UK to lower national voting age to 16 under government proposals
If passed by the parliament, the proposed reforms, unveiled Thursday, would bring national votes in line with elections in Scotland, Wales and the Channel Islands, where younger voters already cast ballots.
'Young people deserve to have a stake and to have a say in the future of our democracy,' said Rushanara Ali, parliamentary under-secretary for local government in the House of Commons on Thursday.
'When we came into power just over a year ago, the government committed through its manifesto to bring forward measures to strengthen our precious democracy and uphold the integrity of our elections.'
The UK's move, which could be in place for the next general election, follows a growing global trend toward younger enfranchisement.
Darren Hughes, chief executive of the Electoral Reform Society, welcomed the proposed reforms, telling CNN that lowering the voting age would 'help more young people to cast that all-important, habit-forming vote at a point when they can be supported with civic education.'
'Participation is a vital sign of the health of our democracy. If fewer people vote, our democracy becomes weaker,' he added.
In 2008, Austria became the first European country to lower its national voting age to 16, with Malta adopting the change a decade later. In South America, countries including Brazil, Nicaragua, Ecuador and Argentina have permitted voting from age 16 for years.
Across much of the world, however, 18 remains the standard minimum voting age. In Asia, countries such as Indonesia and East Timor have set the threshold at 17, while Singapore, Lebanon, and Oman require citizens to wait until 21 to cast a ballot.
Within the UK, the government's intentions have drawn scrutiny.
James Yucel, head of campaigns at the center-right thinktank Onward, told CNN that the proposal was 'not some noble push for democracy' but instead 'political engineering aimed at boosting (Labour's) support.'
In both opinion polls and votes, younger voters tend to skew more heavily towards Labour than the main opposition Conservatives.
The proposed reforms drew criticism from the Conservative Party on Thursday, with lawmaker and shadow cabinet member Paul Holmes saying in the House of Commons: 'Why does this government think a 16-year-old can vote, but not be allowed to buy a lottery ticket, an alcoholic drink, marry, or go to war, or even stand in the elections they are voting in?'
The reforms would also expand acceptable voter ID to include digital formats of existing IDs, such as driving licenses and armed forces' veterans' cards. UK-issued bank cards would also be accepted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
13 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Tulsi Gabbard's ‘Win' for Apple Isn't That Simple
You can't blame Tulsi Gabbard for trying. The US director of national intelligence announced Tuesday that Britain was finally backing down on its outrageous demand that Apple Inc. give it a backdoor to user data. That would seem like a win for US tech giants and privacy advocates, but it's not so simple. Even if the UK government does drop its request, it can still issue other 'technical capability notices' demanding tech firms share information about their users, which firms are not allowed to say they've received. The real problem is bad privacy legislation in the UK, and the best way to solve it isn't through political meddling but in court. Gabbard's pronouncement on X seems good on its face and followed extensive negotiations with British officials, but it now perhaps makes a much-needed change to the law less likely.
CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
Lawyers, an American academic and a former prime minister – the list of people ensnared by Thailand's royal defamation laws keeps growing
Arnon Nampa's youngest child runs toward the sound of shackles. The 3-year-old's only memories of his father, a prominent human right lawyer and activist, are from seeing him in a courtroom – not from his work defending others, but from the numerous lese majeste cases against him, Thailand's notoriously strict royal insult law. 'He remembers Arnon with his closely shaved hair, leg shackles, and prison uniform,' Arnon's wife Pathomporn told CNN. 'Every time we drive past the court, he says 'We are going to see Dad'.' Arnon has been sentenced to a combined 29 years in prison under lese majeste charges, and his struggle has made him a household name in Thailand where unquestioning reverence to the kingdom's monarchy is both expected and enforced. With four outstanding cases against him, the father of two could face more than 60 years behind bars for making speeches that called for reforms to the country's powerful monarchy. 'Our eldest child keeps asking every day when we will be together again. It is always a sad and uneasy atmosphere because we cannot give the children clear answers,' said Pathomporn, who requested to use only her first name. Arnon is one of 281 people charged with lese majeste in Thailand since 2020, according to the Thai Lawyers for Human Rights (TLHR) legal rights group. Among them are ordinary citizens, activists, an American scholar, and children. The list even includes a former prime minister. On Friday, Thailand's billionaire former leader Thaksin Shinawatra, who remains one of the country's most influential and divisive political figures, will hear the verdict in his own highly-anticipated lese majeste case. Here's what to know: The crime of insulting the royal family is a law enforced by some monarchies around the world. But few are stricter than in Thailand. Those found guilty of criticizing, insulting, defaming or threatening the king, queen, or heir apparent can be jailed for between three and 15 years for each count, with some sentences stretching to 50 years. Even talking about the royal family is fraught with risk, as complaints can be filed by anyone, from officials to members of the public, and police are obliged to investigate cases. Supporters of the law say it is as required to protect the monarchy from threats or harm, to maintain the institution's place at the center of Thai society, and for public order. 'It is a law protecting the head of state,' said Tul Sitthisomwong, a medical doctor and pro-royalist activist, comparing it to laws in other nations that protect the state. But human rights organizations and free speech campaigners have long said the law has been used as a political tool to stifle debate and silence critics of the Thai government and shield the monarchy from both scrutiny and reform. In recent times, lese majeste prosecutions have increased during times of anti-government unrest. Even visitors to Thailand, one of the world's most popular tourist destinations, need to careful about what they say and write. 'The risk of being prosecuted or charged under lese majeste is always constant if you are in Thailand,' said Akarachai Chaimaneekarakate, advocacy lead at TLHR. Lese majeste cases have sharply increased under King Maha Vajiralongkorn who ascended the throne in 2016 following the death of his father Bhumibol Adulyadej, a figure whose reign lasted more than 70 years. On August 3, 2020, Arnon Nampa was one of several people who gave a speech at a 'Harry Potter'-themed pro-democracy protest in Bangkok on monarchy reform. It was the first time that discussion of reforming the monarchy had gone public, and the speech helped spark nationwide youth-led protests, with millions of people demanding constitutional, military and democratic reforms, including reforms to the powerful monarchy. 'That's the speech that really shattered the ceiling on what can or cannot be said about the monarchy, (it) really broke the taboo,' said Akarachai. For that speech alone, Arnon was charged with violating Section 112 of Thailand's Criminal Code – lese majeste – and initially sentenced to four years in prison, before it was reduced to two years and eight months. But Thailand's youth were invigorated and their protests, which were ultimately put down by authorities, ignited a progressive political movement that led to unprecedented electoral gains at the ballot box three years later. Since those protests – and because of them – however, lese majeste case have skyrocketed. Between 2014 - when TLHR was formed - and 2019, 65 people were charged with lese majeste, according to the group. Since 2020, that number has risen to 281 people, with almost 2,000 prosecuted for political protest or expression, it said. Even Tul, who has been a leading and vocal proponent of lese majeste — and has himself filed a case against protesters — acknowledged that the law has been misused as a political tool. 'The law is already good by itself, but the problem lies with those who use the law,' he said. Conviction rates for lese majeste stand at around 80%, and prosecutors indict around 99% of the time — a huge percentage given the law is vaguely worded and what constitutes lese majeste is not even legally defined, TLHR said. Hearings and cases are increasingly being shrouded in secrecy, Akarachai's group has found. Those charged with lese majeste can face months or even years in pre-trial detention, contending with the cramped and harsh environment of Thai prison life before even receiving a verdict. 'Arnon has lost about 10 kilograms since entering prison. His hands are cracked and rough. All he has for bedding is a mattress about one inch thick and a thin blanket. He lives in a cell with nearly 30 other inmates. The cell has a toilet, but no door,' said Pathomporn. CNN has reached out to the Department of Corrections for comment. Other Thai pro-democracy activists have described to CNN the toll that being charged with lese majeste has had on their physical and mental health, the difficulty of holding down jobs as they are required to attend hearings every week, and strained family relations. The threat of long prison terms has led some young people to flee the country, leaving their families and lives behind. Some lese majeste activists have gone on hunger strike while in prison. In May 2024, Netiporn 'Bung' Sanesangkhom, 28, died after suffering a 'sudden cardiac arrest' authorities said, following a 65-day hunger strike while awaiting trial in jail, in a case that sparked calls for judicial reform. Seeing a need to help those charged with political crimes, Pathomporn set up Freedom Bridge, an organization that provides financial assistance and other support to political prisoners and their families in Thailand. Her organization buys food, medicine and other supplies for inmates, and helps their families with the increased financial burden. 'For families whose head of household has been imprisoned, the experience is extremely difficult both emotionally and physically,' she said. 'Most of these families are not well-off. They live hand to mouth… On top of that, those on the outside often end up taking on additional debt.' In April, prominent American academic Paul Chambers was arrested at his home in northern Thailand, charged with lese majeste and denied bail. A political science lecturer at Naresuan University in the northern province of Phitsanulok, Chambers had spent decades writing about Thai civil-military relations but provoked the ire of a regional army commander. 'I thought it was possible that it could come, but I never expected it really seriously, because I never did write or publish anything about the king,' Chambers told CNN. Chambers described the case as 'very flimsy' and that 'clearly, somebody had an agenda, and they abused this law to go after me.' 'That's happened to many, many people,' he said. Chambers was kept in the prison's general population for two days before his release on bail. 'I was very much afraid,' he said. 'I also had prisoners continually ask me why I was in prison… They would look at each other and say, 'what, you were insulting my king?' And so it became scarier.' The charges, which included one count of lese majeste and one count under the Computer Crimes Act, were later dropped. But Chambers was still sacked from his university job, his visa was revoked, and he was effectively deported – leaving his wife and a life built over 30 years in Thailand. Chambers believes his case was clearly political, and an example of lese majeste being used to silence critics not just of the monarchy, but the entire Thai establishment. 'There are different dimensions of elites in Thailand, but all of these elites oscillate around the institution of monarchy and the military is one dimension of these elites,' said Chambers, who remains a visiting fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. The military, he said, is increasingly using the courts to go after perceived enemies. 'When a powerful institution becomes afraid that its interests are being attacked, like, for example, I was saying things about the economic empire of the army, when you feel that your interests are being attacked, then those institutions begin to bring charges,' said Chambers. Alongside lese majeste, other laws such as sedition, defamation, and computer crimes are often used to silence a wider net of state criticism, critics say. In January, United Nations experts urged Thailand to repeal its lese majeste law, saying such laws 'have no place in a democratic country.' There have been recent but unsuccessful attempts to amend the law and plenty of Thais support reform, despite the risks. The progressive Move Forward Party, which was forged in the ashes of the 2020 protests, won the most seats in the 2023 general elections on a platform of widespread institutional reforms. Part of their popular campaign was to amend lese majeste. Despite winning the most seats in parliament, the party was prevented from forming a government after conservative lawmakers took issue with the party's royal reform agenda. Thailand's Constitutional Court ordered the party to end its lese majeste campaign, and accused its leaders of seeking to overthrow the constitutional monarchy. The same court later ordered the party to disband. The rulings were a major blow to Thailand's progressive movement, and effectively ensured that no party or person would legally be able to push for amendments to lese majeste without violating the constitution. An Amnesty Bill, currently working its way through parliament, has offered fresh hope to those imprisoned on political charges, but lese majeste is unlikely to be included. For Thaksin, the former premier and ex owner of Manchester City Football Club who was ousted in a 2006 coup, his lese majeste charge revolves around comments he gave to a South Korean media outlet a decade ago. The case against him represents a serious blow to the fortunes of one of the country's most powerful families. Thaksin built a famed political dynasty that has dominated Thai politics in some form for the past 20 years, boasting four prime ministers. But his populist policies were anathema to the country's rich elites and conservatives, and he was dogged by corruption allegations he long denied. Thaksin's daughter Paetongtarn Shinawatra was recently suspended as prime minister and the Constitutional Court will decide her fate next week. 'The conservative forces can always keep these cases up their sleeve, like playing a game of cards, and they could hold these pieces always ready to use them, and make them happen in a heartbeat if they want,' said Chambers.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Russia is dragging on peace in Ukraine – Trump must pressure Putin where it hurts to stop the killing once and for all
President Trump has shifted into high gear to seal a peace deal in Ukraine, putting together a quick summit with Russian dictator Vladimir Putin in Alaska, then just three days later gathering European leaders in the White House. Putin has repaid his efforts by dragging his feet. Russia won't even commit to meetings between Putin and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky. Advertisement Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, the Kremlin's attack dog, blasts Europe and downplays diplomatic efforts. Meetings can only happen if conditions are met — which are usually impossible — and any promises by the West to protect Ukraine without a Russian veto are 'a road to nowhere.' Meanwhile, the killing continues. Advertisement The weekend after Alaska, Russia killed 14 Ukrainian civilians. After the Monday meeting between Trump and Zelensky, Russia fired 270 drones and 10 missiles — the most this month. The bombardment has only ramped up since then. End the killing Trump wants it all to stop. Advertisement He cares about human life, he cares about the children, he even talks about the impact this war has on his soul. 'If I can save 7,000 people a week from being killed, I think that's pretty — I want to try to get to heaven if possible, I'm hearing that I'm not doing well. I am really at the bottom of the totem pole,' he said. 'But if I can get to heaven, this will be one of the reasons.' This is a noble goal — even a Nobel one — but it is unachievable unless Putin is forced to the table. Advertisement The pressure on Ukraine is implicit — it needs the United States' backing. But what is the pressure on Russia? You'd think it was the high death toll, the 1 million casualties it has endured, but Putin doesn't care about the damage he's doing to his own people. He claims it is a necessary sacrifice. No, the only language Putin understands is financial. The Russian economy is already feeling the strain from massive war spending, rapid inflation and sanctions. Passing secondary sanctions, hitting Putin in the side markets he uses to fund his war machine, is what will force him to the negotiating table. Advertisement It was the threat of such sanctions by Trump on Aug. 8 that convinced Putin to agree to the Alaska summit. But in the time since then, all Putin has done is tapped us along. Enough time has passed. You understand, Mr. President, that strength sends a message. Advertisement Increase sanctions. Increase tariffs. Find creative ways to end his trade in oil and minerals. Advertisement That will get Moscow's attention quickly. It will get Putin moving at the speed you are. And it will, God willing, stop the killing.
