
Elgin man who wore nappies and offered girl, 14, money for sex avoids jail
Alex Bruce, 21, contacted his first victim, who was aged just 14, in the spring of 2023.
He flattered her with compliments before offering her money to visit his home and have sex with him.
Bruce went onto target a second girl, sending her videos of him shopping for nappies – and wearing them.
At Elgin Sheriff Court on Monday, almost four months after admitting to his guilt, Bruce was finally sentenced.
Bruce, who had been urged to work with the social-work department to complete background reports into his circumstances, will not serve any time behind bars despite his crimes.
Instead, for the next three years, he will be under the supervision of the social work department.
He will be made to complete any programmes the department staff see as necessary for his rehabilitation.
Bruce, of Mossend Place, will also be under a conduct requirement during that period. which will monitor whether his behaviour is good.
He was also made subject to the sex offenders notification requirement.
This will force him to inform the police of any changes of address or name over the same period.
Bruce's crimes had been laid bare in February when he appeared in court and admitted two charges related to his actions between the dates of April 1 and June 8, 2023.
The first charge was sending an older child sexual written communications.
The second charge was repeatedly sending an older child videos of himself and asking her to send an intimate image of herself.
Fiscal depute Karen Poke revealed that, among his request for sex and messages to the victims, he would also send one girl images of himself urinating while in nappies.
The court heard there were also pictures of himself in women's underwear, including a lace body suit and pictures of what he himself described as his 'thong collection'.
Bruce would ask the girl to send him back illicit images of herself.
Of the first girl receiving these messages, Ms Poke said: 'Initially, she and the accused communicated with each other on Snapchat.
'It turned sexual, the accused telling the witness she was 'pretty gorgeous' and 'beautiful'.
'The accused asked her if she would go round to his house.'
Bruce then offered the girl £50 for sex, said Ms Poke.
Bruce's second victim also received a friend request on Snapchat, where he began making contact with her, before sending her the videos and images.
Ms Poke said that, when one of the girls asked Bruce why he had filmed the urination videos, 'he told her he thought it was funny.'
Matthew O'Neill, Bruce's defence solicitor, had told the court his client had 'learning difficulties in the background' at a previous hearing.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
10 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘Children are entering a hellscape': the terrifying film about grieving parents taking on social media giants
In 2020, Amy Neville found her 14-year-old son Alexander dead in his bedroom. He had taken what he thought was an oxycodone pill, bought – according to Neville – from a drug dealer he met on Snapchat. The pill was a fake, laced with fentanyl. Four years later, his mum stood up in the California high school where Alex would have been a student to warn other parents and teenagers about social media. 'We give our kids these smartphones. We let them have these apps. And that is the equivalent of dropping them off in the worst neighbourhood in our area.' Neville is featured alongside other bereaved parents in Can't Look Away, a terrifying new documentary about kids and social media directed by Matthew O'Neill and Perri Peltz, based on extensive investigative reporting by Bloomberg News journalist Olivia Carville. It follows American families who are filing lawsuits against social media companies and campaigning for stricter legislation; they are represented by the Social Media Victims Law Center, a crusading legal firm run Matthew Bergman, a lawyer so charismatic he could probably play himself in a Hollywood movie. The conversation around teenagers and social media has evolved beyond kids using their phones at the table. In his 2024 bestseller The Anxious Generation, Jonathan Haidt warned of the links between young people's mental health and smartphones. Last month, the technology secretary Peter Kyle apologised for the delay in legislation to keep children safe online. Australia plans to ban social media for under 16s from December. In Can't Look Away, the agony on parents' faces as they tell their stories, and relive the trauma, is hard to watch. Toney and Brandy Roberts filed a lawsuit against Meta over the death of their 14-year-old daughter Englyn in 2020; she killed herself after watching a video of a mock-hanging on Instagram. 'The social media companies know that our children are so vulnerable,' Brandy tells the camera. 'I feel that the only way that they're going to be forced to change is through a lawsuit. So that's why we're joining this fight.' When I talk to the film's directors before Can't Look Away's UK premiere, they do not mince their words. O'Neill says he previously had no idea how extreme the content that children are exposed to on social media is. 'It's so much more than just addiction, or screen time, or wasting time. What young people see is so different because of the algorithms. What they're being fed, what they can't look away from, this is not what they're searching for. Children are essentially entering into a hellscape that adults don't know about.' Algorithms decide what you see on social media, based in part on what you have previously liked or commented on, and how much time you've spent on other posts. If you linger on a piece of content, the algorithm will feed you more of the same. What that means is that teenagers don't have to actively search for harmful material for it to appear in their feed. A 13-year-old girl might look for healthy eating advice and end up down a rabbit hole of pro-anorexia content. 'It can very quickly turn very dark,' says O'Neill. Mason Edens was 16 when he broke up with his girlfriend; normal teenage stuff his mum Jennie DeSerio thought. In his heartache, Mason turned to TikTok, searching for phrases such as: 'My girlfriend broke up with me.' In the film, his mum plays one of the depressing videos that ended up in his feed. It shows a gun in a hand, then an image of blood splatter and the words: 'My hand. My head.' Mason killed himself in November 2022. Jennie doesn't believe that he'd ever searched for the term 'suicide' on TikTok. O'Neill says he was shocked by Mason's feed: 'This is not someone crying. It's not just sad music. It is an image of a gun going into a hand with the exhortation to blow your effing head off. That is not content that a product should be feeding to a child. I think we could all broadly agree on that as a society.' Is it possible, I ask, for the social media companies to filter out harmful content? 'If Meta knows what I want to buy before I buy it, there's no way they can't figure out how to make sure children aren't fed content that demonstrates how to die by suicide.' After screenings of Can't Look Away, the film-makers often ask the kids in the audience if they have ever watched a suicide on social media. 'Almost all the hands go up,' says co-director Peltz. In America, 95% of 13 to 17-year-olds use social media. In 2022, social media companies made an estimated $11bn from advertising directed to under 18s in the US. The longer kids are glued to it, the more billions the companies make, which means there is a huge incentive to design sticky algorithms, says Peltz. 'Why are they feeding children material that they can't look away from? Because it keeps children on their sites for as long as possible. And we know from whistleblowers that that is a business plan. This is not an accident. They are prioritising time on screen over safety.' The film features interviews with such whistleblowers, who say companies have been warned that their products harm children. Arturo Béjar held senior positions at Facebook and Instagram, and became increasingly alarmed by their parent company Meta's own research. In one poll, one in eight 13 to 15-year-olds said they had received an unwanted sexual advance on Instagram in the past week. Béjar emailed his concerns to Mark Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg and other top executives. He says he never received a reply. Can't Look Away tells the heart-breaking story of Jordan DeMay, a popular, outgoing 17-year-old from Michigan who killed himself after being blackmailed in a sextortion scam. In March 2022, he received a message on Instagram from someone he thought was a girl his own age. After some flirting, Jordan sent her nude photographs. Immediately, the threats started: send money or we'll share the photos with your friends and family. Less than six hours after the first of these messages, Jordan was dead. Sextortion is one of the fastest growing cybercrimes. Peltz is keen to share with parents the advice she has picked up from several professionals about how to protect children. 'Talk to your child. Tell them, 'If this ever happens to you, do not be afraid to come to us.' It's very specific advice that can make a major difference.' Can't Look Away ends with some real-life courtroom drama in Los Angeles. Amy Neville, the woman whose son took the fake oxycodone pill, is the lead plaintiff in a case against Snapchat by parents whose children died or were injured after allegedly buying fentanyl-laced drugs. Their lawsuit claims that Snapchat's design makes it an ideal marketplace to sell illegal drugs, with its disappearing messages that make it difficult for police to trace illegal activity. Another feature is Quick Add, which suggests other users to add. Laura Marquez-Garrett is a lawyer at the Social Media Victims Law Center and explains how it works. '[A dealer will] just find one high school kid in your area. You add them, and then you add all their friends, and then you add their friends.' In a courtroom showdown, Snap Inc's defence relies on a piece of US legislation drafted before Zuckerberg hit puberty. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 has for years acted as a shield (or a get-out-of-jail card, depending on your perspective) protecting social media companies from liability for user-generated content posted on their platforms. In court, Snap Inc's attorney describes the platform as a tech-service provider, like a phone company. You wouldn't sue a phone company if a drug deal was made over the phone. The back-and-forth between the lawyers and the judge is a gripping intellectual tennis match. Peltz tells me that parents often feel powerless. 'But this is not a blame-the-parents situation. Companies need to make the changes so that these sites are responsible and are safe for children to be on. Parents can't be expected to keep up with their children when it comes to digital advances. It's time for these companies to stop blaming parents.' As for teenagers, people can be judgmental, she says. 'I think it's human nature to say, 'Well my child wouldn't buy drugs online.' Or, 'My child couldn't be sextorted.' The answer is that we can all hope that our children won't do things like that. But children are children. We all know about the frontal cortex, that it doesn't get fully developed until your 20s. Children make mistakes. They should be allowed to make mistakes and not have to die as a result.' Can't Look Away: The Case Against Social Media is in UK cinemas and streaming on from 8 August In the UK, the youth suicide charity Papyrus can be contacted on 0800 068 4141 or email pat@ and in the UK and Ireland Samaritans can be contacted on freephone 116 123, or email jo@ or jo@ In the US, the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline is at 988 or chat for support. You can also text HOME to 741741 to connect with a crisis text line counselor. In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. Other international helplines can be found at


Daily Mirror
12 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Married teacher sexually abused schoolgirl from 13 in 18 months of horror
English teacher Stefanie Kellenberger, 40, admitted to 21 counts of abuse of a minor after she sexually abused the girl at her home in over 18 months A married English teacher has pleaded guilty to abusing a 13-year-old schoolgirl at her home. Stefanie Kellenberger, 40, admitted to 21 counts of abuse of a minor after she sexually abused the girl at her home in Ohio over 18 months. According to police, she pleaded guilty to all four counts of third-degree felony sexual battery and 17 counts of third-degree felony unlawful sexual conduct with a minor. Authorities said she began grooming the schoolgirl when she was just 13-years-old, and kept in contact with the girl the following year, when she turned 14. The abuse continued until "the age of consent", which is 16, according to Bryan Dove, assistant prosecutor for Richland County. It comes after a 16-year-old boy was allegedly forced to live in an outside shed for months by his parents. The horrific abuse all occurred at Kellenberger's home in Shelby from February 2020 through October 2021. "You had been a teacher. She had been a student,' Richland County Common Pleas Judge Brent Robinson told the former English teacher. "But at the time these occurred, you were not her teacher and she was not your student." Kellenberger was placed on paid administrative leave from Shelby City Schools in February 2024. It comes after the Mansfield Police Department confirmed "allegations were made" against the teacher. She was officially charged in September 2024, and resigned from the school the following month. Kellenberger's victim wanted the former teacher to spend three years in jail, but the judge said that sentence was too short. Instead, the abuser was presented with two options by prosecutors, either 12 years in prison or 15 years with the possibility of judicial release after 10 years. She opted for the latter option. "The victim is relieved to not have to testify. That's why we entered into this agreement with the defendant," Dove, prosecuting, told the judge. Kellenberger will be subject to five years post-release control and must register with the county sheriff as a Tier 3 sex offender every 90 days for the rest of her life. She must also remain under electronic monitoring until her sentencing October 6, and has been banned from teaching. It comes after a married special education teacher has pleaded guilty to sending nudes to a 16-year-old student on Snapchat and pressuring him to have sex. Rikki Laughlin, 26, sent multiple nude pictures and a video of her using a sex toy to the student on the social media app. The student reportedly told authorities that "things progressed fast" after the Snapchat messages and that he and Laughlin had kissed. The teenager "made excuses" because "he did not feel comfortable" when the teacher tried to take things further, police heard.


The Guardian
15 hours ago
- The Guardian
Can't Look Away review – a harrowing, heartbreaking indictment of social media's ruthlessness
'Tweens are herd animals' and have 'an addicts' narrative', according to internal documents revealed by a Facebook whistleblower to congress, making clear the levels of cynicism and obfuscation the company operates with in its quest to hook young people to its platform. Bad though that is, it's not the worst example in this lucidly laid out and often harrowing indictment of social media's ruthlessness; that would be the proliferation of drug dealers on Snapchat, which the company seems to have to some extent turned a blind eye to in the scramble to expand its user base. Based on the investigative work of Bloomberg journalist Olivia Carville, this film covers the attempts of minnow legal outfit Social Media Victims Law Center to net the sharks of Silicon Valley. It represents a host of families who have suffered heartbreaking losses due to unpoliced extreme online content: children and teenagers who fatally copied auto-asphyxiation or pro-suicide videos, ones who killed themselves after falling victim to sextortionists, or who overdosed after buying off-prescription meds from predatory dealers. The battle here is to overcome section 230, a get-out clause in the 1996 Telecommunication Act that gives social media companies immunity for third-party-generated content. Of course, Mark Zuckerberg was still slurping Slush Puppies back then. Matthew Bergman, the center's founder, twice makes the analogy with cigarette companies, arguing that social media companies knowingly prioritise profit over the health of their users. If the film is clear about this causation and the resulting damage, it is not a given that the team can make a longer leap: from establishing a degree of culpability in individual cases and getting justice and closure for these families, to proving that the tech companies systematically predicate their algorithms on fanning our most negative tendencies and impulses. The big victory here is stopping the Snapchat case being dismissed due to section 230; more of a minor triumph that shows the scale of the mountain, but you have to start somewhere. This is a vital piece of public-interest journalism clearly spelling out what we all vaguely intuited. Can't Look Away is in UK cinemas and on Jolt from 8 August In the UK, the youth suicide charity Papyrus can be contacted on 0800 068 4141 or email pat@ and in the UK and Ireland Samaritans can be contacted on freephone 116 123, or email jo@ or jo@ In the US, the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline is at 988 or chat for support. You can also text HOME to 741741 to connect with a crisis text line counselor. In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. Other international helplines can be found at