logo
Uber set to reopen Ebbsfleet International by 2029

Uber set to reopen Ebbsfleet International by 2029

BBC News6 days ago

Trains to and from Europe via the Channel Tunnel will stop in Kent up to 10 times each day under new plans by Gemini Trains and Uber.Eurostar services stopped calling at Ebbsfleet and Ashford international stations at the beginning of the pandemic, and have so far not resumed.But rail operator Gemini Trains and transport app Uber recently announced they were teaming up and planned to rival Eurostar by operating trains between London St Pancras and the continent.Adrian Quine, CEO of Gemini, said the new service could be introduced by 2029 and would stop at Ebbsfleet, although Ashford is not in the plans for now.
Mr Quine told BBC Radio Kent: "It's very important because Eurostar no longer stop in Kent and there's eight million people who live in the south-east of England, outside the M25, for whom having a direct service to the continent is extremely important."Ebbsfleet is a perfect station. It's designed for international traffic, it's got a massive car park, it's very well connected via the road network and it's connected to the rest of Kent via the HS1 service."We're proposing every train stops there."The deal, similar to that between Uber and the London Thames Clipper boats, would see tickets offered through the app but operations remaining the responsibility of Gemini.Mr Quine said he was between 60 and 70% sure that the project between Gemini and Uber would be green lit by the rail regulator.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cumbria Tourism warns bus fares prove 'a barrier' to work
Cumbria Tourism warns bus fares prove 'a barrier' to work

BBC News

time19 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Cumbria Tourism warns bus fares prove 'a barrier' to work

High public transport costs are a barrier to employment in the tourism industry, a business group has Tourism said a survey of its businesses found 80% of employers worried the potential removal of the £3 cap on bus fares would impact their staff's ability to get to work."There is concern for employers that if the cap is removed, staff may stop using buses due to cost and this could affect punctuality, job access and reliability," a spokesman Department for Transport (DfT) said affordable buses were "the lifeblood of communities" and the cap would be in place until the end of 2025. Previously, the cost of single bus journeys had been capped at £2, rising to £3 in Tourism, which represents 4,500 businesses in the area, said the cap had been a "lifeline" for staff who often work in remote hotels and restaurants around the Townson, who works at Lakeside Hotel, said the cap was a "game changer" as she did not drive."If it increased, I'd either have to rely on others to provide lifts or cut back on essentials elsewhere - neither is a great option," she said. Bus cap incentive Cumbria Tourism said it had worked with bus providers and councils to make existing buses work for hospitality employees, with the introduction of early morning and later evening association said its survey also found that 40% of workers had not used buses before the cap was introduced due to high Nesbitt, who works at Grasmere Gingerbread, said: "The £3 bus fare makes it possible for me to get to work without it costing a large portion of my income each week."The DfT said it had put in place a £955m bus funding package to support lower fares."Our Bus Services Bill will further empower local councils to take control of their services in ways that work for their communities," a spokesperson said. Follow BBC Cumbria on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.

The militant ‘crabs' threatening to bring the NHS to a standstill
The militant ‘crabs' threatening to bring the NHS to a standstill

Telegraph

time25 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

The militant ‘crabs' threatening to bring the NHS to a standstill

A militant group of doctors who use social media to recruit is driving forward strike action by resident doctors. The current co-chairs of the British Medical Association's (BMA) resident doctors' committee are members of DoctorsVote, which professes to be 'a grassroots organisation committed to advocating for the full pay restoration of UK doctors'. The group is prolific on social media, where disgruntled medics unite, often behind pseudonyms, seeking to forge ahead with more strikes designed to further boost their salaries. In spring, junior doctors – now referred to formally as resident doctors – were offered the biggest pay rise in the public sector in a bid to end years-long disruption to the NHS. The average full-time salary for a resident doctor will now be more than £54,000, the Department of Health and Social Care said – but the BMA wants another set of strikes to force another 30 per cent pay hike. The slogan: 'Be a crab, not a scab' is used to enforce picket lines, and now crustaceans can be seen on the social media accounts of advocates. The humble crab is now shorthand for strike approval. Reddit, TikTok, Instagram and X are awash with the group, which makes use of Gen Z memes and trends to promote its message. This, in tandem with a traditional TV and PR campaign, creates a potent propaganda machine. In recent years, the group has come to dominate the BMA. The co-chairs of the BMA resident doctors' committee in 2022-2024 both had roots in DoctorsVote. Their successors, Dr Melissa Ryan, a 45-year-old paediatrician from Nottingham, and Dr Ross Nieuwoudt, a 29-year-old surgical trainee from Merseyside, were also elected under the same banner. DoctorsVote won 70 out of 75 seats on regional junior doctor committees across England in 2023. The fresh 30 per cent demand comes on the back of a 22 per cent pay rise that Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, and Sir Keir Starmer prioritised after Labour's landslide election win last year. Now, the Government appears to be paying the price for it negotiation tactics. As one Tory MP told The Telegraph: 'If you roll over so easily then, why would they stop now?' Or, as one anonymous doctor online put it: 'We have them by the balls. Let's squeeze.' Dr Nieuwoudt confessed earlier this week that Mr Streeting's latest offer was 'generous' – but, he said, not generous enough. The BMA sent out a leaflet to the 50,000 members who will vote on whether they are prepared to take strike action and to further the pay dispute. Half need to reply for it to progress. In the leaflet, a section of frequently asked questions includes one in which junior doctors raise concerns that they are now perceived as greedy by their registrars and consultants. They are now cognisant of the reality that they profited the most in recent years compared to other public sector professions, and are worried about how fresh action would look. And, it seems, the public shares their stance and has a diminishing perception of the strike advocates. Gone is the majority support for them to be paid more, replaced by a sense of fatigue that strikes and withdrawal of care are being used to wring out more money from the taxpayer. More people now oppose strikes than support them, a YouGov poll has found – a profound shift from last year, when more than half of people said they supported the strikes. Now, the resident doctors of DoctorsVote want to strike again. Coordination of industrial action with more senior doctors and specialists could hobble the NHS at skeleton staffing akin to Christmas Day levels. The cost to the NHS of 44 days of strike action last year was around £3 billion, according to the NHS Confederation, and this enormous cost is now also being weaponised by the movement. Dr Ryan told The Sunday Times: 'We know how much the strikes last time were disruptive to patient care and the waiting list, but we also know exactly how much they cost the government, and it was more than what it would cost to get to full pay restoration. 'Last time we ended up coordinating some action and it was immensely disruptive for patient care, and we can see that on the horizon for this Government too.'

Residents bid to unseat 'terrible' Springhead Parkway managers
Residents bid to unseat 'terrible' Springhead Parkway managers

BBC News

time29 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Residents bid to unseat 'terrible' Springhead Parkway managers

Residents are looking to remove their estate's management company as they claim they are charged "more and more for less".Homeowners at the Springhead Parkway estate in Gravesend are collecting petition signatures opposing FirstPort, the firm responsible for the area's public 50% of fellow residents sign the petition they can take over management of the area themselves under the 'right to manage', according to the Local Democracy Reporting said it does everything it can to keep costs low "whilst not compromising on the service we provide". Construction on the estate of nearly 800 homes, part of the Ebbsfleet Garden City development area, started in Vistry Group currently contracts FirstPort to maintain the area's public Johnson said "everything was ok" when he moved to the estate three years ago, but now "the maintenance of our public areas is terrible".FirstPort "always paint a sunny picture", he added, but "there's litter and dog mess that's not being collected in the parks" and broken playground equipment "that have not been fixed for over a year now".His partner, Ashley Wilson, said that the couple now avoid taking their young son to the park. The couple claim they have had to pay £2,500 of unjustified FirstPort charges since moving in, including a surprise £600 "maintenance adjustment" fee in November."When we called there was no explanation as to why these charges were being put forward; they were giving no evidence, and they were being quite threatening as well," Mr Johnson are "paying more and more money for what seems to be less work", he added. A FirstPort spokesperson said: "The service charge is not a source of revenue for property managers. It is allocated to cover actual expenses incurred to ensure the smooth running of the property." The MP for Gravesham, Dr Lauren Sullivan, told the Local Democracy Reporting Service she supporting residents' calls to replace FirstPort, but the matter is complicated by some parts of the estate having different management said: "FirstPort has been plaguing communities and new housing communities across the country, and I've joined together with fellow MPs to write a letter summoning them to Parliament to explain what they're doing." Vistry Group declined to comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store