logo
UN expert Francesca Albanese rejects ‘unprecedented' US sanctions on her Israel criticism

UN expert Francesca Albanese rejects ‘unprecedented' US sanctions on her Israel criticism

News246 days ago
The US sanctioned the UN's Francesca Albanese.
She labelled the sanctions a violation of her immunity.
She criticised US companies who trade with Israel.
The UN's unflinching expert on Palestinian affairs Francesca Albanese said on Tuesday that Washington's sanctions following her criticism of the White House's stance on Gaza are a 'violation' of her immunity.
The United Nations' Special Rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories made the comments while visiting Bogota, nearly a week after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the sanctions, calling her work 'biased and malicious'.
'It's a very serious measure. It's unprecedented. And I take it very seriously,' Albanese told an audience in the Colombian capital.
Albanese was in Bogota to attend an international summit initiated by leftist President Gustavo Petro to find solutions to the Gaza conflict.
The Italian legal scholar and human rights expert has faced harsh criticism for her long-standing accusations that Israel is committing 'genocide' in Gaza.
'It's clear violation of the UN Convention on Privileges and Immunities that protect UN officials, including independent experts, from words and actions taken in the exercise of their functions,' Albanese said.
Rubio on 9 July announced that Washington was sanctioning Albanese 'for her illegitimate and shameful efforts to prompt (ICC) action against US and Israeli officials, companies, and executives'.
Abed Rahim Khatib/Anadolu via Getty Images
The sanctions are 'a warning to anyone who dares to defend international law and human rights, justice and freedom', Albanese said.
On Thursday, the UN urged the US to reverse the sanctions against Albanese, along with sanctions against judges of the International Criminal Court, with UN chief Antonio Guterres's spokesperson calling the move 'a dangerous precedent'.
On Friday, the European Union also spoke out against the sanctions facing Albanese, adding that it 'strongly supports the United Nations human rights system'.
Albanese, who assumed her mandate in 2022, released a damning report this month denouncing companies - many of them American - that she said 'profited from the Israeli economy of illegal occupation, apartheid, and now genocide' in the occupied Palestinian territories.
READ | UN expert slams companies which 'profited from the violence, the killing' trading with Israel
The report provoked a furious Israeli response, while some of the companies also raised objections.
Washington in June slapped sanctions on four ICC judges, in part over the court's arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, barring them from the US.
UN special rapporteurs like Albanese are independent experts who are appointed by the UN human rights council but do not speak on behalf of the United Nations.
The war in Gaza was triggered on 7 October 2023 after Hamas militants killed 1 219 people in Israel and took hostages, according to an AFP tally based on official figures.
More than 58 479 Palestinians have been killed in ongoing retaliation operations, according to data from the Health Ministry of the Hamas government, considered reliable by the UN.
Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence has surged in the territory since October 2023.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Analysis: Gabbard's Russian interference claims directly contradict what other Trump officials have said
Analysis: Gabbard's Russian interference claims directly contradict what other Trump officials have said

CNN

time23 minutes ago

  • CNN

Analysis: Gabbard's Russian interference claims directly contradict what other Trump officials have said

When President Donald Trump sided with Vladimir Putin over his own intelligence community on the topic of Russia's interference in the 2016 US election, then-Sen. Marco Rubio sharply rebuked Trump. The Florida Republican said in 2018 that the intelligence community's 'assessment of 2016 is accurate. It's 100% accurate. The Russians interfered in our elections.' He added: 'I think it was not a good moment for the administration, obviously. Hopefully, something like that never happens again.' But seven years later, it just keeps happening — over and over again — as Trump and his most loyal allies seek to sow doubts about that 2016 episode and punish their political enemies. That's now taken the form of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard threatening criminal referrals and even floating allegations of treason for key officials in the Obama administration. Her argument is full of holes, as even critics of the Russia investigation such as the National Review's Andrew McCarthy have noted. (Basically, the whole thing conflates Russia's attempts to influence the 2016 election with nonexistent attacks on election infrastructure that changed votes. ) But just as notable is that Gabbard's move to cast doubt on Russia's 2016 interference is wholly at odds with several top Trump administration officials, most especially Rubio, along with a pair of congressional investigations spearheaded by Republicans. To be clear, Gabbard is basically suggesting there was no Russian interference. Her memo last week cited what it cast as false reporting 'that the CIA 'concluded in a secret assessment that Russia intervened' in the election to help President Trump.' The memo said the assessment 'falsely alleges … that Putin directed an effort to help President Trump defeat Hillary Clinton.' Gabbard in Fox News interviews accused the Obama team of ordering a 'a manufactured piece of intelligence that detailed not if, but how Russia tried to influence the outcome of the United States election.' She cited an intelligence document that purportedly said Russia 'did not attempt to affect the outcome of the election.' In fact, that document — a President's Daily Brief, or his daily intelligence report — merely said Russia hadn't impacted the election results 'by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure.' It was referring narrowly to a very specific (and severe) type of potential election interference. The Obama administration never alleged such interference took place or that Russia manipulated actual votes that were cast. This is a kind of sleight of hand we've seen before with Trump allies trying to call Russia's election interference into question. But Gabbard's commentary is especially striking when juxtaposed with those she serves with in the second Trump administration. Rubio didn't just rebuke Trump for siding with Putin's denials back in 2018; he also spearheaded the Senate Intelligence Committee's big, bipartisan Russia report in 2020. The report concluded that Russia had 'engaged in an aggressive, multi-faceted effort to influence, or attempt to influence, the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.' It not only said Russia had interfered, but also that it had done so to benefit Trump. 'The Committee found that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the Russian effort to hack computer networks and accounts affiliated with the Democratic Party and leak information damaging to Hillary Clinton and her campaign for president,' the report said. 'Moscow's intent was to harm the Clinton Campaign, tarnish an expected Clinton presidential administration, help the Trump Campaign after Trump became the presumptive Republican nominee, and undermine the U.S. democratic process.' The report differed slightly from a similar report from the House Intelligence Committee in 2018. The House report, which was written by Republicans, did not say that Russia aimed to help Trump, but it did say it interfered and that Putin had ordered it. 'In 2015, Russia began engaging in a covert influence campaign aimed at the U.S. presidential election,' the Republican-led House report said. 'The Russia government, at the direction of President Vladimir Putin, sought to sow discord in American society and undermine our faith in the democratic process.' Gabbard, who was a Democratic member of Congress until 2021, now suggestively casts all three of these pillars as false: that Russia interfered, that Putin ordered it, and that it was meant to help Trump. And her conclusions also run afoul of other Trump administration members' statements. During his 2020 confirmation hearing to become Trump's director of national intelligence, now-CIA Director John Ratcliffe — who then served on the House Intelligence Committee — made clear Russia interfered. 'Chairman, my views are that Russia meddled in or interfered with active measures in 2016,' Ratcliffe said. 'They interfered in 2018. They will attempt to do so in 2020. They have a goal of sowing discord, and they have been successful in sowing discord.' Even just days before Gabbard launched her effort last week, Ratcliffe issued a report that not only didn't dispute that Russia interfered, but actually praised the initial intelligence assessment's 'analytical rigor.' Mike Waltz, Trump's nominee for United Nations ambassador and his former national security adviser, has also issued strong statements on the topic. He at one point even warned that people were conflating Trump's claims of 'no collusion' with the idea that Russia didn't interfere at all. 'We do have to draw a bright line between 'no collusion' … versus the Russians attacking our constitutional system and attacking our electoral system, which they absolutely are doing,' Waltz, then a Florida congressman, told CNN's Jake Tapper in 2019. He added: 'We have to stay focused on that, because that is our democracy under attack.' Today, Trump's administration is yet again seeking to blur those lines. The conflations are continuing. And these officials will apparently just keep doing it — no matter what they said before.

Trump's Treasury Secretary suggests August 1 trade deal deadline doesn't matter one day after Commerce Secretary calls it a ‘hard deadline'
Trump's Treasury Secretary suggests August 1 trade deal deadline doesn't matter one day after Commerce Secretary calls it a ‘hard deadline'

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's Treasury Secretary suggests August 1 trade deal deadline doesn't matter one day after Commerce Secretary calls it a ‘hard deadline'

The Trump administration may be taking a flexible approach to what it previously described as a 'hard deadline' of long-promised tariffs taking effect on August 1. 'The important thing here is the quality of the deal, not the timing of the deals,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC on Monday, arguing the president's tariff threats had created 'maximum leverage as only he can do' for countries to swiftly reach trade deals with the U.S. 'Our trading partners were told that the rates could boomerang back toward the April 2nd levels,' he added. 'We can continue talking then. But again, we're proceeding apace with the negotiations, but we're not going to rush for the sake of doing deals.' Other Trump officials have described the August 1 deadline, when U.S. trading partners could face up to 40 percent tariffs, as a firmer cutoff point. 'That's a hard deadline, so on August 1, the new tariff rates will come in,' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CBS News on Sunday. 'Nothing stops countries from talking to us after August 1, but they're going to start paying the tariffs on August 1.' The Trump administration is focusing more on the 'quality' of trade deals than White House's August 1 tariff deadline, though Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent says U.S. is applying 'maximum leverage' through Trump to secure swift results (REUTERS) The president, for his part, has called the deadline "firm but not 100 percent firm.' Throughout July, the Trump administration has written letters to foreign leaders warning of the coming tariffs, expected to include a 35 percent tariff rate against Canada, a major U.S. trading partner, and a 30 percent rate for the European Union and Mexico. Since being unveiled in April, Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff agenda has been repeatedly delayed, and the administration has conceded it won't achieve its original promise of 90 trade deals in 90 days. 'There's 200 countries,'' the president said earlier this month. 'You can't talk to all of them.'' The president's hesitancy to fully implement the tariffs has prompted critics of the president to deem the tariff agenda the 'TACO' plan, for 'Trump always chickens out.' The markets 'shrugged' off Trump's move to push back the tariffs to August, Carolyn Kissane, a professor at NYU's School of Professional Studies Center for Global Affairs, told The Independent earlier this month, compared to the initial market plunge when the tariffs were first revealed. 'The pattern is familiar: dramatic declarations, walk-backs, and renewed threats. It's eroded his credibility and resembles the boy who cried wolf,' Kissane added. 'He believes this tactic gives him a unique leverage to negotiate, but it also weakens the threats.'

Stocks mixed with trade and earnings in focus; Tokyo reopens with gains
Stocks mixed with trade and earnings in focus; Tokyo reopens with gains

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Stocks mixed with trade and earnings in focus; Tokyo reopens with gains

Asian markets were mixed Thursday as traders kept an eye on earnings from Wall Street titans this week while tracking US trade talks just over a week before the deadline for a deal. Japanese stocks edged up and the yen held gains after Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said he will stay in power despite the weekend election debacle. Investors took a more cautious path after a largely positive day on Wall Street, where the S&P ended above 6,300 points for the first time and the Nasdaq chalked up yet another record. Equities continue to rally on expectations key trading partners will strike agreements with Washington before August 1 to avoid Donald Trump's sky-high tariffs, with the US president saying several deals were close. Just three have been struck so far. His press secretary Karoline Leavitt said more could be reached before next Friday but also warned the president could unveil fresh unilateral tolls in that time. While Trump's initial tariff bombshell on April 2 rattled global markets before he delayed introducing the measures twice, they have seen more muted reactions to successive threats as traders expect him to eventually row back again. That optimism has been helped by data indicating the US economy remained healthy despite the imposition of other levies that are beginning to be felt on Main Street. And SPI Asset Management's Stephen Innes warned traders could be in for a shock next week. "The new tariff regime isn't being priced -- full stop," he wrote. "Markets have seen this movie before: tough talk, last-minute extensions, and deal-making in overtime. But this time, Trump isn't bluffing. He's already posted 'No extensions will be granted'. "The new rates -- 30 percent on the EU, 35 percent on Canada, 50 percent on Brazil -- are politically loaded and economically radioactive. If they go live, there's no soft landing." Hong Kong has been the standout in Asia this year, piling on around a quarter thanks to a rally in Chinese tech firms and a fresh flow of cash from mainland investors. And the Hang Seng Index continued its advance Tuesday, with Shanghai, Sydney and Taipei also up. There were losses in Singapore, Seoul, Wellington and Manila. Tokyo rose as investors returned from a long weekend to news that Ishiba would remain in power even after his ruling coalition lost its majority in Japan's lower house elections Sunday, months after it suffered a similar fate in the upper house. His refusal to leave helped the yen push higher against the dollar and other peers, though observers warned the government's tenure remained fragile and investors remained nervous. The yen strengthened to 147.08 Tuesday before paring some of the gains. That compares with 148.80 Friday. But Franklin Templeton Institute's Christy Tan said that "Ishiba now faces heightened political headwinds, including pressure over inflation, taxes, and US trade talks". Focus also turns this week to earnings from some of the world's biggest names, including Tesla, Google-parent Alphabet, General Motors, Intel and Coca-Cola. While there will be plenty of attention given to the results, the firms' guidance will be key as investors try to gauge companies' pulses in light of Trump's trade war. - Key figures at around 0230 GMT - Tokyo - Nikkei 225: UP 0.2 percent at 39,892.81 (break) Hong Kong - Hang Seng Index: UP 0.3 percent at 25,074.15 Shanghai - Composite: UP 0.1 percent at 3,563.59 Dollar/yen: UP at 147.50 yen from 147.42 yen on Monday Euro/dollar: UP at $1.1690 from $1.1688 Pound/dollar: DOWN at $1.3484 from $1.3485 Euro/pound: UP at 86.69 pence from 86.68 pence West Texas Intermediate: DOWN 0.7 percent at $66.70 per barrel Brent North Sea Crude: DOWN 0.9 percent at $68.62 per barrel New York - Dow: FLAT at 44,323.07 (close) London - FTSE 100: UP 0.2 percent at 9,012.99 (close) dan/mtp Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store