Poland extends border controls with Germany, Lithuania
Poland first reintroduced border controls last month, responding to similar measures on the German side. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk has since made lifting the restrictions conditional on a reciprocal move by Berlin.
Speaking at a briefing with local authorities and services on Sunday, Kierwiński said the extension aims to address a key issue: closing off the migration route that, according to Polish authorities, has now shifted to Lithuania and Latvia through Belarus and Russia.
Poland previously suspended asylum applications at parts of its border with Belarus, as it accused Minsk and Moscow of deliberately sending migrants over the border to destabilise the country.
'As you know, these controls were initially introduced for one month, but it won't come as a big surprise [...] that we have decided to maintain them for another two months,' he said.
Kierwiński added that the relevant regulation was issued on Friday and submitted to the European Commission for notification. The temporary controls are now set to remain in place until 4 October and a decision on a further extension will be made in September, according to the Polish minister.
In the four weeks since the controls were introduced, 185 foreign nationals have been denied entry, said Brigadier General Robert Bagan of the Border Guard at the press conference, citing the lack of valid travel documents as the primary reason.
Asked about Berlin's stance, a spokesperson for Germany's Interior Ministry referred to earlier comments by Christian Democrat Minister Alexander Dobrindt, who welcomed Poland's move as 'an important step in joint efforts against illegal migration.'
Polish Defence Minister Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz has nevertheless rebuked Germany's idea of conducting joint border checks last month, saying "respectfully", that a German minister will not tell Polish people what to do in Poland.
(cs)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
28 minutes ago
- Euractiv
Europe's humiliation is a comms strategy – and that's the problem
Nicolai von Ondarza is head of the EU/Europe Research Division at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP, a German government-funded think tank) in Berlin and an Associate Fellow at Chatham House. The EU-US trade deal announced last week has received an icy reception across the continent. French Prime Minister Bayrou decried a " submission" and many commentators lamented a humiliation for Europe. But much like the promises of 5% of defence spending at June's NATO summit, the humiliation has more to do with the performative concessions of European leaders. These embarrassing exhibitions of self-debasement allow Trump to trumpet his victories, but they sting less under closer inspection. Viewed side by side, the NATO summit and the EU-US trade demonstrate a strategic communication of subservience. At NATO, Secretary General Mark Rutte was unabashed in his deference , with texts to Trump that the American president later publicised . 'Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win,' Rutte fawned . The whole summit was designed around Trump's notoriously short attention span. It ended with the pledge from member states to spend 3.5% of GDP on defence, topped up with 1.5% on defence-related spending – an invitation for creative accounting that gave Trump the 5% he so desired. But eyebrow-raising numbers aside, the announcements at the NATO summit will build a stronger European defence. The European increases in defence spending will end up boosting national defence spending. So long as this is done wisely , this will lay the ground for Europe to assert greater control over its defence. In addition, much of the 1.5% top-up will pay for infrastructure investments that were planned anyway. Contrary to the presentation as a gift to Trump, European investment in European defence could significantly reduce the dependence on the US, at least for conventional deterrence. The strategy of subservience was even more obnoxious with Sunday's trade deal. Whilst America's military might is integral to European security, the EU prides itself on its strength as a global economic power, with the EU27's common trade policy conducted by the EU Commission. But over months of tariff threats from Trump, with ever-changing deadlines, the EU – at the behest of its member states – chose to delay retaliation again and again. The Union has now not only accepted a deal that sees tariffs rise to 15% on many goods (without equivalent rises of EU tariffs for the US), but also made investment promises to the tune of €550bn into the US, pledged to ramp up purchases of US fossil energy, and acquiesced to buy defence equipment and AI chips for more than €700bn in the next three years. No reciprocal engagements have been made from the US side. And yet in public, the EU is following Trump's line that the deal is a big win. For Trump, it is surely that. But for the EU, it looks like a capitulation. Not quite. What we see is the same comms strategy that lets Trump show he got big wins by presenting big numbers. Look more closely and these performative concessions consist either of investments Europeans already planned (e.g. AI chips, LNG, defence equipment), and/or lofty, non-binding promises that the EU cannot enforce as the choices must be taken by private companies. Even with the higher tariffs on cars, trade expert Sam Lowe argues , production in Europe is more attractive than in North America when the higher input costs from Trump's tariffs on steel and aluminium are taken into account. But rather than hi l ghlight the President's bluster, European leaders – both national and in the EU – are actively choosing to let Trump have his win. This ostentatious humiliation may well bring Europe some breathing space in the short term. It has already avoided the worst-case scenarios: by keeping the US on board with NATO and preventing the 30% tariffs Trump had been ready to deploy. And the costs are not as high as the public wins for Trump suggest. Yet the political price may be steep: Europe has signalled to its citizens and the world that it is willing to bow to Trump's pressure. This unappealing strategy will only be worthwhile if European leaders use the breathing space it gives them to effectively and jointly reduce dependency on the US. Failure to do so will be a resounding catastrophe.
Euractiv
12 hours ago
- Euractiv
EU to suspend US countermeasures despite lack of auto tariff relief
The European Commission will suspend countermeasures on €93 billion worth of US goods on Tuesday despite Washington's failure to follow through on its pledge to slash duties on EU car exports, Brussels said on Monday. The move comes a week after the world's largest trading partners clinched a much-anticipated 'framework deal', which both sides said would see most EU exporters, including car manufacturers, hit with a 15% flat US levy beginning this Friday – the day after the EU's retaliatory tariffs were initially set to enter into force. On Thursday, Donald Trump issued an executive order confirming the introduction of the flat 15% levy. However, the US president has yet to formally lower the levy on EU cars, which are still subject to a special 27.5% tariff. Most EU exports to America currently face a 10% minimum duty. The reduction of US car duties is crucial for Europe's long-suffering auto industry, which is struggling to keep pace with increasingly fierce competition from Chinese electric vehicle manufacturers. The US accounts for more than a fifth of the EU's car exports, with €40 billion worth of autos shipped to America in 2024. 'On 31 July 2025, the US issued an executive order confirming the first step in the implementation of the agreement, namely the introduction on 8 August of a single, all-inclusive 15% tariff on goods from the EU,' Olof Gill, EU trade Commission spokesperson, said on Monday. 'The other elements of the 27 July agreement are now to be implemented by the US. This includes the commitment to decrease its Section 232 tariffs on cars and car parts imported from the EU to a 15% ceiling rate, as well as the specific treatment agreed for certain strategic products (e.g. aircraft and aircraft parts),' he added. 'With these objectives in mind, the Commission will take the necessary steps to suspend by six months the EU's countermeasures against the US, which were due to enter into force on 7 August.' The proposed suspension comes amid deep disagreements between Washington and Brussels over the precise details of last month's deal, which falls well short of a traditional trade agreement. In addition to the pledged car tariff reduction, the Commission has claimed the deal will see both sides completely forgo duties on each other's aircraft, semiconductor equipment, critical raw materials, and 'certain' chemicals, generics, and agricultural products. A White House 'fact sheet' on the deal also states that the agreed 15% tariff rate applies to cars but does not state that Washington will offer the EU any additional tariff relief. Adding to the confusion, the US officials have claimed that the EU's digital regulations and services taxes remain 'on the table' – a claim fiercely denied by Brussels. Moreover, the US claims its levies on steel and aluminium – which are also subject to a special 50% levy – are not covered by the agreement. The Commission, however, says the US has agreed to a 'quota system' in which some EU metals will be taxed below 50%. In addition to sector-specific duties on metals and cars, Trump has announced special so-called 'Section 232' probes, which could see further tariffs imposed on specific goods on national security grounds. The EU and the US both say that pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, which are each subject to Section 232 investigations, are covered by the 15% levy. The Commission's proposal to suspend the countermeasures is overwhelmingly likely to pass, given that a 'qualified majority' of EU countries, or 15 countries representing 65% of the bloc's population, is required to block it. The measures, which combine two previous lists and have never been imposed, target a wide range of American products, including soybeans, motorbikes, cars, aircraft, machinery, and diamonds. They were designed in response to Trump's sweeping tariffs, which have upended global supply chains currently affecting €370 billion worth of EU goods, or 70% of the bloc's exports to America.
Euractiv
a day ago
- Euractiv
Minsk–Benghazi flights raise EU alarm on migration
ATHENS – The European Commission is investigating a series of unusual flights from Minsk to Benghazi amid growing concern that Russia may be helping to drive a new wave of irregular migration to southern Europe, an EU official told Euractiv. The flights, operated by Belarusian carrier Belavia, have raised suspicions in Brussels of possible coordination with Libyan authorities in eastern Libya – a region controlled by strongman Khalifa Haftar, who maintains close ties with the Kremlin. 'The frequency and nature of these flights raise questions about potential facilitation of irregular migration flows,' the EU official said. Between January and June 2025, more than 27,000 migrants arrived in Italy from Libya, while over 7,000 reached the Greek island of Crete – triple the number from the same period last year. Europe has faced a similar situation before. In the summer of 2021, Belarus was at the centre of a migration crisis on its borders with Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia. Russia was believed to have been indirectly involved in that crisis, with Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko playing a central role – facilitating the issuance of visas, organising flights, and transporting migrants from the Middle East and Africa to Minsk. Brussels now fears Moscow may be attempting a similar strategy via Libya, weaponising migration to sow division within the bloc. Ankara's shadow But Greece believes the EU is overlooking another player in the current crisis: Turkey. Athens is alarmed by Ankara's recent diplomatic overtures to both Libya and Italy. Last Friday, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan hosted a trilateral meeting in Ankara with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Libyan representatives to discuss migration and energy cooperation – a meeting from which Greece was pointedly excluded. Greek officials fear that the meeting marks a pivot in regional alignments, particularly given Turkey's recent rapprochement with pro-Kremlin Haftar and plans to reopen its consulate in Benghazi. Athens is also concerned by Ankara's efforts to implement a controversial maritime border agreement with Libya, which ignores the existence of the Greek island of Crete. The EU does not recognise the maritime deal, the EU official reiterated, noting that the issue was raised by the EU's top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, during her visit to Turkey last January. Meanwhile, the Greek opposition criticised the government for being diplomatically sidelined in the region and accused Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni of backstabbing her once-close EU ally, Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis, by not inviting him to the meeting. Left-wing MEP Nicolas Farantouris told Euractiv that the country risks becoming geopolitically encircled by its neighbours and warned EU partners that Turkey is playing a destabilising role in both the Middle East and Libya. He urged the Greek government to organise a meeting with Cyprus, Libya and Egypt – the latter being aligned with Greece on maritime borders and opposed to Turkey's ambitions. However, the two countries are currently engaged in a diplomatic spat over Cairo's intention to confiscate an ancient Greek Orthodox monastery at the foot of Mount Sinai. (cs)
