McEntee details measures to tackle 'hugely alarming' school absenteeism
Over 110,000 primary and 65,000 secondary students missed 20 or more days of school in the 2022/2023 school year, which education minister Helen McEntee has described as "hugely alarming".
"Unfortunately, the stark reality is that in recent years we have seen a decline in regular attendance, and a rise in the number of children and young people missing a very concerning number of school days," said Ms McEntee, who on Monday is announcing a comprehensive suite of targeted and universal actions to improve school attendance.
Among the key initiatives being introduced is the 'Anseo' programme, which is a new evidence-based framework to help schools analyse and respond to attendance data, which will be rolled out in 60 schools following a successful pilot.
A national multimedia campaign, launching in September, will promote the importance of regular school attendance to students, parents, and guardians and there will be continued investment in the Educational Welfare Service, including expansion of educational welfare officer capacity.
Ms McEntee also plans to revise the Education (Welfare) Act, 2000 to strengthen statutory supports for young children, including bringing children under the age of six attending primary school within its scope to ensure earlier intervention.
Data published by Tusla in its latest annual attendance report shows concerning levels of student absence with 6.86m days lost in primary schools (8.6% of total days) and 5.56m days lost in post-primary schools (11.4%). Deis schools and special education settings recorded particularly high rates of absenteeism.
Ms McEntee said: 'School attendance is linked with attainment and with completing school. While there is excellent practice in schools to support children and young people to attend, we must listen to the data from Tusla and redouble our efforts."
Under the plan a national attendance conference will be held in early 2026 to share best practices and promote whole-system engagement, and a scoping project to deliver real-time attendance data for better decision-making and intervention will be rolled out.
Read More
Free online toolkit aims to combat 'chronic' absenteeism in schools
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Agriland
20 hours ago
- Agriland
Opinion: Is the CAP review a disaster in the making for Irish agriculture?
Every aspect of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) review that emanated from Brussels last week should send the alarm bells ringing within the Irish government. And the same principle holds where every farming stakeholder group in the country is concerned. I believe that if even a fraction of the EU's proposals' package is implemented, Irish agriculture is toast. One only has to look at what we already know about Irish government policy on CAP, relative to wjhat is now out for discussion. Minister for Education Helen McEntee attended a farmers' meeting in her Co. Meath constituency recently and essentially said that a strongly funded Pillar One and Pillar Two would be the only show in town as Ireland looked to the future. So try finding anything that remotely resembles this sentiment in the package pf proposals that came out of Brussels last week. Meanwhile, Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine Martin Heydon is putting great store in the fact that Ireland will host the presidency of the EU during the second half of 2026, the period during which it is expected that the CAP negotiations will be finalised. But, in truth, if it is a case of signing-off on anything that remotely resembles what is on the table right now: heaven help us. I believe Minister Heydon would be better served by putting out a statement with immediate effect, calling for the commission to go back to the drawing board and coming up with something sensible. The only way out of all this would be for the Irish government to agree to a complementary national funding for agriculture - one that would deliver real security and sustainability into the future. However, the likelihood of this happening is remote. Every murmuring that comes out of government circles at the present time is highlighting the dire threat of sanctions that are coming down the track from Washington. And I sense that we are going to see the first Irish policy manifestations of all this coming down the track courtesy of Budget 2026. But, of course, Brussels-based bureaucrats could be thinking that the markets alone are going to save the day for European agriculture. And, indeed, most commodity prices are relatively strong at the present time. But just ask Irish tillage farmers what they make of market returns right now. There is absolutely no guarantee that market returns alone will guarantee a sustainable future for farming throughout Europe. What is needed is a sensible policy framework that recognises the joint priorities of food security and environmental protection We also need practical and fully transparent measures that everyone can understand and buy into.
Irish Examiner
2 days ago
- Irish Examiner
Government's decision to delay alcohol health labelling is bowing to lobbyist influence
How are decisions made in government? One would hope that decision-makers would have access to facts and that this would form the basis of decision making. However, while officials are certainly in possession of the facts when it comes to alcohol harm, the basis of decision-making seems to rest with who has access to government. Never was this clearer than in relation to the recent decision to delay the introduction of alcohol health information labelling. These labels provide basic information to consumers including that alcohol causes liver disease and fatal cancers as well as a warning about drinking in pregnancy; they also include details of calories, alcohol content and a link to a public health website. The regulations are part of a package of legislative measures, Public Health (Alcohol) Act, introduced in 2015 and passed overwhelmingly in 2018 by the Oireachtas. The aim was to reduce Ireland's alcohol consumption by 20% by 2020 - a modest target still not fully achieved. The labelling had been through extensive assessment and notification processes with the EU Commission and the World Trade Organisation and had been signed into law in 2023 to become operational in 2026. Polling indicated strong public support of over 70% for the measures. Labels had even started to appear on dozens of wines, beers and ciders from at least 10 countries in shops right across Ireland as businesses adapted to the regulations expecting the government to deliver on its own law. However, following extensive lobbying of government by the alcohol industry, a memo was brought to Cabinet last week by the Tánaiste and minister for foreign affairs and trade, Simon Harris, to delay labelling until 2028. Does a postponement matter? Some seemed to regard the labels as merely an administrative issue as opposed to a serious public health matter designed to help address issues such, as, for example, the birth of 15 babies every day in Ireland with the life-long neurodevelopmental condition of Foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder, (FASD), or the fact that three people daily get a cancer diagnosis caused by alcohol, or that rates of liver disease have nearly doubled over the past two decades. According to lobbying records, alcohol industry representatives met with senior members of government, including the Taoiseach, at least seven times between January and April 2025. Freedom of Information requests also revealed that immediately upon the formation of the new government, multiple letters were sent to ministers all making the same points – such as worries about possible tariffs, costs to small businesses and a call to wait for an EU label. Alarmist claims were made about jobs and trade, even though labels have nothing to do with exports and the EU Commission adjudicated that labelling does not constitute a barrier to trade. To be clear, this industry has opposed these labels from the outset and employed variations of all the above arguments for years - in addition to false claims that alcohol has health benefits and doesn't really cause cancer. Whatever industry says to government about supporting public health measures (though not just at this time) what they say to their shareholders is that labelling might lead to reduced alcohol consumption. Perhaps the most ridiculous claim from industry is that as population-level alcohol consumption has decreased in recent years, there is apparently no need for further regulation - an argument akin to saying if road deaths decrease, why not increase drink-driving limits. The various entreaties worked and in early April comments were made by the minister for finance about the regulations needing to be 'examined again'. This opened space for industry and bad-faith actors to rehash all the debates which had already taken place over the past decade – debates which had been settled by evidence and fact. Once again health experts were dragged into discussing whether alcohol really causes cancer; the answer is the same now as it was in 2018 – yes. Moreover, we have since learned even more about alcohol and cancer and that it can cause the disease at even relatively low levels of consumption. The usual, unoriginal, worn-out tropes of nanny statism reappeared as if only the alcohol industry has the right to decide what information consumers are entitled to. Government ministers trumpeted that other measures of the Alcohol Act had been introduced (albeit painfully slowly) as if somehow that reduced the necessity to commence all of the legislation which is designed to work as a package. At the same time, multiple health and social organisations, those who are at the coal face dealing with the impact of alcohol harm, were writing to the government warning of the consequences of delaying the regulations. Academics highlighted that alcohol costs Ireland at least 2.5% of GDP - €12 billion annually – in health, justice and lost productivity. That's 10 times what is raised through excise duties. There are other voices which were raised but were ignored. Some of those most hurt by alcohol including those who have grown up with the trauma of alcohol harm in the home, those who are now in recovery and some who have lost precious family members to this drug wrote to government and the media highlighting the importance of these measures. Dr Sheila Gilheany: 'Perhaps the most ridiculous claim from industry is that as population-level alcohol consumption has decreased in recent years, there is apparently no need for further regulation - an argument akin to saying if road deaths decrease, why not increase drink-driving limits.' Requests were made for meetings to the Taoiseach, Tánaiste, minister for finance and the minister for enterprise. These were refused. Meetings were granted with Department of Health officials including the minister, but it is clear that the running on this issue was being made by other departments and in any case, surely the minister for health didn't need to be convinced of the importance of her own department's regulations? All of this, though, distracted focus from the fundamental question which is not, do we need labels, but rather, why is the alcohol industry getting an opportunity to overturn democratically mandated regulations which are there to protect public health? This assault on democratic processes is being presented as a mere delay due to unfortunate trading uncertainties. There are assurances that the regulations will go ahead in 2028. Yet the alcohol industry is already crowing - 'This pause shall be more than just a delay, it is a much-needed chance to rethink how we ensure consumers are well-informed, while also safeguarding the legal and economic coherence of the European market,' said European wine trade body, CEEV. The twist is that industry wants a weak-worded label buried in a meaningless QR code. So, the government decided to pander to the alcohol industry, choosing to believe their claims over the evidence that was presented to them by unbiased sources. Perhaps they didn't really believe the industry arguments but somehow it was expedient to go along with it, maybe in the hope of obtaining a supposedly better trade deal regardless of the health and economic impacts of ignoring the harm from alcohol. Or maybe it is the default position of elements of government to place shareholder profit ahead of public interest since private whispers are louder than the voices of civil society. If so, the dangers are not just to public health but also to public trust in government. Dr Sheila Gilheany is the CEO of Alcohol Action Ireland
The Journal
2 days ago
- The Journal
Stamps of Daniel O'Connell have been unveiled to celebrate his 250th birthday
TWO NEW STAMPS commemorating the 250th anniversary of the birth of Daniel O'Connell have been unveiled. The stamps are part of the widespread celebrations planned to celebrate the revolutionary's quarter of a millennium anniversary. Daniel O'Connell, hailed in his time as 'The Liberator', was born in August emerged as a key figure in Ireland's pursuit of parliamentary democracy through his movement for the repeal of the 1800 Act of Union. Barred from taking his parliamentary seat in 1828, his campaign eventually led to the passage of the 1829 Catholic Emancipation Act. The Kerry man was elected Lord Mayor of Dublin after securing the passage of the Act. The Act meant that Irish Catholics could become members of parliament. Dublin's main thoroughfare bears his name. The two stamps were unveiled by Taoiseach Micheál Martin today. They are designed by Irish artist David Rooney, and are said to commemorate O'Connell's enduring legacy, 'showing him as an inspiring and towering figure in momentous, stylised scenes from his life'. Advertisement One stamp depicts his release from Richmond Bridewell after his three-month imprisonment. The second stamp shows him front and centre at one of his famous 'monster meetings'. According to magazine History Ireland , O'Connell's fifty-plus 'monster meetings' have been described the most spectacular public gatherings in Irish history. They were held across the three southern provinces during the summers of 1843 and 1845 to demonstrate support for O'Connell's campaign to repeal the Act of Union. 'These gatherings were arguably the largest mass phenomena in modern Irish history. In the contemporary nationalist press, almost all of them were said to number over 100,000; many were reported at between a quarter million and a half million; and one of them, the famous gathering at Tara Hill in mid-August 1843, was put at over one million,' the magazine said. Micheál Martin, TCD Provost Linda Doyle, and An Post CEO David McRedmond. MAXWELL PHOTOGRAPHY MAXWELL PHOTOGRAPHY A limited edition First Day Cover envelope features his famous statue in Ennis, Co. Clare and is available, together with the stamps, at selected post offices and online from tomorrow. Speaking today at Trinity College, Martin said that O'Connell is the greatest popular leader the world has ever known. 'He was a campaigner for the Catholic emancipation, the repeal of the Act of the Union and the abolition of slavery. He proved to be a powerful constitutional and legal reformer. I am delighted to unveil these stamps marking 250 years since his birth, to honour him and remember his legacy.' CEO of An Post David McRedmond said that An Post hopes that the stamps will promote a renewed interest in O'Connell. Also a part of the celebrations, Leinster House is to unveil a statue of Daniel O'Connell later this year. A programme of commemorative events will be held for 'The Liberator' in the coming weeks and months, including a State-led ceremony at his principal residence, Derrynane House in Co Kerry. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
