The Liberals aren't tabling a budget. How does that affect the economy — and your wallet?
The recently re-elected Liberal government isn't planning to release a budget this year, opting instead for an economic statement later this fall. But experts warn that not providing a fiscal snapshot could erode economic confidence and delay the government's agenda.
A federal budget is one of the most significant legislative pieces a government can put forward. It provides an update on the health of the nation's coffers and outlines the government's spending priorities.
Typically the budget is tabled in March or April and passed before the House rises in June. But a 2025 budget hasn't been put forward yet since Parliament was prorogued in January and the election campaign began in March.
Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne indicated Wednesday that the government isn't planning on tabling a late spring budget, and will instead opt to release a "substantive" economic statement later this fall.
Champagne cited ongoing economic uncertainty — due in large part to the U.S. trade war — as one of the reasons the government won't pass a budget before June.
"Hopefully by [fall] there'll be less uncertainty that we need to factor into … I want to be straight with Canadians and give them the best possible [financial and economic] picture that I can," Champagne said in an interview with CBC's Power & Politics.
Champagne also argued most of the government's spending priorities were laid out in the Liberals' election platform.
WATCH | Champagne defends delaying budget:
But Kevin Page, a former parliamentary budget officer and head of the Institute for Fiscal Studies and Democracy at the University of Ottawa, told Power & Politics that "the reason you have a fiscal plan is to deal with the uncertainty."
"The party platform that the Liberals produced was based on a set of assumptions that would no longer hold. The economy is much weaker now, the deficit will be much higher," Page told host David Cochrane.
"I don't think it's a strong argument. I understand the argument more in terms of compressed timelines."
Budgets are more than just a fiscal document. In many ways, they are also communications documents and a way for the government to signal where it anticipates the economy is headed.
WATCH | Former PBO on delayed budget:
Rebekah Young, an economist at Scotiabank, argued it's important for the government to show its economic projections and what it's prepared to offer if things take a turn for the worse.
"Markets are looking for those sorts of signals and now what we've seen provinces do is put ranges of uncertainty around their assumptions so at least they know roughly where those guardrails are," she told Power & Politics.
"The big question mark is: if things are a lot worse … the government is likely going to have to deliver additional programs beyond what they've already talked about."
In trying to account for uncertainty, the government could be creating more — specifically in the bond market. Government bonds are used to raise funds and often make up a significant portion of individual savings portfolios.
Without a clear picture of the government's finances, Page said people will have less confidence in buying government bonds.
"The bond rating agencies, they're not going to like the fact that the government is not producing this type of financial document updating Parliament, updating Canadians, on the fiscal position," Page said.
During the campaign, the Liberals promised $130 billion in new measures to boost the economy and transition the country through the trade war.
The House returns at the end of May and is scheduled to rise for the summer before the end of June. That leaves little time for the Liberals to put forward a substantive budget.
Former prime minister Stephen Harper's government tabled a budget in June 2011 despite that year's election taking place in early May. But the Conservatives largely had the budget ready beforehand, having tabled a similar document in March before the campaign.
Page said he thinks it would be realistic for the government to provide a fiscal snapshot this spring and then table a full budget in October.
WATCH | No Liberal budget in 2025 'extremely unusual,' Poilievre says:
An economic statement, which is typically tabled in the fall, is different from a full budget. They can be used just to provide a snapshot of the government's finances and economic projections but they are sometimes considered a sort of mini-budget if new spending is included.
The Liberal government was able to turn around an economic update in November 2015, roughly a month after taking office.
"It's not sustainable for the finance minister not to put out some sort of economic and fiscal document, even if it's just the outlook, which would include the fiscal position of the government as Parliament makes these these changes to the tax act," Page said, referencing the promised tax cut the Liberals are aiming to pass by Canada Day.
Even if the government doesn't table a budget, it doesn't mean current federal programs are at risk of running out of money.
Budgets are required to outline any new spending the government wants to propose. But funding for ongoing programs is typically approved through different Parliamentary measures, namely the government's spending estimates.
Governments are required to table main estimates once a year and supplementary estimates three times throughout the year while the House is sitting.
During an election campaign, the government can use a measure known as special warrants to keep the lights on. In May, such a special warrant was issued and will cover operating costs until June. But the Liberals will need to present its spending estimates to cover costs past that point.
WATCH | Blanchet wants details of Liberal tax cut:
The main estimates are meant to be passed every March, but haven't yet been tabled this year because the House hasn't been sitting. The next deadline for the supplementary estimates to pass is June.
But without a budget to outline the government's overarching fiscal priorities, spending on new items they promised during the campaign might be rolled out at a slower pace.
"You can't implement what they've said they were going to implement without a budget … the clock is ticking," Page said, arguing that the bulk of the Liberal agenda might not get underway until 2026 or 2027.
Young said smaller pieces of legislation will be required until the full fiscal outlook is laid out.
"I expect we're going to see legislation coming forward one at a time," she said.
"I think they'll move forward piecemeal until we get to the fall where we get to see the bigger picture."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This Week in Louisiana Poltics: Approaching the end of the legislative session
BATON ROUGE, La. (Louisiana First) — We're approaching the end of the regular legislative session this week. We've seen many bills debated in the legislature. So far, Governor Jeff Landry has signed into law six bills from his tort and insurance reform effort, which he says will lower insurance rates. We've seen election security bills make it out of committee—they are headed to the House for final passage. And then there's the state's budget, which is House Bill 1 by Representative Jack McFarland. That bill easily passed out of the Committee on Appropriations and then sailed through the full House with bipartisan support. Louisiana House committee rejects bill on homeless camps It's awaiting final passage in the Senate, then will head back to the House, where it'll likely reflect priorities from both the legislature and the governor, including education, fully funding services, and teacher pay raises. This and more on Your Local Election Headquarters. Several injured after Tennessee plane crash Southern University Law Center offering help to clear criminal records with event in Gonzales The best midsize SUVs for 2025 Invasive tick that can be deadly for cattle causing concerns among researchers Tropical Storm Barbara strengthens off Mexico, expected to become hurricane Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


The Hill
34 minutes ago
- The Hill
Speaker Johnson teases follow-ups to the ‘one big, beautiful bill'
The 'one big, beautiful bill' may not be so singular, after all. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) is teasing follow-up legislation to the megabill of President Trump's tax cut and spending priorities that Republicans can push though using the same special budget reconciliation process that requires only GOP votes. That tool can be used once per fiscal year, with the current fiscal year ending on Sept. 30. So after Republicans are done with the 'big, beautiful bill,' the GOP trifecta has, in theory, two more shots to muscle through party-line legislation before the next Congress comes into power after the midterms. Johnson floated plans for a second reconciliation bill while rebutting concerns from deficit hawks on the budget impact of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act — which includes an extension of tax cuts and boosts to border and defense funding, with costs offset in part by new requirements on low-income assistance programs like Medicaid and food aid. 'Everyone here wants to reduce spending,' Johnson said Friday morning on CNBC. 'But you have to do that in a sequence of events. We have a plan, OK? This is the first of a multistep process.' 'We're going to have another reconciliation bill that follows this one, possibly a third one before this Congress is up, because you can have a reconciliation bill for each budget year, each fiscal year. So that's ahead of us,' Johnson continued, also pointing to separate plans to claw back money based on recommendations from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 'We're also doing rescissions packages. We got the first one delivered this week from the White House, and that will codify many of the DOGE cuts.' The promise of another reconciliation bill is somewhat surprising given the crux of the debate that dominated the early weeks of the year: Should Republicans divide up their agenda into two bills, passing the first quickly to give Trump an early win on boosting funding for border enforcement and deportations? Or would putting all of Trump's priorities into one bill — which would contain both bitter pills and sweeteners for different factions of the razor-thin majority — be a better political strategy? Trump eventually said he preferred 'one big, beautiful bill,' a moniker that became the legislation's official title in the House last month. It's not clear what would be in a second piece of legislation. Multiple House Republicans who spoke with The Hill were unaware of plans for more reconciliation bills and were not sure what could be included in them. 'I think we need to see what's left on the table after the first one,' Rep. Michael Cloud (R-Texas) said. And to muster through multiple reconciliation bills is a delicate prospect. If members know more reconciliation bills are coming, that complicates the argument that everything in the current package — even policies some factions dislike that others love — need to stay in one megabill. The Speaker declined to elaborate on what might be in such a package when asked in a press conference last week. 'I'm not going to tell you that,' Johnson said. 'Let's get the first one done.' 'Look, I say this is the beginning of a process, and what you're going to see is a continuing of us identifying waste, fraud, abuse in government, which is our pledge of common sense, restoring common sense and fiscal sanity. So we have lots of ideas of things that might be in that package.' Republicans had started planning for the current legislative behemoth months before the 2024 election so they would be prepared to quickly execute on their policy wish list if they won the majority. 'This isn't something we just drew up overnight. So, we'll go through that same laborious process,' Johnson said. But some members have ideas of what else they'd like to see. Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) said that he'd hope a second bill would do more to tackle rolling back green energy tax credits and make further spending cuts. Ultimately, though, it will be Trump's call, Norman said: 'I know when the president gets involved, it adds a lot of value.' And Rep. August Pfluger (R-Texas) speculated that passing the 'big, beautiful bill' would inspire members to keep going with another bill. 'People like the feeling of winning,' Pfluger said.


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
How the House Settlement will reshape Texas A&M athletics
How the House Settlement will reshape Texas A&M athletics It's time for the universities and colleges to back up the Brinks trucks as they get ready to deal with all the financial obligations as a result of the House settlement approval on Friday evening. After years of lawsuits and the rise of NIL in college athletics, regulation is finally being introduced. However, the legal battles are far from over, and precedent-setting cases will likely continue for years. For now, we can examine how this approval, alongside the Texas bill, will shape Texas A&M athletics, particularly with universities now permitted to directly pay athletes. Financial Impact The most significant factor is money. The landmark case, approved by Judge Claudia Wilken, allocates $2.5–$3 billion to former players from 2016–2024 who were unable to benefit from NIL. Additionally, a revenue-sharing model essentially establishes a salary cap, beginning at approximately $20 million for the upcoming season and increasing annually over the next decade. Scholarship & Roster Changes Another major shift is the removal of scholarship limits, replaced by roster restrictions. Texas A&M head football coach Mike Elko has repeatedly highlighted the challenges this presents when shaping a team while awaiting regulatory clarity. These uncertainties complicate roster management as teams prepare for rapid policy implementation. Title IX Implications An unresolved concern is how funding will be allocated across various sports, particularly women's athletics. Even though money is earmarked for women's sports, the exact distribution under the settlement remains unclear. Following their strong season, fans are calling for increased funding for Texas A&M's softball team, led by Coach Trisha Ford. With the sport's popularity on the rise, financial investments may shift in the coming years. Texas A&M's Position Athletic Director Trev Alberts has faced criticism for his early fiscal conservatism, yet he has positioned Texas A&M ahead of the curve. At the annual SEC meetings, Alberts reinforced the university's commitment to expanding scholarships. Current & Future Scholarship Allocations: Overall: 255 → 400+ 255 → 400+ Football: 85 → 105 85 → 105 Men's Basketball: 13 → 15 13 → 15 Women's Basketball: 15 → 15 15 → 15 Baseball: 11.7 → 34 11.7 → 34 Softball: 12 → 25 12 → 25 Men's Track & Field: 12.6 → 45 12.6 → 45 Women's Track & Field: 18 → 45 While changes will impact each university differently, Texas A&M is well-positioned to provide a strong student-athlete experience without cutting sports. However, the future remains uncertain as college athletics enters a new era of free agency, where players may seek better opportunities elsewhere if an opportunity to secure their future financially presents itself. Contact/Follow us @AggiesWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Texas A&M news, notes and opinions. Follow Jarrett Johnson on X: @whosnextsports1.