logo
Fleeing Pakistan, Afghan refugees rebuild from nothing

Fleeing Pakistan, Afghan refugees rebuild from nothing

Khaleej Times22-04-2025

Pushed out of Pakistan where she was born, Nazmine Khan's first experience of her country, Afghanistan, was in a sweltering tent at a border camp.
"We never thought we would return to Afghanistan," said the 15-year-old girl, who has little idea of what will become of her or her family, only that she is likely to have fewer freedoms.
"When our parents told us we had to leave, we cried," added Khan.
Having nowhere to go in Afghanistan, she and six other family members shared a stifling tent in the Omari camp near the Torkham border point.
Islamabad, accusing Afghans of links to narcotics and "supporting terrorism", announced a new campaign in March to expel hundreds of thousands of Afghans, with or without documents.
Many had lived in Pakistan for decades after fleeing successive wars and crises but did not wait to be arrested by Pakistani forces before leaving, seeing their removal as inevitable.
Since April 1, more than 92,000 Afghans have been sent back to their country of origin, according to Islamabad, out of the some three million the United Nations says are living in Pakistan.
Khan's family fled Afghanistan in the 1960s. Her four brothers and sister were also born in Pakistan.
"In a few days we'll look for a place to rent" in the border province of Nangarhar where the family has roots, she told AFP, speaking in Pakistan's commonly spoken tongue of Urdu, not knowing any Afghan languages.
In the family's tent there is little more than a cloth to lie on and a few cushions, but no mattress or blanket. Flies buzz under the tarpaulin as countless children in ragged clothes come and go.
'Already suffering'
When it comes to her own future, Khan feels "completely lost", she said.
Having dropped out of school in Pakistan, the Taliban authorities' ban on girls studying beyond primary school will hardly change the course of her life.
But from what little she heard about her country while living in eastern Pakistan's Punjab, she knows that "here there are not the same freedoms".
Since returning to power in 2021, the Taliban authorities have imposed restrictions on women characterised by the UN as "gender apartheid".
Women have been banned from universities, parks, gyms and beauty salons and squeezed from many jobs.
"It is now a new life... for them, and they are starting this with very little utilities, belongings, cash, support," said Ibrahim Humadi, programme lead for non-governmental group Islamic Relief, which has set up about 200 tents for returnees in the Omari camp.
Some stay longer than the three days offered on arrival, not knowing where to go with their meager savings, he said.
"They also know that even in their area of return, the community will be welcoming them, will be supporting them... but they know also the community are already suffering from the situation in Afghanistan," he added.
Around 85 percent of the Afghan population lives on less than one dollar a day, according to the United Nations Development Programme.
"We had never seen (Afghanistan) in our lives. We do not know if we can find work, so we are worried," said Jalil Khan Mohamedin, 28, as he piled belongings — quilts, bed frames and fans — into a truck that will take the 16 members of his family to the capital Kabul, though nothing awaits them there.
'Still don't understand'
The Taliban authorities have said they are preparing towns specifically for returnees.
But at one site near Torkham, there is nothing more than cleared roads on a rocky plain.
The International Organization for Migration (IOM) believes "greater clarity" is needed to ensure that the sites intended for returnees are "viable" in terms of basic infrastructure and services such as health and education.
It's important that "returnees are making informed decisions and that their relocation to the townships is voluntary", communications officer Avand Azeez Agha told AFP.
Looking dazed, Khan's brother Dilawar still struggles to accept leaving Pakistan, where he was born 25 years ago.
His Pakistani wife did not want to follow him and asked for a divorce.
"When we crossed the border, we felt like going back, then after a day it felt fine," said the former truck driver.
"We still don't understand. We were only working."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pakistan 'ready for talks with India,' but not desperate, says foreign minister
Pakistan 'ready for talks with India,' but not desperate, says foreign minister

Gulf Today

time3 hours ago

  • Gulf Today

Pakistan 'ready for talks with India,' but not desperate, says foreign minister

Pakistan is "ready but not desperate" for talks with India, its foreign minister said on Wednesday, underlining the lack of a thaw in relations between the nuclear-armed neighbours following their worst military conflict in decades. Both sides used fighter jets, missiles, drones and artillery last month in four days of clashes, their worst fighting in decades, before a ceasefire the US said it brokered on May 10. India has denied any third party role in the ceasefire. "Whenever they ask for a dialogue, at whatever level, we are ready but we are not desperate," Pakistan's Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar told a news conference in Islamabad. The spark for the fighting was an April 22 attack in Jammu and Kashmir that killed 26 people, most of them tourists. New Delhi blamed the incident on "terrorists" backed by Pakistan, a charge denied by Islamabad. Dar said Pakistan wanted a comprehensive dialogue on a range of issues including water, whereas India wanted to focus only on terrorism. "That's not on. Nobody else is more serious than us. It takes two to tango," he said, referring to comments by Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar that the talks should only cover the issue of terrorism. The Indian foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Dar's remarks. New Delhi has previously said the only matter left to discuss with Pakistan was the vacation of what India describes as Pakistani-held territory in Kashmir - a disputed Himalayan region that both nations claim in full but rule in part. Pakistan is keen to discuss water rights after India held "in abeyance" the Indus Waters Treaty following the April 22 attack. The treaty guarantees water for 80% of Pakistan's farms from three rivers that flow from India. Reuters

How Germany's former foreign minister failed Gaza - then got a top UN job
How Germany's former foreign minister failed Gaza - then got a top UN job

Middle East Eye

time4 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

How Germany's former foreign minister failed Gaza - then got a top UN job

United Nations member states on Monday confirmed the nomination of Germany's former foreign minister, Annalena Baerbock, as the next president of the General Assembly. As leader of its 80th session, Baerbock will oversee the work of the UN organ, which serves as a forum for all 193 member states to coordinate on international issues. Her nomination was controversial from the outset, as she was accused of snatching the job away from seasoned German diplomat Helga Schmid, who played a key role in the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. Germany had initially nominated Schmid for the job, but later replaced her with Baerbock, who lost her cabinet position after the February election. In her acceptance speech on Monday, Baerbock affirmed her respect for international humanitarian law and her commitment to safeguard 'a world in which every human can live in peace and dignity'. A look at her performance as foreign minister, however, does not reveal a track record of upholding human rights, but rather an utter failure on this front, amid German state complicity in the Gaza genocide. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Baerbock assumed office in 2021 with a self-proclaimed 'feminist foreign policy' as her guiding principle, vowing that her efforts as foreign minister would focus on the 'rights, representation and resources' of women and marginalised groups. Protecting women in armed conflict was among her 10 key guidelines. Yet during her tenure as foreign minister, Israel waged its genocidal campaign in Gaza, now approaching its 20th month. More than 54,000 Palestinians have been killed, more than half of whom were women and children, according to local health officials. Amid this onslaught, Germany has continued to supply Israel with hundreds of millions of dollars in weapons. Between 7 October 2023 and mid-May 2025, the German government says it issued export licences for arms deliveries to Israel totalling 485.1 million euros ($554.3m), although the pace of exports was considerably higher in the first few months of the war, before international criticism began to mount. Complicity in genocide Under the banner of Germany's Staatsrason ('reason of state'), the controversial idea that Germany's national interest is contingent on Israel's security, former Chancellor Olaf Scholz led Germany into complicity in genocide once again. The mantra of 'standing firmly' by Israel's side has been repeated countless times by various German officials, becoming more painful with every step of Gaza's deepening humanitarian crisis. As foreign minister, Baerbock could have done much to oppose this. She chose not to. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war This is not to say that she expressed no concerns over Israel's actions in Gaza or the plight of civilians. Baerbock repeatedly stressed the importance of adhering to international humanitarian law, called for a ceasefire, and highlighted the need for more aid to enter the besieged territory. At the same time, however, she continuously reiterated Israel's right to 'self-defence', thus undermining her appeals to help the Palestinian population of Gaza and making her an easy target for allegations of hypocrisy. Her speech last October stands as a case in point. 'Self-defence means not only attacking terrorists but destroying them. When Hamas terrorists hide behind people, behind schools … civilian places lose their protected status because terrorists abuse it,' Baerbock said during a parliamentary session marking the anniversary of the 7 October 2023 Hamas-led attack on southern Israel. As she prepares to lead the 80th UN General Assembly, Baerbock has yet to acknowledge mistakes in her approach to Gaza She added: 'That's why I clearly conveyed to the UN that civilian areas could lose their protected status because they are being abused by terrorists.' Just days before her speech, Israeli forces had targeted another school and mosque sheltering displaced people in central Gaza, killing more than two dozen Palestinians. Between October 2023 and April 2024, Baerbock held seven meetings with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. But she failed to publicly advocate for the rights of Palestinian women in armed conflict, a notion central to her 'feminist foreign policy' - even as countless women in Gaza have suffered miscarriages or watched their children starve. A recent report by an independent UN commission found that Israel's systematic destruction of sexual and reproductive healthcare facilities, coupled with restrictions on medical supplies, had caused the deaths of mothers and newborns, noting that Israeli forces had 'intentionally inflicted these conditions of life on the Palestinians in Gaza, in particular women, girls and young children' and that 'such acts amount to the crime against humanity of extermination'. Baerbock has not commented on the report. Rhetorical shift In response to Baerbock's October 2024 speech justifying Israeli attacks on civilian sites, more than 300 academics co-signed a letter calling on the German government to retract her comments and apologise. Meanwhile, an online petition calling for her resignation was signed by thousands of people. If Baerbock was serious about human rights and women's safety, then the right move would have been to step away from a government that has backed Israel's genocidal war on Gaza. No genuine 'feminist foreign policy' could be reconcilable with such atrocities. But to this day, as she prepares to lead the 80th UN General Assembly, Baerbock has yet to acknowledge mistakes in her approach to Gaza. What is behind Germany's complicity in Israel's Gaza genocide? Read More » Her government's lack of action is made even more tragic in light of the recent change of rhetoric towards Israel by Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who assumed office last month. Shortly after his February election victory, Merz vowed to find 'ways and means' for Netanyahu to visit Germany. The German public barely batted an eyelid at the fact that this would contravene the arrest warrant against the Israeli prime minister issued by the International Criminal Court, an institution that Germany played a significant role in establishing. After all, his comments were nothing out of the ordinary for state officials. But last week saw a 180-degree rhetorical shift. Merz, supposedly much more conservative than his social democrat predecessor, Scholz, uttered the words that longtime critics of Germany's support for the war never thought they would hear: 'What the Israeli army is now doing in the Gaza Strip - I no longer understand frankly what its objective is,' Merz said in a televised interview. 'To cause such suffering to the civilian population, as has increasingly been the case in recent days, can no longer be justified as a fight against Hamas terrorism.' The fact that it took more than 54,000 slain Palestinians, the total destruction of Gaza, and widely circulated images of starving children, for a German chancellor to reconsider the state's unwavering support for Israel is hard to grasp. Even harder to grasp is the fact that a former foreign minister, whose government stands accused of aiding a genocide, can assume a top position at the very organisation dedicated to preventing genocide and upholding international law. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

Vietnam scraps two-child limit as birth rate declines
Vietnam scraps two-child limit as birth rate declines

Al Etihad

time4 hours ago

  • Al Etihad

Vietnam scraps two-child limit as birth rate declines

4 June 2025 21:17 HANOI (AFP)Vietnam's government has scrapped its long-standing policy of limiting families to two children, state media said Wednesday, as the country battles to reverse a declining birth country banned couples from having more than two children in 1988, but a family's size is now a decision for each individual couple, Vietnam News Agency country has experienced historically low birth rates in the last three years. The total fertility rate dropped to 1.91 children per woman in 2024, below replacement level, the Ministry of Health said this rates have fallen from 2.11 children per woman in 2021, to 2.01 in 2022 and 1.96 in trend is most pronounced in urbanised, economically developed regions, especially in big cities such as Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City as the cost of living Minh Huong, a 22-year-old office worker, told AFP that the government regulation mattered little to her as she had no plans to have children."Even though I am an Asian, with social norms that say women need to get married and have kids, it's too costly to raise a child."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store