logo
This trait in leaders makes employees three times more likely to lie

This trait in leaders makes employees three times more likely to lie

Fast Company9 hours ago
Not long ago, I sat across from a senior leader who proudly described the culture of transparency he believed he had built. 'My door is always open,' he said. 'I tell my team I want the truth, even when it's hard.'
Later that afternoon, I spoke with one of his direct reports. She paused when I asked her what it was like to work for him.
'He says he wants the truth,' she said quietly, 'but the moment we challenge him or bring up a concern, he gets defensive or shuts the conversation down. So we've all just stopped trying. He's not a bad guy. He's better than a lot of bosses around here. But he doesn't want the truth the way he claims to.'
She wasn't angry. Worse, she was resigned to the fact that's just who he was. And she wasn't alone. The team had learned that what their leader said and what he actually did didn't match. His 'open door' had become symbolic of a broader disconnect—and trust was eroding fast.
The leader didn't see the gap. He genuinely believed he was creating a safe space. But his behavior told another story.
And that's the thing about say–do gaps: we're often the last to know we have them.
What do you do when your words and actions don't match?
Most leaders don't wake up in the morning intending to be dishonest. But every time we make a promise we don't keep, fudge a number to hit a target, or stay silent in a moment that demands courage, we open what I call a say–do gap—the space between what we say we value and what we actually do.
It may feel small in the moment. Harmless, even. But these gaps come at a steep cost.
In my 15-year longitudinal study analyzing over 3,200 interviews across more than 200 organizations, my team and I discovered that when employees perceive misalignment between their leaders' words and actions, they are three times more likely to lie, cheat, and behave unfairly. That's more than a culture problem. That's a leadership choice problem.
And more often than not, it's an unconscious one.
Why Leaders Rationalize Their Gaps
Say–do gaps don't usually come from malice. They come from pressure. From the fear of looking weak. From not wanting to disappoint or disrupt. When leaders find themselves under fire—tight deadlines, investor demands, internal conflict, stress at home—they reach for rationalizations:
'I'll course-correct later.'
'This isn't the hill to die on.'
'No one will really notice.'
The problem is, they do notice. Employees notice everything. The skipped apology. The inflated projection. The performance standards you hold others to—but not yourself. They notice when you declare a new set of values in a town hall, then continue rewarding the same old behaviors.
And slowly, silently, trust begins to erode.
The Hidden Cost of Misalignment
We tend to think of dishonesty as dramatic: embezzlement, fraud, lying, or corruption. But in most organizations, dishonesty takes a quieter, more insidious form; people withholding ideas, exaggerating results, throwing each other under the bus, or simply saying 'yes' when they mean 'no.'
Our research showed that environments where identity—purpose, values, and culture—is misaligned are nearly three times more likely to foster this kind of behavior. Over time, these gaps corrode collaboration, innovation, courage, and employee voice. People become transactional. Cynical. They disengage not because they don't care, but because they no longer trust that honesty is safe or worth it.
In short: say–do gaps cost more than you think. They cost your people's belief in you. Your say-do gaps increase the odds of those around you by a factor of 3x that they will join you in legitimizing their own gaps.
Why It's So Hard to See Our Own Gaps
The human brain is wired for self-protection. When our actions fall short of our espoused values, we tell ourselves a more flattering story to preserve our identity. We become the hero of our narrative. The pressure was impossible. The budget left no choice. The timing wasn't right.
But in order to be honest with others, we have to be honest with ourselves. If we can't see our own dissonance, we can't close the gap.
As one executive confessed to me after a disastrous acquisition: 'We all knew it would fail, but we kept our mouths shut. Deal fever took over. We lost sight of who we were—and couldn't admit it.' The result? A $3.5 billion mistake, shattered careers, and broken trust.
How to Start Closing the Gaps
If you're serious about rebuilding trust and becoming the leader people want to follow, here are four practical ways to begin:
1. Name Your Gaps, Out Loud
Ask yourself: Where am I most tempted to say one thing and do another? Where have I rationalized a disconnect between my values and behavior? Then share that reflection with your team. Vulnerability creates clarity. And clarity is what people crave.
2. Make Your Values Observable
Don't let purpose statements live in frames on walls. Embed them into how decisions get made, who gets promoted, what gets rewarded, and how conflict is handled. When your actions reflect your values without you having to say a word, alignment becomes contagious.
3. Invite Truth Tellers
Every leader needs someone who isn't impressed by their title—someone with permission to challenge and point out blind spots. Create that space. Ask your team regularly, 'Where do you see misalignment in me?' and thank them when they answer honestly.
4. Look for the Pattern
Your say–do gaps aren't random. They have a pattern. Look back over your calendar from the past two weeks. Where did your actions bely your stated values? Be brutally honest. Then ask: what triggered the gap? What did you gain by not acting in alignment—comfort, control, approval? Those choices serve a purpose. They make you feel safe. But until you name the pattern and uncover its origin story, you'll keep repeating it. Reflection is the first step toward repair.
Closing your say–do gaps isn't about perfection. It's about taking responsibility for the moments where your humanity falls short of your ideals. We all have them. Your people are wondering if you know yours.
The most honest leaders I've worked with aren't flawless. They're just relentlessly committed to shrinking the gap between who they say they are and how they show up—especially when it's hard.
And in doing so, they earn something far more valuable than compliance. They earn trust. And once you've earned trust, performance, loyalty, courage, and innovation follow.
So, if you're serious about leadership that inspires—not just instructs or directs—start here: say what you mean. Do what you say. And keep closing the gap.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Winnie Greco, former Adams campaign adviser, allegedly hands journalist cash stuffed in potato chip bag
Winnie Greco, former Adams campaign adviser, allegedly hands journalist cash stuffed in potato chip bag

CBS News

time5 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Winnie Greco, former Adams campaign adviser, allegedly hands journalist cash stuffed in potato chip bag

Just when you think the New York City mayor's race can't get much stranger, it's now all that and a bag of chips - literally. Former City Hall adviser Winnie Greco allegedly handed journalist Katie Honan cash stuffed into a potato chip bag following an Eric Adams re-election campaign event Wednesday in Harlem. Greco, Adams' former director of Asian affairs, resigned from City Hall last year after the FBI raided her home during his corruption case. Honan is a journalist for the website The City. A spokesman for the mayor's reelection campaign said, in part, Greco "holds no position in this campaign and has been suspended from all volunteer campaign-related activities." According to Honan, a red envelope she found inside the bag of chips had at least one $100 bill and several $20 bills inside. Honan says she tried to return the cash and quickly notified the Adams campaign and the Department of Investigation. Greco's attorney, Steven Brill, told The Associated Press the situation was being "blown out of proportion." "This was not a bag of cash," Brill wrote in an email. "In the Chinese culture, money is often given to others in a gesture of friendship and gratitude. And that's all that was done here. Winnie's intention was born purely out of kindness." Asked why Greco wanted to make such a gesture to Honan, Brill said, "She knows the reporter and is fond of her." The City said it interviewed Greco later Wednesday and she apologized, saying she made "a mistake." "The fact that one of Mayor Adams' closest, longtime advisors would attempt to ingratiate herself to any reporter, much less Katie Honan, with a cash gift is deeply disturbing and speaks to a rampant and blatant disregard for the role of a free and fair press," The City's Editor in Chief Richard Kim said in a statement. "The choice of sour cream and onion chips is also questionable." Word of this incident comes as Adams' former top adviser and closest ally Ingrid Lewis-Martin is one of a handful of people facing new charges. Back in December, Lewis-Martin and her son were indicted for an alleged "long-running bribery, money laundering and conspiracy scheme by using her position and authority as the chief adviser to the New York City mayor, the second-highest position in city government, to illegally influence city decisions in exchange for in excess of $100,000 in cash and other benefits for herself and her son, Glenn Martin II."

Ingrid Lewis-Martin, Top Adams Adviser, Faces Fresh Corruption Charges
Ingrid Lewis-Martin, Top Adams Adviser, Faces Fresh Corruption Charges

New York Times

time5 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Ingrid Lewis-Martin, Top Adams Adviser, Faces Fresh Corruption Charges

Mayor Eric Adams's former chief adviser on Thursday was charged for a second time with corruption in a sweeping set of indictments that accuse her of using her position to influence city agencies. The adviser, Ingrid Lewis-Martin, accepted more than $75,000 in bribes, according to prosecutors with the Manhattan district attorney's office. They accused her of conspiring in schemes that included trading the approval of certain renovations of a residential property for thousands of dollars of catering for events at Gracie Mansion and City Hall, and helping to fast-track permit approvals for a Queens karaoke bar in exchange for $50,000 for her son. 'Lewis-Martin consistently overrode the expertise of public servants so she could line her own pockets,' the district attorney, Alvin Bragg, said in a news release. 'While she allegedly received more than $75,000 in bribes and an appearance on a TV show, every other New Yorker lost out.' The four new indictments, which in total involve eight associates and supporters of Mr. Adams, come as he is just months from facing voters in his bid for a second term to be mayor of New York City. When news of the charges broke on Wednesday, a spokeswoman for the mayor, Kayla Mamelak Altus, said Mr. Adams 'was not involved in this matter and has not been accused of or implicated in any wrongdoing.' 'Ingrid Lewis-Martin no longer works for this administration,' she added. This is a developing story and will be updated.

Suffolk County Sheriff Steven Tompkins due in federal court on extortion charges
Suffolk County Sheriff Steven Tompkins due in federal court on extortion charges

CBS News

time5 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Suffolk County Sheriff Steven Tompkins due in federal court on extortion charges

Suffolk County Sheriff Steven Tompkins is due in a Massachusetts courtroom on Thursday, accused of extortion while dealing with a cannabis company based in Boston. Tompkins was arrested by FBI agents on August 8 in Florida, the U.S. Attorney's Office in Boston announced at the time. He is expected to appear in the John J. Moakley Federal Courthouse in Boston around 2:30 p.m. on Thursday. Tompkins faces two counts of extortion under color of official right. Federal prosecutors accuse the 67-year-old of giving an unidentified cannabis company $50,000 in November 2020 to buy stock in the business. According to the allegations, Tompkins pressured someone in the company to sell the stock to him before the company went public. Tompkins paid about $1.73 per share for the stock before the initial public offering (IPO), prosecutors said. When the company later launched its IPO in 2021, the stock was valued at $9.60 per share. As a result, Tompkins' 14,417 shares were worth $138,403. By May 2022, the stocks tumbled in value below the original $50,000 and prosecutors allege that Tompkins demanded a refund. The U.S. Attorney said that Tompkins got the money back in five separate checks that read "loan repayment" and "[company] expense." Tompkins has been sheriff since 2013 and was re-elected to a six-year term in 2022. He oversees nearly 1,000 correctional officers and various employees inside the House of Correction and Nashua Street Jail in Boston.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store