logo
Appeals continue for 11 Hong Kong opposition figures jailed for subversion

Appeals continue for 11 Hong Kong opposition figures jailed for subversion

Lawyers representing 11 Hong Kong opposition figures continued advancing arguments in court in a bid to overturn their convictions for conspiracy to subvert state power, saying they could not be held liable under the
national security law for trying to trigger a constitutional mechanism to oust the city leader.
Legal counsel on Tuesday argued that lawmakers were entitled to use their votes as a bargaining chip to push their political demands, while urging an appellate court to be cautious about criminalising political conduct in the legislature.
But prosecutors said the appellants' complaint was premised on the 'wrong footing' and stressed the allegation targeted the group's 'scheme' to paralyse government operations and topple the chief executive.
The prosecution also dismissed the appellants' defence that they were fighting for universal suffrage as a 'red herring.'
They also argued that it would be absurd to suggest lawmakers could do as they pleased without observing the Basic Law, the city's mini-constitution, which requires the legislature to 'examine and approve' bills and lawmakers to abide by their oath of office.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Prison rules update shows Hong Kong's will to protect national security
Prison rules update shows Hong Kong's will to protect national security

South China Morning Post

time44 minutes ago

  • South China Morning Post

Prison rules update shows Hong Kong's will to protect national security

It is often assumed that those put behind bars are under close watch and are therefore unable to pose any danger to society. But the Hong Kong government is not leaving anything to chance as it seeks to suppress and punish acts jeopardising national security. That is why the prison rules are up for a major revamp to ensure they can meet the needs of safeguarding national security and correctional institution management. Advertisement Under the proposed amendments, the correctional services chief may limit or prohibit a prison visit for the purposes of national security, personal safety, rehabilitation, crime prevention as well as order and discipline. This includes banning visits from a particular chaplain or religious activities conducted by them if national security or any of the other key purposes is undermined. Officials said there were cases in which visits were abused to influence those in custody with 'soft tactics' to incite resistance against supervision and arouse hatred of the central and Hong Kong governments. Separately, the authorities may also apply for court warrants to restrict contact with certain legal representatives and medical practitioners to safeguard national security and prevent abuses of the existing arrangements. Referring to the practices in some countries that do not provide for judicial proceedings when imposing restrictions for national security reasons, officials believe the proposals have struck a balance with inmates' rights. Inevitably, some may find the proposals excessive. For instance, the rules for those on remand to wear their own clothes or procure food from outside prison are to be repealed to maintain good order and security. The authorities said private diet could become a tool for those awaiting trials to engage in secret dealings and had become one of the main causes of disputes and fights whereas personal clothing could become political statements and influence others, which may threaten order and discipline. The United Kingdom abolished the private diet arrangement in 1988, according to the Security Bureau. The amendments will take immediate effect on the day of gazettal to prevent and resolve the relevant risks in a timely manner. The quick pace underlines the government's determination to further enhance national security protection. Advertisement

The Taiwan papers: academics suggest how mainland China might rule the island
The Taiwan papers: academics suggest how mainland China might rule the island

South China Morning Post

timean hour ago

  • South China Morning Post

The Taiwan papers: academics suggest how mainland China might rule the island

As tensions between Beijing and Taipei rise, academia and the education sector reveal how each side is changing to adapt to – or shape – the new environment. In the first of a two-part series, we survey the vast research by mainland academics studying potential paths and models for governing the island. For decades, Beijing has talked about peaceful reunification with Taiwan and possibly governing it under the arrangement of 'one country, two systems', a term that means the island could have a different political system than the mainland. The idea was first proposed by late paramount leader Deng Xiaoping and written into the constitution as a legal foundation for future governance of Taiwan in 1982. Generations of Chinese leaders have shared their broad vision of how post-reunification governance would look for the island, including its military and political parties. Yet it was only under President Xi Jinping – or more specifically since Xi made a key speech on the matter of Taiwan in January 2019 – that detailed discussion of the issue picked up in public, including from policy advisers and academics. The growth in the discussion took place as the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government in Taiwan continued to push the island towards pro-independence, and Washington kept up its support for Taiwan amid competition with Beijing.

University of Michigan investigated after 2 Chinese scientists charged with bio-smuggling
University of Michigan investigated after 2 Chinese scientists charged with bio-smuggling

South China Morning Post

time2 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

University of Michigan investigated after 2 Chinese scientists charged with bio-smuggling

The University of Michigan is under federal scrutiny after two Chinese scientists linked to the school were separately charged with smuggling biological materials into the United States. The US Education Department on Tuesday opened an investigation into the university's foreign funding, citing the pair of cases that were announced days apart in June. It said the 'highly disturbing criminal charges' raise concerns about Michigan's vulnerability to national security threats from China. 'Despite the University of Michigan's history of downplaying its vulnerabilities to malign foreign influence, recent reports reveal that UM's research laboratories remain vulnerable to sabotage,' said Paul Moore, chief investigative counsel of the department. US President Donald Trump has made it a priority to increase transparency around foreign gifts and contracts to US universities, especially those tied to China. Similar investigations have been opened at Harvard University, the University of Pennsylvania and the University of California, Berkeley. It joins efforts from Republicans in Congress who have urged universities to cut research ties with China, saying China exploits the relationships to steal technology. Michigan ended a partnership with a university in Shanghai in January amid pressure from House Republicans who called it a security risk. Chinese scientist Jian Yunqing is accused of trying to bring a toxic fungus into the US. Photo: Sanilac County Sheriff's Office via AP The new investigation demands financial records from Michigan, along with information about research collaborations with institutions outside the US. The Education Department accuses Michigan of being 'incomplete, inaccurate and untimely' in its public disclosures around funding from foreign sources.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store