logo
America first vs Africa: What's at stake for AGOA trade deal

America first vs Africa: What's at stake for AGOA trade deal

On January 20, President Donald Trump shocked the international community by announcing a sweeping freeze on USAID's $43 billion annual budget.
While the shockwaves rippled globally, nowhere were the tremors felt more acutely than across Africa, a continent long reliant on American development assistance and preferential trade programs.
Weeks later, Trump escalated tensions by imposing reciprocal tariffs on several African countries, including Lesotho, which faced a 50% tariff, a move that could severely impact its cost-sensitive apparel exports.
The pause has since been lifted, following intense diplomatic pressure and public backlash. However, the episode revealed just how precarious Africa's trade and aid relationship with the United States has become.
This protectionist shift now casts a long shadow over one of the continent's economic lifelines, the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA).
A trade lifeline under threat
The African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), launched back in 2000, gives eligible sub-Saharan African countries duty-free access to the U.S. for over 1,800 products, on top of 5,000 already covered by a separate trade program called the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP).
The idea was to boost trade, attract investment, and support economic growth in Africa, while also helping the U.S. maintain some soft power and influence on the continent.
Some sectors took off under AGOA, especially apparel and autos. Within five years of the law being passed, African clothing exports to the U.S. jumped by 150%. Countries like Kenya, Lesotho, and Mauritius saw new factories pop up and jobs created.
For example, Lesotho's textile industry, which accounts for 16% of its GDP and employs tens of thousands, mainly women, is almost entirely dependent on AGOA. Today, more than 80% of the country's exports are destined for the U.S. market. So any pause or disruption to the program would hit the economy hard.
" For countries that used AGOA as a foundation for industrial policy, the risks are profound," Amma Gyampo, CEO of the Ghana Venture Capital and Private Equity Association (GVCA), told Business Insider Africa.
However, some analysts say the program's benefits are overstated. According to Capital Economics, AGOA exports made up just 0.5% of sub-Saharan Africa's GDP in 2023. Nigeria and South Africa, two of the biggest users, only exported around 1% of GDP's worth to the U.S. under AGOA last year.
AGOA trade peaked in 2008 when U.S. imports from African countries hit $82 billion. By 2024, that number had dropped to $29.1 billion, AGOA's website shows.
Now, the AGOA legislation, which has been renewed twice since its inception, is set to expire in September 2025. African leaders are advocating for a 10-year extension, but the Trump administration's shift toward economic nationalism makes the renewal uncertain.
Cost of walking away from AGOA
On the cost side, AGOA currently costs the United States about $250 million per year in foregone tariffs. However, pulling the plug on the program isn't as straightforward as it might seem.
The U.S. has traditionally held strong economic sway across Africa's 54 countries, using trade and investment as tools to advance its strategic interests.
Africa's growing importance to Washington isn't just about diplomacy, it's also about resources. In 2023 alone, the U.S. imported $7.3 billion worth of crude petroleum and $4.7 billion in precious metals from sub-Saharan Africa, a sign of the region's value in global supply chains.
If AGOA is allowed to lapse, it could slowly erode U.S. geopolitical influence in Africa, at a time when China and Russia are deepening their footholds, and Gulf states are emerging as powerful new players.
"The U.S.' moves in recent times have been great for Beijing. We've seen some BRICS players offering tariff-free wheat to AGOA-vulnerable nations like Nigeria, swapping trade for UN votes. Venture firm Partech reports a 40% surge in Chinese VC deals in African health tech this year, exploiting the U.S. uncertainty," Gyampo said.
Africa's bargaining chips
Despite the uncertainties, Africa holds strong bargaining chips. The continent boasts a youthful population, booming creative industries, and abundant critical minerals essential for the global energy transition.
According to Gyampo, these assets are in high demand globally, yet Africa has historically failed to fully capitalize on them. " it's a good moment to renegotiate trade deals in Africa's interest, based on what Africa has to offer the world," she said.
There are growing calls for AGOA's renewal to include technology transfer clauses to build local manufacturing and skills capacity across the continent.
Alice Usanase, former EMEA lead at AFC, pointed out a major gap in the current framework, " Digital services Africa's tech sector is growing at 10.8% annually, but AGOA had no provision for software, fintech, or digital content. Future frameworks must include data governance rules, IP protections, and cloud infrastructure financing."
Amma Gyampo echoed that view, saying "Venture capital investors are keen on the creative and tech sectors as well. We need to look at how we emulate what India has done in Tech and leverage Africa's youth talent to boost our contributions to the global tech and business outsourcing sectors for example."
Rethinking regional AfCTA trade
Intra-African trade among the continent's 54 countries has historically remained low. While the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) was established to unlock vast economic potential, its impact so far has been limited. Despite offering access to a combined market of 1.4 billion people and a total GDP of $3.4 trillion, the agreement's promise remains largely underutilized.
Gyampo noted that in the venture capital and small business sectors, there's a strong push for businesses to pivot toward AfCFTA-driven regional trade.
"There is a phrase I hear a lot nowadays, that 'AfCFTA isn't Plan B, it's Plan A". We need to diversify everything and reduce our reliance on any one market or trading partner," Gymanpo noted.
Usanese added that Africa must strengthen its trade diplomacy with emerging markets like India, Brazil, Southeast Asia, and the Gulf states. " These partners are offering co-investment and market access without the heavy conditionalities that often characterize North-South relations," she said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

3 Reasons GIS is Risky and 1 Stock to Buy Instead
3 Reasons GIS is Risky and 1 Stock to Buy Instead

Yahoo

time5 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

3 Reasons GIS is Risky and 1 Stock to Buy Instead

Over the last six months, General Mills's shares have sunk to $54.81, producing a disappointing 17.1% loss while the S&P 500 was flat. This was partly due to its softer quarterly results and may have investors wondering how to approach the situation. Is now the time to buy General Mills, or should you be careful about including it in your portfolio? Get the full breakdown from our expert analysts, it's free. Even with the cheaper entry price, we're sitting this one out for now. Here are three reasons why there are better opportunities than GIS and a stock we'd rather own. Revenue growth can be broken down into changes in price and volume (the number of units sold). While both are important, volume is the lifeblood of a successful staples business as there's a ceiling to what consumers will pay for everyday goods; they can always trade down to non-branded products if the branded versions are too expensive. General Mills's average quarterly sales volumes have shrunk by 1.6% over the last two years. This decrease isn't ideal because the quantity demanded for consumer staples products is typically stable. When analyzing revenue growth, we care most about organic revenue growth. This metric captures a business's performance excluding one-time events such as mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures as well as foreign currency fluctuations. The demand for General Mills's products has barely risen over the last eight quarters. On average, the company's organic sales have been flat. Forecasted revenues by Wall Street analysts signal a company's potential. Predictions may not always be accurate, but accelerating growth typically boosts valuation multiples and stock prices while slowing growth does the opposite. Over the next 12 months, sell-side analysts expect General Mills's revenue to drop by 4.3%, a decrease from This projection is underwhelming and indicates its products will face some demand challenges. General Mills isn't a terrible business, but it isn't one of our picks. Following the recent decline, the stock trades at 12.9× forward P/E (or $54.81 per share). While this valuation is reasonable, we don't really see a big opportunity at the moment. We're fairly confident there are better stocks to buy right now. We'd suggest looking at one of our top software and edge computing picks. Market indices reached historic highs following Donald Trump's presidential victory in November 2024, but the outlook for 2025 is clouded by new trade policies that could impact business confidence and growth. While this has caused many investors to adopt a "fearful" wait-and-see approach, we're leaning into our best ideas that can grow regardless of the political or macroeconomic climate. Take advantage of Mr. Market by checking out our Top 9 Market-Beating Stocks. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025). Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-micro-cap company Tecnoglass (+1,754% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Where Could Air Canada Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Could Air Canada Stock Be in 5 Years?

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Where Could Air Canada Stock Be in 5 Years?

Written by Andrew Button at The Motley Fool Canada Air Canada (TSX:AC) stock has been taking a beating in recent years. In 2020, in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, the stock fell all the way from $54 to $12, as the travel restrictions in that period caused the company's revenue to decline 80%. The company's stock later rallied when the first COVID vaccine was announced, but subsequently gave up the gains for reasons that are less clear. Today, Air Canada is in a much better place than it was in 2020. It's profitable. It has repaid much of its debt. Its revenue has recovered to its pre-COVID level and then some. Nevertheless, at around $19, AC stock is still nowhere near its pre-COVID stock price. What's going on here? There are a few lingering issues for Air Canada that have investors worrying about the stock, even though the underlying company is in a much better place than it was before the crash. The question is, why the apparent discrepancy? In this article, I will explore the reasons why Air Canada stock is still at a relatively low level and why I think it will be at a higher one in five years' time. One reason why some investors are concerned about Air Canada is because of the large amounts of capital expenditures (CAPEX) the company is undertaking in the next three years. CAPEX refers to spending on fixed assets like property, plant and equipment. In the case of an airline, it mainly refers to spending on new aircraft. Air Canada expects $3.4 billion in CAPEX in 2025, $4.3 billion in 2026, and $4.9 billion in 2027. After 2027, the CAPEX spend is expected to decline. The amounts of CAPEX above are fairly large. Notably, they exceed the company's past amounts of free cash flow, seeming to imply that Air Canada will be cash flow negative in the years ahead. Is this CAPEX such a big risk for Air Canada? In my opinion, no. Airplanes tend to be in service for decades, meaning that a lot of CAPEX now does not mean a lot of CAPEX in the future. Also, Air Canada's revenue has far surpassed levels seen in past years, so unprecedented CAPEX does not necessarily mean chronic cash burn. Overall, I don't think Air Canada's CAPEX is going to ruin the company. Another reason why people are concerned about Air Canada is because of Donald Trump's trade wars. Earlier this year, Trump slapped a 25% tariff on Canada, ostensibly to counter the flow of fentanyl into the United States. In response, many Canadians pledged to cancel vacations to the United States. Later, data collection firms reported that Canada-U.S. air travel did decline — one story claimed by as much as 70%. Air Canada said that it saw an impact but denied that its U.S. travel hours went down by 70%. Again, this strikes me as not that big of a risk. Canadians are most likely replacing U.S. travel with inter-provincial travel and overseas travel. Air Canada's most recent earnings release confirms this: revenue was stable year-over-year, and free cash flow was positive. On the whole, Air Canada looks like a bargain at 8.8 times earnings and 1.6 times operating cash flow. I think it will be worth more in five years' time than it is today. The post Where Could Air Canada Stock Be in 5 Years? appeared first on The Motley Fool Canada. More reading Made in Canada: 5 Homegrown Stocks Ready for the 'Buy Local' Revolution [PREMIUM PICKS] Market Volatility Toolkit Best Canadian Stocks to Buy in 2025 Beginner Investors: 4 Top Canadian Stocks to Buy for 2025 5 Years From Now, You'll Probably Wish You Grabbed These Stocks Subscribe to Motley Fool Canada on YouTube Fool contributor Andrew Button has positions in Air Canada. The Motley Fool recommends Air Canada. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2025

Longtime Dividend Giant Announces Hike
Longtime Dividend Giant Announces Hike

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Longtime Dividend Giant Announces Hike

National Fuel Gas Company (NYSE:NFG) is one of the best stocks for a retirement stock portfolio. On June 12, the company declared a 3.9% hike in its quarterly dividend to $0.535 per share. Through this increase, the company stretched its dividend growth streak to 55 years. In addition to this strong dividend growth, National Fuel Gas Company (NYSE:NFG) has also paid regular dividends to shareholders for 123 years in a row. A large oil and gas production plant with pipelines leading to tanker truck and storage tanks. The company's steady dividend growth is largely due to its solid cash reserves. In the latest quarter, it generated $473.8 million in operating cash flow, while its levered free cash flow over the past twelve months totaled $50.3 million. National Fuel Gas Company (NYSE:NFG) offers a dividend yield of 2.54%, as of June 13, and it will trade ex-dividend on June 30. The stock has surged by over 37% since the start of 2025. National Fuel Gas Company (NYSE:NFG) is a diversified energy firm with a fully integrated portfolio of natural gas and oil operations. Its business is divided into four key segments: Exploration and Production, Pipeline and Storage, Gathering, and Utility. While we acknowledge the potential of NFG as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure. None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store