logo
Sobeys and Safeway parent Empire Co. reports Q4 profit up, raises dividend

Sobeys and Safeway parent Empire Co. reports Q4 profit up, raises dividend

CTV News14 hours ago

STELLARTON — Empire Co. Ltd. raised its quarterly dividend as it reported its fourth-quarter profit and sales rose compared with a year ago.
The grocery retailer, which operates Sobeys, Safeway and other banners, says it will now pay a quarterly dividend of 22 cents per share, up from 20 cents.
The increased payment to shareholders came as Empire says it earned a profit attributable to owners of the company of $173 million or 74 cents per diluted share for the quarter ended May 3. The result was up from a profit of $149 million or 61 cents per diluted share a year ago.
Sales for the quarter totalled $7.64 billion, up from $7.41 billion in the same quarter last year.
Same-store rose 3.0 per cent as same-store sales for fuel fell 7.8 per cent driven by lower prices due to the removal of the government carbon tax. Food same-store sales rose 3.8 per cent.
On an adjusted basis, Empire says it earned 74 cents per diluted share in its latest quarter, up from an adjusted profit of 63 cents per diluted share a year ago.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 19, 2025.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

B.C. forestry watchdog urges province work with logging companies on wildfire mitigation
B.C. forestry watchdog urges province work with logging companies on wildfire mitigation

CTV News

time38 minutes ago

  • CTV News

B.C. forestry watchdog urges province work with logging companies on wildfire mitigation

The little-known agency tasked with overseeing B.C.'s forestry industry is urging the provincial government to update regulations and consider compensating logging companies to help minimize wildfire risk near communities. (CTV News) The little-known agency tasked with overseeing B.C.'s forestry industry is urging the provincial government to update regulations and consider compensating logging companies to help minimize wildfire risk near communities. In a special investigation titled, 'Help or Hinder? Aligning Forestry Practices with Wildfire Risk Reduction,' the Forest Practices Board found that 'outdated standards, poor implementation, and regulatory gaps' are impacting companies' ability to help reduce wildfire risk near 'interface' zones near homes. 'It affects everybody in B.C., this kind of risk that we have,' explained board chair Keith Atkinson, in a one-on-one interview with CTV News. Of particular focus is a catch-22 identified in the two-year analysis: Many logging companies are doing a good job of gathering branches and other wood waste in piles for burning, which eliminates wildfire fuel near communities. However, they're only allowed to burn that debris – the most cost-effective way of eliminating it – when conditions are right to avoid sending smoke toward the nearby communities. Some of those piles, the report's authors found, can sit for multiple wildfire seasons and add to the risk, rather than reduce it. 'We need the public to support this kind of good burning and getting rid of that material,' said Atkinson. 'We know that industry operating in the (interface) zone is one of the best ways to reduce the hazard around the community.' A troubled industry The association representing the industry is still analyzing the findings, which were made public Thursday morning, but there is support for the idea in principle. 'It's a public safety matter, so industry is keen to be part of the solution,' said Kim Haakstad, president and CEO of the BC Council of Forest Industries. 'But at the same time, we can't do it in a way that endangers companies' financial health.' Logging companies and wood product producers are facing considerable headwinds at the moment, in large part due to incoming softwood lumber duties in the U.S., as well as American scrutiny of Canadian wood and pulp products. Shifting regulatory considerations are adding to their problems, says Haakstad, and the added expense of managing wildfire fuels for the province means the companies would likely need to be compensated to take new steps. 'We think that we can do things in a way that is taking care of the environment, that is balancing social objectives, that includes First Nation reconciliation, and has forest fire management, and is economic, and that allows the forest industry to continue to provide high paying jobs,' she added. The ministry responds The minister of forests was unavailable for an interview, but his staff responded that they would take some time to 'carefully review' the report and its suggested course of action. The five recommendations are to set proactive fire management goals, clarify legal definitions and improve transparency, increase public accessibility of wildfire risk reduction plans, reduce abatement timelines, and update guidelines. 'Reducing the risk of wildfires is a priority for the ministry, we take this work seriously,' reads an email statement from the Forests Ministry. 'Based on a preliminary review of the recommendations, we believe a number of initiatives underway across the ministry address the recommendations.'

Canada won't pause digital services tax despite pressure from U.S., finance minister says
Canada won't pause digital services tax despite pressure from U.S., finance minister says

National Post

timean hour ago

  • National Post

Canada won't pause digital services tax despite pressure from U.S., finance minister says

OTTAWA — Canada won't put a hold on the digital services tax on big tech companies set to take effect on June 30, the finance minister said Thursday. Article content Article content Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne said Thursday the legislation was passed by Parliament and Canada is 'going ahead' with the tax. Article content Article content 'The (digital services tax) is in force and it's going to be applied,' he told reporters before a cabinet meeting on Parliament Hill. Article content Article content It will apply retroactively, leaving U.S. companies with a $2 billion US bill due at the end of the month. A June 11 letter signed by 21 members of Congress said U.S. companies will pay 90 per cent of the revenue Canada will collect from the tax. Article content Canadian and U.S. business groups, organizations representing U.S. tech giants and American members of Congress have all signed letters in recent weeks calling for the tax to be eliminated or paused. Article content It's set to take effect just weeks before a deadline Canada and the U.S. have set for coming up with a new trade deal, following months of trade conflict between the two countries. Article content Rick Tachuk, president of the American Chamber of Commerce in Canada, said the plan to go ahead with the tax 'undercuts those talks and risks derailing the agreement.' Article content Article content 'A retroactive tax like the DST, weeks before a new deal is supposed to be done, isn't a bargaining chip. It would likely be viewed as a provocation,' he said in an emailed statement. Article content Article content The Canadian Chamber of Commerce and other organizations have warned retaliatory measures in a U.S. spending and tax bill could hit Canadians' pension funds and investments. Article content Champagne said Canada isn't the only country that could be affected by those retaliatory measures. Article content David Pierce, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce's vice-president of government relations, said in an earlier interview his organization fears Canada could 'aggravate an already very tricky trade discussion with the Americans' if it goes ahead with the tax and the retroactive payment requirement. Article content Matthew Holmes, the chamber's executive vice-president and chief of public policy, said in a statement that a Liberal government announcement on counter-tariffs to protect the steel and aluminum industries Thursday was 'geared toward the 30-day deadline, so we see no reason why DST's timeline shouldn't be as well.'

Judge points to ‘tainted' process in Toronto's St. Michael's Hospital bidding process at Bondfield trial
Judge points to ‘tainted' process in Toronto's St. Michael's Hospital bidding process at Bondfield trial

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

Judge points to ‘tainted' process in Toronto's St. Michael's Hospital bidding process at Bondfield trial

The judge presiding over the trial of two men facing criminal fraud charges stemming from the $300-million redevelopment of Toronto's St. Michael's Hospital says the bidding process was 'tainted.' Vas Georgiou, former chief administrative officer of St. Michael's, and John Aquino, the former president of Bondfield Construction Co. Ltd., are each charged with two counts of fraud over $5,000. Both men have pleaded not guilty. 'What the public have lost is the belief that this very expensive procurement would be fair without interference by anybody, and what they have is something that stinks,' Justice Peter Bawden told an Ontario court on Thursday. The Superior Court of Justice case resumed this week after 24 days of testimony last November and December. Since then, Crown prosecutors and defence lawyers submitted written closing arguments amounting to 345 pages, and the hearing on Thursday was designed to allow the judge to address them. Justice Bawden described this week's hearing as 'a bit unorthodox,' but he said it would allow him to tell the court what he thinks about the voluminous written submissions while providing the lawyers with the opportunity to say if he is wrong. The judge is scheduled to deliver his verdict on Oct. 7. Justice Bawden said the public was counting on a fair competition for the hospital redevelopment. Instead, he said, 'the procurement is tainted because of the conduct of the two accused.' Bondfield president given 'insider information,' prosecution alleges in St. Michael's Hospital case The Crown's case against Mr. Georgiou and Mr. Aquino focuses on their alleged undisclosed business connections, as well as their alleged secret communications throughout the bidding process for the lucrative hospital project, which Bondfield won in 2015. These alleged communications took place over a e-mail address and a BlackBerry that Mr. Aquino gave to Mr. Georgiou. The Crown has alleged that Mr. Georgiou used the BlackBerry to leak confidential information about the procurement to Mr. Aquino. Prosecutors allege in their written submissions that the discovery of the electronic devices, set up for the purpose of communicating in secret about the hospital procurement, provide the 'most egregious examples of criminality.' Defence lawyers counter in their submissions that the Crown is overstating the secret nature of the BlackBerry, adding that breaking the rules is not always a criminal act. Justice Bawden said most of his big issues involve Mr. Georgiou, whose defence lawyer, Peter Brauti, fielded a number of questions from the judge. 'I fear that I could see a conviction of your client even if I largely accept his evidence,' Justice Bawden said. 'That makes me very nervous.' Former St. Michael's CEO testifies he was unaware of alleged secret messages between men accused of hospital-bid fraud Mr. Georgiou testified in his own defence last December. The judge noted that Mr. Georgiou's testimony revealed he was strongly motivated to further establish his reputation in the hospital procurement sector and get the St. Michael's expansion and renovation done. Justice Bawden told court that it was almost as though Mr. Georgiou had a conflict from the start: He wanted the procurement to succeed, but he was also a member of a hospital committee set up to impartially evaluate bids from construction companies competing for the project. But, the judge said, the existence of the BlackBerry and e-mail address causes him to see the conflicts in a different light. Had Mr. Aquino not been 'coached' by Mr. Georgiou, he speculated that perhaps the procurement should have failed or proceeded at a higher price. The only surviving content on Mr. Georgiou's e-mail account was communication between him and Mr. Aquino on the May, 2014, long weekend – three days before the deadline for hospital bids. On May 18, Mr. Georgiou advised Mr. Aquino to keep certain costs out of Bondfield's proposed price, explaining that he could 'always fight later when we are No. 1,' says one e-mail. Former St. Michael's Hospital executive promoted co-accused's company before it won project bid, court hears In their submission, Crown prosecutors note that Mr. Georgiou, a busy executive away with his wife for a personal trip in England during the long weekend, answered Mr. Aquino's questions. The fact that Mr. Georgiou brought the BlackBerry with him on a weekend away underscores the intensity of his ties to Mr. Aquino, prosecutors allege in their submission: 'He was ready and expecting to assist.' Alan Gold, Mr. Aquino's lawyer, told the court on Thursday that Bondfield's bid was done by the May long weekend and had nothing to do with anything Mr. Georgiou said in the e-mails. 'Whatever taint your honour sees is totally harmless,' he said. Mr. Brauti told the court Bondfield was the uncrowned winner of the procurement by May, 2014, because the other two rival companies had submitted bids well in excess of the budget. Any rule-breaking, he said, did not result in an unfair outcome. And if the outcome was fair, he said, there was no fraud. At the end of Thursday's hearing, Mr. Gold said the May, 2014 e-mail exchange between Mr. Aquino and Mr. Georgiou did not 'cost victims any money' and, therefore, did not constitute fraud. Special to The Globe and Mail

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store