logo
Somerville rejects poverty target to be substantially missed

Somerville rejects poverty target to be substantially missed

However, a new scrutiny report by the Poverty and Inequality Commission warned the 2030 aims were "not at all likely to be met".
In an exclusive interview with The Herald on Tuesday, Ms Somerville said her government was ''determined' to meet the targets, before clarifying the targets 'absolutely' will be met.
The report, led by the organisation's chair Professor Stephen Sinclair, said: 'On current trends, the Scottish Government is not at all likely to meet the child poverty targets.
'The interim child poverty targets for 2023-24 have been missed and the reduction in child poverty needed to meet the final 2030 targets are now very large.
'Data for 2024-25 will be available till next year, however - given the absence of major interventions to increase incomes or reduce costs during 24-25 – it seems unlikely that it will show a markedly more positive picture than 23-24.
Read more:
'Modelling projections of child poverty into the years approaching the final target, based on current policy, suggest the 2030 targets will be missed, and missed by a substantial margin.'
The report warned 'decisive action' must be taken now to allow 'any chance' for the targets to be met.
While child poverty in Scotland is lower than other parts of the United Kingdom, there remains a 12 percentage point gap between the 2030 target and the current relative poverty rate of 22%.
The report warns at least three more poverty-focused policies, on the scale of the Scottish Child Payment, are required.
It also welcomes the announcement that ministers will mitigate the two-child benefit cap from March 2026, but warns that could only reduce poverty rates by two percentage points.
As Ms Somerville announced the date of mitigation, The Herald asked Ms Somerville whether she was ashamed at the prospect of 2030 targets being missed.
She did not respond to this question and instead said: 'We have more work to do. We know that we are making progress and we are clearly disappointed that the interim targets were not met but we are seeing relative poverty levels for children coming down.
Read more:
'That's reassuring that we're moving in the right direction but we know that we have to do more.'
She added: 'We are determined to meet the targets. We know it's a challenge but we are absolutely determined to make them.'
Ms Somerville was asked if she could guarantee relative child poverty would be under 10% by 2030, while absolute poverty would not be above 5%.
She said: 'Yes, [I give] an absolute commitment that we will meet those targets.'
The Child Poverty (Scotland) Act 2017 set the legally binding targets, and included interim targets for 2023-24 which included reducing relative poverty to below 18% and absolute poverty to below 14%. These targets were missed, it was confirmed.
Professor Sinclair said: 'The latest child poverty statistics published in March showed that all four interim child poverty targets have been missed, despite there being signs of progress in relation to two of the four – relative and absolute child poverty.
'Delivery of the Scottish Child Payment continues to be a success and the Scottish Government's commitment to mitigate the impact of the UK Government's two-child benefit limit is welcome. However, the Scottish Government has made limited progress in 2024/25 on delivering the other major actions set out in its Best Start, Bright Futures plan.
'There is clearly no lack of belief that child poverty is deeply damaging for children and society in Scotland and that it needs to be eradicated.
'However, our report also makes it clear that the Scottish Government must take decisive action now if it is to have any chance of delivering on the 2030 child poverty targets.'
The Herald, alongside 23 leading charities, launched a campaign in April urging First Minister John Swinney to increase the Scottish Child Payment to £40 per week, for each child.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer was also urged to scrap the two-child benefit cap as a matter of urgency.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bosses of Octopus Energy and SSE clash over 'postcode pricing' proposals
Bosses of Octopus Energy and SSE clash over 'postcode pricing' proposals

Sky News

time9 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Bosses of Octopus Energy and SSE clash over 'postcode pricing' proposals

The head of Britain's biggest energy supplier has claimed his competitors oppose proposals for so-called postcode pricing because they financially benefit from the current system. Octopus Energy chief executive Greg Jackson told Sky News his business's rivals were against customers being charged based on where they lived, rather than on a national basis, because they would lose out on profits. He said: "A very small number of companies that today get paid tens of millions, sometimes in a single day, to turn off wind farms and generate gas elsewhere, don't like it. "The reason you're seeing that kind of behaviour from the rivals is they are benefiting from the current system that's generating incredible profitability." The government is currently considering whether to introduce the policy, which is also known as zonal pricing. Energy secretary Ed Miliband is expected to make a decision on the proposals by this summer. Octopus has become Britain's biggest supplier with more than seven million customers. Mr Jackson has been a vocal proponent, as he said he wants to charge customers less and boost government electrification policies by having cheaper electricity costs. What is postcode pricing? Zonal pricing would mean electricity bills are based on what region you live in. Some parts of Britain, like northern Scotland, are home to huge energy producers in the form of offshore wind farms. But rather than feeding electricity to local homes and businesses, power goes into a nationwide auction and is bought to go across Britain. As the energy grid is still wired for the old coal-producing sites rather than the modern renewable generators, it's not straightforward to get electricity from where it's increasingly produced to the places people live and work. That leads to traffic jams on the grid, blocking paid-for electricity moving to where it's needed and a system where producers can be paid a second time, to power down, and other suppliers, often gas plants, are paid to meet the shortfall. Zonal pricing is designed to prevent paying the generators for power that can't be used. It would mean those in Scotland have lower wholesale energy costs while those in the south, where there is less renewable energy production, would have higher wholesale costs. Whether bills go up or down depends on implementation. Savings from one region could be spread across Britain, lowering bills across the board. Mr Miliband has said he's not going to decide to raise prices. However, SSE's chief executive Alistair Phillips-Davies described the policy as a "distraction" and said it could affect already agreed-upon upgrades of the national grid that will lower costs. "I think you've got a very, very small number of people who are asking for this. It's just a distraction. We should remove it now," he said. While Octopus Energy estimates that said postcode pricing could be introduced in two to four years, Mr Phillips-Davies said it could take until 2032 before it was implemented, by which time Britain would have "built much of the networks that are required to get the energy from these places down into the homes and businesses that actually need it". "We just need to stay true to the course," he added. Unions, as well as industry and energy representatives, have also spoken out against the policy. Opponents include eco-tycoon Dale Vince and trade body UK Steel. A joint letter signed by SSE, UK Steel, Ceramics UK and British Glass, along with the unions GMB, Unite and Unison, said zonal pricing could lead to scaled-back investment due to uncertainty and higher bills. A separate letter signed by 55 investors, including Centrica and the Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan, has also criticised the policy. 1:21 However, Mr Jackson said many investors had not voiced opposition, with thousands of small and medium businesses instead backing the policy in the hope of paying less on energy bills.

Orkney Islands Council ends investigation into leaving UK
Orkney Islands Council ends investigation into leaving UK

BBC News

time17 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Orkney Islands Council ends investigation into leaving UK

Orkney Islands Council has accepted it must remain part of the UK - after spending two years exploring opportunities for greater looked into various models for "alternative governance".These included changing their status in the UK or even potentially becoming a self-governing territory of Norway.A report to councillors concluded the proposals were too difficult and too expensive and members agreed to investigate a single authority model to reform how public services are delivered instead. Orkney's bid to loosen its ties to the UK made international headlines two years ago. The former council leader, James Stockan, even floated the idea Orkney could rejoin islands were gifted to Scotland, along with Shetland, by King Christian I of Denmark and Norway in 1472 as security for a wedding debt was never repaid and the islands have remained part of Scotland ever since then. Mr Stockan's quest for constitutional change stemmed from his acute frustration with the financial support Orkney has received from both the Westminster and Holyrood was backed by his fellow councillors at the time, who voted by 15 votes to six in favour of exploring "alternative models of governance".Mr Stockan left his leadership role and stood down from the council in January last year. Detailed appraisal When the report he set in motion finally appeared before councillors, its conclusion that Orkney had no realistic prospect of changing its relationship with the UK was accepted without the council is mapping out a new direction with the Scottish government to reform how local services may be delivered in future through the single authority sees health boards and councils work more closely together to deliver services and preliminary talks have been current council leader, Heather Woodbridge, assured members during their meeting that this was just the start of a more detailed appraisal and implementing the model was not a foregone Scottish government believes the single authority model could also work in Argyll and Bute and the Western has indicated it will publish more details and a timeline for implementation by the end of this parliament next year.

What SJP's selfie trick tells us about the terrifying rise of conspiracy theories
What SJP's selfie trick tells us about the terrifying rise of conspiracy theories

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

What SJP's selfie trick tells us about the terrifying rise of conspiracy theories

Sarah Jessica Parker, the Sex and the City star and Booker prize judge, has a nifty trick for getting out of taking selfies with her fans. 'I did this for a really, really long time and it worked for ever,' Parker said in an interview with Howard Stern. 'I used to say, 'I can't, because of the government,' and I'd do this,' Parker said, pointing up to the sky. 'It really confused people. This was through different administrations, so it wasn't political.' It is not entirely clear why Parker – who has said she refuses to take selfies and would rather 'have a conversation' instead because 'it's much more meaningful' – stopped using this brilliant excuse. But one does have to wonder whether it is because the US has become a nation of conspiracy theorists. Rather than backing away from the weird 'the government is watching' woman, perhaps fans started to excitedly engage her with theories about how Bill Gates has implanted us all with mind-controlling microchips. Or maybe she just got tired of the joke. I don't know. But I'm sure someone out there (the government) does. Conspiracy theories have become so mainstream that they are even prompting nonsensical legislation. Earlier this month, Louisiana lawmakers sent a bill to the state's governor seeking to ban 'chemtrails' – which don't actually exist. They are a longstanding conspiracy which posits that the white lines sometimes left behind by aircraft aren't just due to condensed water vapour but are far more sinister. Some people believe that the government is spraying toxic metals to reduce populations; others believe they are evidence that dark forces are trying to control the weather or people's minds. Lawmakers in at least 11 other states are trying to advance similar 'chemtrail' bans. 'Every bill like this is kind of symbolic, or is introduced to appease a very vocal group, but it can still cause real harm by signalling that these conspiracies deserve this level of legal attention,' a member of the National Association for Media Literacy Education told the Associated Press. Also causing real harm in the US with his obsession with imaginary problems is health secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr. The vaccine sceptic recently fired every single member of a critical advisory committee on immunisation practices. He has replaced them with people who reportedly have very little vaccine expertise and are accused of spreading misinformation. The ousted members of the vaccine committee have said that the shake-up may 'impact people's access to lifesaving vaccines, and ultimately put US families at risk of dangerous and preventable illnesses.' RFK Jr is also fixated on conspiracy theories about fluoride, which he calls 'a dangerous neurotoxin'. There are, to be clear, valid concerns about ingesting too much fluoride, including its effects on IQ as well as potential tooth discoloration. But experts are pretty unanimous that fluoride in drinking water is a great public health achievement that has done wonders for preventing tooth decay. There are worries that RFK Jr's meddling will cause a significant increase in dental cavities, especially among children in lower-income groups. Anyway, I've got a good idea for Parker. Since acting like a conspiracy theorist no longer seems to ward off unwanted attention, why not try engaging selfie-seeking fans with a rational fact-based discussion? Increasingly large numbers of Americans seem allergic to that; some fans will immediately run a mile. I have some other thoughts too but I'm afraid I can't elaborate any more on this issue for top secret reasons. But here's a hint: it's because of the government. Arwa Mahdawi is a Guardian columnist

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store