Democratic Debate Over Private School Choice Reveals Post-Election Tensions
For 11 years, Jennifer Walmer led Democrats for Education Reform Colorado, the state
chapter of the national organization that advocates for school choice.
Among the biggest wins of her tenure, she counts increases in charter funding and twice electing Democrat and school reformer Gov. Jared Polis as governor. After serving as chief of staff for the Denver Public Schools, she fully expected to finish her career at DFER.
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
'We worked hard to build power in the Democratic Party specifically around accountability, choice and the role of public charter schools,' she said. 'Everything had always been grounded 100% in public education.'
But last year, she said she 'saw the writing on the wall' when the organization's leader embraced Education Savings Accounts and other forms of private school choice. She is among several who have since left the group over the issue.
In a May 5 policy paper, DFER CEO Jorge Elorza, former two-term mayor of Providence, Rhode Island, suggested that instead of 'rejecting them offhand,' his party should explore how ESAs can advance Democratic values like uplifting needy families and protecting civil rights. Eighteen Republican-led states now have such programs, which parents can use for private school tuition or homeschooling. Most Democrats say vouchers and ESAs lack accountability and threaten funding for public schools.
To Alisha Searcy, who joined DFER just last year, Elorza's about-face felt like a betrayal.
'DFER has done extraordinary work to get courageous Democrats elected to push bold policies that would truly improve public education,' said the former Georgia state legislator. She was hired last year to expand the organization's reach into her state, Alabama and Tennessee, but resigned in May. 'We need a strong Democratic voice, now more than ever. This move to embrace vouchers and ESAs is the exact opposite.'
Related
The issue has brought bubbling to the surface a debate that was previously restricted to Democratic backrooms. Elorza took the helm of DFER at a time when polls began to show that voters were losing confidence in Democrats as the party they most trusted on education. Parents, the surveys suggested, were more preoccupied with whether their kids were recovering from pandemic learning loss than how schools were teaching issues of race or gender in the classroom. The soul searching only intensified in the aftermath of President Donald Trump's election.
Founded in 2007, DFER always advocated for wider public school options. Leaders worked with the Obama administration and reform-minded Democrats to support policies like magnet schools, dual enrollment and lifting state caps on charter schools. Now, Republicans and their push for parental rights are dominating the education conversation, including a recent proposal to enact a national tax credit for private school choice. Elorza is among those who say the party needs to be open to more options for families if it's going to regain its edge with voters, especially parents. But he recognizes the risks.
'There are a lot of Democrats who are choice curious,' he told The 74. 'They'll say privately that they're open to the idea of choice, including private school choice, but that the politics of it are just so darn challenging.'
In a recent op-ed, he pointed to Pennsylvania as the best opportunity for a swing state to pass an ESA program. Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro came close to supporting such a bill in 2023.
Some observers say Shapiro and Elorza are outliers in the party. During the Obama years, DFER 'nudged' the party toward school reform policies like merit pay for teachers and maintaining strong assessment systems, said David Houston, an assistant education professor at George Mason University in Virginia. But now it's 'further from the center of Democratic politics.'
The recent departure of other DFER staff offers further evidence that Elorza's position doesn't reflect the Democratic mainstream.
Will Andras served as political director in Colorado for Education Reform Now, a think tank affiliated with DFER that Elorza also leads. Andras left last year, shortly after DFER joined the No More Lines Coalition, a group of organizations that advocate for open enrollment and removing school attendance boundaries.
The member organizations, funded largely by the conservative Koch network, also support vouchers and ESAs. In his resignation letter, Andras referenced the change in direction since Elorza came on board in 2023.
'The last six months have shown that the organization I have devoted a substantial portion of my professional career to help build no longer aligns with my political or personal values,' he wrote.
Jessica Giles, who led the D.C. chapter, posted similar words when she walked away in May. It's one of several chapters to close since Elorza became CEO. The Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts and DFER South chapters have also shut down.
Elorza said he respects their stance.
'There are a lot of folks who put a great deal of stock into this public-private distinction, and I think it comes from a principled place,' he said. 'But I truly believe that it is in the party's political best interest to be open minded to any approach that moves the needle for kids and families.'
Related
Backed by far-right billionaires, the private school choice movement has been on a winning streak since 2022, when Arizona passed the first universal ESA. 'The political winds are shifting,' Corey DeAngelis, a self-described 'school choice evangelist' and fellow at multiple think tanks, said at a conference in Atlanta in April. 'If Democrats are smart, they'll stop the Republicans from being able to pick up the football and win on this issue.'
He pointed to Louisiana, where six House Democrats — one-fifth of the party's caucus — voted last year for the LA GATOR Scholarship, an ESA that starts this fall. One of them, Rep. Jason Hughes, passionately defended his vote on the House floor.
'As I watch children in poverty, trapped in failing schools, who can hardly read, I'll be damned if I will continue to defend the status quo,' he said.
Rep. Marlene Terry, a Missouri Democrat, delivered an equally heartfelt speech in May after caucus leaders took away her committee assignments when she supported a $50 million increase to the state's ESA program.
'I will vote how I please, when I please and where I please,' she said. 'No one can take away my voice. I will not be silent.'
While her own children attended public school, she said families in the St. Louis-area district she represents are frustrated that their schools have lacked full accreditation for 15 years.
'That's a long time for families to wait for improvement,' Terry told The 74. Riverview Gardens, a majority Black, high-poverty district, regained local control from the state in 2023, but leaders are still working to make continued gains in attendance and teacher retention. 'That's why I support giving families a range of high-quality public options, including public charter schools, and — when absolutely necessary — scholarships to attend other schools if no viable public options exist.'
Some Democrats agree with Elorza that the party shouldn't distance legislators like Terry. In a recent blog, Virginia Board of Education Member Andy Rotherham, who served in the Clinton White House and co-founded Bellwether, a think tank, said Democrats need to welcome 'a much wider range of perspectives on these questions,' given school choice's surge in popularity since the pandemic.
'This is America — we like choice,' he wrote. 'Being on the wrong side of that culturally and politically is not a great place to be.'
Related
Using an ESA can be particularly uncomfortable for a lifelong Democrat — especially In Arizona, where Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs has called the program a 'billion dollar boondoggle' and wants to set income caps on families using it. Kathy Visser, who administers a ESA Facebook group for parents and vendors, knows some who left the forum because they felt that it was 'not a safe space for Democrats.'
'I hate election time because it's always a mess in the group,' she said. 'People think we should be able to talk about ESAs without talking about politics, but when you've got one party so solidly entrenched against it, it's really hard.'
Some Democrats who use ESAs say they hold their noses when it comes to other aspects of the Republican agenda.
Christina Foster, whose daughter has used an ESA in the past, said she gets 'heart palpitations' when she has to decide on a candidate. She's board chair for Arizona's Black Mothers Forum, which runs microschools serving students using ESAs, and wants to protect the program. But in the 2024 election, she voted for Democrats.
'Some of those Republicans were not supportive of minority rights, immigration rights, women's rights. Those are very important to me,' she said. 'I said 'OK, unfortunately, I'm going to have to vote against the ESA.'
For those within the traditional K-12 system, the choice to use an ESA can be tricky. As a kindergarten teacher in Arizona's Peoria district, Melanie Ford is familiar with anti-ESA talking points about how the program undermines funding for traditional schools and is susceptible to waste and fraud.
But she overlooked those arguments when public school no longer seemed like a safe place for her transgender son Ash. He avoided using the bathroom all day because students said he didn't belong in the boys' or the girls' restroom.
For the 2023-24 school year, Ash used an ESA to attend the Queer Blended Learning Center, a microschool for middle schoolers in Phoenix that incorporates LGBTQ history into the curriculum. Ford told her colleagues that despite her support of public schools, she had to think first about her son. Ash has since returned to a public high school, where he plays on a drumline in the marching band and has straight A's, his mother said. But using the ESA allowed him to transition in a more supportive setting.
'He didn't have to deal with the comments from peers that slowly rip a person apart from the inside out,' she said. 'He could grow into himself without judgement from others and this was so important for his mental health.'
While some Democrats, as Elorza suggested, may think an ESA is the best option for their children, that interest hasn't risen to the national level. No Congressional Democrats, for example, have endorsed the federal Educational Choice for Children Act, the tax credit scholarship program tucked into the Republicans' reconciliation bill.
In some states, vouchers remain unpopular, said Joshua Cowen, an education professor at Michigan State University and a strong opponent of directing public funds to private schools.
He points to Kentucky, where 65% of voters rejected a private school choice measure last November. Coloradans also defeated a school choice-related proposition, and voters in Nebraska repealed a voucher program.
While the Democratic party may embrace vouchers in the future, that day is a long way off, said Ravi Gupta, a former Obama staffer who runs a nonprofit media company. On an intellectual level, he's intrigued by ESAs. Democrats, he said, would never say Medicaid should only be used at a public hospital or Section 8 vouchers only in a housing project, so why doesn't the same principle apply to education?
'Twenty years from now, do I think that could be the reality?' he asked. 'I think it's very likely, but it will take some time.'
Disclosure: The Charles Koch Foundation funds Stand Together Trust, which provides funding to The 74. Andy Rotherham sits on The 74's board of directors.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
10 minutes ago
- Axios
Focus groups: North Carolina swing voters mostly OK with Trump's LA response
A majority of North Carolina swing voters in our latest Engagious / Sago focus groups supported President Trump's deportations and activation of the National Guard and Marines in Los Angeles, despite some concerns about civil rights and government overreach. The big picture: These Biden-to-Trump voters' desire to eject undocumented migrants from the U.S. — and their critical views of California and Democrats — shape how they see this massive test of executive power playing out far from their own hometowns. Seven of 12 panelists said they support the president's activation of the National Guard and Marines in L.A. despite Gov. Gavin Newsom's and local officials' objections. Three disapproved; two didn't have an opinion. Eight of the 12 said they believe Democrats prioritize illegal immigrants over American citizens. Why it matters: "Democrats who doubt their party remains out of touch with swing voters will be stunned by what these North Carolinians told us about immigration," said Rich Thau, President of Engagious, who moderated the focus groups. How it works: Axios observed two Engagious / Sago online focus groups Tuesday night with North Carolinians who said they voted for Joe Biden in 2020 and Donald Trump in 2024. The panelists included nine independents and three Republicans. While a focus group is not a statistically significant sample like a poll, the responses show how some voters are thinking and talking about current events. What they're saying: "The stance California has on illegal immigration only enables all these people, and they're not going to stop it," said Gregory D., 43, of Greensboro. "So we need to bring it up another level. It needs to stop. California doesn't want to stop it." "It's in the best interest of the nation that we call this, I don't know, uprising, call it what you want, but yeah, that needs to get nipped in the bud, just like George Floyd and all that sh*t should have," said Alex H., 44, of Charlotte. Butch F., 58, of Mebane, said he believes illegal immigrants got government assistance that reduced North Carolinians' access to disaster funds. Gerius J., 33, of Charlotte, said he's for diversity but wants to "do it the right way. Get the right paperwork, the right documentation." He said Democrats "have always wanted illegals to come here," and if anyone objects, "you're the bad guy. And as a U.S. citizen, I'm not the bad guy. I just want things to be done the right way." The other side: Karen L., 61, of Wilmington, said of Trump's immigration actions, "When he first started out, it seemed like he was really going after the criminals — like, the ones committing murder and rape — and he was getting all of them. And we don't want them here if they're [here] illegally, especially. But now ... it's way too extreme, and he's violating civil rights, and he's causing more chaos than anything." Rachid O., 46, of Raleigh, said the administration should prioritize arresting and deporting criminals, above all undocumented immigrants. Many undocumented immigrants pay taxes "so they contribute to the country," he said. Between the lines: Shifting the focus to combating illegal immigration may help him with some voters who have cooled on his performance in other areas. Several panelists voiced concerns about the economy, tariffs and political corruption and objected to Trump's moves to cut university research, or possible Medicaid cuts in the spending and tax-cut bill before Congress. "It's getting harder and harder to afford things," said Kimberly S., 37, of Sanford. "We are just kind of told, 'Hey, you just got to bear with us just a little bit more,' and it doesn't feel like it's getting any easier." Shauna S., 54, of Harrisburg, said when it comes to tariffs, "There's no plan, and it's been erratic. It appears to be an opportunity to manipulate the markets, and I really want someone to investigate where and who's actually gaining financially every time these tariffs are being threatened and then removed. I'm just curious what's really happening."


Axios
11 minutes ago
- Axios
Padilla episode triggers five-alarm fire for Democrats
Democrats spooked by President Trump's state-sanctioned shows of force have shifted into five-alarm fire mode, warning he's pushing American democracy to the brink. Why it matters: They're pointing to what happened yesterday to Alex Padilla, California's senior senator, as a crossing-the-Rubicon moment. Driving the news: The jarring scene of Padilla, a Democrat, being forcefully removed from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's press conference after interrupting it — and then being dragged to the ground and handcuffed — felt like kerosene on the nation's political fire. To Trump's most loyal allies, Padilla's actions were merely an exercise in political theater. Back in D.C., House Speaker Mike Johnson was among the Republicans blaming Padilla, saying that "at a minimum," the senator should be censured. To Democrats, the episode crystallized fears about Trump's willingness to crush dissent, and shatter democratic norms and institutions. "This is the stuff of dictatorships. It is actually happening," said Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii). A few Republicans were just as alarmed. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), who's repeatedly proved her independent streak, told reporters the incident was "shocking at every level. It's not the America I know." Padilla wasn't arrested, but the fallout from the incident promises to endure as Congress continues to wrestle with Trump's giant tax and spending bill. Zoom in: To fully understand the alarm that's gripping Democrats over the Padilla incident, consider two factors: 1. It took place in a mostly Democratic city where Trump's immigration agents are using military-style tactics to conduct raids and make arrests in mostly Hispanic communities and workplaces. Padilla is one of the nation's highest-ranking Hispanic public officials, and is the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee's immigration panel. 2. Trump's over-the-top-enforcement seems to be about more than immigration. When Padilla interrupted Noem during her press conference to try to ask a question, the DHS secretary had just said that her agents were in Los Angeles "to liberate this city from the socialist and the burdensome leadership that this governor and this mayor have placed on this country."


Bloomberg
27 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Republicans Are (Almost) Ready for Maximum Pressure on Russia
The epiphany of common sense came late in an otherwise tedious congressional subcommittee hearing, and from a Democrat, Representative Jim Costa. He gets that Republicans and the administration of Donald Trump take pride in exerting 'maximum pressure' on Iran, Costa made clear. But at this 'seminal moment in American and world history,' he asked, 'what about maximum pressure on Russia?' What about it indeed? The greatest puzzle (among many) about MAGA foreign policy is why Trump refuses to get tough with Russian President Vladimir Putin, who shows no interest in good-faith peace negotiations and is cynically stringing Trump along — 'playing this president like a fiddle,' in the words of Jeanne Shaheen, the ranking member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.