The surging gold price is boosting Central Asia's economies
Tian Shan—the name for the mountains that cross Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan—roughly translates as 'Mountains of Heaven". It is fitting for a range that is dotted with gold mines, including Kumtor, one of Central Asia's largest and a symbol of Kyrgyz national pride. Moreover, it is not just the mountains of Central Asia that hold big reserves. Hundreds of kilometres to the west, in Uzbekistan's Kyzylkum Desert, sits Muruntau, the world's largest open-pit gold mine.
Now the good times are rolling. The price of gold has more than doubled since 2019. In March it breached $3,000 per troy ounce for the first time. That is good news for both governments and miners in the poor but mineral-rich Central Asian states. The yellow metal is the biggest export for Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, and one of the biggest in Kazakhstan, the region's largest and richest economy.
Indeed, the Uzbek Navoi Mining and Metallurgical Company (NMMC), which operates the Muruntau mine, is the world's fourth-largest gold producer. It accounted for almost one-sixth of the Uzbek state's revenue in 2023, when prices were significantly lower than they are today. The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development forecasts average economic growth of 5.7% for Central Asia this year—well above its forecast of 3.2% for emerging markets in general.
The gold boom has made life easier for the region's central bankers. After the Kazakh tenge struck a record low against the dollar in January, the country's policymakers sold some of their gold reserves—the value of which had soared to a record $25.9bn in October—to prop up the currency.
Little surprise, then, that the region's leaders are eager to mine still more gold. Under his 'Uzbekistan 2030" strategy, Shavkat Mirziyoyev, the country's president, seeks 50% more production by the end of the decade. Mr Mirziyoyev wants to reduce the government's role in the economy and entice foreign capital. To that end, the state-owned NMMC is reportedly planning an initial public offering (in London, with a rumoured valuation of more than £4bn, or $5.2bn). China has also invested in Central Asian gold-mining as part of its Belt and Road Initiative, focusing on Tajikistan, the region's poorest country. In 2018 it agreed to build a power station in return for the right to develop the Upper Kumarg gold mine.
Foreign investors have not always had an easy time in the region. Kyrgyzstan's Kumtor mine had for decades been run by Centerra Gold, a Canadian company. In 2021, amid tax disputes and allegations of environmental damage, it was taken over by the government of Sadyr Japarov, Kyrgyzstan's nationalist president. In ordinary times, that might give overseas investors pause. But gold is alluring, especially when prices are this high.
Correction (May 30th 2025): An earlier version of this article wrongly stated that central banks in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan had used gold to settle their own transactions. Sorry.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
OPEC+ to hike July oil production after Trump urges Saudi to increase output
VIENNA: Saudi Arabia, Russia and six other key OPEC+ members announced on Saturday a huge increase in crude production for July. They will produce an additional 411,000 barrels a day -- the same target set for May and then June -- according to a statement, which is more than three times greater than the group had previously planned. In recent years the 22-nation group had agreed to daily reductions of 2.2 million barrels with the aim of boosting prices. But in early 2025, leading members of the group known as the "Voluntary Eight", or V8, decided on the gradual output increase and subsequently began to accelerate the pace. The moves have resulted in oil prices plummeting to around $60 per barrel, the lowest level in four years. Trump pressure OPEC+ "struck three times: (the output target for) May was a warning, June a confirmation and July a warning shot", Rystad Energy analyst Jorge Leon told AFP. "The scale of the production increase reflects more than just internal supply dynamics," he said. "This is a strategic adjustment with geopolitical aims: Saudi Arabia seems to be bowing to Donald Trump's requests." Shortly after taking office, the US president called on Riyadh to ramp up production in order to bring down oil prices, meaning cheaper prices at the pump for American consumers. Saturday's decision comes after a meeting of all OPEC ministers on Wednesday, where the alliance's collective production policy was reaffirmed. The decision is officially justified by "healthy market fundamentals" covering oil reserves and structural demand growth during coming months. Riyadh 'angry' But markets have met this view with scepticism amid concerns about demand and a trade war launched by the United States. Analysts see several possible motivations for the production hikes, one of them being Saudi Arabia and others penalising members for not keeping to their quotas under the cuts first agreed in 2022. The increase is all the more likely due to "the latest statements of Kazakh Energy Minister Yerlan Akkenzhenov, who has apparently already informed OPEC that his country will not reduce production," said Thu Lan Nguyen, an analyst at Commerzbank. "Saudi Arabia is angry with Kazakhstan", which is seen as one of the main laggards, and which "produced 300,000 barrels per day more than its quota," said Bjarne Schieldrop, an analyst at SEB. Analysts meanwhile do not foresee a plunge in oil prices when markets open Monday as the announcement was largely anticipated, instead resulting in a "moderate" reaction. On Friday, the benchmark Brent crude futures price had settled at $62.61 per barrel, while West Texas Intermediate was at $60.79.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
a day ago
- Business Standard
IndiGo to start non-stop flights to 10 int'l destinations in FY26: CEO
IndiGo plans to launch non-stop flights to 10 new international destinations in 2025–26 (FY26), including Manchester and London in the UK, Amsterdam in the Netherlands, Copenhagen in Denmark, Siem Reap in Cambodia, Athens in Greece, and four cities in Central Asia, its Chief Executive Officer Pieter Elbers said on Friday. 'IndiGo currently serves 40 international destinations. By the end of FY26, we aim to expand this to 50,' Elbers said at a press conference. He added that the expansion will be supported by the recently leased Boeing 787 aircraft and the Airbus A321XLR planes, which are expected to join the fleet in the latter part of FY26. The A321XLR is a new long-range narrow-body aircraft developed by Airbus. It is slated to enter commercial service globally in the second half of FY26. Elbers did not mention the names of the Central Asian cities that would be connected via IndiGo flights in FY26. Responding to a question on whether IndiGo might consider joining one of the three major global airline alliances — Star Alliance, oneworld, or SkyTeam — Elbers said the airline currently sees more value in building bilateral codeshare partnerships rather than joining a formal global grouping. 'We're having partnerships with different airlines from different parts of the world. If it makes sense for the two parties, we can do the partnership... We have no short-term ambitions — or no ambitions, actually — at this point in time to move into an alliance,' he said. He explained that while Indian carriers currently account for about 45 per cent of India's international passenger traffic, the figure is significantly lower on certain routes, particularly to Europe. 'In some parts of the world, it's a 50-50 share, but for Europe, for example, it's more like 70 per cent of traffic on European operators and just 30 per cent on Indian operators... So the opportunity to expand in that region is just very obvious for us," he added. There are three major global airline alliances in the world: Star Alliance (featuring Lufthansa, Singapore Airlines, United Airlines, Air India, among others), SkyTeam (which includes Air France-KLM, Delta Air Lines, and Korean Air), and oneworld (featuring British Airways, Qatar Airways, and American Airlines). These alliances allow member airlines to coordinate schedules, share airport lounges, offer reciprocal frequent flyer benefits, and simplify global ticketing and connections. A year ago, IndiGo — for the first time — placed an order for wide-body aircraft, ordering 30 Airbus A350 planes. These are scheduled to join IndiGo's fleet from 2027 onwards. Elbers ruled out the possibility of advancing the delivery schedule for the A350s, saying the production and allocation of such aircraft follow a rigid timeline. 'Wide-bodies have a very different structure compared to narrow-bodies,' Elbers said, when asked whether the A350 deliveries could be brought forward to accelerate IndiGo's international expansion. 'I wish I could just pick up the phone and say, 'You know what, switch a few — I won't take these (narrow-bodies), I'll take those (wide-bodies).' But it doesn't work like that,' he added. Using a culinary metaphor, he stated, 'It's not like switching from a samosa to a paneer tikka — you can't just do it instantly. There's a lead time involved, and the production schedule is already very tight and optimised.' Elbers noted that the decision to place the wide-body order in 2024 was a timely move. 'I'm very glad we made the A350 order last year, which will allow us to induct those aircraft from 2027. But yes, you're right — India is in a hurry, and so is IndiGo.'
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
BRI's debt trap and China's expanding footprint
When Beijing's flagship Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) marked its decadal milestone in October 2023, Chinese President Xi Jinping said, 'Viewing others' development as a threat or taking economic interdependence as a risk will not make one's own life better or speed up one's development.' However, instead of mutually-beneficial interdependence, China today has managed to make 140 countries highly asymmetrically dependent on it for economic investment and trade. Many of these dependencies are a result of the over $1.175 trillion worth of construction contracts and non-financial investments Beijing has undertaken under the BRI. Now, analysts suggest that loans to the tune of a whopping $35 billion may be up for repayment in 2025, and most countries affected are financially vulnerable, developing economies. When compared with the first few years of its launch, the BRI today has changed gears from being a money-pumping endeavour to one focused on 'small but smart and beautiful' projects. This is because, as Xi highlighted in so many words in 2023, the BRI has faced multiple challenges vis-à-vis increasing international hostility, inadequate completion of projects and repayment of loans. If one looks at Pakistan, it owes most of its external debt (~22 per cent of total debt; nearly $29 billion) to China. As part of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a crown jewel initiative of the BRI in Asia, China promised an investment of $62 billion to Pakistan, of which approximately $26.6 billion has already been infused. The major projects the money has gone to include Special Economic Zones built in Karachi, Sialkot, Risalpur and other key Pakistani cities, the development of the Gwadar Port, and various infrastructure projects including construction of various energy power plants and a Pak-China Technical and Vocational Institute. However, the CPEC has not yielded the growth it was supposed to. This is primarily because of the internal dynamics of Pakistan. For example, even though Rawalpindi has created a Special Security Division to protect CPEC projects and personnel, insurgency by the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), and militancy in Karachi have continued to plague projects. Similarly, frequent electricity cuts and supply shortages have made project completion difficult and energy initiatives untenable. A Chinese government article from 2018 itself argues that Pakistan has problems of corruption and is facing a sharp fall in its foreign exchange reserves. As a result, it has repeatedly sought a bailout from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Another major BRI-indebted economy, and India's neighbour, is Sri Lanka. The Hambantota port, which is owned and operated by Chinese firm CMPort and enables Beijing's strategic foothold in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR), faces its own hurdles. The key project, an oil refinery on the port, was initiated in 2019, but has yielded no results so far. With Sri Lanka's economic crisis, emerging from massive unpaid sovereign debt (of which, officially, only about 10 per cent was owed to China), the project was halted for many years between 2020 and 2024. Given Sri Lanka's overt dependence on imports for servicing its oil and energy needs, the project has been deemed crucial to yield growth dividends for the island nation. Nonetheless, if true, the claims that the Hambantota port development is mired in corruption due to China's collusion with local elites, may mean that the dividends take a long time to materialise. In this light, Xi has referred to the new BRI as an endeavour to 'take results-oriented actions' and undertake 'a new stage of high-quality development.' Further, the goals of the revamped BRI included emphasising green and sustainable infrastructure development, progress in scientific innovation and people-to-people exchanges, and 'high-level principles of integrity'. To meet these goals, the China Development Bank (CDB) and the Export-Import Bank of China also announced in 2023 a 350 billion yuan (~$48 billion) financing window. Further, to enforce integrity and compliance internally, in 2024, China's anti-corruption watchdog, the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection (CCDI) also launched a widespread campaign against embezzlers and bribers in the BRI financing ecosystem. The crackdown started at the highest levels, with one of the first ones to fall being Wang Yongsheng, former deputy president of CDB, who was expelled from the Communist Party for 'severe violations of Party discipline and the law.' Liu Liange, former President of the EXIM Bank (2015-18), was even given the death penalty by a Shandong province people's court for corruption and illegal issuance of loans in November 2024. While none of these announcements identified corruption as part of BRI projects, the CCDI targeted the most powerful officials, who undoubtedly had a major role to play in decision-making vis-à-vis BRI financing. Externally, the announcement of CPEC 2.0 at the meeting between Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar and Chinese counterpart Wang Yi in Beijing on May 20, 2025, also carried a new message. This 'upgraded version' of CPEC will promote cooperation in industry, agriculture, energy and minerals, security and human resource development, and does not necessarily revolve around mighty infrastructure projects. Similarly, in January 2025, Chinese energy firm Sinopec concluded a fast-tracking agreement with Sri Lanka, to curb any further hindrances that may plague the Hambantota refinery project. None of these challenges seem to indicate that Chinese investment in BRI would halt — they are, however, likely to slow down. In fact, as per numbers released by the Chinese Ministry of Commerce in late April this year, Chinese enterprises made non-financial direct investments totaling 63.63 billion yuan (~$8 billion) in BRI partner countries, a year-on-year increase of 16.8 per cent. In the same period, construction contracts worth 338.27 billion yuan (~$47 billion) have also been signed with BRI partner countries. In strong economies, BRI investments may lead to GDP growth, minimising any drastic implications for the debt-to-GDP ratio. Singapore is an example for this. However, the biggest victims of a BRI-induced debt trap would be smaller economies in the Indian subcontinent, Southeast Asia, and Africa, many of which incidentally are also the economies with the most external debt owed to China, and have weak domestic institutional structures. With a lack of global opportunities and alternatives, these economies are unlikely to turn their back on Chinese funding. In this regard, one can only hope that BRI financing focuses on sustainability and deliverability in the coming future, especially because in the first quarter of 2025, global debt has reached a record high of $324 trillion. The writer is Staff Research Analyst, Indo-Pacific Studies Programme, Takshashila Institution
