2 lawsuits against Summit allowed to advance; a third case is pending
Two North Dakota judges have ruled that lawsuits filed by landowners against carbon pipeline company Summit Carbon Solutions can proceed over objections about court procedures.
Several landowners are suing Iowa-based Summit Carbon Solutions, which is attempting to build a network of pipelines across five states. The pipelines would take carbon dioxide emissions captured at ethanol plants to sites in western North Dakota for permanent underground storage.
Attorneys for Summit had filed motions to dismiss the lawsuits, arguing that not all parties involved were properly notified and that the cases were not filed in the proper court.
Iowa Senate passes bill restricting eminent domain for carbon pipelines
South Central Judicial District Court Judge Pam Nesvig issued her ruling Friday rejecting Summit's arguments in one case in which landowners are suing Summit and the North Dakota Public Service Commission.
South Central Judicial District Court Judge Jackson Lofgren filed a similar ruling Tuesday in another case in which landowners are suing Summit entities and the North Dakota Industrial Commission.
The Public Service Commission in November granted Summit a permit for its pipeline route, about 333 miles through southeast and south-central North Dakota.
The Industrial Commission in December granted permits for underground permanent storage of carbon dioxide in Oliver, Mercer and Morton counties.
South Central Judicial District Court Judge David Reich has yet to rule on a motion to dismiss in another case where Burleigh County is suing the North Dakota Public Service Commission and Summit Carbon Solutions.
Among the issues raised in the PSC cases is that the agency did not give enough consideration to the safety of residents along the pipeline route. The lawsuit also challenges the PSC's ruling that state zoning rules trump county zoning ordinances on pipelines.
The PSC ruled last year that a 2019 state law gives the state the upper hand on pipeline setbacks – such as how far away the pipeline must be from a residence – after Summit said Emmons and Burleigh had passed unreasonable set ordinances.
In the Industrial Commission case, landowners contend the state Department of Mineral Resources withheld information about Summit's models that would predict where the carbon dioxide would move when the gas is pumped underground. The Industrial Commission oversees the Department of Mineral Resources, which recommended approving the storage permits. About 92% of landowners have voluntarily agreed to participate in the storage facility.
CO2 storage law challenged in North Dakota Supreme Court hearing
In yet another case, the North Dakota Supreme Court heard arguments last month in a challenge to a state law related to underground storage of CO2.
The Northwest Landowners Association and other landowners contend a state law that can force landowners to take part in an underground CO2 storage project through a process called amalgamation is unconstitutional. Summit Carbon Solutions is taking part in the defense of that law along with the state of North Dakota and the Industrial Commission. An attorney for Minnkota Power, who joined the Industrial Commission in arguing to the Supreme Court, said a small percentage of property owners should not be able to deny a majority the right to develop their property.
Summit's pipelines are planned to connect 57 ethanol plants, including Tharaldson Ethanol at Casselton, to the underground carbon storage sites.
Summit so far has been denied a permit in South Dakota. It has obtained permits in Iowa and for part of its Minnesota route. Nebraska has no state permitting for carbon pipelines.
Supporters of the Summit project say it would support the ethanol industry by lowering the carbon intensity score of the ethanol plants, opening up potential sales in low-carbon fuel markets.
The project would take advantage of federal tax credits promoting carbon sequestration to combat greenhouse gas emissions.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
a few seconds ago
- New York Post
Putin claims Ukraine should give up Donetsk because Russia will conquer region by October —despite a decade of failing to do so
Russian leader Vladimir Putin reportedly told President Trump his forces could conquer the long-sought-after Donetsk region by October if Ukraine didn't give up the land as part of a peace deal — but Kyiv and US observers point out that the Kremlin has failed to take it for more than a decade. While intelligence varies on Russia's advancements along the frontlines, one US assessment agrees that Putin could succeed in conquering the remaining 30% of Donetsk that he does not control by October, Axios reported. Experts at the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), a Washington-based think tank that has tracked the granular progress of the war since its start, however, point out that Russia has been unable to seize the region through three and a half years of bloody war — and 11 years of Kremlin-backed rebellion before that. 6 Russian President Vladimir Putin reportedly told President Trump at the Alaska summit last week that he will be able to capture Ukraine's Donetsk region by October. POOL/AFP via Getty Images And there's no reason Moscow will suddenly break through Ukraine's most heavily fortified frontline. 'Even if we're being generous to the Russians and say they can maintain their current advance, which we know they can't keep up and have been pushed back from… It would take about 475 days for Russia to take the entirety of Donetsk, that's December 2026,' George Barros, the head of the ISW's Russia team, told the Post. 'And I think that's putting it generously. To say Moscow can take it by October seems hyperbolic.' Ukrainian sources who also spoke with The Post were incredulous about the alleged intelligence assessment that Kyiv could lose Donetsk. 'Donetsk by October? They've been saying that since February of '22,' an American serving in the Ukrainian Armed Services said. 6 A Ukrainian soldier giving an order to a captured Russian troop in the Donetsk region on Aug. 17, 2025. Getty Images Speaking with Trump in Alaska on Friday, Putin demanded Donetsk be handed to him as a condition for ending his full-scale invasion of Ukraine, along with demanding the Luhansk, Crimea, Zaporizhia and Kherson regions. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has scoffed at the proposal to give up land where his forces have fended off Russian soldiers who have outgunned and outnumbered the defenders. A source familiar with the talks described negotiations over the fate of Donetsk as 'the ball game.' 'Every issue is an ancillary issue, except Donetsk,' the source previously told The Post. 6 Ukrainians firing an anti-aircraft gun at Russian drones in the Donetsk region on Aug. 15, 2025. Getty Images Moscow has launched four notable campaigns over the last year to take the remainder of Donetsk, with each major operation failing and resulting in Russia's advancement of just over six miles, according to the ISW. The quagmire is emblematic in the Russian operation to take the town of Toretsk, which finally fell under Moscow's control on Aug. 1 after 14 months of fighting, with the Kremlin currently struggling to keep the 6.4 miles of land. 'Russia's big push is happening in the summer, which has always been the case, but come fall, with the muddy season, things are going to slow down again,' Barros noted. 'Russia won't be able to sustain this push.' 6 Putin demanded that Ukraine give up Donetsk as a condition for ending the invasion. Vyacheslav Prokofyev, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP Moscow faced a similar struggle in taking the city of Avdiivka, with a US military veteran, known by the callsign 'Jackie,' noting that Ukraine's defenses continue to defy the odds. 'It took the Russians from 2017 to 2024 to take Avdiivka,' Jakie, a spokesman with the 3rd Assault Battalion said. 'I fought in the Battle of Bahkmut where I counted eight Russian shells fired for every one Ukrainian response. 'And that was during the lulls, during enemy pushes they were shooting 15-to-1 and it still took them 10 months,' he added. 6 A man carrying his belongings out of a building hit by a Russian strike in Bilozerske in Ukraine's Donetsk region on Aug. 12, 2025. Photo by GENYA SAVILOV/AFP via Getty Images After claiming Avdiivka, Moscow set its sights on Pokrovsk, a logistical hub in eastern Ukraine that Russia claimed to be making advancements in last week along with Dobropillia. The city, however, continues to repel Russia's soldiers, with more than 400 Moscow troops killed after last week's push, according to Kyiv. Zelensky and his top commanders also noted that Kyiv still holds the strategic cities of Sloviansk and Kramators, which have served as a 'fortress belt' protecting Donbas, the land comprised of the Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts. 6 A house destroyed by Russian shelling in Donetsk seen on Aug. 18, 2025. REUTERS/Alexander Ermochenko 'They remain Ukraine's main strongholds in Donbas, and the enemy does not have sufficient forces to storm them,' Kyiv said in a statement. 'Russia's capture of the entire Donetsk region — including the cities of Sloviansk, Kramatorsk, Druzhkivka, Dobropillia, and others — by October is impossible given the scale of losses and the inability of Russian forces to advance at the required pace,' the officials added. Kyiv claims that Russia is suffering 1,200 casualties per day, matching estimates from western officials and think tanks, with the US veteran Jackie saying that Ukrainian soldiers will continue to fight to the last man to keep the invaders out of Donbas. 'If you think Ukrainians are going to give up Kramatorsk and Sloviansk, I suggest asking a Texan if Davy Crockett should have given up the Alamo,' the American said. Despite the Trump administration's latest suggestion that Ukraine will have to concede land to end the war, Kyiv maintains that territory not currently occupied by Russian soldiers is off the table. 'It's not acceptable, but we don't want to be the person who said 'no,' because for us, it's important to go forward [with the US],' a Kyiv official exclusively told The Post. 'We definitely, honestly, believe that just Trump can end this war.'
Axios
a few seconds ago
- Axios
Sugar Creek motel rooms are being turned into $1,000/month apartments
Two budget motels in the West Sugar Creek area are being converted into studio apartments with rents starting at about $1,000 — a rarity in Charlotte. Why it matters: The conversions replace crime-linked motels with much-needed, organically affordable housing in northeast Charlotte, a roughly 20-minute drive to Uptown. The latest: This is Washington-based Sage Investment Group's first adaptive reuse conversion project in Charlotte. The Charlie Apartments is beginning leasing at the end of September. Construction began at the former Rodeway Inn and Speedway Inn in January and is expected to be completed by the end of the year. By the numbers: The floor plans range from 298 to 673 square feet and rent for $1,070 to $1,299, plus fees for pest control, cable and internet. Units under $1,000 a month are disappearing in America, declining by around 30% over the past decade, per a Harvard report. Between the lines: Converting motels into housing is a fast and relatively low-cost process, making it an attractive investment. The motels already come with amenities like pools and gyms. Yes, but: During a construction tour, Sage's team told Axios they often uncover unforeseen issues once they're inside the walls. It's also a significant effort to rework all the mechanical wiring. Typically, people are living in these hotels, providing another challenge. With the help of Crisis Assistance Ministry, Sage rehoused about 60 people who were living in the motels during the acquisition. The big picture: Charlotte is actively trying to revitalize the Sugar Creek and I-85 intersection, a high-crime area. The city even bought a motel itself to tear down and is partnering with a private developer to build affordable townhomes on the site. The Charlie Apartments will be a gated community with a full security camera system. The city's Corridors of Opportunity program provided $50,000 for local artists Jen Hill and Liz Haywood to paint murals on the property. Sage is gathering feedback on what the community wants to see. What's next: Sage is already eyeing two other properties for conversions in the Charlotte market — another in Sugar Creek and one off Tuckaseegee Road. Tour the construction. Sage is converting the old hotel lobby into a temporary leasing office. Later, it will become bike storage. This area between the two motels will become an amenity called "The Porch" with grilling stations, rocking chairs, dining tables and yard games. The second hotel was in poorer condition and required more structural repairs to address water damage and stabilize the building. It will open after the first building. The pool is being renovated and brought up to code. There will be another amenity space close by with a fireplace and seating. This is the entrance to the future clubhouse, with a fitness center, leasing office, coworking space and restrooms.
Axios
a few seconds ago
- Axios
Mega-landlord settles with DOJ for Mass. price fixing claims
The U.S. Department of Justice and the landlord Greystar Management Services reached a deal to settle their legal fight over claims that the company used an algorithmic software to fix rental prices. Why it matters: Greystar, the nation's largest landlord, runs apartment complexes across Massachusetts, including in Brighton, Revere and East Boston. The big picture: The price fixing allegations come as the state grapples with a worsening housing crisis, partly due to limited housing supply. Catch up quick: Six states and the DOJ sued the company behind the rent-setting software, Texas-based RealPage, last year, accusing the company of illegal price fixing and monopolization. Massachusetts and Illinois then joined an amended version of the lawsuit that named South Carolina-based Greystar and five other landlords. They accused the six landlords of colluding to raise rents across their properties, relying on RealPage's software. State of play: Greystar agreed in the settlement to stop using any "anticompetitive algorithm" that sets rental prices using competitors' sensitive pricing data, per the settlement. The company also agreed to stop sharing its own sensitive information with competitors, stop attending RealPage's meetings convening competing landlords, accept a court-appointed monitor and cooperate with part of the federal legal fight against RealPage. By the numbers: A White House report estimates that renters whose landlords used RealPage's algorithm paid an additional $70 a month on average in 2023. For Boston-area renters, the cost was $79 a month, per the analysis. The report happened independently of the multi-state lawsuit. That lawsuit didn't specify which Greystar properties used the algorithm. What they're saying: Greystar didn't admit any wrongdoing as part of the settlement. The company said in a statement that it "firmly believes that its use of RealPage's revenue management software complies with all applicable laws." "We entered into these settlements to make clear the government's interpretation of the law and to ensure we continue to do things the right way," the company wrote. Flashback: A 2022 ProPublica story revealed that RealPage worked with landlords to set rents nationwide in what legal experts said "may be artificially inflating rents and stifling competition." When the multi-state lawsuit began, RealPage refuted the allegations about its software with a six-page statement, saying landlords set their own prices and that RealPage "helps ensure that prospective residents have access to the best pricing available." One other landlord, Cortland, agreed to a settlement after being named in the amended lawsuit earlier this year.
