logo
New rules to help renters including bans on shock evictions delayed again

New rules to help renters including bans on shock evictions delayed again

The Sun26-06-2025
NEW rules giving more power to renters including a ban on shock evictions have been delayed again.
The Renters' Reform Bill will reportedly not come into force in autumn as planned due to delays in Parliament.
The far-reaching bill will ban Section 21, also known as "no fault" evictions, as well as prevent landlords from increasing rents to deliberately squeeze hard-up renters out of their homes.
The delay to the ban on Section 21 notices, as first reported by The Financial Times, is the first in a string of push backs.
Fears have been raised by campaign group the Renters Reform Coalition that the latest delay could mean the bill not coming into effect until the spring of 2026.
Tom Darling, director, said: "Renters will feel let down yet again on hearing that Section 21 no fault evictions are now unlikely to be scrapped until 2026 - a year and a half since the government was elected on a manifesto pledge to 'immediately abolish' them.
"Now we find out renters will be facing a second no-fault eviction nightmare at Christmas since this promise was made.
"Everyone needs a decent, secure home, but with every month that passes thousands more renters are faced with a no-fault eviction.
"The Government must show a renewed impetus to get this over the line."
Estimates from Shelter suggest around 25,000 households have been threatened with homelessness following a Section 21 notice since the Labour Party was elected.
The charity said this means for each day the Government delays a ban, 70 households will be threatened with homelessness.
The Sun spoke to one couple who were forced out of their home before Christmas, leaving them scrambling to find a new place to live with their four kids.
Trevor and Tnaesha Twohig described receiving the no-fault eviction as "devastating and anxiety-inducing".
The Sun asked the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities to comment.
What else is included in the Renters' Reform Bill?
It's not just a ban on Section 21 evictions covered in the Renters' Reform Bill.
A host of other changes are included in the legislation. These are just a few of the major ones:
Ensuring possession grounds are fair to both parties - this will give tenants more security but also allow landlords to recover their properties "when reasonable".
Providing stronger protections against backdoor eviction - this will ensure tenants can appeal above-market rents which are designed to force them out.
Introduce a new Private Rented Sector Landlord Ombudsman - this will mean renters can get impartial help if they have a grievance with their landlord.
Give tenants strengthened rights to request a pet in the property - a landlord will have to consider this and cannot refuse it unreasonably.
Apply "Awaab's Law" to the sector - this will set clear legal expectations about the timeframes within which landlords in the private rented sector have to take action to make homes safe where they contain serious hazards.
Help you can get to pay rent
You might be able to get help via the Household Support Fund, which is worth £742million to councils in England.
What to do if you've been served a Section 21 notice
Here is what you can do, according to the Renters' Reform Coalition...
Check the form - A section 21 notice must be on an official form, known as a 6a form. Your landlord can't issue an eviction notice just by telling you in person or by text/email.
Check if the form is valid - you must be given at least two months notice to vacate a property. You also can't be given a section 21 if your tenancy started less than four months prior. If you are on a fixed term contract you can't receive a section 21 unless there is a break clause in it.
These things can also make a section 21 notice invalid:
The council have given your landlord an improvement notice to fix things, or an emergency works notice, in the last 6 months.
Your deposit isn't in a deposit protection scheme. In that case the landlord must return it to you before they can issue a section 21.
The property is a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) but it doesn't have a HMO licence from the council. In some areas all rented properties need a licence - check with your council.
The landlord has charged you illegal fees - such as a deposit worth more than 5 weeks rent, or admin fees. In this case they must return the money to you before serving a section 21.
You never received key paperwork for the property - the Energy Performance Certificate, the 'How to rent' guide, and a gas safety certificate (if there is gas).
What to do if the section 21 is valid:
You don't have to leave the property at the end of your section 21 notice. Your landlord still has to apply to court for a possession order and a warrant for eviction, to use court bailiffs to evict you.
If you are remaining in your property after the end of a section 21 notice, make sure you inform your landlord and continue to pay rent while you look for another place to live.
If you can't find somewhere to rent and are facing homelessness, tell your council immediately. They should be able to advise you on what to do and provide emergency temporary accommodation or other support.
Local authorities have until March 31, 2026, to allocate their share of the fund and can set their own eligibility criteria.
But you might be able to get free money through the fund which can be used to pay for rent.
Speak to your local council about what help is on offer. You can find your local council via www.gov.uk/find-local-council.
You might also be able to apply for a Discretionary Housing Payment to cover the cost of rent.
You can apply for a DHP if you get Housing Benefit or receive the housing element of Universal Credit.
Some charities offer grants to those struggle to make ends meet as well.
Use the Turn2Us grants search checker to see if you're eligible for anything - grants-search.turn2us.org.uk.
.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reform UK mayor under-fire over £1m community fund website
Reform UK mayor under-fire over £1m community fund website

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Reform UK mayor under-fire over £1m community fund website

One of Reform UK's metro mayors has been accused of misleading residents with a new website to promote a £1 million community fund. Olympic boxing champion and mayor of Hull and East Yorkshire Luke Campbell launched his fund last week with a website that invites locals to submit projects for consideration. But a Lib Dem councillor has accused Mr Campbell of using the website to harvest data for his Reform UK party, and of failing to get the appropriate sign-offs for his fund. In a video posted on his social media at the weekend, the mayor said: 'Exciting news. We have a £1 million community fund. 'This is a million pounds every year, for the next four years. 'I want to hand over the decision to the people of this region. 'Please tell me where you want to see this money being spent. It's all down to you.' Writing on X, councillor Tom Astell said that, although the website carries Hull and East Yorkshire Combined Authority branding, it is actually promoted by Reform UK. Mr Astell said: 'Your personal data goes to the party — not the Authority.' The councillor said: 'And the £1m fund? It doesn't exist. 'It has never been through the Combined Authority Executive Board. No decision. No approval. 'It's not even clear if the Combined Authority actually has the ability or monies available for such a fund.' Mr Astell said any spending of more than £250,000 has to be approved by the executive board as a 'key decision'. He said: 'So residents are being invited to pitch ideas for a fund that hasn't been agreed — while handing their data to a political party. 'This is a serious breach of trust. Public branding. Party data collection. A non-existent fund. Residents deserve honesty.' Mr Astell, who represents a ward in town of Beverley on East Riding of Yorkshire Council, said he has written to the combined authority's interim chief executive Mark Rogers about his concerns. He said: 'Public office is a public trust. Hull & East Yorkshire deserves honesty, not smoke and mirrors.' Mr Campbell was elected in May 2024, becoming one of two Reform metro mayors, along with Dame Andrea Jenkyns in Greater Lincolnshire. He won a gold medal at the 2012 London Olympics before embarking on a successful pro boxing career. The mayor's office has been approached for a comment.

Calm down, homeowners – Rachel Reeves' property tax might be an improvement
Calm down, homeowners – Rachel Reeves' property tax might be an improvement

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Calm down, homeowners – Rachel Reeves' property tax might be an improvement

Another day, another idea that Rachel Reeves is said to be considering. It's as if the chancellor is putting suggestions out there to see what sticks. Either that, or she just wants to be seen to be busy and to let it be known she has considered all options before delivering her autumn Budget, which is when we will discover for certain. What is clear is that Reeves has a funding gap to fill, and the backdrop – of stretched national and local public services and a flatlining economy – isn't pretty. Nor too is a regime of anachronistic, complex and often unfair taxes, especially regarding homes. The latest possibility for dissection and reaction then, is a new property tax, to replace stamp duty and council tax. First up would be an annual tax to replace stamp duty on homes worth more than £500,000, to be paid by owner-occupiers. The amount charged would be based on the value of the property according to a rate set by the government; HMRC would collect payment. The annual levy would not apply to second homes because they would still be subject to stamp duty, including the 5 per cent second home surcharge. The aim of this new national property tax would be the creation of a revenue source that is more reliable and not so prone to fluctuations in the housing market as stamp duty. It would be more efficient and practical, reflective of a current Britain (stamp duty, the oldest of all taxes, was born in 1694) and, crucially, would not be such a drag on home sales. Properties in the bracket below £500,000, upwards of £250,000, would be freed. Given that the average price of a home in the UK was £272,664 according to Nationwide, most homes would be liberated, including starter homes. It would prove easier and cheaper to move house and encourage greater mobility. Inevitably, the new tax will, and is, already being criticised as another 'wealth tax'. Quickest out of the traps was Location, Location, Location presenter Kirstie Allsopp who decried the suggestion of a property tax as 'really destabilising for the property market – and when I say the property market, I mean people's homes. This government seems to want to punish people for making the sacrifices they've made to buy their own homes.' Reeves and her advisers are letting it be known that they are following a report from the centre-right (so not leftist) think tank, Onward. It was Onward that came up with the £250,000-to-£500,000 net. Under the Onward plan, the suggested annual rate above £500,000 would be 0.54 per cent, and a home worth more than £1m would pay 0.81 per cent on the portion over that limit. Important, given the state of the nation's finances, is the possibility it will not actually raise more than stamp duty. Onward's recommendation that it should not be retrospective would mean stamp duty would not be scrapped in one go, the substitute being phased in gradually. So, it is no fiscal panacea, rather a nice thing to have. Onward also recommended ditching council tax, also loathed by left and right, and introducing a local proportional property tax. It would be charged yearly to homeowners, not residents, on properties up to £500,000. Like council tax, the rate would be set by local authorities, but Onward's guide of 0.44 per cent would mean a maximum bill of £2,196 a year, payable to the council. With properties worth more than £500,000, the government will step in and take an additional 0.54 per cent, also annually, on the portion above £500,000. Out would go the outdated and flawed council tax banding system assessed on property values from 1991. It would be fairer and would allow councils to retain a strong lever over their own finances. It could head off some of the council bankruptcies that are brewing. Unfortunately, though, it too is unlikely to prove a quick fix – experts are predicting it will take a while to implement. A test for Reeves and for Sir Keir Starmer would be, given their talk of wanting to go 'further and faster' and their commitment to removing bureaucracy, is just how soon any of these changes could come on-stream. The new local tax is also not especially redistributive – poor areas would still remain disadvantaged, affluent ones would still be able to bask in their good fortune. The new, national and local property tax would enjoy another advantage, in that Britain would operate under one structure. At present, stamp duty exists in England and Northern Ireland – Wales and Scotland do it their way. This would cut across, and while it might not be popular with nationalists it would be uniform. Above all, what is under discussion, if it is Onward, bearing in mind that other think tanks have their own ideas, is more appealing than the current mess. It is true that it is not hard, that anything would be better, but this does begin to feel like genuine reform and modernisation.

SNP leader provokes fresh rebellion over independence
SNP leader provokes fresh rebellion over independence

Telegraph

time24 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

SNP leader provokes fresh rebellion over independence

Rebel SNP members have lashed out at John Swinney after their alternative plan to achieve Scottish independence was blocked from being discussed at the party conference. They had unveiled a blueprint to open independence negotiations with the UK Government if nationalist parties got a majority of the popular vote in next year's Holyrood election. The plan differed markedly from Mr Swinney's proposal that the SNP winning an outright majority of seats in the election should force Sir Keir Starmer to allow another independence referendum. But a resolution outlining the rebel plan was not selected by a powerful party committee for discussion at October's conference, despite it being backed by 43 local branches. The Herald reported that it was excluded from a draft agenda for the conference, which has been distributed to members. Unless it is amended, this means that the rebel plan will not directly rival Mr Swinney's motion on his blueprint, which will be discussed and voted on by members at the Aberdeen gathering. It has previously emerged that some of the rebel group want to oust Mr Swinney as party leader amid concerns he is not doing enough to achieve independence. One SNP activist said: 'John Swinney last year made a point several times that he was going to listen to the membership. But he hasn't done so. 'There are just under 200 branches, nearly a quarter of all branches supported the resolution, but the party leadership is refusing to listen. 'If there is a difference of opinion between the leadership and the members then it should be debated at conference and conference should decide. To not let this resolution be debated at the conference is ignoring the internal democracy of the party.' A second activist, who supported the proposal, added: 'I am absolutely seething. I have never known a resolution with so much backing which has been so unceremoniously put to the side.' Mr Swinney has argued that the SNP winning an outright majority of seats next year should be the benchmark as this was the precedent set by the 2011 Holyrood election. Alex Salmond led the SNP to a majority win that year and David Cameron, the then prime minister, authorised the referendum that was lost by the nationalists in 2014. First Minister 'living in cuckoo land' But this is an extremely high bar and Alex Neil, a former SNP health secretary, previously told the Telegraph that Mr Swinney was 'living in cloud cuckoo land' given the current level of public support for the SNP. Under the rebel plan, independence negotiations would open between the Scottish and UK governments if the three nationalist parties – the SNP, the Greens and Alba – together achieve more than 50 per cent of the regional list vote. Successive UK governments have repeatedly turned down SNP calls for a second referendum, with the UK Supreme Court ruling in 2022 that only Westminster can allow another poll. Sir Keir said last month that he could not imagine another referendum being staged while he was prime minister and an SNP victory in the May 2026 election would not change his mind. Kenny MacAskill, the Alba Party leader and a former SNP justice secretary, said: 'You cannot expect the SNP members to unite behind a strategy when the views of 43 of its branches have been so casually dismissed. 'This is treating the grassroots of the party with utter contempt and is totally unacceptable in a democratic party.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store