Parents 'elated' after judge rules schools must provide single-sex toilets
The local authority said it had accepted the argument prior to the hearing and therefore did not defend itself in court.The move comes after judges at the UK Supreme Court last week unanimously ruled that a woman is defined by biological sex under equalities law.
Ms Hurley said she had felt "very emotional and very tearful" since the conclusion of the case."It's felt bittersweet," she told BBC Scotland News."It should never have come this far, we should never have had to do a judicial review."We're grateful to the legal minds that supported us and we're thankful that we got the result that we got."
'It's the law'
Mr Stratford said he was "delighted" but still felt "a bit of anger as to the way we were treated".He added: "It was very clear, and we pointed it out to them that it was very clear. "It's the law. This could have been dealt with at such an early stage."
Ms Hurley said she found out through working at the school that children were allowed to play on the sports teams that matched the gender they identified with.She asked more questions about this policy in the summer of 2023 and discovered that the toilets in the new school would be gender neutral. She said the school had failed to consult parents on this.As well as Earlston, Jedburgh Grammar Campus - also in the Scottish Borders - only has gender neutral toilets.Three new schools being planned and built by Scottish Borders Council are designed to have gender neutral toilets.Wednesday's judgement ruled that mixed-sex schools must have single-sex toilets, but they can have gender neutral toilets in addition to that.BBC Scotland News understands that the Scottish government is confident that the vast majority of schools in Scotland already offer single-sex lavatories.
'Confusing' guidance
Ms Hurley said she received "confusing" guidance from the school after she raised concerns. She said she did not understand how the guidance would work.She added: "We just thought there should be so much more of a holistic approach and I just wanted to understand how we can support everybody."Mr Stratford said they had requested risk and equality impact assessments on the council's decision, but they felt "dismissed" and "treated like we were imbeciles".He said in his view, the law was clear but the council kept referring to Scottish government guidance.
Ms Hurley said it would be better to have three spaces that included a gender neutral option."We just couldn't understand why you had to take away the boy's space and the girl's space," she said. "We didn't understand the need for it."She said the case had cost "a lot of money", but they received some financial backing from For Women Scotland, as well as other donors they did not name."I think we're at a point where schools need more support from the government on this," she added. "You have to get it right for every child."Scottish Borders councillor Julie Pirone said the local authority would be reviewing the toilet provision in all its schools to ensure all children felt safe."It's not a huge review but we need to get it right," she added. "I expect it to be small and minor changes of what we've got because our new schools are absolutely fantastic facilities. "But this will make us pause and have a little rethink on the provision we've got and make sure they fit in with the legislation and the ruling we've had this week."After the court ruling, the Scottish government said it would carefully consider the implications of the judgement.A spokesperson added: "Local authorities have statutory responsibility for the school estate, including provision of toilets."The Scottish government is committed to ensuring that our Transgender Guidance for Schools remains up to date and fit for purpose."As with any significant legal or policy developments, we will consider whether the guidance requires to be updated to reflect upon these."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
Swinney says SNP majority at Holyrood could make second referendum a ‘reality'
He dismissed as 'laughable' claims from critics that this strategy for getting a second referendum is 'punting' independence 'into the long grass'. However, while opinion polls have the SNP in the lead in the run-up to the crucial Holyrood vote, none has indicated Mr Swinney's party could win an overall majority. The Scottish Parliament's proportional representation system makes it harder for any single party to win more than half of the seats, with only former SNP leader Alex Salmond having achieved this in 2011. That victory led to the 2014 independence referendum, with Mr Swinney now relying on this 'precedent' as he seeks to secure a second vote on Scotland's place in the UK. His comments came as he indicated independence supporters are 'frustrated' that despite the 2016 and 2021 Holyrood elections both returning majorities of MSPs supporting independence, successive Westminster governments have refused to allow a second ballot to be held. Mr Swinney, speaking at an event organised by think tank Enlighten in Edinburgh on Tuesday, also noted that while Scots voted to stay in the UK in 2014 there were now 'various polls' with a majority for independence. Pressed on his strategy of using a Holyrood majority to achieve another referendum, the Scottish First Minister insisted that the idea this was 'punting it into the long grass is laughable for me'. Instead, he insisted independence as an 'urgent necessity', claiming decisions by the Labour Government at Westminster will make it harder for him to achieve his 'mission' of eradicating child poverty. However, he insisted he has 'got to be realistic' about how a second referendum could be brought about. Mr Swinney said: 'An independent Scotland will only come about if it carries domestic and international legitimacy, ie the rules of how it becomes independent are accepted by all parties.' He stressed this had been the case in 2014, as he added: 'If we want to advance on this issue there has got to be a means of breaking the log jam that we are currently in. 'Two successive elections, the majority of members of the Scottish Parliament supporting holding a referendum on independence and the Westminster government just folds its arms and says 'no'.' The First Minister noted that 'in 2011, when the SNP won a majority of seats in the Scottish Parliament, that led to a referendum in 2014'. John Swinney said the fact the 2014 independence referendum came after the SNP won a majority of seats in Holyrood set a 'precedent' (Jane Barlow/PA) And he added: 'If we want independence to happen we have got to rely on that precedent.' He rejected suggestions from Enlighten director Chris Deerin that returning a majority of SNP MSPs to Holyrood next May was a 'bold ambition', as he called on independence supporters to make the issue a 'priority' in that election. 'Then we can turn this into reality,' Mr Swinney said. Polls currently indicate the SNP could still be the largest party at Holyrood after the next election, but have so far failed to show Mr Swinney's party winning more than half the 129 seats. However, Mr Swinney recalled that in the run-up to 2011 election, his party was 'miles behind' in the opinion polls but 'then we won a majority four months later'. And he said: 'Today, nine months out from the election, I am ahead in the opinion polls. 'When I took over as SNP leader we were behind. I have brought the SNP back into the lead, a commanding lead in the opinion polls, and on the opinion polls today, we still would be the largest party by a country mile in the Scottish Parliament.' However he insisted: 'That's not good enough for me. 'I have set out what we have got to do to clear a pathway to win Scottish independence and I am going to give absolutely every fibre of my being from now until May 7 next year to make sure it happens.'
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Swinney says SNP majority at Holyrood could make second referendum a ‘reality'
However, while opinion polls have the SNP in the lead in the run-up to the crucial Holyrood vote, none has indicated Mr Swinney's party could win an overall majority. The Scottish Parliament's proportional representation system makes it harder for any single party to win more than half of the seats, with only former SNP leader Alex Salmond having achieved this in 2011. That victory led to the 2014 independence referendum, with Mr Swinney now relying on this 'precedent' as he seeks to secure a second vote on Scotland's place in the UK. His comments came as he indicated independence supporters are 'frustrated' that despite the 2016 and 2021 Holyrood elections both returning majorities of MSPs supporting independence, successive Westminster governments have refused to allow a second ballot to be held. Mr Swinney, speaking at an event organised by think tank Enlighten in Edinburgh on Tuesday, also noted that while Scots voted to stay in the UK in 2014 there were now 'various polls' with a majority for independence. Pressed on his strategy of using a Holyrood majority to achieve another referendum, the Scottish First Minister insisted that the idea this was 'punting it into the long grass is laughable for me'. Instead, he insisted independence as an 'urgent necessity', claiming decisions by the Labour Government at Westminster will make it harder for him to achieve his 'mission' of eradicating child poverty. However, he insisted he has 'got to be realistic' about how a second referendum could be brought about. Mr Swinney said: 'An independent Scotland will only come about if it carries domestic and international legitimacy, ie the rules of how it becomes independent are accepted by all parties.' He stressed this had been the case in 2014, as he added: 'If we want to advance on this issue there has got to be a means of breaking the log jam that we are currently in. 'Two successive elections, the majority of members of the Scottish Parliament supporting holding a referendum on independence and the Westminster government just folds its arms and says 'no'.' The First Minister noted that 'in 2011, when the SNP won a majority of seats in the Scottish Parliament, that led to a referendum in 2014'. John Swinney said the fact the 2014 independence referendum came after the SNP won a majority of seats in Holyrood set a 'precedent' (Jane Barlow/PA) And he added: 'If we want independence to happen we have got to rely on that precedent.' He rejected suggestions from Enlighten director Chris Deerin that returning a majority of SNP MSPs to Holyrood next May was a 'bold ambition', as he called on independence supporters to make the issue a 'priority' in that election. 'Then we can turn this into reality,' Mr Swinney said. Polls currently indicate the SNP could still be the largest party at Holyrood after the next election, but have so far failed to show Mr Swinney's party winning more than half the 129 seats. However, Mr Swinney recalled that in the run-up to 2011 election, his party was 'miles behind' in the opinion polls but 'then we won a majority four months later'. And he said: 'Today, nine months out from the election, I am ahead in the opinion polls. 'When I took over as SNP leader we were behind. I have brought the SNP back into the lead, a commanding lead in the opinion polls, and on the opinion polls today, we still would be the largest party by a country mile in the Scottish Parliament.' However he insisted: 'That's not good enough for me. 'I have set out what we have got to do to clear a pathway to win Scottish independence and I am going to give absolutely every fibre of my being from now until May 7 next year to make sure it happens.'
South Wales Guardian
2 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Swinney: My focus is on the future and Scotland – not Sturgeon's book
John Swinney said while he has read some extracts from the former first minister's memoirs, Frankly, which were published last week, he has not yet read yet the entire book. But he refused to comment on her claims about Alex Salmond, with the current SNP leader saying: 'For me, in my role today, and what I have got to do for Scotland just now, I have got focus on the country and the future.' He insisted: 'That's what is driving everything I do in my political life, what is the future of Scotland, what is the best future for Scotland. 'That is what I am best to concentrate my thinking on.' Mr Swinney was pressed on the matter by Chris Deerin, director of the think tank Enlighten, which was formerly known as Reform Scotland. At an event in Edinburgh on Tuesday, Mr Deerin said Ms Sturgeon had portrayed her predecessor 'at times as a bully, a bit of a drunk, as a man who was detached from the details'. In her book, Ms Sturgeon, who was first minister in Scotland and SNP leader between 2014 and 2023, set out how her relationship with her predecessor Mr Salmond deteriorated – claiming in the book that after she took on the top job her former mentor had wanted to 'destroy' her. She insisted her relationship with the late politician began to started to sour after she became leader of Scotland. She added that her infamous falling out with her predecessor was a 'bruising episode', as she claimed Mr Salmond had created a 'conspiracy theory' to defend himself from reckoning with misconduct allegations, of which he was cleared in court. Mr Swinney said, on Tuesday, that the memoirs gave a 'fascinating insight into Scottish political history', as he praised Ms Sturgeon for her leadership during the Covid pandemic. The SNP leader, who was deputy first minister at that time, told the audience at the Enlighten event: 'We were all taking big decisions in difficult circumstance.' He added: 'In a moment of absolutely unparalleled difficulty for the country, in which there was no manual, there was no precedent, I saw Nicola Sturgeon deliver considered and careful leadership as we moved our way through the pandemic, under enormous strain of delivering against those expectations, those difficulties.' He went on to state that 'leadership is not easy', with Mr Swinney explaining: 'I feel that way, it is not straight forward, the decisions I take are invariably contested decisions.' As a result, he said, making such decisions was 'inevitably' a 'very lonely place'. The First Minister added: 'Ultimately, it is your call, you have got to decide. 'And I think some of that is explained in Nicola's book about what she felt at times.'
