MEPs Debate Proposed Laws On ‘Facilitation' Of Smuggling And Migration
Representatives in the EU's legislative arm are to begin debating new rules designed to prevent human smuggling and irregular migration around the bloc. The legislative package presented by the EU's executive arm has been criticized for treating migrants and people lending them assistance as criminals. It is argued the proposal - if made into law unchanged - could have serious implications for humanitarian workers and other people acting in solidarity with migrants..
Members of the European Parliament's Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE) are to begin debating the legislative package from the European Commission, known as the 'Facilitation Directive' in early April. The proposal, formally known as 'Preventing and countering the facilitation of unauthorized entry, transit and stay in the EU' is nominally designed to modernize Europe's legal framework to crack down on people smugglers and other vendors who 'profit' from irregular migration.
The proposal is not from scratch, rather a redraft of proposed changes to the existing 2002 Facilitation Directive. This week, European Member of Parliament (MEPs) in the relevant committee will begin debating the proposal from the commission, as part of its potential journey to adoption. They will be working from a draft report by socialist MEP Birgit Sippel, which highlights some of the major concerns about the proposal.
One of the main concerns addressed by the draft report is the danger that humanitarian workers might face criminal sanction for assisting irregular migrants on their journey, or indeed protecting their lives and wellbeing. Such 'criminalization' has already long taken place in various forms around European member states, including the detention of sea rescue workers by Italy, or the persecution of rights NGOs in Greece.
This practice is common enough to form a pattern. As Amnesty International notes in a recent policy paper on the directive, 'across Europe, member states have in fact targeted individuals and NGOs, providing non-profit humanitarian assistance - such as food, shelter, medical care, or legal advice - with criminal investigations and prosecutions.'
Human rights NGOs and civil society groups fear the Facilitation Directive might formalize that 'criminalization.' The PICUM charity, which works with undocumented migrants, welcomed MEP Sippel's draft report - which would exempt humanitarian workers from the new directive, but says a lot more needs to be done to stop people unfairly prosecuted.
'This text is a first positive step forward in the protection of solidarity actions, but more could be done to prevent the criminalization of migrants themselves,' said PICUM's Silvia Carta. "We stand ready to work with the European Parliament so that no one faces prosecution simply because they crossed a border or helped people in need'.
Aside from the humanitarian issue, the Commission proposal also contains many clauses that people fear are either too broad or are just irrelevant to protecting people on the move. These include definitions of facilitation that could see all manner of people who engage in commercial transactions with irregular migrants - think shopkeepers, taxi drivers, landlords - criminalized for in theory financially benefitting from people's journeys. At the same time, the proposal contains elements that could see migrants themselves prosecuted as 'smugglers' for taking some active part in their own journey, something that is already widespread among many reception countries in Europe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
29 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
NATO chief calls for ‘quantum leap' in defense and says Russia could attack in 5 years
LONDON (AP) — NATO members need to increase their air and missile defenses by 400% to counter the threat from Russia, the head of the military alliance said Monday, warning that Moscow could be ready to attack it within five years. Secretary-General Mark Rutte said during a visit to London that he expects the 32 NATO members to agree to a big hike in military spending at a summit in the Netherlands this month. Speaking at the Chatham House think tank, Rutte said Russia is outpacing the far bigger NATO in producing ammunition, and the alliance must take a 'quantum leap' in collective defense. 'Wishful thinking will not keep us safe,' Rutte said. 'We cannot dream away the danger. Hope is not a strategy. So NATO has to become a stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance.' Rutte has proposed a target of 3.5% of economic output on military spending and another 1.5% on 'defense-related expenditure' such as roads, bridges, airfields and sea ports. He said he is confident the alliance will agree to the target at its summit in The Hague on June 24-25. At the moment, 22 of the 32 members meet or exceed NATO's current 2% target, which was set in 2014. Rutte said he expects all to reach 2% by the end of this year. The new target would meet a demand by U.S. President Donald Trump that member states spend 5% of gross domestic product on defense. Trump has long questioned the value of NATO and complained that the U.S. provides security to European countries that don't contribute enough. Rutte said he agreed that 'America has carried too much of the burden for too long.' Rutte said NATO needs thousands more armored vehicles and millions more artillery shells, as well as a 400% increase in air and missile defense. 'We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies,' he said. 'Russia could be ready to use military force against NATO within five years,' Rutte added. 'We are all on the eastern flank now.' Rutte also held talks Monday with Prime Minister Keir Starmer and praised the U.K.'s commitment to increase defense spending as 'very good stuff.' Starmer has pledged to boost military spending to 2.5% of gross domestic product by 2027 and to 3% by 2034. Like other NATO members, the U.K. has been reassessing its defense spending since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. European NATO members, led by the U.K. and France, have scrambled to coordinate their defense posture as Trump transforms American foreign policy , seemingly sidelining Europe as he looks to end the war in Ukraine. Last week the U.K. government said it would build new nuclear-powered attack submarines, prepare its army to fight a war in Europe and become 'a battle-ready, armor-clad nation.' The plans represent the most sweeping changes to British defenses since the collapse of the Soviet Union more than three decades ago. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Forbes
33 minutes ago
- Forbes
Low Turnout In Italian Vote Ends Hopes For Shorter Citizenship Wait
Getty Creative A measure presented to Italians via referendum, to reduce the waiting time for Italian citizenship, has failed after nowhere near enough people showed up to vote on it. The result - unsurprising given widespread political opposition to the measure - means millions of people will continue to wait well more than ten years for citizenship and Italy remains an outlier in the EU on the matter. The measure, if passed, would have reduced the official residency requirement for documented residents to attain citizenship from ten years to five, bringing Italy in line with most other European member states. In practice, the wait can be considerably longer than ten years. Activists campaigning for the reform argued that such a long process is a needless wait for people who are already well-integrated into Italian society, many having spent much of their life there, and have shown their attachment to the country. Citizenship confers various legal privileges, depending on the issuing country, including the right to vote, run for public office and sometimes participate in certain labor markets. More broadly, citizenship is considered valuable to many immigrants as it represents the acceptance of the host country, as well as a level of security offered by a permanent status. There is also a whole raft of discriminations based on someone not being a citizen - beyond what one might consider 'standard' discrimination. People who may have full language and cultural fluency in a country, for instance, may still find themselves more easily rejected from accommodation, jobs and other services than are people with the right passport, as working with citizens is seen as less of a risk or hassle. At the same time, citizenship - and the pathway towards it - is seen as a strong motivator for the integration of migrants of all classes. The gradual acceptance into both the social and democratic systems of a country offers milestones for someone to learn to live in the country as best they can. Conversely, the systematic refusal to allow even very long-term residents seen in some countries is seen as a method for creating a multi-tiered society, with those denied citizenship feeling and being perceived as permanently 'other' to their host society. Such dynamics are occasionally weaponized, as seen recently in the U.K. when the government announced plans to permanently bar refugees from citizenship if they arrived by boat. It is estimated the Italian measure would have sped up the process for between two and three million people lawfully resident in Italy. The fact that it was rejected - even though it would have applied to people with residence permits rather than an 'amnesty' for undocumented migrants - is no surprise given anti-immigration political tone in Italy. Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who was elected on a campaign platform heavily featuring immigration and has led a campaign to reduce arrivals and even target NGOs, campaigned against the citizenship measure, encouraging voters simply not to show up to keep turnout low.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Canada plans to hit NATO spending target early and reduce US defense reliance, Carney says
TORONTO (AP) — Canada will meet NATO's military spending guideline by early next year and diversify defense spending away from the United States, which he says no longer plays a predominant role on the world stage, Prime Minister Mark Carney said Monday. Carney said Canada will achieve NATO's spending target of 2% of gross domestic product five years earlier than it had previously planned. 'Our military infrastructure and equipment have aged, hindering our military preparedness," Carney said. 'Only one of our four submarines is seaworthy. Less than half of our maritime fleet and land vehicles are operational. More broadly we are too reliant on the United States.' According to NATO figures, Canada was estimated to be spending 1.33% of GDP on its military budget in 2023, below the 2% target that NATO countries have set for themselves. Canada previously said it was on track to meet NATO's spending target by the end of the decade. 'Our goal is to protect Canadians, not to satisfy NATO accountants,' Carney said. The announcement of increased spending came as Canada is about to host U.S. President Donald Trump and other leaders at a summit of the Group of Seven leading industrialized nations in Alberta on June 15-17, and before the NATO summit in Europe. It also comes as NATO allies are poised to increase the commitment well beyond the 2% target. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said last week that most U.S. allies at NATO endorse Trump's demand that they invest 5% of gross domestic product on their defense needs and are ready to ramp up security spending even more. Carney has said that he intends to diversify Canada's procurement and enhance the country's relationship with the EU. 'We should no longer send three quarters of our defense capital spending to America,' Carney said in a speech at the University of Toronto. 'We will invest in new submarines, aircraft, ships, armed vehicles and artillery, as well as new radar, drones and sensors to monitor the seafloor and the Arctic.' Canada has been in discussions with the European Union to join an EU drive to break its security dependency on the United States, with a focus on buying more defense equipment, including fighter jets, in Europe. Carney's government is reviewing the purchase of U.S. F-35 fighter jets to see if there are other options. 'We stood shoulder to shoulder with the Americans throughout the Cold War and in the decades that followed, as the United States played a predominant role on the world stage. Today, that predominance is a thing of the past,' Carney said in French. He added that with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, the United States became the global hegemon, noting its gravitational pull, always strong, became virtually irresistible and made the U.S. 'our closest ally and dominant trading partner.' 'Now the United States is beginning to monetize its hegemony: charging for access to its markets and reducing its relative contributions to our collective security,' Carney said. The prime minister said that "a new imperialism threatens.' 'Middle powers compete for interests and attention, knowing that if they are not at the table, they will be on the menu," Carney said. Trump's calls to make Canada the 51st U.S. state have infuriated Canadians, and Carney won the job of prime minister after promising to confront the increased aggression shown by Trump. Carney said that the long-held view that Canada's geographic location will protect Canadians is becoming increasingly archaic. European allies and Canada have already been investing heavily in their armed forces, as well as on weapons and ammunition, since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022.
