Failing water firms forced to pay ten times as much compensation
People whose homes are left flooded could get twice as much money in compensation from water companies after a shake-up of the payout scheme.
Reimbursements for a range of issues, from cancelled appointments to late restoration of supply, will be boosted from today.
It means those who consistently face low pressure in their homes could go from getting a maximum payout of £25 once a year to £50 up to five times each financial year.
And the top amount of compensation for victims of internal flooding from sewers will double from £1,000 to £2,000.
Environment Secretary Steve Reed said: 'Too many water companies are letting down their customers – with leaking pipes, poor water supply and low water pressure.
'The government is holding water companies to account by making them put money back into people's pockets when they fail their customers.'
Sign up to Metro's politics newsletter, Alright Gov?
Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here.
Compensation will also be awarded for a wider range of issues from later this year, the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said.
They will include times when customers are asked to boil their water due to a contaminated supply.
At least 46 people fell in in Brixham last May due to a waterborne disease (Picture:)
That was the case last year in the Devon town of Brixham, where some South West Water customers had to boil their water for more than a month due to a Cryptosporidium outbreak.
The government said the changes to the Guaranteed Standards Scheme (GSS) announced today were the first raise in compensation rates for 25 years.
How water supply compensation is changing Internal flooding from sewers : Previously minimum of £150 and maximum of £1,000, rising to minimum of £300 and maximum of £2,000
: Previously minimum of £150 and maximum of £1,000, rising to minimum of £300 and maximum of £2,000 External flooding from sewers : Previously minimum of £75 and maximum of £500, rising to minimum of £150 and maximum of £1,000
: Previously minimum of £75 and maximum of £500, rising to minimum of £150 and maximum of £1,000 Low pressure : Previously £25 once a year, rising to £50 up to five times a year for total of £250
: Previously £25 once a year, rising to £50 up to five times a year for total of £250 Supply not restored on time : Previously £20 for households, with £10 for each subsequent 24 hours, and £50 for non-households, with £25 for each subsequent 24 hours. Rising to £50 for households with £50 for each subsequent 24 hours, and £100 for non-households with £100 for each subsequent 24 hours
: Previously £20 for households, with £10 for each subsequent 24 hours, and £50 for non-households, with £25 for each subsequent 24 hours. Rising to £50 for households with £50 for each subsequent 24 hours, and £100 for non-households with £100 for each subsequent 24 hours Planned interruption to supply lasting more than four hours, with less than 48 hours' notice : Previously £20 for households and £50 for non-households, rising to £50 for households and £100 for non-households
: Previously £20 for households and £50 for non-households, rising to £50 for households and £100 for non-households Failure to make automatic compensation payment : Previously £10 to £20 for households and £10 to £50 for non-households, rising to £40 for households and £100 for non-households
: Previously £10 to £20 for households and £10 to £50 for non-households, rising to £40 for households and £100 for non-households Appointments not kept : Previously £20, rising to £50
: Previously £20, rising to £50 Appointments not made properly : Previously £20, rising to £40
: Previously £20, rising to £40 Failure to action complaints, account queries, or requests to change payment arrangements on time: Previously £20, rising to £40
Ofwat Chief Executive David Black said: 'When customers suffer from problems like low pressure, disruptions to supply or sewer flooding they can experience major stress and inconvenience, and payment amounts must recognise the disruption to their lives when standards are not met.
'These new changes are another way to make sure customers are protected when companies get it wrong.'
Liberal Democrat environment spokesperson Tim Farron said 'half-baked announcements' wouldn't achieve the 'fundamental reform' his party believes is needed in the sector.
He said: 'To create real change in our failing water industry, the regulator Ofwat must be abolished and replaced with a tough new regulator that can hold companies accountable.'
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
Arrow MORE: Inside 'Alligator Alcatraz', the abandoned airport turned Trump's migrant detention facility
Arrow MORE: Let's give back to the environment on David Attenborough's 100th birthday
Arrow MORE: Major parental leave review launched with current system 'not working'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
17 hours ago
- Metro
I'm a single mum on benefits — this is exactly what I spend my money on
Welcome back to Me and My Money, Metro's series taking a look at the UK's spending and saving habits. This week we meet Danielle Taylor*, 26, who is a single mother to a 4-year-old son who has a rare genetic condition that means he needs round-the-clock support. Danielle, who lives in Greater Manchester, hopes to be able to work when her son starts school full-time from September. Here, she explains how she manages without being able to earn an income. Income: Universal credit: £1,029 Disability benefit: £740 Total: £1,769 Main monthly outgoings: Council tax: £13 (discounted rate) Gas and electric: £250 Water: £70 Internet: £44 Food: £200 Transport (taxis): £200 – £250 Driving lessons: £149.50 (2 x 2 hour lessons) Loan: £50 Total: £976.50 – £1,026.50 (Rent of £433 is covered by the council) My son, Clayton, was born with a rare genetic condition that means he may never walk or talk. He also can't eat and had a feeding tube fitted last month. I'm a single parent with very little support, although I do get help from my family nearby and charities when I can. I've tried to apply for respite care, to give me a break, but I've been told Clayton's needs aren't high enough, although I think it's more because of his young age. Clayton is currently at pre-school, attending three hours a day term time. This will go up to standard school six-hour days when he starts reception at the same school in September. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video I'm counting down the days, to be honest, because I'm hoping the longer days will give me a better chance at finding work – although my employer would have to be flexible and understanding of my situation. Because of Clayton's condition, he needs 24/7 care all the time and he has various hospital appointments. I don't mind what kind of work I do. When I was younger I used to want to work with children with disabilities, helping them with sports and activities. But now I have a child with a disability myself, I want a break from caring for other people. Because I don't earn an income from work, I rely on benefits. I get Universal Credit of just over £1,000 a month and Clayton gets £740 through the Disability Living Allowance (DLA). This takes my total monthly income to £1,769, which typically pays the bills on my two-bedroom bungalow with not much to spare. Our rent of £432 a month is covered by the local authority and paid directly to the landlord. My energy bill is around £250 a month, water £70 and I spend around £150 to £200 a month on food. I eat a lot of convenience food because Clayton is nil by mouth so I tend to make it easy for myself, but I'm aware I could spend less by doing more food prep. Clayton has prescribed milk and water through his feeding tube. We find the money ok to manage on – it covers the bills and extras that Clayton wants or needs. He likes being outdoors, swimming and bubbles. We have a taxi provided by the council to take him to school and back, but otherwise transport costs can be high for me as I tend to take taxis after having a bad experience on a crowded bus when there wasn't enough space for Clayton's adapted pushchair. I'm currently having driving lessons so that I'll be able to drive us around. The lessons cost £345 for a block of 10 and I have a two-hour lesson every fortnight. If I need to make any large purchases, I have the option to borrow the money. I'm signed up to Creditspring, a regulated responsible lender that doesn't charge interest on its loans. I pay £10 a month to borrow up to £300 twice a year. I recently borrowed £250 to buy Clayton an adapted ball pit and I'm currently paying the loan back at £50 a month. Clayton loves sensory experiences so it's the best purchase I've got for him. He bangs his head a lot and this one has extra padding so it reduces the risk of him hurting himself. Clayton's dad has never met Clayton since the day he was born. He just didn't want to have kids. He was in the army and was worried he would be tied down. The relationship didn't work out and I went it alone. He does not give any financial support and I've not been able to get anywhere legally. More Trending When Clayton was little, he needed blood testing from his father to try to establish the genetic issue. I tried to persuade him to do a blood sample but he refused. I've also tried to go through the Child Maintenance Service (CSA) to claim financial support from Clayton's dad. But the CSA said that because he has a common name and they didn't know his address because he travelled with the army, I couldn't get anywhere. It's disgraceful that men can get away with this. I'd like to continue fighting for Clayton's dad to support him but I don't know where to go next. My next priorities are to pass my driving test and to get a job so I can earn money to give us better experiences. View More » *Surname changed. MORE: I told my husband 'we're over' after carrying the mental load alone MORE: Martin Lewis reveals why these accounts are 'unbeatable' — despite savers feeling 'conned' MORE: Primark makes 'life-changing' overhaul to range across all UK stores Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
Home sales crater to 13-year low... and realtors warn the next step is every American's worst fear
America's spring homebuying season just hit its weakest point in over a decade — marking the slowest market since 2012 and sparking fears that a full-blown price collapse could be next. Spring is traditionally the hottest time for pending home sales but that's no longer the case in the in the now struggling US housing market. In 2025, April through June brought the lowest sales in 13 years, according to Redfin. The once-reliable season fizzled as sky-high mortgage rates, stubbornly elevated prices, and growing economic uncertainty pushed buyers to the sidelines. 'People say price solves everything,' Atlanta real estate veteran Glennda Baker told Bloomberg. 'But price doesn't solve uncertainty.' She currently has 21 listings — a personal high — is now urging clients to slash prices to sell. Earlier in the year, analysts hoped the market might rebound as mortgage rates dipped slightly and listing prices softened. But that flicker of optimism has faded. Hesitant buyers, mounting price cuts, and frustrated sellers have left what agents are now calling a 'paralyzed' market — one that, realtors warn, may only revive if sellers start slashing prices in earnest. 'We thought we hit rock bottom but we keep discovering there's more rock bottom to be had,' said Chen Zhao, head of economics research at Redfin. Redfin's findings confirm what brokers across the country already know. Lack of showings, showings, weak offers, and growing desperation among sellers is not helping the market. Some sellers are pulling homes off the market entirely — de-listing their properties because they won't get asking price. Experts predict it's not going to get batter any time soon. 'The outlook for the housing market is dire,' said Thomas Ryan of Capital Economics. 'Affordability is at its worst since the 1980s. Nothing has changed on that front.' The market is playing out differently across the country, though. In the Northeast and Midwest, the scarcity of listings is still keeping home prices high. But in Sun Belt metros like Florida, Texas and Nevada, inventory keeps piling up and sales are plunging. Chen Zhao, the head of economics research for Redfin, says 'more rock bottom to be had' In Las Vegas, active listings have soared more than 38 percent year-over-year, while sales have dropped 15 percent, Redfin reported. 'The fear of missing out has shifted from buyers to sellers,' said Angela O'Hare, a Las Vegas-based agent. 'Sellers who need to sell will make it happen. I had a listing at $950,000. I cut it down to $799,000 and had three offers.' Some luxury enclaves like Narragansett, RI, are starting to show signs of uncertainty. 'We're seeing a lot more price decreases throughout Rhode Island now,' said Johnny Sheil, of Mott & Chace Sotheby's International Realty. 'Uncertainty scares some people.' Experts also warn there's little chance of a dramatic turnaround for the remainder of the summer. Meanwhile, the surplus of homes is so bad in some US metros that it's become a sellers worst nightmare. In one instance, Cape Coral, Florida, has become a place people are desperately trying to escape, with for sale signs popping up on lawns all over town. But no one will touch their properties. Open houses are empty, foreclosure 'boat tours' take locals around to see homes that the bank has repossessed, and half-built homes are left to rot. 'It is one of the worst real estate markets for a seller right now,' local realtor José Echevarria told the Daily Mail. Prices in Cape Coral have been slashed for more than 50 percent of homes over the past two years - more than any other major metro area in the US, he added.
Scotsman
2 days ago
- Scotsman
Why Labour's Ed Miliband is moving too quickly towards end of North Sea oil and gas
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... In the days before he was Secretary of State for Energy, Ed Miliband once described me to a group of people as his 'lift buddy'. As his office was then directly above mine, it was where we bumped into each other. Our conversations were generally about energy, and while we agreed on the need for change, we tended to differ on how, and how quickly. For me, energy security and employment, never mind keeping the lights on, are key. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad I think it's fair to describe the Energy Secretary as favouring a speedier end to all oil production. In recent days, the topic has begun to dominate the airwaves as golf course entrepreneur and US President Donald Trump, and then environment charities, threw scorn on developments of offshore wind farms. Unlikely bedfellows, and although their reasons are very different, they reflect a growing unease. READ MORE: Chancellor Rachel Reeves defends windfall tax on oil and gas giants on visit to Scotland Ed Miliband tours Balltech Engineering Solutions, which specialises in offshore wind as well as oil and gas engineering, in Morecambe (Picture: Christopher Furlong) | Getty Images For Trump there is the dual scourge of spoiling the view from his controversial golf developments on a previous Site of Special Scientific Interest on the Aberdeenshire coast, and going against his 'drill baby drill' philosophy. For his former environmental opponents, it is about protecting wildlife. While I have a lot of sympathy with the latter, I also agree with those pointing to the irony of our growing dependence on gas imports rather than using our own. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Add that to the concerns that Chinese involvement in, and control of, windfarm facilities might threaten our energy security and it seems the future picture is far from universally agreed. Oil and gas supporters have long warned that premature shutdown of the North Sea would mean importing carbon fuels from countries with fewer safeguards and damaging our carbon footprint in the process. This week their argument has been given fresh impetus as government figures show UK gas imports grew by 20 per cent between January and March this year. With damaging price increases caused by our dependence on Russian gas supplies at the outbreak of war in Ukraine still fresh in the public memory, reliance on any foreign source feels risky and even unnecessary. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Will this autumn's Budget signal a change of direction from Downing Street? The Climate Change Committee has estimated that between 13 and 15 billion barrels of oil and gas could still be needed while we work towards net zero. Experts reckon that our domestic production could only fulfil about one third of that. If it could be doubled, it would not only reduce our foreign dependence, but industry lobby group Offshore Energy UK claim it could raise more than £160 billion of useful revenue. There is no simple or cheap solution. Shutting down the North Sea now might seem on the surface like the best way to ensure net zero, but it brings a host of other obstacles to overcome. Conversely, continuing to depend too heavily on a naturally declining basin would not only delay net zero but wouldn't guarantee cheaper energy. Getting the balance right will be the key and right now I am not sure that we have it right, either to protect the climate or help the Exchequer stabilise our economy and create growth. Once the UK Parliament returns, I will be looking to my lift buddy to navigate the best route forward.
