
Dining across the divide: ‘I don't think I broadened his perspective'
Occupation Pharmacist
Voting record Lib Dem
Amuse bouche He once saw Rio Ferdinand in a cafe near his mum's house. 'I looked at him, smiled and then remembered I was a Liverpool fan'
Occupation Assistant financial analyst
Voting record Usually Labour, 'for my sins'. Would like the Greens to get in but doesn't think they can
Amuse bouche Has survived breast cancer three times
Isabel Lovely bloke. I'd meet him again in a heartbeat. He felt like an old uni mate I hadn't seen for ages. I had duck breast and then the cod.
Naser She's lovely, lovely, lovely. A very educated, genuine young lady. She's been through a lot, but is still smiling, still battling, still fighting and still happy. I had monkfish, then stuffed cod with reduced lobster bisque. It was delicious.
Isabel For me, the NHS must be preserved. What I didn't realise until I spoke to Naser was just how much strain everybody in the NHS is under. It wasn't that we disagreed about the size of it, it was more about how it is managed. The impression I had initially is that he wanted to cut it back, but what he was actually saying is that because of the pure demands on the service, we need to do what they do in France and Germany, so you pay in and you get mixed access.
Naser The French and Dutch systems have insurance models – co-pay – and they don't have doctors on strike. My proposal was to make corporations and big companies pay for private insurance for their staff. It happens a bit already. Make it law. It will reduce the financial burden on the NHS. But the problems in the NHS aren't just about money – you could add another £10bn/20bn/30bn and the fundamental flaws would still be there.
Isabel When you think of an insurance model, you always think of America, where if you don't have the money, you die. I still don't know what the right answer is. I don't think I broadened his perspective; he knows what it's like. He was coming from a place of taking the pressure off the people who work in the NHS. They need to feel that they're valued, that they can do their jobs, that the facilities are good.
Naser I've seen private prescriptions just explode – people can't get to see their GP and they'd rather pay £50 than go through the frustration. So they're being forced into it, rather than it being organised properly. Why can you buy a box of Viagra over the counter, but not a blue asthma inhaler? This is an unnecessary regulatory burden that means people have to faff around, involve 111 and emergency services.
Isabel Basically, we really bonded over the fact that when you're a second-generation immigrant, your parents say: lawyer, doctor, accountant, those are the jobs you're allowed to do. It's very hard to break free from those shackles if you want to do something else. We both understood it – we both saw it.
Naser She's Ghanaian by background; I'm Palestinian. We had a lot of shared immigrant perspective. We both felt that our parents pushed us hard to go to university, to go into a profession, to prove ourselves. They wanted to justify the investment, justify leaving, to people back home. My dad was a consultant surgeon, head of his department in the NHS, but did he have to do that? Could he not just have been a good guy?
Isabel The Labour party have really moved away from where they started, and become a centre-right party. They say they want the right kind of immigrant, but what is the right kind of immigrant?
Naser Starmer is a human rights lawyer, and he's not doing enough to call out Israel for starving the Gaza Strip. He's completely vapid.
Isabel We exchanged numbers, so I'm hoping I can hit him up in three months.
Naser It was so friendly – we had a lovely time. I think we were both open-minded, and we both felt that the capitalist class is really screwing people over.
Additional reporting: Kitty Drake
Isabel and Naser ate at The Cavendish, London SW1
Want to meet someone from across the divide? Find out how to take part

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BreakingNews.ie
25 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Badenoch says organisations should be able to decide if staff can wear burkas
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has said employers should be able to decide if their staff can wear burkas in the workplace. Mrs Badenoch also said people who come to her constituency surgeries must remove their face coverings 'whether it's a burka or a balaclava'. Advertisement Ms Badenoch posted a video on X of part of her interview with the Telegraph, in which she said: 'My view is that people should be allowed to wear whatever they want, not what their husband is asking them to wear or what their community says that they should wear. 'I personally have strong views about face coverings. 'If you come into my constituency surgery, you have to remove your face covering, whether it's a burka or a balaclava. 'I'm not talking to people who are not going to show me their face. Advertisement 'Organisations should be able to decide what their staff wear for instance, it shouldn't be something that people should be able to override.' She added that France has a ban and has 'worse problems than we do in this country on integration'. On Wednesday, Reform's newest MP Sarah Pochin asked Sir Keir Starmer during Prime Minister's Questions whether he would support such a ban. Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice said his party has 'triggered a national discussion'. Advertisement Asked if he wants to ban burkas, Mr Tice told GB News on Sunday: 'We've triggered a national discussion. I'm very concerned about them (burkas). 'Frankly, I think they are repressive. I think that they make women second-class citizens. 'We're a Christian nation. We have equality between the sexes, and I'm very concerned, and if someone wants to convince me otherwise, well come and talk to me. 'But at the moment, my view is that I think we should follow seven other nations across Europe that have already banned them.' Advertisement He called for a debate on the topic to 'hear where the country's mood is'. Meanwhile, shadow home secretary Chris Philp said 'employers should be allowed to decide whether their employees can be visible or not', when discussing face coverings. Asked on the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme if the Conservative Party's position is not to speak to people who cover their face, Mr Philp said of Mrs Badenoch: 'Well she was talking specifically about her constituency surgery I think, and it is definitely the case that employers should be allowed to decide whether their employees can be visible or not. 'But I don't think this is necessarily the biggest issue facing our country right now. Advertisement 'There's a legitimate debate to have about the burka. 'You've got, obviously, arguments about personal liberty and choice and freedom on one side, and arguments about causing divisions in society and the possibility of coercion on the other. 'That is a debate I think we as a country should be having, but as Kemi said, it's probably not the biggest issue our nation faces today.' Asked if he would talk to people who would not show their face, the Croydon South MP said: 'I have in the past spoken to people obviously wearing a burka – I represent a London constituency – but everybody can make their own choices, that's the point she was making, each employer should be able to make their own choices.'


STV News
35 minutes ago
- STV News
Swinney tried to ‘push people into arms of Reform', claims Sarwar
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has accused First Minister John Swinney of 'attempting to push people into the arms of Reform', following the Hamilton by-election. During a heated exchange with journalist Martin Geissler on BBC Scotland's Sunday Show, Sarwar branded questions put to him as 'embarrassing' and suggested Geissler was asking about a 'fantasy world'. Sarwar repeatedly described the SNP campaign – which urged voters they could only stop Reform by voting SNP – in the run-up to last week's poll as 'dishonest and disgraceful'. Labour's Davy Russell gained the seat from the SNP with 8,559 votes, while SNP candidate Katy Loudon came second on 7,957, ahead of Reform's Ross Lambie on 7,088. Before the vote, Swinney had claimed 'Labour are not at the races' and he described it as a 'two-horse race' between the SNP and Reform. Speaking on Sunday, Sarwar said: 'The best John Swinney had to offer after 18 years was 'vote SNP to stop Farage' – a dishonest, shameful campaign.' He said it showed a 'lack of ambition' from a Government 'running down the clock', and he claimed commentators had been 'embarrassed' by the result. Sarwar added: 'Frankly, your questions are embarrassing too, Martin.' The broadcaster responded: 'I think you should be slightly embarrassed.' PA Media Prior to the vote, John Swinney had claimed only SNP candidate Katy Loudon could stop Reform (PA). Sarwar said he had spoken to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer on Friday following the victory, and the Scottish leader said he wants to see the two-child benefit cap removed 'as fast as possible'. He told the BBC that Labour aims to 'improve growth' and bring mortgage rates and energy bills down to alleviate the cost-of-living crisis. He added: 'Maybe you don't have a mortgage Martin, but people do have mortgages across the country. 'There have been four interest rates cuts because of economic stability and those four interest rates cuts have meant that the average mortgage is down by over £1,000. 'We've started to see energy bills come down, but those need to come down much quicker, because people feel a real pressure in the cost-of-living crisis.' He said voters had 'utterly rejected the SNP and Reform and sent a message to John Swinney that he ran a dishonest and disgraceful campaign that attempted to push people into the arms of Reform rather than confront the issues he has caused in people's communities'. He added: 'That's why, ultimately, people want them removed from office.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Rachel Reeves is the new Steve Jobs, says Cabinet minister
A Cabinet minister has been ridiculed for comparing Rachel Reeves to the creator of the iPhone. In an attempt to defend Labour's spending plans, Peter Kyle, the Technology Secretary, said the Chancellor was fixing the public finances in much the same way Steve Jobs saved Apple from the brink of bankruptcy in the late 1990s. Mr Kyle's comments prompted a swift backlash from the Tories, who argued it was ridiculous to liken Jobs's achievements to Ms Reeves's record tax rises on businesses. The Chancellor launched a £40 billion tax raid in her first Budget last year, including an increase in employers' National Insurance contributions. At the spending review on Wednesday, she will announce departmental budgets for the next three years. The process has involved a significant amount of wrangling behind the scenes as ministers attempt to dodge expected real-term cuts. Challenged on where the money was coming from for his department, Mr Kyle told the Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips show on Sky News that the Government is going 'to be investing record amounts of money into the innovations of the future '. 'Just bear in mind how Apple turned itself around … when Steve Jobs came back to Apple, they were 90 days from insolvency,' he said. 'That's the kind of situation that we had when we came into office. Now, Steve Jobs turned it around by inventing the iMac, moving to a series of products like the iPod. 'Now we are starting to invest in the vaccine processes of the future, some of the high-tech solutions that are going to be high growth. We're investing in our space sector … they will create jobs in the future.' Mr Jobs, who co-founded Apple in 1976, was credited with rescuing the company from collapse in 1997, when it teetered on the brink of bankruptcy in the face of competition from Microsoft. He died aged 56 in 2011 after a long battle with cancer. At the time, floods of tributes described him as a 'visionary' whose impact would be felt for many generations to come. Labour has long blamed 'difficult' decisions on tax and spending on the 'dire' state of the economy they inherited from the Conservatives. However, the Tories claimed that comparing Ms Reeves to Mr Jobs was inappropriate. Andrew Griffith, the shadow business secretary, told The Telegraph: 'Labour are plumbing new depths of delusion. Steve Jobs, creator of Apple and the iPhone, improved life for billions of people. 'In contrast, Rachel Reeves has trashed the UK economy, spending billions of pounds that we don't have in the process. 'This comment just shows Labour have not the faintest understanding of business.' Greg Smith, the shadow business minister, added: 'Kyle's comments are a little far of the mark. 'Steve Jobs created a mega international business from scratch and Rachel Reeves is actively preventing anyone doing that in the UK, ripping businesses apart, increasing tax and red tape. Apart from that, yeah, they're identical.'