Former La Salle College principal on his tenure in Hong Kong
Brother Patrick's novitiate group, 1958-59, at Castletown, County Laois, Ireland. Photo: courtesy Brother Patrick
MY MOTHER HAD to go shopping for pyjamas, shoes and football boots; I really wanted those. We didn't have a football apart from in Primary Four, when Brother Conleth organised the town into street leagues. That was Gaelic football, of course. I was sent to Mallow, in County Cork, to this place run by the brothers and then on to County Laois to prepare for O-levels. Then we had to do one year of spiritual formation. That was tough. There was a lot of prayer, a lot of chapel and a lot of manual labour as they had big grounds. There was a lot of silence.
Brother Patrick (left), Sister Maria, principal of Sacred Heart Canossian College, and G.J. Grant, of the University of Hong Kong, attend a geography exhibition at St Joseph's College in 1977. Photo: SCMP Archives
LA SALLE IS ALL ABOUT education. (The De La Salle Brothers, officially called the
education. (The De La Salle Brothers, officially called the
Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools , was set up in France in 1680 and is a Catholic order dedicated to education.) So the mission basically is educating young people, hopefully for the betterment of society in the future. To me, it's the most beautiful vocation in the world. We're dealing with young people who help us to be young also in mind and heart.
SO THAT WAS THE novitiate year and we were asked, 'Would anyone like to go to the Far East?' And up went my hand. First we went to England, and it was there that we did our A-levels and teacher training college. Two years in the beautiful Berkshire countryside in a village called Kintbury. And then three years at a teacher training college run by the brothers in Middleton, on the outskirts of Manchester. This was the early 60s, and that's where some of us fell in love with Manchester United, because you had these legends there. You know, 1963, 64, you had Bobby Charlton, Denis Law, George Best. We were sometimes allowed to go to Old Trafford and watch them. We hardly ever saw them lose, not like nowadays, where they're losing quite a bit.
Brother Patrick as a student at University College Dublin in the late 1960s. Photo: courtesy Brother Patrick
IN 1964, TWO OF US were
were
selected for Hong Kong . My first assignment was St Joseph's College. In 1967, I had a very good view from the roof of our college, which is on Kennedy Road, looking down at the Hilton Hotel intersection where
rioting occurred . I also had a very good view of the students marching up, chanting and holding up Mao Zedong's 'little red book'.
I TAUGHT for four years – English, religious studies and PE (physical education). Then, after a holiday with my family in Ireland, I was sent to University College Dublin, where I studied English literature and history, mainly of Europe. We had a great time at university. I got into bad habits, including smoking. Everybody smoked. You could not imagine having a Guinness without smoking. But I got rid of all that later. We were also sent to help out in orphanages or homes for delinquents because we ran some of these. I was sent to Northern Ireland and again, wow, 69 was the riots in Northern Ireland. It was a bad time but we continued to run the schools. By the time I finished university, it was the early 70s and I carried on teaching at St Joseph's. Then the principal had to go to our secondary school in the New Territories, and I was kicked upstairs (made principal of St Joseph's College in 1974). The old boys still talk about how they got out of the shanties of Lion Rock, Diamond Hill, Sham Shui Po and so on, when they were accepted here, and the huge change it made in their lives. We had a nice mix of them, the middle class and then some who were rather well off.
Brother Patrick (right) with his eldest brother, Thomas. Brother Patrick is the youngest of 12 siblings. Photo: courtesy Brother Patrick
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
14 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Spouses, children of top talent unhappy with life in Hong Kong: university study
Most of the spouses and children of top talent, mainly from mainland China, are struggling to adapt to life in Hong Kong and are feeling unhappy, a university study has found, with researchers calling for better support services from schools and communities. Hang Seng University last week published a cross-subject study that began last December and involved 1,000 people who arrived as dependents of those admitted under the Quality Migrant Admission Scheme, with many coming from across the border. The scheme, which was introduced in 2006, allows successful applicants to relocate to Hong Kong without a prior employment offer. But the recent study found that the dependents of such candidates, in particular children , reported low satisfaction overall with their lives in Hong Kong. According to the research, nearly 70 per cent of spouses and 85 per cent of children reported feeling dissatisfaction, with 30 per cent of youngsters saying they were 'very dissatisfied'. The study also found that education and learning were the areas that dependents attached the most importance to, yet more than 70 per cent of them felt that studying in Hong Kong was not the right choice.
South China Morning Post
2 days ago
- South China Morning Post
For war-ravaged youth, education is an anchor amid chaos, not a luxury
Education systems adapted to local conditions are strategic, long-term investments in community resilience. It must be treated as a frontline intervention in a crisis Most global actors still treat education as an afterthought during crises, something to address only once food, water and shelter are secured. But in places like Palestine, Syria and Afghanistan, this hierarchy collapses. Education isn't a post-crisis luxury; it's the anchor in the chaos. Over the past decade, I've learned that education must be treated as a frontline intervention, restoring not only learning, but also safety, identity and hope. It's not just about classrooms. It's about systems that endure. This requires a different mindset, prioritising community-led design over one-size-fits-all frameworks, embedding psychosocial support structurally, trusting youth with leadership and planning for local ownership from the start. Education isn't what follows survival; it's how people survive. We don't need more tool kits, we need a mindset shift. Global actors must listen more, prescribe less and embrace complexity over metrics. Only then can we build education systems that endure when everything else collapses. In 2015, a few months after a war in Gaza, I entered a shelter that had been a bustling school. A boy, no older than 10, asked: 'When will the school come back?' I didn't have an answer. Since then, I've worked across some of the world's hardest-hit areas, in Palestine, Syria, Lebanon and Afghanistan. These experiences challenged many assumptions that still shape global education policy. In the years that followed, we began to understand that restoring education in crisis zones wasn't only about reopening schools, it was also about building adaptable systems. Our work began to evolve beyond emergency. We developed scholarship programmes for marginalised and refugee youth, not as charity but as strategic, long-term investments in community resilience. 'I'm as old as the revolution', Syrian boy turns 10 as nation marks decade of civil war In Syria and Lebanon, prolonged displacement rendered traditional education models ineffective. For some, the urgent need was a quick entry into the labour market; for others, the dream of academic excellence still burned bright. What they needed were parallel, flexible pathways. Newsletter Daily Opinion By submitting, you consent to receiving marketing emails from SCMP. If you don't want these, tick here {{message}} Thanks for signing up for our newsletter! Please check your email to confirm your subscription. Follow us on Facebook to get our latest news. The thoughtful response was to design modular options: short-term, market-aligned diplomas that allowed learners to pause and resume, alongside full bachelor's degree opportunities through partnerships with institutions such as the American University of Beirut. Optionality, not rigidity, became a lifeline, ensuring dignity, adaptability and access to opportunity. In Afghanistan, the Taliban's 2021 return triggered the collapse of the education system, particularly for girls and women. This prompted a dual strategy. The Afghan Thrive initiative aimed to offer globally recognised online learning for women barred from classrooms. Meanwhile, the Qatar Scholarship for Afghans Project (QSAP) mobilised over 60 US universities and international stakeholders to provide scholarships and safe relocation pathways for hundreds of Afghan youth. These weren't temporary fixes. They were structural interventions designed for continuity, portability and resilience because in fragile settings, sustaining education is also about sustaining identity. But access to learning means little without addressing trauma. In Gaza, therapy rooms were introduced into public schools for the first time, central case units were developed to handle high-risk mental health interventions, and school counsellors were embedded in long-term mentorship programmes. Twinning partnerships were created with international institutions to help universities establish degree tracks in psychosocial support, and a national digital case management platform was developed to link services, ministries and NGOs. How 2 years of Taliban rule have transformed Afghanistan back to the past Still, some of the most profound healing didn't happen in counselling sessions. Many young people described dignity and income as the greatest sources of resilience. With local job markets saturated, digital freelancing became a powerful outlet. Training in globally in-demand skills allowed young people to work remotely, earn income and reclaim a sense of agency. These were not symbolic efforts. They were deliberate investments in psychological, economic and social recovery. This was never clearer than after the most recent Gaza war broke out in 2023. As institutions collapsed, young people didn't wait for aid agencies. They created informal schools in shelters, distributed hygiene kits, ran mental health activities for children and cooked meals for their communities. Many were our students and graduates from the scholarship programmes before the war. We didn't script this response. They did. We simply gave them the small grants and logistical support they needed. They are not beneficiaries. They are infrastructure. And in the absence of functioning systems, they are often the only infrastructure left. What this reveals is a fundamental flaw in how the world still approaches education in emergencies. It's not that youth lack initiative; it's that systems too often fail to recognise or support them. This ties into a deeper misconception that education can wait, that first comes food and shelter. But in conflict settings, education is often the thread holding everything else together. That boy in Gaza is likely a man now. I still don't know when schools will reopen in the strip. But I know this: if we listen more and design smarter, we may help youth believe learning is worth holding onto, even in the ruins.
South China Morning Post
2 days ago
- South China Morning Post
For war-ravaged youth, education is an anchor amid chaos, not a luxury
Most global actors still treat education as an afterthought during crises, something to address only once food, water and shelter are secured. But in places like Palestine, Syria and Afghanistan, this hierarchy collapses. Education isn't a post-crisis luxury; it's the anchor in the chaos. Over the past decade, I've learned that education must be treated as a frontline intervention, restoring not only learning, but also safety, identity and hope. It's not just about classrooms. It's about systems that endure. This requires a different mindset, prioritising community-led design over one-size-fits-all frameworks, embedding psychosocial support structurally, trusting youth with leadership and planning for local ownership from the start. Education isn't what follows survival; it's how people survive. We don't need more tool kits, we need a mindset shift. Global actors must listen more, prescribe less and embrace complexity over metrics. Only then can we build education systems that endure when everything else collapses. In 2015, a few months after a war in Gaza, I entered a shelter that had been a bustling school. A boy, no older than 10, asked: 'When will the school come back?' I didn't have an answer. Since then, I've worked across some of the world's hardest-hit areas, in Palestine, Syria Lebanon and Afghanistan . These experiences challenged many assumptions that still shape global education policy. In the years that followed, we began to understand that restoring education in crisis zones wasn't only about reopening schools, it was also about building adaptable systems. Our work began to evolve beyond emergency. We developed scholarship programmes for marginalised and refugee youth, not as charity but as strategic, long-term investments in community resilience.
