logo
From Partition to present, India and Pakistan's fraught journey of conflict

From Partition to present, India and Pakistan's fraught journey of conflict

Malay Mail07-05-2025

ISLAMABAD, May 8 — India said it attacked nine sites in Pakistan including in the disputed territory of Kashmir yesterday in response to the killing of 26 people, mostly tourists, on its part of Kashmir last month that it blamed on Pakistan.
Pakistan said its response to the Indian missile strikes was underway.
India's latest action adds to a long list of military conflicts between the nuclear-armed neighbours. Here is a look at some of the key clashes:
1947: First war over Kashmir
Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan were born in August 1947 after the British ceded colonial control of the subcontinent, and months later the two new countries were at war for control over the scenic Himalayan territory of Kashmir.
India claimed Kashmir as its then Hindu ruler acceded to Delhi, while Pakistan cited popular support from the region's Muslim majority as a basis for its claim.
Fighting raged for months, until the United Nations intervened to establish a ceasefire line in 1949, leaving both countries with control of a part of the territory. Both still claim the entire region.
1965: Second war over Kashmir
Still seeking control over Kashmir, Pakistani forces crossed into India's portion of the disputed region, in response to which India launched a military incursion across the boundary.
The fighting spread outside Kashmir into many settled boundary areas, seeing pitched battles involving both ground and air forces, and some of the biggest tank battles in history.
1971: War over East Pakistan
The neighbours fought their third war over Pakistan's eastern wing, where regional groups were seeking independence from the federal government.
Thousands of people died in the conflict, which ended in India helping the region secede, creating the independent country Bangladesh.
1999: Kargil War
The countries faced off in the high-altitude region of Kargil after Pakistani troops infiltrated Indian-administered Kashmir. It was the first clash since both officially gained nuclear weapons capability, raising the risks of a catastrophic war.
Both sides suffered hundreds of casualties before Indian forces reclaimed the territory, and international intervention stopped the fighting.
2016: Uri Attack
India said it conducted "surgical strikes" on alleged Islamist militant launchpads in Pakistani territory after gunmen stormed an Indian military base in Kashmir's Uri region.
Islamabad said there had been no Indian incursion into its territory and there was no retaliation by Pakistani forces.
2019: Pulwama Attack
India conducted air strikes on what it said was a militant training camp near the Pakistani town of Balakot in response to a suicide car bombing in Kashmir's Pulwama area.
Pakistan, which said the planes had bombed an empty hillside and not a camp, launched a retaliatory incursion into Indian airspace that led to a dogfight between the two air forces, leading to the capture of an Indian pilot.
The situation cooled after he was released days later. — Reuters

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No intervention means Gaza genocide continues
No intervention means Gaza genocide continues

New Straits Times

time13 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

No intervention means Gaza genocide continues

RIGHTS groups, lawyers and some governments are describing the Gaza war as "genocide" and calling for a ceasefire but Israel, created in the aftermath of the Nazi Holocaust of Jews, vehemently rejects the explosive term. Israel's military offensive on Gaza since October 2023 has killed 54,677 people, mostly civilians, according to the Health Ministry in the occupied Palestinian territory. The United Nations has said the territory's entire population of more than two million people is at risk of famine, even if Israel said last month it was partially easing the complete blockade on aid it imposed on Gaza on March 2. Despite international calls for an end to the war, a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas remains elusive. In December 2023, South Africa brought a case to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the United Nations' highest judicial organ, alleging that Israel's Gaza offensive breached the 1948 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. In rulings in January, March and May 2024, the ICJ told Israel to do everything possible to "prevent" acts of genocide during its military operations in Gaza, including by providing urgently needed humanitarian aid to prevent famine. Amnesty International has accused Israel of carrying out a "live-streamed genocide" in Gaza, while Human Rights Watch has alleged it is responsible for "acts of genocide". A UN committee in November found Israel's warfare in Gaza was "consistent with the characteristics of genocide". And a UN investigation concluded in March that Israel carried out "genocidal acts" in Gaza through the destruction of the strip's main IVF (in vitro fertilisation) clinic and other reproductive healthcare facilities. Omer Bartov, an Israeli scholar of the Holocaust, wrote in August last year that "Israel was engaged in systematic war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocidal actions". Fellow Israeli historians Amos Goldberg and Daniel Blatman in January co-wrote an article in which they said: "Israel is indeed committing genocide in Gaza." France's President Emmanuel Macron has said it is not up to a "political leader to use the term but up to historians to do so when the time comes". But Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has used it and Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has accused Israel of "premeditated genocide". The International Criminal Court (ICC) in November issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant over alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes in Israel's war in Gaza — including starvation as a method of warfare. In the case of Rwanda, in which the UN said extremist Hutus killed some 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus in 1994, it took a decade for the International Criminal Tribunal to conclude genocide had happened. It was not until 2007 that the ICJ recognised as genocide the murder by Bosnian Serb forces of almost 8,000 Muslim men and boys in Srebrenica in 1995 during the Bosnian war. French-Israeli lawyer Omer Shatz said "there is no doubt that war crimes, crimes against humanity are being committed" in Gaza. But the international law expert agreed intent was more difficult to prove. That is why, after the ICC issued an arrest warrant against Netanyahu and Gallant, Shatz filed a report with the court in December arguing they were among eight Israeli officials responsible for "incitement to genocide in Gaza". "If incitement is established, that establishes intent," he said. His 170-page report lists such alleged incitements, including Gallant at the start of the war saying Israel was fighting "human animals" in Gaza and far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich urging "total extermination" in the Palestinian territory. Mathilde Philip-Gay, an international law expert, warned: "International law cannot stop a war. The judiciary will intervene after the war. "The qualification (of genocide) is very important for victims but it will come later." The 1948 Genocide Convention says signatories can call on UN organs "to take such action... for the prevention and suppression of acts of genocide".

Lebanon Says Israel Aggression On Southern Suburb Blatantly Violates Int'l Agreement
Lebanon Says Israel Aggression On Southern Suburb Blatantly Violates Int'l Agreement

Barnama

time15 hours ago

  • Barnama

Lebanon Says Israel Aggression On Southern Suburb Blatantly Violates Int'l Agreement

He added that the attack clearly manifests the perpetrator's rejection of the requirements of stability, settlement, and just peace in the region. Aoun denounced the attack as a blatant violation of an international agreement and the basic tenets of United Nations (UN) and humanitarian laws and resolutions, on the eve of a sacred religious occasion. In a statement issued by the Lebanese Presidency's media office, Aoun added that the perpetrator of these atrocities is sending a message, primarily to the United States, its policies, and initiatives, through Beirut's mailbox and the blood of its innocent civilians, to which Lebanon will never submit. For his part, Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam condemned the aggression as a systematic and deliberate targeting of Lebanon, its security, stability, and economy, especially on the eve of the holidays and the tourist season. In a statement issued by the Lebanese government, Salam affirmed that these attacks constitute a flagrant violation of Lebanese sovereignty and UN Resolution 1701, calling on the international community to assume its responsibilities to deter Israel from continuing its attacks and to compel it to fully withdraw from Lebanese territory.

Musk's Starlink gets key India licence from telecoms ministry
Musk's Starlink gets key India licence from telecoms ministry

Free Malaysia Today

time15 hours ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

Musk's Starlink gets key India licence from telecoms ministry

India's satellite broadband service market is expected to be worth US$1.9 billion by 2030, making it lucrative for players like Starlink. (EPA images pic) NEW DELHI : Elon Musk's Starlink has received a licence to launch commercial operations in India from the telecoms ministry, two sources told Reuters today, clearing a major hurdle for the satellite provider, which must also show it meets security rules. The approval is good news for Musk, whose public spat with President Donald Trump threatens US$22 billion of SpaceX's contracts and space programmes with the US government. Starlink is the third company to get a licence from India's department of telecommunications, which has approved similar applications by Eutelsat's OneWeb and Reliance Jio to provide services in the South Asian nation. Starlink and the department of telecommunications did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The approval comes months after Musk met Prime Minister Narendra Modi during his visit to the US, where the two discussed Starlink's long-delayed launch plans and India's concerns over meeting certain security conditions. Starlink has been waiting since 2022 for licences to operate commercially in India. While it has cleared a key hurdle, it is still a long way from launching commercial services. Starlink now needs a separate licence from India's space regulator which it is 'close' to securing, said a third source with direct knowledge of the process. It also needs to demonstrate, through testing and trials, that it meets the security rules it has signed up for, said one of the two sources. 'This will take a couple of months at least and will be a rigorous process,' said the person, adding that only once it gets an all clear from Indian security officials can it begin selling its equipment and services to customers. Indian telecom providers Jio and Bharti Airtel, in a surprise move in March, announced a partnership with Musk to stock Starlink equipment in their retail stores, but they will still compete on offering broadband services. Musk and billionaire Mukesh Ambani's Jio clashed for months over how India should grant spectrum for satellite services. India's government sided with Musk that spectrum should be assigned and not auctioned. India's telecom regulator in May proposed satellite service providers pay 4% of their annual revenue to the government for offering services, which domestic players have said is 'unjustifiably low' and will hurt their businesses. Deloitte predicts India's satellite broadband service market will be worth US$1.9 billion by 2030, making it lucrative for players like Starlink and Amazon's Kuiper, which is still awaiting a licence.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store