logo
Council announces £20m investment in green vehicles

Council announces £20m investment in green vehicles

Yahoo09-02-2025

A local authority has announced a multi-million pound investment into environmentally friendly vehicles across its fleet.
The £20m Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole (BCP) Council scheme will see the authority replace vehicles reaching the end of their life with lower carbon alternatives.
It is the second stage of the council's plan to make its fleet greener, and will see 280 new vehicles purchased over the next three years.
The investment means residents will "benefit from lower carbon emissions", BCP Council said.
Andy Hadley, the authority's environment chief, said the scheme marked a "significant step" towards its plan to be carbon neutral by 2030.
"Phase Two of this scheme will allow the council to build on its successful first phase and will place BCP amongst leading councils in transitioning towards operating a green fleet," he said.
"This new investment ensures we can continue to deliver on our promise of making Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole a better place for everyone."
Phase one of the council's scheme began in 2021 with seven electric bin lorries and 67 electric vans.
The authority said it had so far resulted in annual carbon emissions being cut by 250 tonnes every year.
It operates more than 600 vehicles across BCP, and said it anticipated that around a quarter of these will be electric by 2028.
BCP Council's Cabinet unanimously approved the scheme's funding at a meeting on Wednesday.
The final decision will be considered at a full council meeting in the coming weeks.
You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Meta Advises Page Managers to Include Links in Post Comments
Meta Advises Page Managers to Include Links in Post Comments

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Meta Advises Page Managers to Include Links in Post Comments

This story was originally published on Social Media Today. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Social Media Today newsletter. Do we now have official confirmation from Facebook itself that you shouldn't include links in your post, and that you should, in fact, be adding them in the first comment instead? Well, kind of. Over the weekend, several users noted this recommendation in their post-specific insights in the Professional Dashboard for their Facebook Pages: This one was shared by @cmcalgary on Threads, but several other users posted the same, highlighting it as official, confirmed advice from Facebook that you should be adding your links in the first comment, as opposed to including the URL in your post body. So I checked this out on SMT's posts, which all include a link (as we're using this to get people to read out full posts, not engage on Facebook as such). And sure enough, this advice is there, though with one key difference: As you can see, in the advice here it notes that this post, which does include a link, doesn't actually display a link. That's because I delete the actual URL. Once the post is composed, I attach the URL, let FB generate the preview, then delete the URL text from the post. So, technically, there's no link in the caption, but there is a link still attached to the post. Does that impact performance in the same way? Well, I guess it doesn't include a photo, as it's only got the preview image pulled in from the link. Maybe that means that you should be including all of your post links in the first comment, and an image in the main post, which is what many high-performing publishers on Facebook are currently doing. It does seem like that may be a better way to go. Which makes sense. According to Meta's latest 'Widely Viewed Content Report,' currently, 97.3% of all post views on Facebook (in the U.S.) go to updates that don't include a link to a source outside of that app. The actual exposure for link posts has been declining over time (though it saw a slight increase in the last report), which suggests that Meta's algorithm is looking to drive users away from link posts, with video content being the main beneficiary of that switch. Meta has seemingly had a change of heart on this front of late, as part of its broader re-alignment towards 'free expression,' and it is also worth noting that the Threads team says that it's been working to improve the reach of links in the app, with a view to encouraging more publishers and creators to post to the app. So maybe, Meta is changing focus a little bit. But the stats show that it is only a little, while Meta's official advice is that link posts don't do as well. So maybe you can get around this by deleting the URL from the post text, or maybe it's worth experimenting with including the post link in the first comment. Which is more work for social media managers, as you can't schedule the first comment. But it could be worth experimenting with. I've asked Meta for further confirmation on this element, and the specifics of what sees better (or worse) performance, and will update this post if/when I hear back. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

How to set up a WhatsApp account without Facebook or Instagram
How to set up a WhatsApp account without Facebook or Instagram

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

How to set up a WhatsApp account without Facebook or Instagram

There's no shortage of reasons to stay off the Meta ecosystem, which includes Facebook and Instagram, but there are some places where WhatsApp remains the main form of text-based communication. The app is a great alternative to SMS, since it offers end-to-end encryption and was one of the go-to methods to send uncompressed photos and videos between iPhone and Android users before Apple adopted RCS. Even though Facebook, which later rebranded to Meta, acquired WhatsApp in 2014, it doesn't require a Facebook or Instagram account to get on WhatsApp — just a working phone number. To start, you need to download WhatsApp on your smartphone. Once you open the app, you can start the registration process by entering a working phone number. After entering your phone number, you'll receive a unique six-digit code that will complete the registration process. From there, you can sort through your contacts on your attached smartphone to build out your WhatsApp network, but you won't have to involve Facebook or Instagram at any point. Alternatively, you can request a voice call to deliver the code instead. Either way, once you complete the registration process, you have a WhatsApp account that's not tied to a Facebook or Instagram account. If you change your mind and want more crossover between your Meta apps, you can go into the app's Settings panel to change that. In Settings, you can find the Accounts Center option with the Meta badge on it. Once you hit it, you'll see options to "Add Facebook account" and "Add Instagram account." Linking these accounts means Meta can offer more personalized experiences across the platforms because of the personal data that's now interconnected. You can always remove your WhatsApp account from Meta's Account Center by going back into the same Settings panel. However, any previously combined info will stay combined, but Meta will stop combining any personal data after you remove the account.

How to set up a WhatsApp account without Facebook or Instagram
How to set up a WhatsApp account without Facebook or Instagram

Engadget

time12 hours ago

  • Engadget

How to set up a WhatsApp account without Facebook or Instagram

There's no shortage of reasons to stay off the Meta ecosystem, which includes Facebook and Instagram, but there are some places where WhatsApp remains the main form of text-based communication. The app is a great alternative to SMS, since it offers end-to-end encryption and was one of the go-to methods to send uncompressed photos and videos between iPhone and Android users before Apple adopted RCS. Even though Facebook, which later rebranded to Meta, acquired WhatsApp in 2014, it doesn't require a Facebook or Instagram account to get on WhatsApp — just a working phone number. To start, you need to download WhatsApp on your smartphone. Once you open the app, you can start the registration process by entering a working phone number. After entering your phone number, you'll receive a unique six-digit code that will complete the registration process. From there, you can sort through your contacts on your attached smartphone to build out your WhatsApp network, but you won't have to involve Facebook or Instagram at any point. Alternatively, you can request a voice call to deliver the code instead. Either way, once you complete the registration process, you have a WhatsApp account that's not tied to a Facebook or Instagram account. If you change your mind and want more crossover between your Meta apps, you can go into the app's Settings panel to change that. In Settings, you can find the Accounts Center option with the Meta badge on it. Once you hit it, you'll see options to "Add Facebook account" and "Add Instagram account." Linking these accounts means Meta can offer more personalized experiences across the platforms because of the personal data that's now interconnected. You can always remove your WhatsApp account from Meta's Account Center by going back into the same Settings panel. However, any previously combined info will stay combined, but Meta will stop combining any personal data after you remove the account.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store