Trump dismisses Musk's political ambitions as 'ridiculous' in sharp rebuke
Trump spoke with reporters before boarding Air Force 1 in Bedminster, New Jersey, when he was asked about Musk's move to start a third party.
"I think it's ridiculous to start a third party," Trump said from the tarmac. "We have a tremendous success with the Republican Party. The Democrats have lost their way, but it's always been a two-party system, and I think starting a third party just adds to confusion.
"It really seems to have been developed for two parties," the president continued. "Third parties have never worked. So, he can have fun with it, but I think it's ridiculous."
Musk announced the launching of a new political party called the "America Party" on his social media platform X on Saturday.
The entrepreneur called the formation of the party a direct response to a corrupt political establishment that no longer represents the American people.
The announcement followed a viral July 4 poll on X, where Musk asked whether voters wanted independence from what he called the "two-party (some would say uniparty) system."
Over 1.2 million votes were cast, with 65.4% saying "yes."
"By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it," Musk posted Saturday. "When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy. Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom."
The move came just after Trump signed the "big, beautiful bill" into law Friday at the White House.
The sweeping $3.3 trillion legislation includes tax cuts, infrastructure spending and stimulus measures and has drawn criticism from fiscal conservatives and libertarians. Though Musk did not reference the bill directly in his America Party posts, the timing suggests rising friction between the billionaire and the president. Musk has previously warned that unchecked spending by both parties threatens the long-term health of the economy.
The new party, according to Musk's posts, will target a few key seats in Congress. The goal is to create a swing bloc powerful enough to hold the balance of power and block what Musk sees as the worst excesses of both Republicans and Democrats.
Third parties have traditionally had a difficult time gaining ground in American politics as the system is built for two dominant parties. With the Electoral College, winner-take-all elections and strict ballot access laws, outsiders cannot meaningfully compete. Even when a third-party candidate catches fire, it rarely lasts beyond a single election cycle.
One of the biggest third-party efforts in recent history was Ross Perot's 1992 run. He earned nearly 19% of the popular vote as an independent but didn't win a single Electoral College vote. It was the closest a third-party candidate got to the White House after President Teddy Roosevelt's famed Bull Moose Party run in 1912 against his onetime protégé, William Howard Taft.
Others, like Ralph Nader, have tried with the Green Party, and Gary Johnson with the Libertarian Party, but no third-party candidate has come close to winning the presidency.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
31 minutes ago
- Politico
Don Davis eyes open North Carolina Senate seat
Republicans finally got their 'big, beautiful bill' across the finish line. Now they're turning to their next urgent tasks: codifying billions in spending cuts and avoiding a government shutdown. The Senate plans to vote no earlier than next week on President Donald Trump's request for lawmakers to scrap $9.4 billion in previously approved funding for NPR, PBS and foreign aid, according to two people granted anonymity to discuss the plans. That's running dangerously close to lawmakers' July 18 deadline to vote in favor of the rescissions package, or the administration will be forced to spend the money as Congress originally intended. GOP leaders have work to do to shore up votes for the package, which would formalize funding cuts previously sought by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency initiative. Among the wary Republicans is top Senate Appropriator Susan Collins, who helped tank Trump's unsuccessful rescissions request back in 2018. The Maine Republican said during a late-June hearing with White House budget chief Russ Vought that reducing support for the AIDS-fighting program PEPFAR would be 'extraordinarily ill-advised and short-sighted;' Collins later told Calen that she's looking at 'drafting an alternative package of rescissions.' Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan of Alaska and Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota have also echoed Collins' warnings about slashing money for public broadcasting, with Sullivan saying he's seeking an amendment for 'very rural' stations that would be affected by the White House proposal. Looming over the rescissions talks: appropriations. Senators will Thursday begin marking up their first batch of spending bills necessary to fund the government beyond the end of the current fiscal year on Sept. 30. Leaders are under immense pressure to allow votes on individual measures rather than seek to avert a shutdown with a massive omnibus, and more than anything else want to avoid having to pass another short-term stopgap. But the scheduled August recess will take away four weeks of time lawmakers would otherwise be in Washington to negotiate. The House has made some progress with its appropriations work, passing one bill so far and advancing four others out of committee. House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) says he wants to complete all 12 markups by July 30. Yet even the typically bipartisan bill to fund the Department of Veterans' Affairs garnered only two Democratic votes on the chamber floor. It underscores how a process that once relied on buy-in between the two parties has become a largely partisan exercise — a risky situation for Republicans who can lose only three votes on their side of the aisle for party-line legislation. What else we're watching: — How lawmakers respond to the deadly flooding in Texas: Some state officials are sharply criticizing the National Weather Service for severely underestimating the rainfall in its forecasts. The White House on Sunday pushed back against attempts to link the administration's NWS staffing cuts to its inability to warn Texas residents about the storms. At least two members have been directly affected by the catastrophe: GOP Reps. August Pfluger of Texas and Buddy Carter of Georgia. Pfluger's daughter and Carter's granddaughters were rescued from a camp affected by the flooding, with Carter also sharing that his granddaughters' cousin was killed. — More reconciliation bills ahead: Riding high on a legislative win, Speaker Mike Johnson is sketching out a timeline for potentially pushing two more party-line packages through the reconciliation process this Congress. Watch what policy areas they'll address — and whether they include the priorities of key hard-liners who claimed they got certain assurances to support the megabill last week. — NDAA to shake up the Pentagon: House Armed Services is aiming to make it harder to withdraw troops from Europe and change how the Pentagon buys its weapons as it heads toward a markup next Tuesday of the annual defense bill. Senate Armed Services will mark up its version of the defense bill this week; the full panel debate is slated to begin Tuesday afternoon and will likely take several days. Jordain Carney, Gregory Svirnovskiy, Mia McCarthy and Connor O'Brien contributed to this report.
CBS News
32 minutes ago
- CBS News
1-year vs. 5-year CD: Which CD term do experts recommend now?
We may receive commissions from some links to products on this page. Promotions are subject to availability and retailer terms. The choice of a 1-year CD or a 5-year CD will come down to a series of personal considerations now. GYRO PHOTOGRAPHY/amanaimagesRF Certificate of deposit (CD) account interest rates remain attractive in mid-2025, with top CDs offering yields between 4.00% and 4.40%. The Federal Reserve kept its benchmark interest rate frozen at its June meeting, keeping it at a range of 4.25% to 4.50%. Fed officials still project two rate cuts by year-end, but uncertainty is high as they weigh a variety of economic concerns against the need for economic growth. This environment has created a dilemma for savers who are torn between locking in today's rates for five years or keeping their options open with shorter one-year terms. To help you navigate this decision, we consulted three financial experts to find out which CD term is smarter now. Below, we'll detail what they want you to know. Start by seeing how high a CD interest rate you could qualify for here. 1-year vs. 5-year CD: Which CD term do experts recommend now? "We're generally leaning toward 1-year CDs right now," says Christopher L. Stroup, a certified financial planner and president of Silicon Beach Financial. "With rate cuts likely in the next 12 to 18 months, shorter terms offer flexibility and let [you] reassess when rates shift," he says. When weighing your options, though, don't focus only on current rates. "Today's shorter-term rates can be higher than longer-term rates … [making them] more tempting," Mark Sanchioni, chief banking officer at Ridgewood Savings Bank, points out. "[But] when that term is over, [you] may be disappointed with [your] renewal rate options." Sometimes, it can work out in your favor to take a slightly lower rate for a longer term. Both experts agree that the right CD choice depends on your timeline, risk tolerance and financial goals. When it would (and wouldn't) make sense to choose a 1-year CD now "A 1-year CD would be appropriate [if you need] access to [your] funds within the next year," says Rick Wilcox, head of retail product management and development at PNC. Industry professionals say that 1-year CDs make sense in these scenarios: You're saving for a house down payment or a wedding in the next 12 to 18 months. You're a business owner building cash reserves for a product launch or equipment purchases. You want to park an emergency fund and earn a predictable return but may need to withdraw soon. Short-term CDs work especially well for entrepreneurs and business owners. Stroup mentions an early-stage founder who had $250,000 in reserve before a funding round. "We chose a 1-year CD to earn interest while keeping cash accessible," he says. A 1-year CD becomes less attractive if you don't need the money for several years, though. "[You'd] risk reinvestment uncertainty when rates drop and miss out on locking in current yields," Stroup explains. Compare your top 1-year CD account offers here now. When it would (and wouldn't) make sense to choose a 5-year CD now "A 5-year CD would be appropriate [if you don't] have an immediate need for the funds, feel interest rates may decline over this period and/or desire safety and security," says Wilcox. Financial advisors say that 5-year CDs make sense if you find yourself in one these scenarios now: You're within 10 years of retirement and want guaranteed income without market risk. You recently received a windfall (e.g., a business sale or inheritance) and want to preserve your capital. You're building a CD ladder A longer-term CD choice often benefits seniors seeking steady income. "[I worked with] a retired aerospace engineer with no near-term liquidity needs," Stroup recalls. "[He] used a 5-year CD ladder to lock in predictable, penalty-free income for the next five years." A 5-year CD may not be the best choice if you anticipate needing funds before maturity. "[Anyone] considering [this] must be certain they will [not] need to access those funds over the next five years," Sanchioni emphasizes. Early withdrawal penalties can amount to two years of interest or more, eroding a substantial portion of your returns. This option also backfires if you expect CD interest rates to climb steadily. You'd miss out on higher yields by staying locked into today's rates for half a decade. The bottom line "A CD should be part of a broader strategy, not a standalone decision," Stroup stresses. Many savers are hedging their bets in today's unpredictable rate environment. Sanchioni notes that more clients are using a "Three Buckets" approach — keeping some money immediately accessible, some in short-term CDs and some locked up long-term. Taking this route can help you come out ahead no matter how rates move. Regardless of the approach you take, though, experts recommend aligning your CD term with your actual cash flow needs rather than timing the market.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump to terminate deportation protection for thousands of Hondurans and Nicaraguans in U.S
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Department of Homeland Security will terminate deportation protections for thousands of Hondurans and Nicaraguans in the U.S., according to U.S. government notices posted on Monday, part of a broad effort by President Donald Trump to strip legal status from migrants. The terminations, effective September 6, would end Temporary Protected Status for an estimated 72,000 Hondurans and 4,000 Nicaraguans who have had access to the legal status since 1999, according to a pair of notices posted online on Monday. Trump, a Republican, has sought to end temporary legal status for hundreds of thousands of migrants in the U.S., including some who have lived and worked there legally for decades. The Trump administration argues that deportation protections were overused in the past and that many immigrants no longer merit protections. Democrats and advocates say that the migrants could be forced to return to dangerous conditions and that U.S. employers depend on their labor. During his 2017-2021 presidency, Trump sought to end most TPS enrollment, including the designations covering Honduras and Nicaragua, but was blocked by federal courts.
