logo
Trump Is Targeting Cities With Large Black Populations

Trump Is Targeting Cities With Large Black Populations

Source: The Washington Post / Getty
Donald Trump's latest 'anti-crime' crusade against Democratic-led, predominantly Black cities is a blatant lie.
The 34-count felon turned grifter in chief doesn't care about crime; he's a criminal, and his latest propaganda push is nothing more than the preservation of a regime built on fear and racial division and another act in his decades-long performance of racist political theater.
He's doing the same tired ol' routine of painting Black and Brown communities as dangerous, only to position himself as the 'law-and-order' savior while laying the groundwork for an authoritarian power grab; but the jig is up—Trump is not fighting crime; he's manufacturing it to dismantle democracy.
His fixation on cities like Washington, D.C., Baltimore, Oakland, and Chicago has nothing to do with reducing crime and everything to do with undermining democracy, targeting Black political leadership, and manufacturing a false narrative that paints Black and Brown communities as violent, dangerous, and in need of 'rescue,' in order for him to justify illegally taking control.
We care about your data. See our privacy policy.
This strategy is straight out of the authoritarian playbook: create a crisis where there isn't one, assign blame to a marginalized group, then use the fabricated emergency to consolidate power. For Trump, that means militarizing policing in Black cities, vilifying their leaders, and distracting his followers from the reality that violent crime in most major cities is down—not up—over the past two years.
Data shows declines in violent crime, murders, and robberies. Oakland has seen significant drops in homicides. Baltimore just recorded its lowest homicide rate in over 50 years. Chicago's violent crime is down over 30%. Yet Trump trots out false, misleading statistics to paint these communities as hellscapes. Why? Because they have Black mayors, significant Black populations, and they vote against him in overwhelming numbers.
While Trump points fingers, the truth is that the only convicted felon in this conversation is Donald J. Trump himself—a man who has been convicted of sexual assault, fraud, and who has repeatedly stiffed small business owners out of money owed. He's not interested in making Black communities safer—he's interested in dismantling the institutions that protect them, all while enriching himself and those bankrolling his political ambitions.
In response to Trump's announcement that his administration would be taking over the city, the Washington Post reports officials in Washington, D.C., stated they were still in command of their police department, operating as usual, having received no new orders from the Trump administration. The city's police chief, Pamela A. Smith, has been supplying ideas about how federal law enforcement could be used by D.C. — not the other way around, but the White House, however, continued to project clear control.
'We plan to work with the D.C. police,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday, 'but ultimately the chain of command is as such: The president of the United States; the attorney general of the United States; our DEA administrator, Terry Cole,' who she said 'is in charge of' the department and is 'working with the chief to ensure that law enforcement officers are allowed to do their jobs in this city.'
On Tuesday evening, the White House announced the National Guard would begin to arrive on D.C.'s streets that night. Five Humvees lined the street at the corner of Jefferson Drive and 14th Street SW, between the National Museum of African American History and Culture and the Holocaust Memorial Museum. National Guard troops walked the sidewalks that form walking paths around the monuments, as three DEA agents headed east toward the U.S. Capitol.
This racist fearmongering is a smokescreen to distract from his own many failures and crimes. If we're talking about criminals that need removing from this country, let's start with Trump, his entire administration, and every enabler in Congress, statehouses, and boardrooms funding this regime. Because make no mistake, the clown in the seat is not the real danger—it's the regime of hatred paying him to dismantle America from within, to rewind the clock to an era when white supremacy was the law of the land. That's the real threat.
The attack on predominantly Black cities is part of a broader strategy. Trump's targeting of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, his hostility toward Black billionaires, his focus on dismantling Black political influence, and his push to gut protections in education, housing, reproductive health, and environmental justice are all interconnected. These efforts are designed to keep Black and Brown Americans economically weakened, socially marginalized, and politically powerless.
We've already seen the fallout since the great white heist began; over 300,000 Black women professionals have been laid off. Trump's interests in controlling college athletes' Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals, his attacks on Hollywood and the Kennedy Center, and his assaults on Black-led educational and legal institutions all point to one thing—he's targeting the economic, cultural, and political engines of progress in our communities.
Trump has already said the quiet part out loud. During his recent interview with CNBC, the disgraced president said that 'the inner city isn't going to work on the farms,' before outlining an indentured labor scheme where brown immigrants 'come to work and leave' because they 'do it naturally.' The over-policing of Black neighborhoods isn't just about intimidation—it's about filling prison beds when immigrant labor won't suffice. It's one step closer to the full authoritarian implementation of Project 2025, which is designed to strip away civil rights, consolidate executive power, and crush any community or institution that resists.
Under its provisions, the president could wield near-unilateral authority over the federal government, erasing decades of legal safeguards designed to protect marginalized communities. Source: Andrew Leyden / Getty
Project 2025 is not abstract—it is a clear and present danger to Black America across seven critical areas:
• Civil Rights: It guts anti-discrimination laws and bars federal agencies from collecting racial demographic data, making it nearly impossible to enforce workplace protections.
• Education: It dismantles the Department of Education, allowing discriminatory discipline to run rampant and making higher education even less accessible for Black students.
• Political Power: By overhauling the Census and criminalizing election-related activity, it will suppress the Black vote and destabilize multiracial democracy.
• Criminal Legal System: It expands the racially biased death penalty and abolishes consent decrees that hold police accountable for civil rights violations.
• Housing: It hands affordable housing programs to states with histories of racial discrimination, threatening millions of Black low-income families.
• Reproductive Rights: It bans federal access to abortion care, disproportionately harming Black women, who already face dangerously high maternal mortality rates.
• Environmental Justice: It shutters the Office of Environmental Justice, allowing environmental racism to further poison Black communities.
What we're witnessing is a modernized version of post-Reconstruction America, when Jim Crow laws stripped newly freed Black people of their constitutional rights, locking them out of political power, economic opportunity, and social equality. The playbook is the same—change the laws, control the narrative, suppress the vote, and weaponize the justice system.
By invoking images of chaos in Black cities, Trump is not just playing to racist stereotypes—he's setting the stage for federal takeovers of local governance, replacing elected leaders with handpicked loyalists and eroding the very foundation of home rule. Washington, D.C., has already been subjected to this unprecedented seizure of power, and the list of targeted cities is growing.
The bottom line is: Trump is lying and Trump is the criminal. The projection in his 'lock them up' chant is as transparent as it is tired. His lies about crime in Black-led cities are more than campaign rhetoric; they're part of a deliberate, well-funded scheme to erode democracy, suppress Black political power, and cement an authoritarian regime. The 'law and order' talk is nothing but code for racial domination and political control, and his repeated targeting of these cities is a direct assault on the progress made by generations of Black Americans.
The only people who should be behind bars are the ones orchestrating this dismantling of democracy.
It's time to stop treating this as politics as usual. This is a coordinated assault on truth, justice, and equality—and the regime funding the coup are betting we won't fight back.
We've seen this move before, and we know how it ends if we don't act. It's time to clean house, America—before there's nothing left to save.
America's biggest threat is not the residents of D.C., Baltimore, Chicago, or Oakland—it's the man in the Oval Office who sees democracy as an obstacle, truth as a liability, and the law as something that applies to everyone but himself.
SEE ALSO:
Black D.C. Is The Stage For Trump's Authoritarian Rehearsal
Dean Cain's New Job: Being A Superhero For White Nationalism
SEE ALSO
Trump Is Targeting Cities With Large Black Populations was originally published on newsone.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Government data is now in question. Here's where macro investors are turning to fill the gaps.
Government data is now in question. Here's where macro investors are turning to fill the gaps.

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Government data is now in question. Here's where macro investors are turning to fill the gaps.

The firing of the BLS head by President Donald Trump has spooked some macro investors. Trump's nomination of a partisan economist may push investors to rely more heavily on other data. Sources like ADP, Homebase, and MIT's Billion Prices Project have become critical, traders say. No savvy investor makes a decision off a single data point, but there are some numbers that carry more weight than others. For many macro investors, the North Star has long been the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the unit within the Department of Labor that measures, among other things, inflation, unemployment rates, and wage growth. Those in charge of the BLS have long been non-partisan economists, but President Donald Trump's firing of Commissioner Erika McEntarfer on August 1 and his top pick for her replacement, chief economist at the right-leaning Heritage Foundation, EJ Antoni, have many concerned with the validity of future government data, especially as Antoni floated pausing monthly jobs reports. Love Business Insider? Log in to Google and make us a preferred source. It's concerning for macro traders who rely on this data to make their bets, but there are non-governmental data sources that many already use. While helpful, these alternative databases can't replicate the widespread foundation BLS numbers provided for decades, where all market participants worked for the same set of basic facts about the state of the world's biggest economy. Still, traders are ramping up their use of this data in light of Trump's moves. "What's going to be tricky here is how to judge numbers coming out of the Bureau of Labor Statistics moving forward," said Andreas Steno Larsen, onetime macro investor and researcher, on his weekly podcast. He compared the firing to something that would happen "in Latin America" and predicted that investors would "look for alternative sources" to get a second opinion on the official data. Four macro investors pointed to the well-known ADP jobs report, which comes out monthly and tracks payroll from private employers, and MIT's Billion Prices Project as ways to track employment and inflation, respectively, in the US. The investors declined to be named because their firms don't authorize them to speak publicly. Some investors tap datasets that constantly scrape e-commerce prices, such as PriceStats, and track how different products rise and fall over time. This is a useful tool to understand Trump's tariff policies' impact, given the volume of online goods that US consumers buy from overseas. Payroll and scheduling company Homebase tracks more than 150,000 small businesses and produces monthly employment reports. LinkUp has tracked online job postings since 2007. Numerator has become a key source for in-person consumer data at places such as restaurants and home improvement stores. "Given the recent BLS conversations, we've recently seen demand for our data increase," Homebase CEO John Waldmann said in a statement. Not a replacement These alternative data sources are just that — alternative. They were used to get a sneak peek or a deeper look at inflation or unemployment figures that the government would release, not replace them entirely. They also sometimes vary. For example, ADP's payroll figures often diverge from the BLS's monthly jobs report, and MIT's Billion Prices Project can capture inflation trends sooner than the official CPI but is less comprehensive. "We don't see them replacing economic statistics altogether in the near future," said Julie Meigh, the head of ESG & macro research at alt-data platform Neudata, about non-traditional datasets. Even if BLS data becomes less trustworthy, the different macro investors who spoke with Business Insider said they'll still need to use it in some fashion unless there's a structural change in financial products. For example, Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, or TIPS, change when the Consumer Price Index from the government is announced. For those who have exposure to these types of assets, ignoring the BLS is not possible even if the data becomes untrustworthy. As one trader at one of the world's biggest macro hedge funds said, he was surprised markets weren't more spooked by Trump's firing. Equity markets were near record highs, and bond yields stayed mostly steady. "I think it's clear that institutions are not as strong as many had thought," this individual said. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

The Mayor Of Chicago Fired Back At Donald Trump Calling Him "Incompetent," And His Response Is Going Viral For Being The "Bar Of The Year"
The Mayor Of Chicago Fired Back At Donald Trump Calling Him "Incompetent," And His Response Is Going Viral For Being The "Bar Of The Year"

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The Mayor Of Chicago Fired Back At Donald Trump Calling Him "Incompetent," And His Response Is Going Viral For Being The "Bar Of The Year"

The Mayor of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, is going viral for his "brilliant" takedown of a reporter and Donald Trump, which people are calling the "bar of the year." Chicago — like other major cities across the nation — is preparing for a potential "federal takeover of policing" following Donald Trump's issuing of National Guard troops on the streets of Washington, D.C. in the name of fighting crime. Recent videos of FBI and DEA agents patrolling the streets of Georgetown — a D.C. neighborhood — wearing tactical gear have gone viral online. FNTV / Twitter: @ScooterCasterNY Related: "If we need to, we're going to do the same thing in Chicago, which is a disaster," Trump said in a recent press conference. "We have a mayor there that's totally incompetent. He's an incompetent man." It's important to note that, according to FBI statistics, violent crime in Chicago is down. Well, the mayor of Chicago was repeatedly asked by a reporter to respond to Trump calling him "incompetent," and his response is going super-viral. "What do you say to Donald Trump? How did you feel when Donald Trump called you 'incompetent?' Please answer that question if you will," a reporter asked from the crowd. Related: "OK. Fine. Since you are begging," Johnson replied to the reporter. The reporter then tried to interrupt, but Johnson continued. "So let me just answer that. I do appreciate you begging," he repeated. "So, I will just say it like this, that the President has always been intimidated by the intellectual prowess of Black men." Related: "And so, of course, he would speak in those petite and puerile terms, because he's small." The clip of the interaction has received over 1.5 million views on TikTok and thousands of comments. People are absolutely obsessed with Johnson's quick-witted response, with many applauding the way he addressed the eager reporter. ...Others called Johnson's comments on the President the "bar of the year." Related: "Using vocabulary that he won't even understand is damn poetic," one person wrote. "*MAGA furiously googles petite and puerile,*" another person joked. And this person praised Black politicians who have clapped back at Trump. What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:

Putin praises Trump's efforts to end Ukraine war ahead of Friday summit in Alaska
Putin praises Trump's efforts to end Ukraine war ahead of Friday summit in Alaska

Los Angeles Times

time5 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Putin praises Trump's efforts to end Ukraine war ahead of Friday summit in Alaska

LONDON — Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday praised President Trump's efforts to end the war in Ukraine, more than three years after Moscow launched its invasion, as the two leaders prepared for a pivotal U.S.–Russia summit Friday in Alaska. Following a meeting Thursday with top government officials on the summit, Putin said in a short video released by the Kremlin that the Trump administration was making 'quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the hostilities' and to 'reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved.' Putin also suggested that 'long-term conditions of peace between our countries, and in Europe, and in the world as a whole,' could be reached under an agreement with the U.S. on nuclear arms control. In Washington, Trump said there was a 25% chance that the summit would fail, but he also floated the idea that, if the meeting succeeds, he could bring Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to Alaska for a subsequent, three-way meeting. In a radio interview with Fox News, Trump also said he might be willing to stay in Alaska longer, depending on what happens with Putin. Meanwhile, Zelensky and other European leaders worked to ensure their interests are taken into account when Trump and Putin meet in Anchorage. U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer welcomed Zelensky to London on Thursday in a show of British support for Ukraine a day before the critical Trump-Putin meeting. The two embraced warmly outside Starmer's offices at 10 Downing Street without making any comments, and Zelensky departed about an hour later. Zelensky's trip to the British capital came a day after he took part in virtual meetings from Berlin with Trump and the leaders of several European countries. Those leaders said that Trump had assured them that he would make a priority of trying to achieve a ceasefire in Ukraine when he meets with Putin. Speaking after the meetings to reporters, Trump warned of 'very severe consequences' for Russia if Putin doesn't agree to stop the war against Ukraine after Friday's meeting. While some European leaders, including German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and French President Emmanuel Macron, praised Wednesday's video conference with Trump as constructive, uncertainty remained over how the U.S. leader — whose rhetoric toward both Zelensky and Putin has evolved dramatically since retaking office this year — would conduct negotiations in the absence of any other interested parties. Both Zelensky and the Europeans have worried that the bilateral U.S.-Russia summit would leave them and their interests sidelined, and that any conclusions could favor Moscow and leave Ukraine and Europe's future security in jeopardy. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov tamped down expectations for any breakthroughs from the Friday summit, saying there were no plans to sign documents and that it would be a 'big mistake' to predict the results of the negotiations, according to Russian news outlet Interfax. The Kremlin on Thursday said the meeting between Trump and Putin would begin at 11:30 a.m. local time. Putin's foreign policy adviser, Yuri Ushakov, told reporters that Trump and Putin will first sit down for a one-on-one meeting followed by a meeting between the two delegations. Then talks will continue over 'a working breakfast.' A joint news conference will follow. Trump contradicted the Kremlin, saying that no decisions have been made about holding a news conference with Putin. The uncertainty reflects just how much about the summit, including its schedule, remains unsettled. Starmer said Wednesday that the Alaska summit could be a path to a ceasefire in Ukraine, but he also alluded to European concerns that Trump may strike a deal that forces Ukraine to cede territory to Russia. He warned that Western allies must be prepared to step up pressure on Russia if necessary. During a call Wednesday among leaders of countries involved in the 'coalition of the willing' — those who are prepared to help police any future peace agreement between Moscow and Kyiv — Starmer stressed that any ceasefire deal must protect the 'territorial integrity' of Ukraine. 'International borders cannot be, and must not be changed by force,'' he said. Kyiv has long insisted that safeguards against future Russian attacks provided by its Western allies would be a precondition for achieving a durable end to the fighting. Yet many Western governments have been hesitant to commit military personnel. Countries in the coalition, which includes France and the U.K., have been trying for months to secure U.S. security backing, should it be required. Following Wednesday's virtual meetings, Macron said Trump told the assembled leaders that while NATO must not be part of future security guarantees, 'the United States and all the parties involved should take part.' 'It's a very important clarification that we have received,' Macron said. Trump did not reference any U.S. security commitments during his comments to reporters on Wednesday. With another high-level meeting on their country's future on the horizon, some Ukrainians expressed skepticism about the summit's prospects. Oleksandra Kozlova, 39, who works at a digital agency in Kyiv, told The Associated Press on Wednesday that she believes Ukrainians 'have already lost hope' that meaningful progress can be made toward ending the war. 'I don't think this round will be decisive,' she said. 'There have already been enough meetings and negotiations promising us, ordinary people, that something will be resolved, that things will get better, that the war will end. Unfortunately, this has not happened, so personally I don't see any changes coming.' Anton Vyshniak, a car salesman in Kyiv, said Ukraine's priority now should be saving the lives of its military service members, even at the expense of territorial concessions. 'At the moment, the most important thing is to preserve the lives of male and female military personnel. After all, there are not many human resources left,' he said. 'Borders are borders, but human lives are priceless.' Zelensky said Thursday that Ukraine had secured the release of 84 people from Russian captivity, including both soldiers and civilians. Those freed included people held by Russia since 2014, 2016 and 2017, as well as soldiers who had defended the now Russian-occupied Ukrainian city of Mariupol, Zelensky wrote on Telegram. The Russian Defense Ministry said Thursday that it too had received 84 soldiers as part of a prisoner exchange. In other developments, Russian strikes in Ukraine's Sumy region overnight Wednesday resulted in numerous injuries, Ukrainian regional officials said. A missile strike on a village in the Seredyna-Budska community wounded a 7-year-old girl and a 27-year-old man, according to regional governor Oleh Hryhorov. The girl was hospitalized in stable condition. In Russia, a Ukrainian drone attack damaged several apartment buildings in the southern city of Rostov-on-Don, near the border with Ukraine, where 13 civilians were wounded, according to acting governor of the region, Yuri Slyusar. Two of the wounded were hospitalized in serious condition, Slyusar said. Pylas and Spike write for the Associated Press. Spike reported from Budapest, Hungary. AP writers Lorne Cook in Brussels; Hanna Arhirova in Kyiv, Ukraine; Katie Marie Davies in Manchester, England; Dasha Litvinova in Tallinn, Estonia, and Will Weissert in Washington contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store