
Guinea pigs to lions? Danish zoo wants unwanted pets for predator meals
The zoo insists all animals will be 'gently euthanized' by trained staff and used in a way that promotes the 'natural behavior, nutrition and well-being of our predators.''That way, nothing goes to waste,' the zoo added.The post includes a photo of a wildcat with its jaws open and a link to the zoo's website, where it also notes interest in receiving larger animals, including horses.'If you have a healthy animal that needs to be given away for various reasons, feel free to donate it to us,' the zoo said, though it did not clarify whether other common pets like cats or dogs would be accepted. The zoo has not provided further details.The request has sparked a mix of reactions online — with some applauding the transparency and practicality of the idea, and others disturbed by the concept of pets becoming prey.- EndsInputs from Associated Press

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
Do you have sharp eyes to find the hidden duck and butterfly in this family scene?
Credit: Facebook/@Toll Gavel United Church and Centre Ahhh.. A warm, cheerful scene of a family engaged in a woodworking project. Nostalgic enough, right? There's a man, a woman,one child, and a small dog playfully jumping near the center. Pieces of wood are scattered on the ground, tools are neatly arranged, and there's a cozy garden shed backdrop. But come on, it's a garden. How can there be only one animal? Yes, the number is more. The excited dog is not the only one. Even though the dog is clearly visible, right at the center of the scene. If you move your eyes at every nook and corner of the picture, there are two more animals waiting for your attention . They're skillfully embedded within the illustration itself, waiting to be discovered. Ready for the challenge? While most people spot only the dog, on average, it takes 35-40 seconds to identify the other hidden you can spot all 2 in under 15 seconds? Congratulations—you likely have exceptional attention to detail. Hint? Don't ignore the negative space. Maybe the areas that you are giving the least importance , can be your biggest clue. Time starts..... Let's break it down section by section: The duck That happy dog in the middle has gotten all your attention and that's why you must have missed the space formed between its legs and the hammer. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Notice something familiar? Correct, there's a duck shape subtly outlined there. It's a perfect example of negative space trickery, where your brain fills in the blanks. The butterfly Now, let your eyes move to the top-left part of the image, around the large tree and its leaves. Somewhere in the texture and overlap, can you spot the butterfly, now? Its wings are formed by leaves and gaps. It's not brightly colored or obvious, but once you spot the wing symmetry, it becomes impossible to unsee it. Credit: Facebook/@Toll Gavel United Church and Centre How does this optical illusion work? This illusion is created by a cognitive phenomenon known as 'Dual perception' where your brain can interpret the same visual data in more than one way. Initially, our eyes focus on familiar human figures and central subjects, filtering out the rest as background clutter. But once the brain is invited to look beyond the obvious, it starts to connect patterns, shapes, and negative space in new ways. That's when the 'hidden' animals start to pop out. How many animals did you spot before reading the answers? Optical illusion: Find a man's hidden face in 7 seconds


The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
Hiroshima and Nagasaki: 80 years after the bombing
Share Copy link Email Facebook Twitter Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit 80 YEARS AGO The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki cleaved history into 'before' and 'after' — for Japan, the U.S., and the entire world. A remembrance of the first, and thankfully last, time humans used atomic weapons in war Video credits: Museum of Modern Art, New York City, New York NEAR-TOTAL RUIN At 8:15 am on August 6, 1945, the U.S. B-29 bomber Enola Gay released 'Little Boy', a uranium-powered atomic bomb, over Hiroshima. The explosion unleashed a firestorm. An estimated 70,000 people were killed instantly, with total deaths by the end of 1945 reaching around 140,000. The majority were civilians, including a significant number of children. Three days later, a plutonium implosion bomb dubbed 'Fat Man' was detonated over Nagasaki, causing approximately 74,000 deaths by year's end. In Hiroshima, about 70% of all buildings were razed or burnt, with damages extending up to 2 km from the bomb's hypocentre. Steel frame buildings suffered severe structural damage up to 1.7 km while multistorey brick buildings were completely demolished as far as 1.3 km. Roof tiles were melted by the flash heat and virtually all wooden or timber-framed buildings within 3 km were either destroyed or heavily damaged. Strong reinforced concrete buildings were blown down 700 m away in Nagasaki. Fires after the blast consumed almost all combustible materials, compounding the destruction by burning wooden structures, tearing away windows and doors, and damaging ceilings and equipment. In Nagasaki, the bomb levelled 6.7 sq. km and destroyed buildings up to 2.5 km away. Some earthquake-resistant structures such as reinforced concrete smoke stacks were overturned within 1.2 km of ground zero. The bombs also flattened nearly all masonry buildings and caused mass structural failures in residential, religious, and industrial buildings. All together, the blast's concussive force, intense heat, and ensuing fires reshaped the urban landscapes of Hiroshima and Nagasaki into scenes of near-total ruin. The survivors, known as hibakusha, endured horrific injuries and long-term health consequences including radiation sickness, increased cancer rates, chronic diseases, and permanent psychological trauma. Nagasaki before Nagasaki after JuxtaposeJS Move the line to see images of Nagasaki before and after IN THE BALANCE The August 30, 1945, telegram from Hiroshima to Tokyo The scale and nature of devastation were unprecedented in human warfare. A Red Cross delegate sent this telegram on August 30, 1945, from Hiroshima to his colleague in Tokyo. The first four lines read: VISITED HIROSHIMA THIRTIETH CONDITIONS APPALLING STOP EIGHT PERCENT ALL HOSPITALS DESTROYED OR SERIOUSLY DAMAGED INSPECTED TWO EMERGENCY HOSPITALS CONDITIONS BEYOND DESCRIPTION FULL STOP EFFECT OF BOMB MYSTERIOUSLY SERIOUS STOP MANY VICTIMS APPARENTLY RECOVERING SUDDENLY SUFFER FATAL RELAPSE DUE TO DECOMPOSITION OF WHITE BLOOD CELLS AND OTHER INTERNAL INJURIES NOW DYING IN GREAT NUMBERS STOP The U.S. justified the bombings on several grounds. Foremost was Japan's refusal to accept unconditional surrender, as outlined in the Potsdam Declaration. The bombings were also part of a broader geopolitical contest with the Soviet Union. While it was a U.S. ally during World War II, rising tensions and distrust had fuelled a desire in Washington to assert technological and military supremacy before Soviet influence in Asia expanded. NEW WORLD ORDER Leaders of the Allied powers of the Second World War meet at the Potsdam Conference in July 1945 to discuss post-war Europe and the terms for Japan's surrender The atomic bombings marked a profound shift in American foreign policy. The U.S. shaped the postwar order using its nuclear umbrella to guarantee the security of Western European allies and Japan, thus cementing alliances and shaping political economies that aligned with American strategic interests. Winston Churchill, Harry Truman, and Joseph Stalin in July 1945 The psychological impact of nuclear weapons redefined warfare and diplomacy. Nuclear deterrence became foundational, setting up doctrines like 'mutually assured destruction' that underscored superpower relations for decades. The bombings also marked the beginning of a struggle to balance the strategic benefits of nuclear arms with their horrifying humanitarian consequences. The bombings accelerated the onset of the Cold War. The Soviet Union perceived the atomic strikes as a direct threat and a demonstration of American geopolitical and technological dominance. Anti-nuclear protests intensified in the 1980s In response, the USSR rapidly pursued its own nuclear weapons programme, testing its first atomic bomb in 1949, just four years after Hiroshima. This initiated the nuclear arms race, embedding nuclear weapons at the core of superpower rivalry and global tensions. The Cold War era was defined by periodic crises such as the Cuban Missile Crisis and arms control negotiations, including anti-ballistic-missile treaties and successive arms limitation talks. The baleful legacy of Hiroshima and Nagasaki also catalysed international attempts to control nuclear weapons and prevent their spread. Early initiatives such as the Baruch Plan (1946) sought to place atomic energy under international control but couldn't succeed. More comprehensive frameworks emerged only decades later. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) of 1968 became the cornerstone of non-proliferation policy. It established a threefold objective: prevent the spread of nuclear weapons, achieve nuclear disarmament, and foster peaceful uses of nuclear energy. The treaty recognised five nuclear-weapon states (U.S., USSR/Russia, UK, France, China) and barred other signatories from developing or acquiring nuclear weapons. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was tasked with inspection and verification roles to ensure compliance. The IAEA inspection team that on September 1, 2022, began IAEA's first inspection of a nuclear plant in a war zone: the Zaporizhzhia facility in Ukraine. Credits: IAEA Imagebank The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), opened for signature in 1996, represented an effort to ban all nuclear explosions worldwide. Though it has not entered into force due to key states' non-ratification, it embodies near-global consensus on eliminating nuclear testing. These treaties shaped international norms and institutions around non-proliferation. However, implementation remained complex. States like India, Pakistan, and North Korea never joined or withdrew while covert proliferation raised new challenges. Non-proliferation efforts also intersected with regional conflicts, nuclear latency, and the politics of deterrence. This said, by the late 20th century, the anticipated flood of nuclear states hadn't come about, partly due to the NPT and diplomatic pressure. Key success stories include South Africa's voluntary dismantling of its nuclear arsenal and post-Soviet denuclearisation agreements that removed weapons from Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine. Still, the international community wrestled with mistrust, technical verification issues, and geopolitical rivalries that complicated the ultimate goal of complete disarmament. Aerial footage of thermonuclear tests during the Cold War era: Castle Romeo (left) and Castle Bravo, both in 1954. The fallout from Castle Bravo hit the 23-member crew of the Japanese fishing vessel Daigo Fukuryū Maru, drawing international condemnation of atmospheric nuclear testing and later contributing to the genesis of Nihon Hidankyo. Eighty years on, the spectre of nuclear weapons is as real and complex as ever. The Cold War's end did not eliminate nuclear weapons. Instead, it shifted the focus to non-proliferation and disarmament, with treaties like the NPT and CTBT becoming central to global security. However, the post-Cold War era has seen new challenges, including North Korea's nuclear programme, Iran's contested nuclear ambitions, and the erosion of arms control agreements. The 21st century has also witnessed a resurgence of great power competition, with nuclear deterrence remaining a key element in U.S.-China and U.S.-Russia relations. While large-scale use has thankfully been avoided since 1945, the global stockpile is still around 12,000 warheads worldwide. Contemporary conflicts from Ukraine to Korea and tensions around Israel and Iran in West Asia and between India and Pakistan in South Asia continue to bear nuclear overtones. The risks of accidental launch, escalation from conventional conflicts or the introduction of novel technologies like hypersonic delivery systems and cyber warfare are new destabilising factors. Efforts continue through the United Nations, the 2017 Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, and new calls for arms control diplomacy, among others. One particularly bright light is Nihon Hidankyo, an organisation representing the hibakusha that took shape in Japan in 1956. Nihon Hidankyo secretary general Terumi Tanaka speaks to youth about surviving the Nagasaki bombing at a UN event in Vienna in 2007. The organisation was awarded the Nobel Prize for Peace in 2024 for its 'its efforts to achieve a world free of nuclear weapons and for demonstrating through witness testimony that nuclear weapons must never be used again.'


Hindustan Times
2 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Denmark zoo asks people to donate healthy pets to feed predators
A zoo in Denmark has made international headlines with a morbid appeal to visitors. In posts shared on Facebook and Instagram, the zoo asked pet owners to donate their unwanted guinea pigs, rabbits, chickens and horses so they could be fed to predators. A zoo in Denmark has appealed for healthy, unwanted pets that can be euthanized to feed its predators (Aalborg Zoo) The Aalborg Zoo added a caveat: the pets must be healthy. With this initiative, the zoo said it was trying to imitate the natural food chain of the animals – something that all zoos have a responsibility to do, it said. Denmark zoo's appeal 'Chickens, rabbits and guinea pigs make up an important part of the diet of our predators,' Aalborg Zoo explained in its Instagram post. It added that food provided this way would be reminiscent of what the predators would 'naturally hunt in the wild' – especially the Eurasian lynx, which 'needs whole prey.' 'If you have a healthy animal that has to leave here for various reasons, feel free to donate it to us,' it added in its appeal. The zoo said that donated pets would be gently euthanised and then used as fodder. 'That way, nothing goes to waste - and we ensure natural behavior, nutrition and well-being of our predators,' it concluded. Appeal sparks debate According to a CNN report, the Aalborg Zoo is home to predators like the Asiatic lion, European lynx and Sumatran tiger. Its appeal, however, has drawn mixed reactions on social media. Some people objected to the idea of pets being used as prey. Others felt there was nothing wrong with it as unwanted pets are abandoned every day, and this way they would at least be euthanized humanely.