Iran accused of 'hiding nuclear weapon ingredients' as Trump's ceasefire remains
Only two hours after President Trump had announced a ceasefire had been struck between Israel and Iran - peace was hanging in the balance. Israel accused Iran of sending missiles - something it denied - and launched counterstrikes, despite the US President urging them not to act.
"Do not drop those bombs. If you do it is a major violation. Bring your pilots home, now," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform, before unleashing a sweary rant about the two countries to reporters.
When asked about reports Iran had broken the ceasefire and Israel's response, Trump said, "I'm not sure they did it intentionally. They couldn't reign people back. I don't like the fact that Israel went out this morning, and I'm going to see if I can stop it. As soon as I get away from you, I'm going to see if I can stop it."
He added: "We have two countries that have fought for so long and so hard that they don't know what the f*** they're doing."
Since then, the ceasefire seems to be tentatively holding. The US waded into the conflict with its own strikes against three of Iran's nuclear facilities: Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordo.
Using 125 US aircraft and so-called 'Bunker Buster' bombs, the attack is said by Trump to have done significant damage to Iran's nuclear capabilities, with the President calling them "obliterated'.
However, a recently leaked intelligence report from the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency has claimed that the strikes have not done anywhere near as much damage as Trump claimed and only set Iran back a few months from developing a nuclear weapon.
An expert speaking to The Telegraph echoed these sentiments, claiming that it is likely Iran had far more supplies to create nuclear weapons hidden away.
"I'm sure they have a hidden place somewhere with some hundreds, if not thousands of centrifuge[s] and they have material all there in several places all over Iran,' said Sara Shine, who previously worked within the Israeli military for three decades, and is reported to be an expert on Iran's nuclear programme.
She added: 'They cannot do anything now, tomorrow, but in the future, they have all the capabilities [to build a bomb]".
Whilst she didn't doubt the US strikes - dubbed Operation Midnight - did serious damage to the three targeted facilities, she believes that further caches will likely exist.
"The [known] sites in themselves, for the time being, are not a lot of threat", the former research director for Mossad was quoted as saying. "The problem is, as you know, the material and the advanced centrifuges that I'm sure they have somewhere".
However, another source said that whilst it was likely the expert was right that further enriched uranium is kept in other places by Iran, the facilities to further enrich it to weapons-grade, or indeed build a weapon had been "significantly damaged".
Iran responded to the US strikes with what has been called a carefully choreographed attack on a US military base in Qatar. Advanced warning was given of the strike, and there were no injuries - with some experts claiming that the restrained measure allowed Iran to save face, but also provided an "off-ramp" for de-escalation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Opinion: Signals that prove Trump forced a historic reckoning
No one knows if there will be a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia. But this much is emphatically and impressively true: Donald Trump has already done something extraordinary — he has created a moment in which all parties can see two stark alternatives with sudden clarity. They can compromise and make a deal, or they can face the continuation of a grinding war with an uncertain duration and outcome. That sense of crossroads was on display at the White House on Monday in a tableau that was at once theatrical and substantive. Trump has managed, at least for now, to coax the United States, Europe, and Ukraine into a common position. That united front presents Vladimir Putin with what he has long tried to avoid: Western cohesion in the face of his aggression. The day unfolded with all the trappings of political theater. There was the banter about President Volodymyr Zelensky 's choice of wardrobe — a jacket that suggested a nod to formality rather than the olive drab sweatshirt that has become his wartime uniform. There was also a moment of personal warmth, when Zelensky handed Trump a letter from his wife to Melania Trump, written about the plight of children in the war zone. These gestures may appear minor, but in diplomacy such small signals help reinforce the larger message: unity, solidarity, and an insistence on treating each other as friends rather than supplicants or tetchy combatants. For Zelensky, a former actor who once made his living playing roles, Monday was a performance that mattered. He carried his lines with precision and his tone with care. The last time he visited Washington the chemistry soured and tensions spilled into public view. This time, the body language told a different story. Smiles, nods and a sense of easy rapport radiated from the Oval Office outward. Compared with Putin's frosty reception during his stop in Alaska on Friday — a visit the Kremlin had hoped would project strength — Monday's White House welcome stood as a vivid counterpoint. The most consequential takeaway from the day was the absence of daylight between Washington and its European allies. For years, Putin has relied on fissures within the transatlantic alliance, exploiting differences over energy, trade or the use of force. Yet on Monday, the alignment was clear: the US, Europe and Ukraine are working together to shape a peace plan. This is precisely the scenario Putin has sought to prevent, and brings the world to the essential questions now hovering over these fragile negotiations. Will Putin accept a combined European and American framework that offers Ukraine the security guarantees it needs to risk peace? And will Ukraine, whose soldiers have retaken and held swathes of territory at immense cost, truly be willing to cede land now under its control in exchange for ending the bloodshed? Neither question yields an obvious answer. For Putin, compromise has always been a synonym for weakness. For Ukraine, yielding territory risks validating aggression and betraying those who have died defending it. Yet the very posing of these questions, out loud and on equal terms, marks a shift in the conversation. The possibility of peace, however brutal, is now at least conceivable. If the answer to either or both questions is 'no,' then the burden will shift back to Trump. What will he do? Will he enforce punishing new sanctions designed to cripple the Russian economy? Will he authorize Ukraine to use American-supplied weapons to strike deeper into Russian territory? Will he risk escalation to demonstrate resolve? The options ahead are perilous, but they are his to shape. What is striking is how Trump — long painted as skeptical of NATO, dismissive of Europe and oddly solicitous of Putin — now finds himself in the role of transatlantic unifier. By engineering a moment when the allies stand shoulder to shoulder, he has created the conditions for a test: either Putin comes to the table, or he faces the combined weight of American and European pressure. This is not a neat choice between war and peace. It is instead what might be called a 'brutal peace.' Any deal will be painful, incomplete, and fraught with moral compromise. But it will still be peace. If Trump cannot deliver Putin to the table, then he must bring him to heel by other means. Either way, the calculus has changed. Diplomacy often depends on timing. Wars grind on until one side collapses or until leaders perceive that further bloodshed is more dangerous than negotiation. What Trump has done, at least for now, is force that moment of reckoning. He has made all sides look squarely at the costs of continuing the war versus the costs of ending it. It is too soon to know whether history will mark this week as a turning point. But it is fair to say that Trump, a man once derided as an opponent of Europe and a skeptic of alliances, has demonstrated a capacity to bring allies together in common cause against a murderous dictator. That alone is remarkable. It may yet be remembered as the moment when urgency became opportunity.
South Wales Guardian
35 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
383 aid workers were killed in global hotspots in 2024, nearly half in Gaza: UN
UN humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher said the record number of killings must be a wake-up call to protect civilians caught in conflict and all those trying to help them. 'Attacks on this scale, with zero accountability, are a shameful indictment of international inaction and apathy,' Mr Fletcher said in a statement on World Humanitarian Day. 'As the humanitarian community, we demand — again — that those with power and influence act for humanity, protect civilians and aid workers and hold perpetrators to account.' The Aid Worker Security Database, which has compiled reports since 1997, said the number of killings rose from 293 in 2023 to 383 in 2024 – including more than 180 in Gaza. On #WorldHumanitarianDay the humanitarian movement is united in grief, anger, and in demanding change. — Tom Fletcher (@UNReliefChief) August 19, 2025 Most of the aid workers killed were national staffers serving their communities who were attacked while on the job or in their homes, according to the UN Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs, known as Ocha. This year, the figures show no sign of a reversal of the upward trend, Ocha said. There were 599 major attacks affecting aid workers last year, a sharp increase from the 420 in 2023, the database's figures show. The attacks in 2024 also wounded 308 aid workers and saw 125 kidnapped and 45 detained. There have been 245 major attacks in the past seven-plus months, and 265 aid workers have been killed, according to the database. One of the deadliest and most horrifying attacks this year took place in the southern Gaza city of Rafah when Israeli troops opened fire before dawn on March 23, killing 15 medics and emergency responders in clearly marked vehicles. Troops bulldozed over the bodies along with their mangled vehicles, burying them in a mass grave. UN and rescue workers were only able to reach the site a week later. 'Even one attack against a humanitarian colleague is an attack on all of us and on the people we serve,' Mr Fletcher said. 'Violence against aid workers is not inevitable. It must end.' According to the database, violence against aid workers increased in 21 countries in 2024 compared with the previous year, with government forces and affiliates the most common perpetrators. The highest numbers of major attacks last year were in the Palestinian territories with 194, followed by Sudan with 64, South Sudan with 47, Nigeria with 31 and Congo with 27, the database reported. As for killings, Sudan, where civil war is still raging, was second to Gaza and the West Bank with 60 aid workers losing their lives in 2024. That was more than double the 25 aid worker deaths in 2023. Lebanon, where Israel and Hezbollah militants fought a war last year, saw 20 aid workers killed compared with none in 2023. Ethiopia and Syria each had 14 killings, about double the number in 2023, and Ukraine had 13 aid workers killed in 2024, up from six in 2023, according to the database.
Times
36 minutes ago
- Times
Swiss Army knife production may move to US amid Trump tariffs
America could wrest control of the manufacture of Swiss Army knives away from their Alpine homeland in a coup for President Trump's trade policy. Victorinox, which has made the knives in Ibach, Switzerland, since 1884, is considering moving part of its production to the US to soften the blow from import tariffs on its business. Carl Elsener, chief executive of Victorinox, told the German business magazine WirtschaftsWoche: 'We are looking into carrying out directly on site individual processing steps at the end of the value chain, such as the final cleaning and packaging of commercial knives.' 'That would reduce the value of the goods on which we have to pay customs duty by 10 per cent,' he added. Since 1884, Victorinox's founding family, the Elseners, have worked to keep manufacturing the Swiss Army knife in Switzerland. The country has been severely hit by Washington's trade policy under Trump, who earlier this month increased US tariffs on Swiss imports to 39 per cent. The US is a leading export market for Swiss brands including Swatch, Rolex and Patek Philippe watches as well as high-end cheeses and chocolates. Victorinox, which makes commercial knives as well as its well-known pocket knives, generates some 13 per cent of its revenue in the US. Elsener told WirtschaftsWoche that the customs duties were coming at an already difficult time. 'The strong Swiss franc has put our competitiveness and our margins under considerable pressure,' he said. Still, high inventories in the US meant the tariffs would not affect Victorinox until early next year, he added. For now, the firm would wait and see how things develop, he said. Industry associations and economists have said the tariffs will inflict major damage on the Swiss economy, put jobs at risk and curtail growth. They could also push the Swiss National Bank to cut interest rates next month. Economic uncertainty caused by Trump's trade policies has fuelled demand for the safe haven Swiss franc, boosting the currency and making Swiss-made goods more expensive abroad.
