logo
Bayer Appeals Roundup Case to Supreme Court as Legal Woes Mount

Bayer Appeals Roundup Case to Supreme Court as Legal Woes Mount

Bloomberg04-04-2025

Bayer AG said it's seeking a US Supreme Court review of litigation over the weedkiller Roundup, its latest effort to get beyond a mountain of legal woes.
The German company asked the high court on Friday to take up its appeal of a 2023 verdict from a St. Louis trial in which a jury ordered Bayer to pay $1.25 million in compensatory damages to plaintiff John Durnell, according to a statement. No punitive damages were awarded in the case.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BioNTech buys mRNA, courtroom rival CureVac in all-stock deal
BioNTech buys mRNA, courtroom rival CureVac in all-stock deal

Yahoo

time17 hours ago

  • Yahoo

BioNTech buys mRNA, courtroom rival CureVac in all-stock deal

This story was originally published on BioPharma Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily BioPharma Dive newsletter. COVID vaccine maker BioNTech is buying rival CureVac, announcing Thursday an all-stock deal weeks before the two companies were due to face off in a German court over potentially billions of dollars worth of royalties related to intellectual property on messenger RNA drugs. Per deal terms, each CureVac share will be exchanged for about $5.46 worth of BioNTech's U.S.-listed shares, valuing the company at $1.25 billion. Upon the deal's close, CureVac shareholders will own between 4% and 6% of BioNTech. In the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, BioNTech and CureVac were among the companies racing to develop the first coronavirus vaccines. BioNTech, however, partnered with Pfizer and won approval of the first COVID-19 shot, while CureVac's program never made it to market. The two companies have since been embroiled in patent litigation. CureVac was a leading candidate to develop the first COVID-19 vaccine, launching rumors, later denied, that the U.S. government might even buy the company or its research. But while BioNTech and fellow mRNA drugmaker Moderna succeeded in making vaccines that saved millions of lives and earned billions of dollars in revenue, CureVac fell short. Its initial project wasn't effective enough at preventing sickness, prompting it to scrap development. A year later, CureVac sued BioNTech, claiming it infringed four patents. CureVac has since changed course, selling off most rights to influenza and COVID-19 vaccines to partner GSK and focusing on cancer instead. But its legal spat with BioNTech has lingered. The European Patent Office had upheld two CureVac patents, and a trial in a Dusseldorf regional court was set on July 1 to determine if BioNTech had infringed on them. A separate trial in the U.S. was scheduled to begin Sept. 8 in Virginia. Some Wall Street analysts, as a result, speculated that BioNTech's primary purpose is buying CureVac is to sidestep the risk of a loss in court. A single-digit percentage royalty awarded to CureVac could've cost BioNTech as much as $3 billion, Evercore ISI analyst Umer Raffat wrote in a note to clients. 'It seems to us that [BioNTech] assessed the cost of a cash settlement as substantially greater than the cost of buying [CureVac] outright,' Raffat wrote. The deal could also help BioNTech further its oncology ambitions. Like CureVac, BioNTech has made cancer research a top priority. It's invested in a variety of programs, from cell therapies to mRNA vaccines and a coveted type of bispecific antibody. Some are in advanced testing. CureVac's cancer vaccines are in earlier phases of development. A brain cancer shot has delivered early clinical data, while a lung cancer immunotherapy was cleared in April for human testing. The deal should help CureVac because of 'the early stage of the oncology pipeline and the need for a development partner to effectively compete in personalized cancer vaccines – which [BioNTech] is well positioned to execute,' wrote Leerink Partners analyst Mani Foroohar. Raffat, of Evercore ISI, however, wrote that the deal ascribes 'very little value' to CureVac's pipeline. Recommended Reading Recursion to acquire two Canadian drug discovery startups Sign in to access your portfolio

David Lynch Explains Florian Wirtz's Liverpool Move
David Lynch Explains Florian Wirtz's Liverpool Move

Yahoo

time17 hours ago

  • Yahoo

David Lynch Explains Florian Wirtz's Liverpool Move

Liverpool's Elite Move for Florian Wirtz Signals a Bold New Era Florian Wirtz Deal Shows Liverpool Are Shopping Top Shelf Liverpool supporters woke up to a seismic shift on Friday the 13th. Contrary to superstition, it proved a day of jubilation as the club confirmed a deal with Bayer Leverkusen for Florian Wirtz. As revealed on Anfield Index's Media Matters podcast, journalist David Lynch was unequivocal in describing it: 'This is a huge, huge transfer.' Speaking with host Dave Davis, Lynch highlighted the rarity and scale of this kind of signing: 'To win one of those races is rare… Liverpool have seen off every competitor to sign one of the most exciting young players in world football.' That list of competitors, notably including Bayern Munich and Manchester City, makes the capture all the more impressive. Recruitment Confidence and a Club on the Rise Though Liverpool's recruitment strategy has historically leaned towards undervalued talents, Lynch was quick to stress that this isn't a shift in philosophy. 'People at Liverpool actually suggest to you this isn't actually a departure from our approach,' he said. 'Every time there's a transformational signing on the market who wants to join us… we will push the money out there.' Advertisement He added that the attacking profile naturally drives the fee up — reported in UK media as £100 million plus £16 million in potential bonuses — but reaffirmed confidence in the club's current recruitment staff. 'They've been able to convince him this is the right place in sporting merit over other places,' said Lynch. The role of key Liverpool figures also came under praise. Lynch noted, 'Well done to Richard Hughes… well done to Arne Slot.' It's understood that their meeting with Wirtz was pivotal, showcasing not just a vision of collective success but also a tailored development path. More Than Just a Fee: Wirtz's Character and Commitment What stands out is not just the financial package or the skill set Wirtz brings, but the player's decision-making. 'City would have been the easy option. Bayern Munich would have been the easy option,' Lynch emphasised. 'To come to Liverpool, to accept lesser wages because you believe in the sporting project… for me is something special.' Advertisement While Lynch acknowledged he's no expert on German football personalities, he drew a telling comparison with another transformative Liverpool signing. 'It was hugely significant that Virgil van Dijk chose Liverpool,' he explained. Wirtz's decision to join despite more lucrative options, in Lynch's eyes, hints at a character aligned with Liverpool's ethos. What Wirtz Brings to Liverpool's Attack On the pitch, the excitement is just as real. Lynch pointed to the statistical dominance of Wirtz's performances. 'The numbers are unbelievable… assists, goals, chance creation — he's good at absolutely everything in the final third.' There is still uncertainty around where Wirtz will line up under Slot. Lynch admitted, 'I haven't heard anything specifically on position yet,' though speculation around a number 10 role or even as a false nine remains strong. Advertisement What is certain is Wirtz's versatility and quality. As Lynch put it, 'He defends a little bit like an attacking midfielder rather than an out-and-out number 10.' With Liverpool having 'walked the league last season,' adding such a dynamic talent could widen the gap even further. 'If you're one of the rivals… you'd be seriously worried,' said Lynch. Final Word: A Statement of Intent 'This is not normally like Liverpool,' said Dave Davis during the discussion, and he's right. This signing is bolder, louder and utterly deliberate. It speaks of a club ready not just to maintain its position but to dominate. Liverpool have made their move. The Premier League has been warned.

Tesla Drivers Sue Elon Musk for Turning Their Cars Into "Extreme" Right-Wing Symbols
Tesla Drivers Sue Elon Musk for Turning Their Cars Into "Extreme" Right-Wing Symbols

Yahoo

time18 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Tesla Drivers Sue Elon Musk for Turning Their Cars Into "Extreme" Right-Wing Symbols

Tesla drivers in France are suing Elon Musk's EV maker for turning their vehicles into what they characterize as "extreme-right" symbols. As news agency France 24 reports, the owners are demanding that their lease contracts be terminated and reimbursed for the accrued legal costs. "Because of Elon Musk's actions... Tesla branded vehicles have become strong political symbols and now appear to be veritable extreme-right 'totems,'" said GKA, the law firm representing the owners, in a statement, "to the dismay of those who acquired them with the sole aim of possessing an innovative and ecological vehicle." As a result, they are being prevented from "fully enjoying their car," the firm added. The suit highlights how damaging Musk's well-documented embrace of far-right ideologies has been. The mercurial CEO made two Nazi salutes during an election event earlier this year, and has appeared via video link at German and Italian far right political rallies — actions that have thrown the carmaker into chaos and car buyers running the other way. Musk's political realignment has proven immensely unpopular among consumers, causing sales of his carmaker to crater worldwide and leaving a massive dent in Tesla's finances. New Tesla registrations in Europe dropped by a stunning 53 percent last month, indicating continued and widespread disillusionment and disgust with Musk's actions. Meanwhile, frustrated owners have desperately been looking for ways to ditch their Teslas in light of a massive protest movement aimed at Musk's carmaker. Worse yet, resale values of the EVs have tanked as well, leaving owners between a rock and a hard place. Some embarrassed drivers have resorted to slapping stickers that read "I bought this before Elon went crazy" on their bumpers. The French clients who are now suing Elon Musk's carmaker argue Tesla owes them financially for all the drama and embarrassment. "The situation is both unexpected and impossible for French Tesla owners," lawyer Patrick Klugman, who's representing them, told France 24. "Musk's political positions have interrupted enjoyment" of their cars, he added, and "we believe that Mr Musk owes these buyers the peaceful possession of the thing sold." More on Tesla: You Are Completely Unprepared for What Tesla's Robotaxi Actually Looks Like

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store