fishing rights, that are likely to prompt anger from Brexit supporters.
Here, The Telegraph looks at where the Prime Minister won, and lost, in his EU reset deal.
The EU has secured fishing rights in British waters for 12 years, until 2038. The move has been seen as a major concession by Sir Keir to secure other elements of the deal.
Prior to Brexit, the Commons Fisheries Policy gave European fishing vessels access to UK waters more than 12 nautical miles from the coast.
The Brexit deal struck by Boris Johnson reduced the annual quota that could be caught by EU fishermen by 25 per cent, but set a cut-off date for that arrangement in 2026.
Sir Keir has now agreed to extend the quota of 75 per cent of pre-Brexit fishing rights until 2038.
It has been dubbed a 'fish for food' deal, as the concession was made in return for an agreement to boost trade.
The UK Government has argued that it is a practical step as it removes the politics from annual negotiations and allows both sides to concentrate on other, more important areas.
In return for the granting of access to British waters for much longer than was expected, the UK has managed to secure a veterinary agreement to boost trade.
The Swiss style-deal that removes border checks and red tape on agri-food will be permanent.
But it does mean Britain has agreed to align with EU plant and animal health laws and will therefore be subject to European Court of Justice decisions over them.
The acceptance of 'dynamic alignment' will be highly controversial, with Brexiteers saying it is again allowing the EU to make British laws, subjecting the UK to the jurisdiction of a foreign court.
Monday's deal does not contain a youth mobility scheme, but does set out an intention to 'work towards' devising a 'balanced youth experience scheme' for the UK and EU.
The documents say that a future scheme should allow young people to work, study, volunteer and travel for a 'limited period of time' with a 'dedicated visa pathway'.
It also says that the overall number of participants should be capped at a level 'acceptable to both sides'.
Britain has also effectively promised to join the EU's Erasmus+ student exchange programme, which allows students from participating nations to do placements at higher education institutions in other countries.
Britain will have access to the EU's Security Action for Europe (Safe) fund, which will raise at least €150 billion (£126 billion) through the EU's budget to buy weapons from manufacturers in participating countries.
British firms such as BAE Systems will be able to bid for contracts from the fund, which will be a boost for the sector and create jobs.
Britain will also be able to jointly procure military equipment with the EU, which in theory will make it cheaper.
The wording of the agreement also suggests the EU will consider joining a Rachel Reeves-backed defence investment bank.
But the arrangement will mean that UK troops are likely to be deployed on EU military missions, if Britain's position on any mission is aligned with Brussels.
This is underpinned by the fact that the EU and UK are working in a similar way in Ukraine, and share the same visions for the Western Balkans and multilateralism.
The UK will now have access to EU databases of third country nationals' fingerprints, DNA and criminal records. There will also be facial recognition sharing.
This will be seen as a sizeable win for the Home Office, which is then better able to profile illegal migrants and can also use the data for extradition.
There will also be greater co-operation between the UK and Europol on migration, helping to crack down on people-smuggling.
Observers have said that this area is a surprising win for Britain, and comes at a time when the Government is seeking to show that it is committed to bringing down net migration.
Britain has agreed to dynamically align with the EU's rules for electricity trading, paving the way for a deal that will make it easier to buy and sell electricity.
It will also aid joint renewables projects in the North Sea. The EU has said that this will make bills cheaper, but it will again mean accepting the bloc's regulations.
The agreement, leaked to The Telegraph, says: 'The European Commission and the United Kingdom should explore in detail the necessary parameters for the United Kingdom's possible participation in the European Union's internal electricity market, including participation in the European Union's trading platforms in all timeframes.'
The UK will align with EU rules to hit net zero by rejoining the EU's Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS).
This would mean rejoining the ETS carbon market and changing British rules to match EU laws, before then having to accept further decisions from the European Court of Justice. It would also mean the UK would be under pressure to stay in lockstep with Brussels on policy around achieving net zero.
Critics have claimed the move would push up the cost of producing electricity from gas-fired power plants – the UK's second-largest source of power – and ultimately add to the costs faced by British industry and increase household bills.
But the ETS system is very new, so it remains to be seen how it would work for Britain and the rest of the bloc.
British passport holders will be able to use EU e-gates, which means holidaymakers will no longer need to wait in longer queues to get their passport stamped at border control.
In the majority of EU countries, only EU travellers and members of the European Economic Area are allowed to use the e-gates.
This was one of the elements of the deal championed by Labour figures as a big win for voters.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israeli forces board Gaza-bound aid boat, Freedom Flotilla Coalition says
Israeli forces board Gaza-bound aid boat, Freedom Flotilla Coalition says

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Israeli forces board Gaza-bound aid boat, Freedom Flotilla Coalition says

Israeli forces board Gaza-bound aid boat, Freedom Flotilla Coalition says Show Caption Hide Caption Israel prepares to 'conquer' and 'clear out' all of Gaza Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he plans to "take over" Gaza and move the civilian population southward. JERUSALEM — Israeli forces have boarded a charity vessel attempting to reach the Gaza Strip in defiance of an Israeli naval blockade, the Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC) said early on June 9. The British-flagged yacht Madleen, operated by the pro-Palestinian FFC, had departed from Sicily on June 6 and had hoped to reach Gaza later in the day, when the interception occurred, the group said on its Telegram account. Among those on board the boat are Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg and Rima Hassan, a French member of the European Parliament. The Israeli military had no immediate comment. Shortly before the FFC statement, the Israeli Foreign Ministry posted a video on X showing the Israeli Navy communicating with the Madleen over a loudspeaker, urging it to change course. "The maritime zone off the coast of Gaza is closed to naval traffic as part of a legal naval blockade," a soldier said. "If you wish to deliver humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip, you are able to do so through the (Israeli) port of Ashdod." The yacht, with its 12-person crew, was carrying a symbolic shipment of humanitarian aid, including rice and baby formula. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz ordered the military on June 8 to prevent the Madleen from reaching Gaza, calling the mission a propaganda effort in support of Hamas. Israel imposed a naval blockade on the coastal enclave after Hamas took control of Gaza in 2007. The blockade has remained in place through multiple conflicts, including the current war, which began after a Hamas-led assault on southern Israel on October 7, 2023, that killed more than 1,200 people, according to an Israeli tally. Gaza's health ministry says over 54,000 Palestinians have been killed since the start of Israel's military campaign. The United Nations has warned that most of Gaza's more than 2 million residents are facing famine. The Israeli government says the blockade is essential to prevent weapons from reaching Hamas. (Reporting by Crispian Balmer, Yomna Ehab and Enas Alashray; Editing by Richard Chang)

Albo urged to go hard on Trump
Albo urged to go hard on Trump

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Albo urged to go hard on Trump

Anthony Albanese should play hardball with the US on beef as tariff talks grind on, Nationals leader David Littleproud says. American beef imports have emerged as a key negotiating item in the Albanese government's efforts to secure a tariff carve out. The Trump administration has been pushing for Australia to loosen import rules to include beef from cattle originating in Canada and Mexico but slaughtered in the US. The Prime Minister has confirmed biosecurity officials were reviewing the request but vowed his government would not 'compromise' Australia's strict bio laws. But the prospect of changing laws has sparked unease among cattle farmers worried about keeping bovine diseases well away from the country's shores. With beef imports seemingly key to securing a US tariff exemption, Mr Littleproud on Monday said there needed to be some 'perspective'. 'The United States does need Australia and other countries to import beef to be able to put on their hamburgers,' he told Sky News. 'They don't have the production capacity to be able to produce the type of beef that goes on their hamburgers. 'So this is a tax on themselves that they put on Australian beef.' Despite being subject to the blanket 10 per cent tariffs on foreign imports, Australian beef into the US has risen by 32 per cent this year, according to Meat and Livestock Australia. Meanwhile, the cost of domestically produced beef within the US has been climbing, as cattle farmers struggle with drought. Mr Littleproud said the Nationals were not against importing American beef provided that it was from cattle 'born in the United States and bred all the way through to their slaughter in the United States'. But beef from cattle originating in third countries was a risk because 'we don't have the traceability that we have over the US production system'. 'And that's why Anthony Albanese needed to rule out straight away that he would not open that up to those cattle that were born in Canada, Mexico, or anywhere else in the Americas, because that poses a significant risk unless we can trace those cattle,' Mr Littleproud said. Mr Albanese has been clear in saying he would 'never loosen any rules regarding our biosecurity'. But he has also said that if a deal can be struck 'in a way that protects our biosecurity, of course we don't just say no'. Mr Littleproud acknowledged Mr Albanese's words but said 'when you see reports from departments saying this is what's on the table in terms of negotiations – where there's smoke, there's fire'. In addition to the baseline 10 per cent duties on foreign goods, Australia has also been subjected to 50 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium. Only the UK has been able to secure a partial exemption from the Donald Trump's tariffs. A key UK concession was scrapping its 20 per cent imposts on American beef and raising the import quota to 13,000 metric tonnes. But with many British goods still subject to tariffs, analysts have questioned whether the deal was worth it. The US has trade surpluses with both the UK and Australia. Though, Australia also has a free-trade agreement with the US, meaning goods should be traded mostly uninhibited. The Albanese government has repeatedly criticised Mr Trump's decision to slap tariffs on Australian products as 'economic self-harm' and 'not the act of a friend'.

Tesla Just Bucked An EV Trend In Europe, And It's A Huge Problem For The Company
Tesla Just Bucked An EV Trend In Europe, And It's A Huge Problem For The Company

Miami Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Tesla Just Bucked An EV Trend In Europe, And It's A Huge Problem For The Company

Tesla's reputation has taken a significant hit since January, when CEO Elon Musk created the DOGE task force, billed as a means to decrease spending across the United States government. In doing so, Musk damaged his standing with the public, which has carried over to Tesla. New data shows that Tesla's reputational hit is not limited to the United States, as sales in Europe are down for Tesla amid a surging electric vehicle market. According to the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association, sales of battery electric vehicles across the European Union (EU) increased by 26.4 percent in 2025 compared to 2024, year-to-date. Tesla registrations in the EU have declined by 46.1 percent through April 2025, with a 52.6 percent year-over-year decrease in April alone. For 2025 (January through April; all figures are year-over-year comparisons), Tesla has sold 41,677 units. In the same period in 2024, Tesla registrations (sales) were 77,314 units. If this downward trend continues, Tesla will be one of the five worst-selling brands in the EU by mid-2025. In April alone, Tesla only sold 5,475 vehicles in the EU. Though the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association didn't break out its data by month, it's easy to conclude Tesla sales have been in decline since the beginning of the year. If April were a "normal" month, Tesla would have sold about 22,000 vehicles in the EU. Expanding the scope doesn't help much. In the EU, the UK, and across the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), which includes Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, and Switzerland, Tesla sold 61,320 vehicles compared to 100,255 in the same timeframe in 2024, representing a 38.8 percent decline. In April, Tesla sold 7,261 vehicles, down from 14,228 last year, signaling a 49 percent drop. Battery-electric vehicle sales in the EU from January through April 2025 are up 26.4 percent, which is the same percentage decline for ICE vehicles, suggesting that Europe is embracing the concept of replacing combustion engine vehicles with EVs. France and Estonia were the only countries to experience a decline in EV registrations year over year. EVs account for only 15.3 percent of the market in the EU, trailing behind petrol vehicles (28.6 percent) and hybrids (35.3 percent). Though total car sales dipped 1.2 percent year to date, EV sales were up 3.3 percent. Diesel and petrol sales have dropped over ten percent year over year. As Elon Musk quietly slips away from his work in government, the damage done to Tesla may be irreversible. Less than ten percent of overall Tesla sales occurred in one out of four months in 2025, which is an indicator that Tesla is a brand non grata in Europe and sales are declining sharply every month. Upstart Chinese automaker BYD, a brand some consider Tesla's main existential threat, outsold Tesla in the EU in April by about 60 cars, according to data from analyst firm JATO. BYD doesn't have a vehicle in the top 10, according to JATO, but both of Tesla's main vehicles - the Model Y and Model 3 - saw sales decline 49 percent and 41 percent, respectively. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store