
US Education Department releases $1.3 billion for after-school programs after legal and political pressure
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The decision follows mounting political pressure from Republican lawmakers and a legal challenge launched by more than 20 states against the Trump administration's controversial freeze on more than $6 billion in federal education grants.
The released amount pertains to the 21st Century Community Learning Centres (CCLC) program, which supports before-school, after-school, and summer enrichment activities, especially in underserved and low-income areas.
These programs had been abruptly stalled after the administration initiated a spending review on July 1 to assess whether the grants aligned with federal priorities.
What the funding supports
The 21st Century CCLC program has long been a key federal initiative designed to provide safe, structured learning opportunities outside regular school hours. It serves millions of children nationwide, especially those from working-class families who depend on free programming for child care, homework help, and enrichment in STEM, arts, and literacy.
Beyond academics, the centres also serve as community hubs—offering meals, counselling, and recreation. In many rural and economically marginalised communities, they are the only structured options available to families after school.
The $1.3 billion now being released will allow these programs to proceed with hiring, contracts, and scheduling for the 2025–26 academic year. However, many organisations report having already faced severe setbacks, including the loss of staff, cancellation of summer initiatives, and withdrawal of enrolled students due to uncertainty.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Delay triggers nationwide disruption
The decision to withhold funding came without prior notice, catching states and districts off guard during a critical planning period. As schools and nonprofits scrambled to adjust budgets and operations, many were forced to cancel fall programming, halt hiring processes, and cut back on planned services.
Administrators in several states reported that the two-week delay led to furloughs, reduced staffing for the summer term, and delays in opening registrations for the fall.
Some rural and inner-city programs, where budgets operate on razor-thin margins, have already experienced lasting damage.
Education advocacy organisations said the temporary freeze had real-world consequences for vulnerable children and families who rely on these services for both academic support and basic care.
States push back: Lawsuit filed over $6 billion freeze
While the administration's review of the 21st Century program is now complete, approximately $5 billion in additional education funding remains frozen.
These include grants for adult literacy, English as a Second Language (ESL) instruction, teacher training, and other state-administered initiatives.
On Monday, a coalition of more than 20 states, led by California, filed a federal lawsuit challenging the legality of the funding freeze. The states argue that the money was already approved by Congress and signed into law by President Trump earlier this year, and that withholding it unilaterally violates both constitutional and administrative protocols.
The suit also asserts that delaying these funds threatens public education systems, especially in high-poverty districts, and undermines bipartisan efforts to improve literacy, language access, and adult education outcomes.
Political pushback from Republican senators
Adding to the pressure, 10 Republican senators, led by Sen. Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, sent a letter to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) urging the administration to lift the freeze.
The senators emphasised that the affected programs enjoy longstanding bipartisan support and are critical for communities in both red and blue states.
The letter clarified that while lawmakers are aligned with the administration's efforts to prevent misuse of federal funds, there is no indication that these particular grants are being used inappropriately or to advance political agendas.
Several of the letter's signatories serve on education-related committees and expressed concern that the freeze undermines local control of education—an issue frequently championed by conservative leaders.
Education groups demand immediate action
Education policy experts, school administrators, and nonprofit coalitions have called on the White House to expedite the release of the remaining funds. The AASA (School Superintendents Association) warned that continued delays would lead to staffing cuts, halted adult education programs, and reduced ESL services, just as schools are preparing for the new academic year.
These programs often support recent immigrants, job seekers, and parents returning to the workforce—groups that are already vulnerable and have fewer alternatives.
With school budgets already strained due to inflation and rising operational costs, federal funding plays a crucial role in keeping these services afloat.
As of now, there is no confirmed timeline from the Office of Management and Budget on when the rest of the education funds will be released. School districts continue to navigate uncertain conditions, with many fearing they will have to make staffing and programming decisions without clarity on federal support.
Funding future still undecided
While the release of $1.3 billion is a relief for many after-school programs, the broader issue of federal interference in already-appropriated funds has raised concerns across the education sector. Many see the freeze—and the method by which it was implemented—as a dangerous precedent that could impact future grant cycles.
Educators, lawmakers, and community leaders alike are watching closely to see how and when the administration resolves the remaining $5 billion freeze. For now, schools are being asked to plan for the academic year with limited certainty—placing crucial programs, jobs, and student services at continued risk.
TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us
.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
12 minutes ago
- India Today
Zelensky, Trump Discuss Ceasefire, Sanctions, and Major Drone Deal
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said on Tuesday (local time) that he had had a "productive" conversation with his US counterpart, Donald Trump on ending the war, sanctions on Russia and the finalisation of a US - Ukraine drone deal."President Trump is fully informed about Russian strikes on Kyiv and other cities and communities," Zelensky wrote on X, referring to intensifying drone and missile who has signalled frustration with Vladimir Putin in recent weeks, has given the Russian president until August 8 to make peace in Ukraine or face tougher sanctions. A source in Washington said US envoy Steve Witkoff would be meeting the Russian leadership in Moscow on in his nightly video address, Zelensky said Trump "knows the situation along the front line," which extends for 1,000 km (620 miles) through eastern and southern he said, had long supported US proposals for an immediate ceasefire and had proposed a number of formats to implement a halt to the fighting."We have spoken with and proposed to Russia quiet in the skies, no missile and drone attacks and specifically no attacks on civilian infrastructure or on the energy sector," he said."All of this has been violated by the Russians and in a very cynical fashion."Trump has threatened to hit Russia with new sanctions and impose 100% tariffs on countries that buy its oil, although sources close to the Kremlin have told Reuters that Putin is unlikely to bow to the said Ukraine was also ready to conclude a deal with the U.S. on the purchase of Ukrainian drones that would amount to "one of the strongest agreements". He had earlier said the deal was worth around $30 is increasingly seeking financing and investment from its foreign partners to bolster its burgeoning domestic arms said Kyiv's European partners had so far pledged to buy more than $1 billion in US weapons for Ukraine as part of a new scheme.- EndsTune InMust Watch


Economic Times
12 minutes ago
- Economic Times
World War 3 Near? Russia ends nuclear limits as Putin signals Cold War-style arms race with West
Russia has declared it will no longer limit its nuclear missile deployment. This comes after the US planned to station new missiles in Germany. President Vladimir Putin and top officials warned of retaliatory steps, raising fears of a new Cold War-era arms race with advanced weapons and reduced response times. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Russia Responds to US Missile Plans Kremlin Declares End to Nuclear Restraint Putin Prepares New Oreshnik Missile Deployment Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Missile's Impact Could Blur War Lines Trump's Role and Medvedev's Reaction Return of Cold War Missile Tensions Risks of Escalation Increase FAQs This announcement follows the United States' plans to deploy new intermediate-range weapons in Europe. The move marks a shift in global nuclear strategy and has raised concerns about a renewed Cold War-style arms Russian Foreign Ministry accused the United States and its NATO allies of creating a direct threat to its national security. The trigger is the planned deployment of US-made Typhoon and Dark Eagle missiles in Germany starting in 2026. These intermediate-range weapons have been a point of contention since the collapse of the INF Treaty in spokesperson Dmitry Peskov stated that Russia no longer considers itself bound by any previous arms control limits. He said Russia has the right to take appropriate steps if needed. According to Russian officials, the deployment of US missiles in Europe has broken the remaining stability between nuclear is preparing to deploy the Oreshnik missile, which can travel at Mach 10 and carry either nuclear or conventional warheads. This missile was first used in Ukraine in November. It is now being readied for deployment in Belarus. President Vladimir Putin has claimed that even conventional strikes using this missile could cause destruction comparable to nuclear Oreshnik missile's use suggests a new gray zone in warfare. While it may not carry nuclear warheads, its destructive potential could resemble that of a nuclear weapon. This tactic could lead to confusion about whether a nuclear strike has occurred, further complicating international Russian declaration comes shortly after Donald Trump repositioned two US nuclear submarines in response to nuclear threats from Dmitry Medvedev, Russia's Security Council deputy chairman. Trump has demanded a peace deal on Ukraine or warned of new sanctions. Medvedev responded that each new ultimatum was a step toward war. He also posted that Russia's end of its missile moratorium is a direct answer to NATO's missiles, banned under the 1987 INF Treaty, are now being considered again by both sides. The United States claimed Russia violated the treaty first. In contrast, Russia said its actions are in response to US missile placements in warn that intermediate-range missiles reduce decision-making time to just a few minutes. This increases the risk of mistakes, as world leaders may misinterpret incoming threats and respond without full information. The breakdown of arms control increases global said it will no longer follow past nuclear limits and may deploy its own missiles in reaction to US weapons moving into Oreshnik is a fast missile that can carry nuclear or conventional warheads. It is being prepared for deployment in Belarus.


Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Totally out of control': Trump calls for prosecuting minors amid Washington crime concerns; threatens to take federal control
US President Donald Trump (Image credits AP) US President Donald Trump on Tuesday threatened to place Washington, DC, under federal control, claiming the city's crime is 'totally out of control' and urging that minors as young as 14 be prosecuted as adults. His comments came the same day the FBI released new data showing a nationwide drop in violent crime. In a post on Truth Social, Trump wrote, 'Crime in Washington, DC, is totally out of control. Local 'youths' and gang members, some only 14, 15, and 16-years-old, are randomly attacking, mugging, maiming, and shooting innocent citizens, at the same time knowing that they will be almost immediately released.' While sharing a photo of a critically injured youth from a recent violent incident involving local teenagers, Trump claimed the victim had been 'beaten mercilessly by local thugs,' though he did not provide specific details about the case. 'The Law in DC must be changed to prosecute these 'minors' as adults, and lock them up for a long time, starting at age 14,' he added. Trump also suggested that if city leaders fail to act, he would move to federalise the capital. 'They are not afraid of Law Enforcement because they know nothing ever happens to them, but it's going to happen now! If DC doesn't get its act together, and quickly, we will have no choice but to take Federal control of the City, and run this City how it should be run,' he said. Trump's remarks directly contradict the FBI's annual crime report, released earlier Tuesday. According to the report, cited by NBC News, violent crime in the US fell by 4.5% in 2024, with significant declines in murder, robbery, rape, and aggravated assault. Property crime and hate crime rates also saw drops compared to 2023. The report draws from data submitted by over 16,000 law enforcement agencies, covering 95% of the US population. FBI Assistant Director Timothy Ferguson noted during a media briefing that although crime is down overall, violent and property crimes still occur regularly. Trump has frequently made crime a central theme in his political messaging, often portraying American cities as lawless. At a campaign event near Detroit last year, he said, 'You can't walk across the street to get a loaf of bread. You get shot, you get mugged, you get raped,' according to NBC News. While crime remains a contentious political issue, particularly in major urban areas like Washington, DC, recent federal data indicates that overall trends are moving in the opposite direction of Trump's claims.