Tesla Ordered to Stop 'Deceptive Practices' on Cars' Self-Driving Capabilities in France or Face Thousands in Fines
France has ordered Tesla to stop "deceptive practices" related to the marketing of its vehicles' self-driving features, warning that Elon Musk's company could face daily fines exceeding $58,000 until it complies.
Following investigations conducted in 2023 and 2024, France's Directorate General for Competition, Consumer Affairs and Fraud Control (DGCCRF) concluded that Tesla engaged in "deceptive commercial practices" by falsely advertising its vehicles as "fully autonomous." In reality, the vehicles require a human to be in the driver's seat, paying full attention to the road, the Financial Times reported.
The inquiry also found that Tesla signed sales contracts without specifying dates, times or delivery locations, and routinely failed to issue refunds or receipts in a timely manner.
The DGCCRF gave Tesla four months to comply with the order. It said that the "particular seriousness" of the misleading practices over autonomous vehicles meant that Tesla would face the hefty fine for each day that it did not conform with demands to stop misleading customers.
France's investigation marks the latest setback for Musk as Tesla's profits in the country have sharply declined following his alignment with the Trump administration. In May, Tesla's sales in the European nation plunged 67% compared to the same month in 2024, with new vehicle registrations falling to their lowest level since July 2022.
Originally published on Latin Times
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
4 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Grok Shows 'Flaws' In Fact-checking Israel-Iran War: Study
Elon Musk's AI chatbot Grok produced inaccurate and contradictory responses when users sought to fact-check the Israel-Iran conflict, a study said Tuesday, raising fresh doubts about its reliability as a debunking tool. With tech platforms reducing their reliance on human fact-checkers, users are increasingly utilizing AI-powered chatbots -- including xAI's Grok -- in search of reliable information, but their responses are often themselves prone to misinformation. "The investigation into Grok's performance during the first days of the Israel-Iran conflict exposes significant flaws and limitations in the AI chatbot's ability to provide accurate, reliable, and consistent information during times of crisis," said the study from the Digital Forensic Research Lab (DFRLab) of the Atlantic Council, an American think tank. "Grok demonstrated that it struggles with verifying already-confirmed facts, analyzing fake visuals, and avoiding unsubstantiated claims." The DFRLab analyzed around 130,000 posts in various languages on the platform X, where the AI assistant is built in, to find that Grok was "struggling to authenticate AI-generated media." Following Iran's retaliatory strikes on Israel, Grok offered vastly different responses to similar prompts about an AI-generated video of a destroyed airport that amassed millions of views on X, the study found. It oscillated -- sometimes within the same minute -- between denying the airport's destruction and confirming it had been damaged by strikes, the study said. In some responses, Grok cited the a missile launched by Yemeni rebels as the source of the damage. In others, it wrongly identified the AI-generated airport as one in Beirut, Gaza, or Tehran. When users shared another AI-generated video depicting buildings collapsing after an alleged Iranian strike on Tel Aviv, Grok responded that it appeared to be real, the study said. The Israel-Iran conflict, which led to US air strikes against Tehran's nuclear program over the weekend, has churned out an avalanche of online misinformation including AI-generated videos and war visuals recycled from other conflicts. AI chatbots also amplified falsehoods. As the Israel-Iran war intensified, false claims spread across social media that China had dispatched military cargo planes to Tehran to offer its support. When users asked the AI-operated X accounts of AI companies Perplexity and Grok about its validity, both wrongly responded that the claims were true, according to disinformation watchdog NewsGuard. Researchers say Grok has previously made errors verifying information related to crises such as the recent India-Pakistan conflict and anti-immigration protests in Los Angeles. Last month, Grok was under renewed scrutiny for inserting "white genocide" in South Africa, a far-right conspiracy theory, into unrelated queries. Musk's startup xAI blamed an "unauthorized modification" for the unsolicited response. Musk, a South African-born billionaire, has previously peddled the unfounded claim that South Africa's leaders were "openly pushing for genocide" of white people. Musk himself blasted Grok after it cited Media Matters -- a liberal media watchdog he has targeted in multiple lawsuits -- as a source in some of its responses about misinformation. "Shame on you, Grok," Musk wrote on X. "Your sourcing is terrible."
Int'l Business Times
7 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Tesla Ordered to Stop 'Deceptive Practices' on Cars' Self-Driving Capabilities in France or Face Thousands in Fines
France has ordered Tesla to stop "deceptive practices" related to the marketing of its vehicles' self-driving features, warning that Elon Musk's company could face daily fines exceeding $58,000 until it complies. Following investigations conducted in 2023 and 2024, France's Directorate General for Competition, Consumer Affairs and Fraud Control (DGCCRF) concluded that Tesla engaged in "deceptive commercial practices" by falsely advertising its vehicles as "fully autonomous." In reality, the vehicles require a human to be in the driver's seat, paying full attention to the road, the Financial Times reported. The inquiry also found that Tesla signed sales contracts without specifying dates, times or delivery locations, and routinely failed to issue refunds or receipts in a timely manner. The DGCCRF gave Tesla four months to comply with the order. It said that the "particular seriousness" of the misleading practices over autonomous vehicles meant that Tesla would face the hefty fine for each day that it did not conform with demands to stop misleading customers. France's investigation marks the latest setback for Musk as Tesla's profits in the country have sharply declined following his alignment with the Trump administration. In May, Tesla's sales in the European nation plunged 67% compared to the same month in 2024, with new vehicle registrations falling to their lowest level since July 2022. Originally published on Latin Times
Local Germany
12 hours ago
- Local Germany
EU lawmakers vote to ban airlines from charging fees for hand luggage
Passengers travelling in Europe should be able to carry on board one personal item, such as a handbag, backpack or laptop and one small hand luggage without having to pay additional fees, members of the European Parliament transport committee concluded on Tuesday. The position aims to bring into EU law a judgement made by the European Court of justice, which ruled back in 2014 that the 'carrying of hand baggage cannot be made subject to a price supplement, provided that it meets reasonable requirements in terms of its weight and dimensions and complies with applicable security requirements'. Currently many low-cost airlines allow passengers to only take one small on-board item for free and charge extra for other hand baggage. The rules vary between airlines and different countries. Tuesday's vote appears to be good news for passengers but it is not final. The change will still have to be endorsed by all MEPs in the full parliament and green lighted by European governments in the EU Council. Airlines against the move Last year the Spanish Ministry of Social Rights and Consumption fined five airlines €179 million for such practices following a complaint by the Spanish consumer organisation OCU (Organización de Consumidores y Usuarios). Consumer groups also lodged a complaint with the European Commission arguing that the EU top court recognised hand luggage as 'an essential aspect of passengers' carriage,' said European consumer organisation BEUC. Advertisement But airlines condemned Tuesday's vote as a limit to 'consumer choice' that will result in 'higher costs for millions of passengers who neither need nor use an extra trolley bag.' Airlines for Europe (A4E), the group representing major air carriers at the EU level, said that 'travelling light is the choice for hundreds of millions of European passengers'. In Spain, for instance, over 50 million passengers 'didn't need an additional piece of cabin baggage last year and had the choice not to have this included as part of their airfare," A4E said. A4E Managing Director Ourania Georgoutsakou said: 'What's next? Mandatory popcorn and drinks as part of your cinema ticket? The European Parliament should let travellers decide what services they want, what services they pay for and, importantly, what services they don't.' The measure, which would apply to all flights departing or arriving within the 27-nation European Union. Advertisement Children must be seated next to accompanying passengers The proposed change to hand luggage fees was part of a package of amendments to passenger rights when travelling by air, rail, sea, coach and inland waterways put forward by the European Commission in 203. The committee also voted to ensure that children under 12 years old are seated next to their accompanying passenger free of charge. People accompanying passengers with reduced mobility should also travel with them for free, and there should be compensation rights in case of loss or damage to their equipment or injury to assistance animals, MEPs said. Italian MEP Matteo Ricci, who is in charge of the file, said the new rules aim to 'protect all passengers, with special attention to persons with disabilities and reduced mobility' and clarify the definition of free hand luggage 'up to a maximum size of 100cm.' Rules for intermediaries New rules also aim to clarify the role of intermediaries, such as ticket vendors or travel agencies, in the reimbursement of air passengers for cancellations, delays or denied boarding. According to the parliament transport committee, these companies should inform passengers at the time of booking about the full cost of the air ticket, intermediation or service fees, and the reimbursement process. This should not take longer than 14 days or, past the deadline, it will be for the air carrier to process the reimbursement within 7 days. Advertisement Multimodal journey In a separate vote, MEPs also backed the proposal to introduce compensation for disruptions in journeys involving at least two modes of transport, for example plane and bus, or train, ferry and plane. If a customer buys a single contract involving multiple transport modes from one operator, and a missed connection results in a delay of 60 minutes or more, the passenger should be offered meals, refreshment and a hotel stay free of charge. 'Switching between transport modes should not mean losing protection against missed connections and assistance', MEPs said. 'Our proposals are intended to strengthen passenger confidence and encourage companies to develop more attractive multimodal offers,' said German MEP Jens Gieseke, who leads on this part. Question on compensation In parallel, the European Parliament and Council are discussing a revision of compensation rules in case of flight delays or cancellations. On Tuesday, MEPs also voted in favour of a common reimbursement form in case of travel disruption, with airlines requested to send passengers the pre-filled form within 48 hours following the problem - 'or activate alternative automatic communication channels'. They also voted on a well a defined list of extraordinary circumstances, such as natural disasters or war, under which airlines can avoid having to pay compensation.
