From rebels to recognition: Crypto's path into conservative portfolios
Driven by institutional adoption, stable infrastructure and familiar financial mechanisms, digital assets are shifting from speculative ventures into trusted components of conservative portfolios, marking crypto's maturation and broader mainstream financial integration.
Cryptocurrencies were born as rebels, but they're maturing into something far more familiar: a respectable addition to conservative investment portfolios.
When Bitcoin debuted during the financial crisis of 2008, it was pitched as a radical alternative, promising decentralization and independence from traditional monetary systems. But today, crypto assets are quietly following a path already traveled by stocks, bonds and commodities, transforming from speculative bets into stable investment options.
Historically, skepticism greeted every new asset class. Stocks, once considered highly speculative in the early 20th century, were dismissed as volatile gambles only to become integral additions in the portfolios later, while bonds took decades to earn their reputation as a safe haven.
Crypto is now entering this same acceptance stage, as institutional investors (including pension funds, asset managers and family offices) allocate portions of their portfolios to digital assets, recognizing them as potential hedges against inflation and financial instability. Why crypto's volatility is attracting conservative investors
At first glance, cryptocurrencies' appeal to conservative investors may seem counterintuitive. However, the infrastructure behind is capable of providing experiences remarkably similar to traditional financial instruments.
Stablecoins, pegged to currencies like the US dollar, provide the benefits of blockchain technology without wild price swings, becoming an attractive gateway for risk-averse investors. Their adoption is rapidly growing as they offer investors a familiar, fiat-like experience, but with the additional benefits of blockchain technology, such as rapid settlement and transparency.
Moreover, the rise of platforms offering insured crypto custody and deposit-based rewards has significantly boosted confidence. These platforms echo traditional banking services, complete with regulated oversight, robust security and familiar mechanisms such as withdrawal flexibility and comprehensive asset protection. Putting idle crypto to work
For example, CoinDepo, a crypto staking platform, illustrates how crypto has adapted to conservative financial expectations. Founded in 2021 and managing over $125 million in crypto assets for more than 55,000 users across 220 jurisdictions, CoinDepo provides an insured environment to securely hold crypto assets while earning stable rewards.
🌍✨ Together, We Can Make a Difference! ✨🌍
Check out this quick video about our CoinDepo Charity Project with the Damark Charity Foundation (https://t.co/mebnWe8mF3) – a powerful initiative driven by our belief in positive change! Join us in making an impact on the world, one… pic.twitter.com/baE42BYx5I
— CoinDepo (@DepoCoin) November 13, 2024
Unlike typical crypto offerings that lock funds indefinitely, CoinDepo ensures full liquidity, allowing users immediate access to their crypto in case of emergencies. Supported by extensive insurance coverage and Fireblocks, a leading custodial provider for banks and financial institutions, it further aligns with traditional investor expectations.
Additionally, the platform aims to launch crypto-backed credit cards integrated with Apple Pay and Google Pay by the end of 2025, delivering up to 8% cashback on purchases. The cards will be accepted by over 90 million merchants globally, allowing seamless utility in daily life.
Choose a CoinDepo Crypto Credit Card and earn up to 8% cryptocurrency cashback 💳⁰📌 Join the waitlist now & get a 500 USDC bonus after spending $3,000 within the first 3 months⁰⁰Why choose CoinDepo Credit Card?⁰🔸Monthly ATM withdrawal limit up to $10,000
🔹No origination /… pic.twitter.com/0uFrlbRptn
— CoinDepo (@DepoCoin) April 12, 2024
CoinDepo is also preparing to list its native token soon, which is currently in the Pre-sale stage, further integrating its ecosystem into mainstream crypto markets and expanding opportunities for user engagement. A shift toward mainstream financial acceptance
As crypto adoption increases, what once seemed radical is becoming routine. Bitcoin is frequently compared to gold and referred to as digital gold, indicating the seriousness with which it's being regarded.
The gradual embrace of digital assets in the finance industry is partly driven by increased regulatory clarity and institutional-grade infrastructure. Major financial institutions, once hesitant to engage with crypto, now offer products specifically designed for digital asset exposure.
These changes reassure conservative investors who historically avoided crypto, allowing digital assets to take a meaningful place alongside bonds, equities and real estate in balanced portfolios.
This evolution signals crypto's coming of age. By mirroring traditional asset trajectories — complete with familiar safeguards, reliable infrastructure and practical real-world use cases — crypto is no longer just for speculators. It's now an integral part of modern investment strategies, bridging the gap between digital innovation and trusted financial tradition.
Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/from-rebels-to-recognition-crypto-s-path-into-conservative-portfolios
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Crypto Insight
a day ago
- Crypto Insight
Crypto VC deals hit 2025 low despite $909M raised in May
Cryptocurrency investment deals fell to their lowest point of 2025, as analysts cited a mix of market-specific and macroeconomic factors behind weakening venture capital (VC) activity. Only 62 rounds were completed in May, a monthly low last seen in January 2021, according to data from crypto analytics platform RootData. Despite the drop, the 62 investment rounds still raised more than $909 million, making it the second-best month of the year by value, trailing only March's $2.89 billion across 78 rounds The slowdown is likely a 'combination of market prices and sentiment,' as both 'peaked at the end of January and rebounded only in April, before ranging from May 23 on deterioration of tariff rhetoric,' said Aurelie Barthere, principal research analyst at crypto intelligence platform Nansen. A challenging 'macro backdrop' paired with 'higher-for-longer policy rates, jittery bond markets and fresh tariff headlines have made it harder for risk assets to get new M&A deals over the finish line,' according to Patrick Heusser, head of lending at Sentora and a former investment banker: 'Most of the transactions we are seeing are consolidation plays, a pattern that typically emerges in cooling markets or after extended periods of range-bound pricing.' The disappointing year-to-date performance of most crypto assets added to the lack of interest, with Bitcoin 'standing out as a rare bright spot,' he added. M&A activity remains strong Despite the drop in venture deals, merger and acquisition activity remained robust. Coinbase Global acquired Deribit for $2.9 billion in a traditional merger and acquisition (M&A), the exchange announced on May 8. 'I also see many large deals going through the traditional liquid channels,' said Nansen's Barthere, adding that more crypto regulatory clarity will benefit 'direct deals between large companies and protocols, away from the VC market.' The $2.9 billion marks a new all-time high for crypto M&As, according to RootData sourced by Blockworks. The slowdown in VC deals may also be a function of 'seasonal patterns,' for May and June, according to Marcin Kazmierczak, co-founder and chief operations officer at blockchain oracle firm RedStone. 'Macro conditions certainly play a role, but I'd expect activity to pick up again as we head into early Q4; that's historically when the best deals get done and investors return from summer mode,' he told Cointelegraph. Source:
Crypto Insight
a day ago
- Crypto Insight
FCA-registered BCP launches British pound stablecoin
BCP Technologies, a United Kingdom-registered cryptocurrency firm, has launched a new British pound-backed stablecoin. The company revealed the rollout of its Tokenised GBP (tGBP) stablecoin in an announcement shared with Cointelegraph on June 3. TGBP is now live on BCP Technologies-operated crypto trading platform, BCP Markets, and is available to customers who pass Know Your Customer checks, with major exchanges expected to list tGBP in the coming weeks. 'There are two large exchanges that we are finalising details with. We are hoping to be able to announce these in the following weeks,' BCP Technologies CEO Benoit Marzouk told Cointelegraph. 'Live proof-of-concept for future FCA stablecoin regulation' TGBP's launch comes days after the UK Financial Conduct Authority launched a public consultation on proposed new rules for stablecoin issuers and crypto custody providers on May 28. According to Marzouk, BCP Technologies is in a unique situation where tGBP might be considered a 'live proof-of-concept for future FCA stablecoin regulation.' 'BCP works closely with the FCA, and will participate in the FCA roundtable discussion on July 4 on the recently published consultation paper,' the CEO said. The launch follows a 14-month submission process as a new product in the FCA Connect and a one-month review in the FCA regulatory sandbox. 1:1 stablecoin issued on Ethereum TGBP is backed fully with cash held in a segregated bank account, with each token minted representing 1 British pound. The stablecoin is launched as an ERC-20 token, meaning that it is initially issued on the Ethereum blockchain. 'BCP proposes in the future to back tGBP with short-term UK government bonds, in line with the FCA discussion paper,' Marzouk told Cointelegraph. Acting as the issuer, BCP Technologies has been an FCA-registered crypto asset service provider since 2021, formerly known as BitcoinPoint, according to official FCA records. 'Historically, it was a platform 'BitcoinPoint' to democratise access to Bitcoin, where anyone could buy Bitcoin easily,' Marzouk said, adding: 'When the regulation came in 2020, BCP had to stop cash and pivoted into a more standard 'buy online' app. BCP was the first crypto company to implement open banking; you could buy Bitcoin by linking your bank account instantly.' Multiple use cases At launch, tGBP targets a broad range of use cases, including self-custody for retail and corporations as an alternative to banks, cross-border payments, institutional collateral management and decentralized finance lending. The new stablecoin is also expected to be used as the main pound rail for settling tokenised assets like bonds, securities or real estate, Marzouk said. 'Stablecoins enable open, instant, and frictionless transfers, free from volatility. Our vision is to abstract the complexity of blockchain with the familiarity of a GBP denomination, ultimately replacing GBP e-money with our GBP stablecoin,' the CEO stated in the announcement. Limited availability of pound stablecoins BCP's launch enters a market with limited competition. According to data from CoinGecko, there are only two tracked pound stablecoins at the time of writing, including VNX British Pound (VGBP) and Celo British Pound (CGBP), with a combined market cap of less than $500,000. Other pound stablecoin projects include the 'poundtoken' (GBPT) stablecoin launched by Blackfridge in 2022 and a pound (GBPA) stablecoin developed by the Digital Pound Foundation member Agant. Tether, issuer of the world's largest stablecoin USDt, attempted to launch a pound stablecoin in 2022, but it has not achieved significant adoption in the market. Source:
Crypto Insight
2 days ago
- Crypto Insight
SEC's 2025 guidance: What tokens are (and aren't) securities
The US Securities and Exchange Commission's Division of Corporation Finance (CorpFin) released a comprehensive statement on April 10, 2025, outlining what companies need to disclose when offering or registering crypto asset securities. This statement (the SEC's 2025 guidance) aims to reduce ambiguity regarding classifications of crypto tokens under US securities laws. It updates how the Howey test is used and introduces a clearer system to tell the difference between security tokens and non-security tokens. The Howey test is a decades-old framework used to determine whether a crypto asset qualifies as a security. Four criteria that the test applies are investment of money, an expectation of profit, a common enterprise and reliance on the efforts of others. A major highlight of the SEC 2025 guidance is the 'reasonable expectation of profit' criterion. The SEC emphasizes that if token buyers expect profits based primarily on the efforts of a centralized team or promoter, the token is likely a security. The SEC noted, 'Where entrepreneurial efforts drive price appreciation, tokenholders effectively invest in a common enterprise.' The guidance also introduces a three-pronged framework: Initial sale context: Whether the token was marketed as an investment Whether the token was marketed as an investment Ongoing use: If the token provides functional utility on a decentralized network If the token provides functional utility on a decentralized network Issuer influence: Degree of control retained by the founding team or foundation. Tokens with no expectation of profit, like Ether after the Merge, or stablecoins backed by real, transparent reserves, usually don't count as securities. But tokens tied to governance rights or revenue sharing could still be classified as securities, depending on how they work. Did you know? The Howey test was first used in 1946. Despite being older than the internet, it still shapes whether digital assets qualify as securities today. The SEC's 2025 rules say crypto tokens are likely securities if they act like investment contracts. This means tokens sold with promises of profits, driven by a central team's efforts, will be categorized as securities. The SEC's 2025 guidance outlines specific scenarios in which crypto tokens will likely be classified as securities. These typically involve projects that are still centrally controlled, promote profit expectations, or offer limited utility at the time of sale. Below are the common characteristics that may trigger securities classification: ICOs with profit-centric marketing: Tokens launched through initial coin offerings (ICOs) are a major target, especially when the project team markets them based on future price appreciation or project success. Tokens launched through initial coin offerings (ICOs) are a major target, especially when the project team markets them based on future price appreciation or project success. Profit-sharing governance tokens: Governance tokens that offer dividends, revenue sharing or protocol profits can be classified as securities due to their resemblance to traditional investment contracts. Governance tokens that offer dividends, revenue sharing or protocol profits can be classified as securities due to their resemblance to traditional investment contracts. Utility tokens with financial incentives: Even so-called utility tokens may qualify as securities if buyers are led to believe the tokens will increase in value or offer financial benefits. Even so-called utility tokens may qualify as securities if buyers are led to believe the tokens will increase in value or offer financial benefits. Legal precedents from court rulings: In the LBRY case (2023), the token was ruled an unregistered security. Similarly, the Ripple case determined XRP's institutional sales were securities, while public sales were not. Tokens with centralized control or pre-mining: The SEC warns that tokens that are pre-mined, centrally managed or promoted with value-growth promises lack decentralization and are likely to fall under securities regulation. In 2025, the SEC stressed that tokens controlled by a core team, pre-mined or limited in supply with promises of value growth will likely be securities. These tokens often aren't decentralized enough or lack user utility at the time of sale, reinforcing their classification under federal securities laws. The SEC's 2025 rules say crypto tokens aren't likely securities if they are used like tools or goods, not for making money. These tokens let you use a platform's services, like in-game items, digital access or nontransferable membership credits, and aren't pitched as investments. While the SEC's 2025 guidance focuses on investor protection, it also recognizes that not all tokens meet the criteria of securities. Tokens that are decentralized, utility-driven or serve non-investment purposes may fall outside the scope of securities laws. Below are key characteristics that reduce the likelihood of a token being classified as a security: Fiat-backed stablecoins with transparent reserves: Stablecoins that are 1:1 backed by fiat currency, regularly audited and designed for payments rather than investments are generally not viewed as securities by the SEC. Stablecoins that are 1:1 backed by fiat currency, regularly audited and designed for payments rather than investments are generally not viewed as securities by the SEC. Layer-1 utility tokens for network operations: Tokens like Ether, Solana and Avalanche are used to pay gas fees and validate transactions, not for profit-seeking. Their decentralized validator networks and functional utility lower the chances of being labeled securities. Tokens like Ether, Solana and Avalanche are used to pay gas fees and validate transactions, not for profit-seeking. Their decentralized validator networks and functional utility lower the chances of being labeled securities. Lack of profit marketing and central control: Tokens that aren't marketed with profit promises or don't rely on a central team for value growth are less likely to be securities. Their value is derived from network use, not speculation. Tokens that aren't marketed with profit promises or don't rely on a central team for value growth are less likely to be securities. Their value is derived from network use, not speculation. Decentralized and open-source governance: Projects that are community-driven, open-source and have distributed control over rewards or updates support non-security classification. These traits show the token functions as a digital tool, not an investment contract. Did you know? Under the 2025 guidance, tokens with genuine utility on decentralized networks may escape securities classification. It is a major shift from earlier years of the 'if it moves, it is a security' rule. The SEC's 2025 guidance for the crypto industry marks a pivotal moment, offering much-needed clarity on which tokens are classified as securities. It will reshape how projects launch, how tokens are traded and how platforms manage regulatory risk. For token issuers: Follow rules, register or change your approach The SEC's 2025 rules push token issuers to check whether their tokens count as securities. If tokens are promoted for profits or controlled centrally, issuers may need to register with the SEC or redesign tokens to focus on use and decentralization. Not following rules could lead to penalties, lawsuits or removal from platforms. New projects should plan for legal reviews from the start. For investors: Fewer tokens, but safer markets Investors might find fewer tokens available, especially if they are seen as unregistered securities. Tokens in legal trouble or those flagged by the SEC could be removed or restricted on exchanges. While this might limit quick-profit chances, it could make markets safer by cutting down on scams or risky projects. For exchanges: Stricter rules and more warnings Crypto exchanges, both centralized and decentralized, will likely set stricter standards for listing tokens, requiring more legal checks and more explicit risk warnings. US platforms may avoid tokens labeled as securities to steer clear of trouble. Exchanges might also need to register as securities brokers or alternative trading systems, raising costs and responsibilities. Did you know? The phrase 'reasonable expectation of profit' is the central point in the SEC's 2025 rules. If you expect a token's value to rise in the future and profit from it, it is a security. The SEC's 2025 rules still provide some confusion, especially for tokens that seem like both tools and investments. For example, governance tokens don't directly pay profits but affect decisions that boost protocol income. If tokenholders gain from rising prices due to treasury earnings, fees or staking rewards, they might be considered securities. Decentralized finance (DeFi) and decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) make things trickier. Many DAOs act like decentralized companies, handling funds, giving out rewards or teaming up with businesses. This raises questions like when does a community-run project act like a centralized company, or does voting protect it from securities laws? To deal with this, legal opinions and SEC no-action letters are the key. A strong legal memo can support a project's claim that its token falls outside securities law, though it does not guarantee immunity. Meanwhile, SEC no-action letters, in which the agency agrees not to pursue enforcement, offer clarity but are rare and context-specific. The 2025 rules clarify, but classifying tokens depends on each case, needing careful steps through changing legal, tech and financial worlds. Legal and compliance experts appreciate the more explicit token classification rules, which help projects evaluate risks. However, many note that the guidelines still allow subjective interpretations, particularly regarding decentralization and governance tokens. Industry groups and developers worry the rules may hinder crypto innovation in the US. They argue that focusing on 'profit expectations' and issuer control might wrongly label decentralized projects as securities, even without active promoters. For example, Coinbase legal officer Paul Grewal stated in a letter to the SEC's Crypto Task Force on March 19, 2025, that some crypto activities, like token airdrops and selling tokens with clear uses, shouldn't be treated as securities transactions. He contended these activities don't involve raising money or promising profits based on a company's ongoing work, so traditional securities laws may not apply to these decentralized actions. At the 'SEC Speaks' event in May 2025, SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce expressed concern about the commission's tendency to rely on enforcement actions rather than clear rulemaking. The SEC Speaks conference is an annual event where the SEC provides updates on its current initiatives and priorities. Peirce noted that this approach creates legal uncertainty and practical difficulties, complicating compliance for cryptocurrency firms and potentially hindering innovation. Supporters of the SEC's approach believe the guidance promotes investor protection and regulatory consistency, especially after years of confusion. Critics, however, see it as regulation by enforcement, claiming it burdens startups and creates legal uncertainty. For instance, legal analyst Jake Chervinsky noted that the SEC had indeed issued helpful guidance on crypto. Anderson PC, a boutique law firm, on the other hand, termed the SEC crypto guidance a flop, arguing that it wasn't clear who the rule applied to. The SEC's 2025 cryptocurrency guidelines differ significantly from the EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation in their scope, structure and approach. The SEC's rules focus on applying the Howey test to determine what tokens are securities. Decisions about what tokens are and aren't securities are made on a case-by-case basis. On the other hand, MiCA provides a detailed legal framework that divides crypto assets into clear categories such as utility tokens, asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens. It sets specific licensing and operational rules for each category, ensuring clarity for issuers and service providers. Unlike the SEC, MiCA does not broadly assume all tokens are securities and focuses on consumer protection, market integrity and stablecoin regulation. Overall, while the SEC's approach is more enforcement-driven and investor-risk focused, MiCA is rule-based, offering a clearer compliance path for the European market. Source:
