logo
TN undocumented students bill passes another committee

TN undocumented students bill passes another committee

Yahoo02-04-2025
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WJHL) — A bill to allow Tennessee public schools to charge tuition to children illegally in the U.S. or deny them enrollment passed another state Senate committee Tuesday, though again with multiple 'no' votes from Republican members.
A new amendment to the bill appears to reinstitute a mandate that all state public school systems document the citizenship, visa or legal immigration status of each child seeking to enroll. A previous amendment from last week would have given school systems an option to not check that status and to continue serving all students regardless of legal status. The current bill does make the decision whether to deny enrollment or demand tuition optional for school districts.
Senate Bill 0836, sponsored by Hixson Republican Bo Watson, passed the Senate Finance, Ways and Means Committee 7-4 and will now head to the Senate Calendar Committee. News Channel 11 emailed Watson's office Tuesday morning for clarification on the documentation issue but had not received a response by late Tuesday afternoon. We also requested an interview March 26 after Watson's previous amendment but did not receive a response.
Sen. Jeff Yarbro (D-Nashville) was in Tuesday's meeting and told News Channel 11 in an afternoon Zoom call that he interpreted the amendment to mean school districts would be required to develop systems to document citizenship/legal status.
'Trying to determine as a matter of law what someone's immigration status is a thorny endeavor that usually requires a lot of expertise in both the way the documents work from other states and what the law says,' Yarbro said. He said if the law passes he expects school systems will need to seek outside legal counsel to enact it.
'It's going to be a massive expense that's genuinely an unfunded mandate,' Yarbro said.
Yarbro's assessment contrasts with Watson's remarks during the committee meeting, during which he said school districts already collect the information.In addition to Democrats London Lamar and Yarbro, Republican Senators Ferrell Haile and Page Walley voted against the bill. Watson, John Stevens, Joey Hensley, Jack Johnson, Bill Powers, Paul Rose and Ken Yager, all Republicans, voted in favor.
Advocacy groups have expressed strong opposition to the bill, which would likely wind up in court if it becomes law due to its implicit challenge to the 1982 Plyler v Doe Supreme Court decision. That 5-4 ruling found that all children in the U.S., regardless of legal status, have a right to a free, public K-12 education.
Monday, when the amended bill still made checking student status optional, Johnson City School Board Chairman Jonathan Kinnick told News Channel 11 the system would not set up such a system if it was optional.
'I can't imagine any system that would do that,' Kinnick said. 'I know for sure Johnson City will not.'
Watson produced a chart showing sharply rising costs to provide English Language Learner (ELL) classes. Because school systems don't track the number of undocumented students they teach, he said he's using that as 'a correlation of what may be happening in the undocumented community.'
'I have long felt that we need to have a conversation about the costs imposed upon the citizens for funding ELL,' Watson said.
Neither Walley nor Haile asked their fellow Republican Watson any questions before casting their 'no' votes, but Yarbro and Lamar had numerous questions and comments.
Yarbro said he believed the bill would create significant administrative costs for school districts to set up documentation systems centered around citizenship verification. He added that school systems would likely keep most of their ELL staff in place to continue teaching what he estimated is the vast majority of ELL students with citizenship or legal status.
'If you talk to districts and think about what it means to convert all 1,800 public schools into institutions that review the citizenship status of every student every year, that is going to be massively expensive,' Yarbro said.
Watson disagreed, though he said the Tennessee Department of Education's promulgation of rules regarding the process would provide the most specific answers to cost. He held up enrollment forms for the Metro Nashville Public Schools that ask for a birth certificate, passport, I-94 or other paperwork related to a person's place of birth after Lamar also expressed concerns about the difficulty people might have getting the required documentation.
'These things are already being required,' Watson said. 'I'm not adding anything to that. So the challenges that you describe would exist today.'
Lamar asked Watson whether school systems 'will be required to call ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) if a student attempting to enroll can't show citizenship or legal status. Watson said the legislation doesn't address that.
'That would be considered in the rules and regulations that the Department of Education would promulgate relative to this legislation,' Watson said.
Lamar said she didn't find that answer sufficient.
'I just want to point … to the dangers of how we're creating another avenue for law enforcement to come in and take children away based on something they cannot control,' she said.
The fear of ICE entering schools is real enough that Johnson City Schools have at least prepared for that possibility, Kinnick told News Channel 11 Monday.
'We've already got protocols in place in case ICE shows up at the school,' Kinnick said.
'The administrators know what to do, to send them here to Central Office. The Central Office knows what to ask credential-wise and authority-wise. So we're prepared if anything strange does happen.'
Yarbro said during Tuesday's meeting the legislation has 'a moral cost,' and said getting at the number of undocumented people in Tennessee could be done by penalizing companies that hire undocumented workers.
'That would at least be going after the people who are relying upon and in many cases profiting from undocumented labor,' he said.
'But instead we are in this legislation punishing kids. Children. For conduct that, regardless of what you think, here certainly isn't a 6-year-old and 7-year-old's fault. Depriving people of the ability to become literate, to learn the language of the country where they are living is … unconscionable.'
Watson said schools that choose not to enroll students won't lose state funding for those slots. He said the state's other K-12 students would gain if undocumented ones pay tuition or aren't enrolled, 'to the extent that the per pupil funding for the students who are documented is increased, which increases what people have been screaming for across the state.'
The bill has mostly been in Senate committees so far, and from those votes, it appears Senate Republicans will be at least somewhat split on it. Republicans, though, hold a 27-6 advantage in that chamber, and at least 11 of them would have to defect from a full Senate vote to defeat the bill.
'It's remarkably uncommon to see this level of opposition to a bill that's brought by leadership of the Republican party,' Yarbro told News Channel 11. Four out of 15 Republican senators in committees have cast 'no' votes on the bill, and three House Republicans (out of 14 voting) voted 'no' in an Education Committee meeting last week — including Sixth District Rep. Tim Hicks of Gray.
'I think that you've seen a lot of people who are motivated by their faith conviction, motivated by just their sense of what's right and wrong who are going to stand in opposition to this bill and think that this is a bridge just way too far,' Yarbro said.
So far, in committee, the ratio has not equaled that 16-11 level. A total of 11 Republicans have voted yes in committee, and four have voted no: Haile, Walley, Mark Pody and Kerry Roberts.
In addition to the seven who voted in favor Tuesday, Education Committee members Rusty Crowe of Johnson City, Dawn White, Bill Powers and Adam Lowe have cast yes votes.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump offers Putin, Zelensky contrasting approaches
Trump offers Putin, Zelensky contrasting approaches

USA Today

time23 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump offers Putin, Zelensky contrasting approaches

President Donald Trump has offered his critics, the world and U.S. allies contrasting images on how America treats its friends and adversaries after failing to broker a ceasefire in Russia's unprovoked war to annex Ukraine. At the Alaska-based summit Russian President Vladimir Putin received a red-carpet welcome from the U.S. that included a B-2 bomber fly-by and a ride in the presidential limousine, nicknamed "The Beast" with video of him laughing with Trump. The two superpower leaders exchanged flatteries, with Putin saying the war wouldn't have started it Trump had been president in 2022. Andrei Gurulyov, a Russian parliament member and retired general, described it as a "breakthrough" moment that was played up heavily on Russian state television. Putin's foreign ministry said it marked an end to the foreign country's reported isolation. That showcase is in sharp contrast to a fiery exchange Trump and top administration officials had earlier this year with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy when the foreign ally's leader was told in the Oval Office he was being disrespectful to the U.S. and risking World War III. Zelenskyy was teased by Trump and others for his attire and eventually booted from the White House. Republican lawmakers, such as Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., suggested Ukraine's president should either resign, change his tune or "send somebody over that we can do business with." The administration went as far to pause intelligence sharing and weapons shipments to Ukraine after the incident, and while Trump has threatened to impose sharp economic penalties on Russian if an agreement to end the war wasn't reached, he suspended those sanctions after the Alaska sit-down with Putin. Now, Trump is poised to welcome Zelenskyy back to Washington on August 18 to discuss a peace agreement. Republican praise Trump's strength, Dems fret 'it was just theater' After being hyped by the administration and its congressional allies as an opportunity to end the more than three-year conflict in region, Trump's dealmaking skills are being tested in an international negotiation that could backfire on the country and globe. "The goal is always peace," the White House said in an Aug. 15 post on X, amid the talks. Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Arkansas, said in an Aug. 16 post on X that Trump "stood firm in defense of U.S. interests," and that the summit marks a critical first step to a "durable and stable peace that protects Ukraine's territorial and economic sovereignty." But Democrats and other detractors warn that the summit has largely benefited Putin, who is facing war crime charges from the International Criminal Court and seeking legitimacy on the global stage after starting a war that has resulted in more than 1.4 million casualties, according to studies. "Our fear is that the Trump-Putin meeting wasn't diplomacy—it was just theater," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, said in a post on X ahead of the talks. Trump seeks reset in pursuit of peace as Europe worries Trump returned to Washington on Aug. 16 carrying plenty of compliments from Putin, who said the war wouldn't have started if Joe Biden hadn't been in charge back in 2022. But without a deal the administration appears to be skipping cease-fire discussions altogether and pivoting quickly to reset its public relationship with Zelenskyy, who will be returning to the Oval Office on Aug. 18 for a talk that remains inconclusive to most observers. Trump began to tip-toe away from Putin and toward Zelenskyy in late April after Russia bombarded Kyiv with missiles. The president, however, is also reportedly considering land swaps including Ukraine areas not currently occupied by the Russians, according to the New York Times, something U.S. allies have opposed in the past. Zelenskyy said in an Aug. 16 post on X that he spoke with Trump and European leaders, adding that the "killings must stop" but that the battling must pause first before a larger peace agreement can be made. "The positions are clear," he said. "A real peace must be achieved, one that will be lasting, not just another pause between Russian invasions." In a joint statement, European leaders echoed that sentiment and expressed support for a Putin-Zelenskyy summit. "I'm disgusted that Donald Trump met with Putin on American soil and did so with no representatives from Ukraine," Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Illinois, a retired Army helicopter pilot, said in an Aug. 16 post on X. "Trump and his inflated ego may not realize it, but it's clear that Putin is not engaging in good faith to end this war."

In Trump's redistricting push, Democrats find an aggressive identity and progressives are on board
In Trump's redistricting push, Democrats find an aggressive identity and progressives are on board

Boston Globe

time23 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

In Trump's redistricting push, Democrats find an aggressive identity and progressives are on board

Then multiple Democratic governors promised new districts in their own states to neutralize potential Republican gains in Washington. Their counter has been buoyed by national fundraising, media blitzes and public demonstrations, including rallies scheduled around the country Saturday. 'For everyone that's been asking, 'Where are the Democrats?' -- well, here they are,' said U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas, one of several Democrats who could be ousted under her state's new maps. 'For everyone who's been asking, 'Where is the fight?' – well, here it is.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up There is no guarantee Democrats can prevent the Republican-powered redistricting, just as Democrats on Capitol Hill have not been able to stop Trump's moves. But it's a notable turn for a party that, by its own leaders' admissions, has honored conventional rules and bypassed bare-knuckled tactics. Advertisement So far, progressive and establishment Democrats are aligned, uniting what has often been a fragmented opposition since Republicans led by Trump took control of the federal government with their election sweep in November. Leaders on the left say the approach gives them a more effective way to confront him. They can challenge his redistricting ploy with tangible moves as they also push back against the Republicans' tax and spending law and press the case that he is shredding American democracy. Advertisement 'We've been imploring Democrats where they have power on the state and local level to flex that power,' said Maurice Mitchell, who leads the Working Families Party at the left flank of mainstream U.S. politics. 'There's been this overwrought talk about fighters and largely performative actions to suggest that they're in the fight.' This time, he said, Democrats are 'taking real risks in protecting all of our rights' against 'an authoritarian president who only understands the fight.' Texas made sense for Republicans as the place to start a redistricting scuffle. They dominate the Statehouse, and Gov. Greg Abbott is a Trump loyalist. But when the president's allies announced a new political map intended to send five more Republicans to the U.S. House, state Democratic representatives fled Texas, denying the GOP the numbers to conduct business in the Legislature and approve the reworked districts. Those legislators surfaced in Illinois, New York, California and elsewhere, joined by governors, senators, state party chairs, other states' legislators and activists. All promised action. The response was Trumpian. Govs. Gavin Newsom of California, JB Pritzker of Illinois and Kathy Hochul of New York welcomed Texas Democrats and pledged retaliatory redistricting. Pritzker mocked Abbott as a lackey who says 'yes, sir' to Trump orders. Hochul dismissed Texas Republicans as 'lawbreaking cowboys.' Newsom's press office directed all-caps social media posts at Trump, mimicking his signature sign off: 'THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.' U.S. Rep. Al Green, another Texas Democrat who could lose his seat, called Trump 'egomaniacal.' Yet many Democrats also claimed moral high ground, comparing their cause to the Civil Rights Movement. Advertisement State Rep. Ramon Romero Jr., invoked another Texas Democrat, President Lyndon Johnson, who was 'willing to stand up and fight' for civil rights laws in the 1960s. Then, with Texas bravado, Romero reached further into history: 'We're asking for help, maybe just as they did back in the days of the Alamo.' A recent Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll found that about 15% of Democrats' own voters described the party using words like 'weak' or 'apathetic.' An additional 10% called it 'ineffective' or 'disorganized.' Beto O'Rourke, a former Texas congressman who is raising money to support Texas Democrats, has encouraged Democratic-run statehouses to redraw districts now rather than wait for GOP states to act. On Friday, California Democrats released a plan that would give the party an additional five U.S. House seats. It would require voter approval in a November election. 'Maximize Democratic Party advantage,' O'Rourke said at a recent rally. 'You may say to yourself, 'Well, those aren't the rules.' There are no refs in this game. F--- the rules. ... Whatever it takes.' Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin acknowledged the shift. 'This is not the Democratic Party of your grandfather, which would bring a pencil to a knife fight,' he said. Andrew O'Neill, an executive at the progressive group Indivisible, contrasted that response with the record-long speeches by U.S. Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J. and the Democratic leader of the U.S. House, New York Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, in eviscerating Trump and his package of tax breaks and spending cuts. The left 'had its hair on fire' cheering those moments, O'Neill recalled, but were 'left even more frustrated in the aftermath.' Advertisement Trump still secured tax cuts for the wealthy, accelerated deportations and cut safety net programs, just as some of his controversial nominees were confirmed over vocal Democratic opposition. 'Now,' O'Neill said, 'there is some marriage of the rhetoric we've been seeing since Trump's inauguration with some actual action.' O'Neill looked back wistfully to the decision by Senate Democrats not to eliminate the filibuster 'when our side had the trifecta,' so a simple majority could pass major legislation. Democratic President Joe Biden's attorney general, Merrick Garland, he said, was too timid in prosecuting Trump and top associates over the Capitol riot. In 2016, Democratic President Barack Obama opted against hardball as the Senate's Republican leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, refused to consider Obama's nomination of Garland to the Supreme Court. 'These unspoken rules of propriety, especially on the Democratic side, have created the conditions' that enabled Trump, Mitchell said. Even on redistricting, Democrats would have to ignore their previous good-government efforts and bypass independent commissions that draw boundaries in several states, including California. Party leaders and activists rationalize that the broader fights tie together piecemeal skirmishes that may not, by themselves, sway voters. Arguing that Trump diminishes democracy stirs people who already support Democrats, O'Neill said. By contrast, he said, the GOP 'power grab,' can be connected to unpopular policies that affect voters' lives. Green noted that Trump's big package bill cleared the Senate 'by one vote' and the House by a few, demonstrating why redistricting matters. U.S. Rep. Greg Casar of Texas said Democrats must make unseemly, short-term power plays so they can later pass legislation that 'bans gerrymandering nationwide ... bans super PACs (political action committees) and gets rid of that kind of big money and special interest that helped get us to this place.' U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, added that a Democratic majority would wield subpoena power over Trump's administration. Advertisement In the meantime, said U.S. Rep. Julie Johnson, D-Texas, voters are grasping a stark reality. 'They say, 'Well, I don't know. Politics doesn't affect me,'' she said of constituents she meets. 'I say, 'Honey, it does' If you don't do politics, politics will do you.''

West Virginia sends hundreds of National Guard members to Washington at Trump team's request
West Virginia sends hundreds of National Guard members to Washington at Trump team's request

San Francisco Chronicle​

time23 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

West Virginia sends hundreds of National Guard members to Washington at Trump team's request

WASHINGTON (AP) — Hundreds of West Virginia National Guard members will deploy across the nation's capital as part of the Trump administration's effort to overhaul policing in the District of Columbia through a federal crackdown on crime and homelessness. Gov. Patrick Morrisey, announced Saturday that he was sending a contingent of 300 to 400 to nearby Washington at the Republican administration's request. They will arrive in the district along with equipment and specialized training services, his office said in a statement. 'West Virginia is proud to stand with President Trump in his effort to restore pride and beauty to our nation's capital,' Morrisey said. 'The men and women of our National Guard represent the best of our state, and this mission reflects our shared commitment to a strong and secure America.' The move comes as federal agents and National Guard troops have begun to appear across the heavily Democratic city after Trump's executive order Monday federalizing local police forces and activating about 800 D.C. National Guard troops. Maj. Gen. James Seward, West Virginia's adjutant general, said in a statement that members of the state's National Guard 'stand ready to support our partners in the National Capital Region' and that the Guard's 'unique capabilities and preparedness make it an invaluable partner in this important undertaking.' Federal agents have appeared in some of the city's most highly trafficked neighborhoods, garnering praise, pushback and alarm from local residents and leaders across the country. City leaders, who are obliged to cooperate with the president's order under the federal laws that direct the district's local governance, have sought to work with the administration though have bristled at the scope of the president's takeover. On Friday the administration reversed course on an order that aimed to place the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration as an 'emergency police commissioner' after the district's top lawyer sued to contest. After a court hearing, Trump's attorney general, Pam Bond, issued a memo that directed the Metropolitan Police Department to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement regardless of any city law. District officials say they are evaluating how to best comply. In his order Monday, Trump declared an emergency due to the 'city government's failure to maintain public order.' He said that impeded the 'federal government's ability to operate efficiently to address the nation's broader interests without fear of our workers being subjected to rampant violence.' In a letter to city residents, Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, wrote that 'our limited self-government has never faced the type of test we are facing right now." She added that if Washingtonians stick together, 'we will show the entire nation what it looks like to fight for American democracy -– even when we don't have full access to it.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store